Living with severe mental illness--what families and friends must know: evaluation of a one-day psychoeducation workshop.

One-day "family survival" psychoeducation workshops are a promising, convenient method of disseminating basic information to families with a relative who is diagnosed with a serious mental illness such as schizophrenia, major depression, or other affective disorders. At five separate psychoeducation workshops, 83 participating families completed the self-report North-Sachar Family Life Questionnaire and open-ended "problem lists" of issues facing the families both before and after the workshops. Outcomes consistently demonstrated positive change pre- to post-workshop. Issues reported by workshop participants included desire for education about illness, identification of resources, coping with the illness, and family relationships. The workshop model demonstrated consistent achievement of the outcomes measured, meeting short-term goals. Although models such as the family responsive approach reported in this article are not designed to create long-term gains for the family, they appear to benefit families and may help connect families with more intensive services to facilitate long-term change.

Certification and program regulations for inpatient services to youth with addiction: a state-level analysis.

Recent evidence has indicated that the prevalence of addiction in youth is far higher than previously expected. High demand for services to this population require attention to programs providing interventions, in particular to the regulations and structures that assure youth receive quality services. Thus, the current research examines state-level certification and program requirements for inpatient youth facilities. Current data (from August 2002 through July 2003) on state-level regulations was collected from a variety of sources. Wherever possible, confirmation was sought from multiple sources. Multiple authors interpreted information. Youth with addictions are currently being treated across a wide variety of governmental agencies. Level of detail and clarity of information varied widely, as did distinctness of youth requirements from adult ones. Adequate regulatory attention was evident in a minority of states, while a handful of states did little or nothing to distinguish youth from adult services. While it is undoubtedly the case that providers within each state offer outstanding services, there is often little or no available protection for these youth through governmental regulations. Attention is needed in almost all states to providing additional regulations and program requirements that assure youth consistency in service quality. Recommendations are made for standards of certification requirements.