[Retrospective evaluation of relevance of care in the management of presumed benign ovarian tumors]. / Évaluation rétrospective de la pertinence des soins dans la prise en charge des tumeurs ovariennes présumées bénignes.

INTRODUCTION: The relevance of care is defined by the right act, for the right patient, at the right time. We were interested in the relevance of the management of presumed benign ovarian tumors before and after the release of the CNGOF guidelines 2013 (French guidelines). METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study conducted at the University Hospital in Strasburg France from 01/01/2013 to 31/12/2017 including all patients treated for a presumed benign ovarian cyst. We were interested in the diagnostic approach: relevance of the prescribed imaging and the use of CA 125 dosage, in the therapeutic approach: the relevance of the technique used as well as the relevance of the surgical indication. We compared our practices between 2013 and 2017 for these same items. RESULTS: We included 682 cysts for 621 patients, the imaging performed was relevant in 55% of cases, not relevant but justified in 25% and irrelevant in 20%. The CA 125 assay or its absence of assay was relevant in 84% of cases. The surgical technique was relevant in 67% of cases and not relevant but justified in 29%. With a significant improvement 7.1% in 2013 of irrelevant against 0.9% for the year 2017. The surgical indication was relevant in 72% of cases, not relevant but justified in 20% and irrelevant in 2.7%. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of the relevance of care allows an evaluation of our practices. Professional recommendations can have an impact on the quality of care.

[Evaluation of a measurement tool with real-time display of the standard value for fetal biometrics]. / Évaluation d'un outil de mesure avec affichage de la norme en temps réel pour les biométries fœtales.

OBJECTIVES: Most of the ultrasound machines include a tool allowing real-time display of the standard value of the biometric measurement being taken. Our hypothesis was that this tool influences the sonographer as measurements are taken, by inducing a normalization, thus a tendency towards the 50th percentile. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a real-time display of the standard value in prenatal ultrasound screening. METHODS: We conducted an observational, prospective, controlled and open study including all patients who underwent a prenatal ultrasound scan in the 2nd or 3rd trimester at the University Hospitals in Strasbourg between December 2017 and June 2018. Exclusion criteria were the presence of a fetal morphological abnormality or a karyotypic abnormality. The tool being tested was the real-time display on screen of the gestational age, of which the measurement corresponds to the 50th percentile. The measurements were retrospectively transformed into Z-scores. The main end-point was to compare the distribution of Z-scores between the groups. RESULTS: We included 3551 ultrasound examinations: 696 performed with the tool and 2796 performed without. Fifty-nine scans were excluded due to morphological abnormalities. There was no statistically significant difference between the Z-scores distributions of measurements performed with or without the tool, regardless of the parameter studied. There was also no difference in the detection of pathological measurements: below the 10th percentile or above the 90th percentile. CONCLUSION: The use of such a tool does not seem to be detrimental to biometric screening, but on the other hand does not seem useful either.