Exogenous surfactant for lung contusion causing ARDS: A systematic review of clinical and experimental reports.

This systematic review aimed to summarize the available data on the treatment of pulmonary contusions with exogenous surfactants, determine whether this treatment benefits patients with severe pulmonary contusions, and evaluate the optimal type of surfactant, method of administration, and drug concentration. Three databases (MEDline, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched using the following keywords: pulmonary surfactant, surface-active agents, exogenous surfactant, pulmonary contusion, and lung contusion for articles published between 1945 and February 2023, with no language restrictions. Four reviewers independently rated the studies for inclusion, and the other four reviewers resolved conflicts. Of the 100 articles screened, six articles were included in the review. Owing to the limited number of papers on this topic, various types of studies were included (two clinical studies, two experiments, and two case reports). In all the studies, surfactant administration improved the selected ventilation parameters. The most frequently used type of surfactant was Curosurf® in the concentration of 25 mg/kg of ideal body weight. In most studies, the administration of a surfactant by bronchoscopy into the segmental bronchi was the preferable way of administration. In both clinical studies, patients who received surfactants required shorter ventilation times. The administration of exogenous surfactants improved ventilatory parameters and, thus, reduced the need for less aggressive artificial lung ventilation and ventilation days. The animal-derived surfactant Curosurf® seems to be the most suitable substance; however, the ideal concentration remains unclear. The ideal route of administration involves a bronchoscope in the segmental bronchi.

Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Does a Consensus Exist for Diagnosis?

PURPOSE: Cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) is the second most common compressive neuropathy of the upper extremity. We aimed to determine a consensus among experts using the Delphi method for clinical criteria that could be validated further for the diagnosis of CuTS. METHODS: The Delphi method was used for establishing a consensus among a group of expert panelists, comprising 12 hand and upper-extremity surgeons, who ranked the diagnostic clinical importance of 55 items related to CuTS on a scale from 1 (least important) to 10 (most important). The average and SDs of each item were calculated, and Cronbach α was used to assess homogeneity among the panelist-ranked items. RESULTS: All panelists answered the 55-item questionnaire. A Cronbach α value of 0.963 was obtained on the first iteration. The top criteria that were considered most clinically relevant to the diagnosis of CuTS among the group were determined based on the most highly ranked and correlated items among the expert panelist group. The criteria based on which there was agreement were as follows: (1) paresthesias in ulnar nerve distribution, (2) symptoms precipitated by increased elbow flexion/positive elbow flexion tests, (3) positive Tinel sign at the medial elbow, (4) atrophy/weakness/ late findings (eg, claw hand of the ring/small finger and Wartenberg or Froment sign) of ulnar nerve-innervated muscles of the hand, (5) loss of two-point discrimination in ulnar nerve distribution, and (6) similar symptoms on the involved side after successful treatment on the contralateral side. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated a consensus among an expert panelist group of hand and upper-extremity surgeons on potential diagnostic criteria for CuTS. This consensus on diagnostic criteria may help clinicians readily diagnose CuTS in a standardized form; however, further weighting and validation are necessary prior to the development of a formal diagnostic scale. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study is the first step in producing a consensus on how to diagnose CuTS.

Qualitative Approach to Environmental Risk Assessment in Transport.

The purpose of this paper is to present the development of a qualitative approach to environmental risk assessment (QAERA) in transport. The approach is described as a model developed for the future software tool which will be utilizable as a risk decision support system. The basic part is aimed on developing a quantitative environmental risk assessment. Thus, this paper describes a set of 6 pillars of safety and security. Accordingly, the paper contains both chosen safety and security indicators and selected criteria for assessing the risk of launching the environmental change of global model thinking in the transport sector. The environmental risk assessment as a global model of thinking was originally based on historical experience but, nowadays, it is changing. Based on new expert knowledge, more precisely, on input of new global data, paper displays an environmental risk assessment with actual interpretation. The discussion of the paper is oriented to support research results, a new knowledge-oriented approach to global climate changes, using suitable risk assessment methods and technics. The result of the paper is a new approach for the modeling of environmental risk assessment in the transport sector.