Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 5(7)2016 07 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27402237

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is increasing in prevalence, and remains a significant source of mortality and limb loss. The decision to recommend surgical or endovascular revascularization for patients who are candidates for both varies significantly among providers and is driven more by individual preference than scientific evidence. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Best Endovascular Versus Best Surgical Therapy for Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia (BEST-CLI) Trial is a prospective, randomized, multidisciplinary, controlled, superiority trial designed to compare treatment efficacy, functional outcomes, quality of life, and cost in patients undergoing best endovascular or best open surgical revascularization. Approximately 140 clinical sites in the United States and Canada will enroll 2100 patients with CLI who are candidates for both treatment options. A pragmatic trial design requires consensus on patient eligibility by at least 2 investigators, but leaves the choice of specific procedural strategy within the assigned revascularization approach to the individual treating investigator. Patients with suitable single-segment of saphenous vein available for potential bypass will be randomized within Cohort 1 (n=1620), while patients without will be randomized within Cohort 2 (n=480). The primary efficacy end point of the trial is Major Adverse Limb Event-Free Survival. Key secondary end points include Re-intervention and Amputation-Free-Survival and Amputation Free-Survival. CONCLUSIONS: The BEST-CLI trial is the first randomized controlled trial comparing endovascular therapy to open surgical bypass in patients with CLI to be carried out in North America. This landmark comparative effectiveness trial aims to provide Level I data to clarify the appropriate role for both treatment strategies and help define an evidence-based standard of care for this challenging patient population. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT02060630.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Extremidades/irrigação sanguínea , Isquemia/cirurgia , Doença Arterial Periférica/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/métodos , Amputação Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Anastomose Cirúrgica , Pesquisa Comparativa da Efetividade , Análise Custo-Benefício , Procedimentos Endovasculares/economia , Estudos de Equivalência como Asunto , Humanos , Stents , Resultado do Tratamento , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/economia
3.
N Engl J Med ; 370(1): 13-22, 2014 Jan 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24245566

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis is a common problem in the elderly. Despite two randomized trials that did not show a benefit of renal-artery stenting with respect to kidney function, the usefulness of stenting for the prevention of major adverse renal and cardiovascular events is uncertain. METHODS: We randomly assigned 947 participants who had atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis and either systolic hypertension while taking two or more antihypertensive drugs or chronic kidney disease to medical therapy plus renal-artery stenting or medical therapy alone. Participants were followed for the occurrence of adverse cardiovascular and renal events (a composite end point of death from cardiovascular or renal causes, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for congestive heart failure, progressive renal insufficiency, or the need for renal-replacement therapy). RESULTS: Over a median follow-up period of 43 months (interquartile range, 31 to 55), the rate of the primary composite end point did not differ significantly between participants who underwent stenting in addition to receiving medical therapy and those who received medical therapy alone (35.1% and 35.8%, respectively; hazard ratio with stenting, 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76 to 1.17; P=0.58). There were also no significant differences between the treatment groups in the rates of the individual components of the primary end point or in all-cause mortality. During follow-up, there was a consistent modest difference in systolic blood pressure favoring the stent group (-2.3 mm Hg; 95% CI, -4.4 to -0.2; P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Renal-artery stenting did not confer a significant benefit with respect to the prevention of clinical events when added to comprehensive, multifactorial medical therapy in people with atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis and hypertension or chronic kidney disease. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00081731.).


Assuntos
Bloqueadores do Receptor Tipo 1 de Angiotensina II/uso terapêutico , Obstrução da Artéria Renal/terapia , Stents , Idoso , Anlodipino/uso terapêutico , Angioplastia com Balão , Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapêutico , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Terapia Combinada , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Ácidos Heptanoicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Hipertensão/complicações , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pirróis/uso terapêutico , Artéria Renal , Obstrução da Artéria Renal/complicações , Obstrução da Artéria Renal/tratamento farmacológico , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/complicações , Falha de Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...