Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of temozolomide on a daily-for-5-days schedule in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

PURPOSE: To determine the principal toxicities, characterize the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and pharmacodynamics (PDs) of temozolomide (TMZ) on a daily-for-5-days schedule, and recommend a dose for subsequent disease-directed studies in both minimally pretreated (MP) and heavily pretreated (HP) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received TMZ as a single oral dose daily for 5 consecutive days every 28 days. TMZ doses were escalated from 100 to 150, and 150 to 200 mg/m(2)/d in separate cohorts of MP and HP patients. PK plasma was sampled on days 1 and 5. TMZ concentrations were analyzed and pertinent PK parameters were related to the principal toxicities of TMZ in PD analyses. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were treated with 85 courses of TMZ. Thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were the principal dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of TMZ on this schedule. The cumulative rate of severe myelosuppressive effects was unacceptably high at TMZ doses exceeding 150 mg/m(2)/d in both MP and HP patients. TMZ was absorbed rapidly with maximum concentrations achieved in 0.90 hours, on average, and elimination was rapid, with a half-life and systemic clearance rate (Cl(S/F)) averaging 1.8 hours and 115 mL/min/m(2), respectively. When clearance was normalized to body-surface area (BSA), interpatient variability in Cl(S/F) was reduced from 20% to 13% on day 1 and from 16% to 10% on day 5. Patients who experienced DLT had significantly higher maximum drug concentration( )(median 16 v 9.5 microg/mL, P =. 0084) and area under the concentration-time curve (median 36 v 23 microg-h/mL, P =.0019) values on day 5. CONCLUSION: Prior myelosuppressive therapy was not a determinant of toxicity. TMZ 150 mg/m(2)/d administered as a single oral dose daily for 5 days every 4 weeks is well tolerated by MP and HP patients, with higher doses resulting in unacceptably high rates of severe hematologic toxicity. TMZ doses should be individualized according to BSA rather than use of a prespecified oral dose for all individuals. TMZ is an optimal agent to develop in combination with other cytotoxic, biologic, and targeted therapeutics for patients with relevant malignancies.

Phase I dose-escalation and pharmacokinetic study of temozolomide (SCH 52365) for refractory or relapsing malignancies.

Temozolomide, an oral cytotoxic agent with approximately 100% bioavailability after one administration, has demonstrated schedule-dependent clinical activity against highly resistant cancers. Thirty patients with minimal prior chemotherapy were enrolled in this phase I trial to characterize the drug's safety, pharmacokinetics and anti-tumour activity, as well as to assess how food affects oral bioavailability. To determine dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), temozolomide 100-250 mg m(-2) was administered once daily for 5 days every 28 days. The DLT was thrombocytopenia, and the MTD was 200 mg m(-2) day(-1). Subsequently, patients received the MTD to study how food affects the oral bioavailability of temozolomide. When given orally once daily for 5 days, temozolomide was well tolerated and produced a non-cumulative, transient myelosuppression. The most common non-haematological toxicities were mild to moderate nausea and vomiting. Clinical activity was observed against several advanced cancers, including malignant glioma and metastatic melanoma. Temozolomide demonstrated linear and reproducible pharmacokinetics and was rapidly absorbed (mean Tmax approximately 1 h) and eliminated (mean t1/2 = 1.8 h). Food produced a slight reduction (9%) in absorption of temozolomide. Temozolomide 200 mg m(-2) day(-1) for 5 days, every 28 days, is recommended for phase II studies.

Effect of gastric pH on the relative oral bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of temozolomide.

PURPOSE: Temozolomide is an imidazotetrazine alkylating agent which undergoes chemical conversion at physiological pH to the active species 5-(3-methyltriazene-1-yl)imidazole-4-carboxamide (MTIC) but is stable at acid pH. This study evaluated the effect of an increase in gastric pH, through the use of ranitidine, on the oral bioavailability and plasma pharmacokinetics of temozolomide and MTIC. METHODS: Fifteen patients with advanced cancer were enrolled of which 12 were evaluable, all of whom had pharmacokinetic blood sampling. Each patient received temozolomide 150 mg m(-2) day(-1) for 5 days in cycle 1 and also received ranitidine 150 mg every 12 h either on days 1 and 2 or days 4 and 5. Gastric pH was monitored by the use of the Heidelberg capsule system. RESULTS: Following the administration of ranitidine there was a rise in gastric pH by 1-2 pH units over the duration of the study period (pH range 2.2-5.2 without ranitidine and 3.5-6.0 with ranitidine). There was no difference in the pharmacokinetic parameters of temozolomide or MTIC with or without the concomitant administration of ranitidine. There was however, a lower C(max) for temozolomide and MTIC for patients receiving ranitidine on day 1 and 2 versus day 4 and 5. Temozolomide was rapidly absorbed [time to maximum plasma concentration (t(max)) 1.8 h] and eliminated [elimination half-life (t(1/2)) 1.8 h] and MTIC followed a similar pattern with a t(max) of 1.9 h and a t(1/2) of 1.9 h. Overall, the AUC of the MTIC represented about 2-4% of the AUC for temozolomide.

Absorption, metabolism, and excretion of 14C-temozolomide following oral administration to patients with advanced cancer.

The purpose of this study is to characterize the absorption, metabolism, and excretion of carbon 14-labeled temozolomide (14C-TMZ) administered p.o. to adult patients with advanced solid malignancies. On day 1 of cycle 1, six patients received a single oral 200-mg dose of 14C-TMZ (70.2 microCi). Whole blood, plasma, urine, and feces were collected from days 1-8 and on day 14 of cycle 1. Total radioactivity was measured in all samples. TMZ, 5-(3-methyltriazen-1-yl)imidazole-4-carboxamide (MTIC), and 4-amino-5-imidazole-carboxamide (AIC) concentrations were determined in plasma, and urine and plasma samples were profiled for metabolite/degradation products. Maximum TMZ plasma concentrations were achieved between 0.33 to 2 h (mean, 1.2 h), and half-life, apparent volume of distribution, and oral clearance values averaged 1.9 h, 17 liters/m2, and 104 ml/min/m2, respectively. A first-order absorption, one-compartment linear model, which included first-order formation of MTIC from TMZ and elimination of MTIC via degradation to AIC, and a peripheral distribution compartment for AIC, adequately described the plasma TMZ, MTIC, and AIC concentrations. MTIC systemic clearance was estimated to be 5384 ml/min/m2, and the half-life was calculated to be 2.5 min. Metabolite profiles of plasma at 1 and 4 h after treatment showed that 14C-derived radioactivity was primarily associated with TMZ, and a smaller amount was attributed to AIC. Profiles of urine samples from 0-24 h revealed that 14C-TMZ-derived urinary radioactivity was primarily associated with unchanged drug (5.6%), AIC (12%), or 3-methyl-2,3-dihydro-4-oxoimidazo[5,1-d]tetrazine-8-carboxyl ic acid (2.3%). The recovered radioactive dose (39%) was principally eliminated in the urine (38%), and a small amount (0.8%) was excreted in the feces. TMZ exhibits rapid oral absorption and high systemic availability. The primary elimination pathway for TMZ is by pH-dependent degradation to MTIC and further degradation to AIC. Incomplete recovery of radioactivity may be explained by the incorporation of AIC into nucleic acids.

Phase I study of temozolomide in paediatric patients with advanced cancer. United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group.

A phase I study of temozolomide administered orally once a day, on 5 consecutive days, between 500 and 1200 mg m(-2) per 28-day cycle was performed. Children were stratified according to prior craniospinal irradiation or nitrosourea therapy. Sixteen of 20 patients who had not received prior craniospinal irradiation or nitrosourea therapy were evaluable. Myelosuppression was dose limiting, with Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) grade 4 thrombocytopenia occurring in one of six patients receiving 1000 mg m(-2) per cycle, and two of four patients treated at 1200 mg m(-2) per cycle. Therefore, the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was 1000 mg m(-2) per cycle. The MTD was not defined for children with prior craniospinal irradiation because of poor recruitment. Plasma pharmacokinetic analyses showed temozolomide to be rapidly absorbed and eliminated, with linear increases in peak plasma concentrations and systemic exposure with increasing dose. Responses (CR and PR) were seen in two out of five patients with high-grade astrocytomas, and one patient had stable disease. One of ten patients with diffuse intrinsic brain stem glioma achieved a long-term partial response, and a further two patients had stable disease. Therefore, the dose recommended for phase II studies in patients who have not received prior craniospinal irradiation or nitrosoureas is 1000 mg m(-2) per cycle. Further evaluation in diffuse intrinsic brain stem gliomas and other high-grade astrocytomas is warranted.

A systemic bioactivity comparison of double-strength and regular-strength beclomethasone dipropionate MDI formulations.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of regular-strength beclomethasone dipropionate MDI prescribed within its recommended dosing range of 2 to 5 puffs three to four times daily has been well established in more than 25 years of worldwide use. A more concentrated formulation delivering 84 microg per puff was developed to provide for a more convenient twice-daily dosing regimen. OBJECTIVE: This randomized, single-blinded, positive and placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multiple-dose bioactivity study was conducted to assess the potential of a new beclomethasone dipropionate 84 microg double-strength metered-dose inhaler (Vanceril 84 microg Double Strength Inhalation Aerosol/Key) to cause hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis suppression. METHODS: Beclomethasone dipropionate double-strength 84 microg was compared with beclomethasone dipropionate regular-strength 42 microg, orally administered prednisone, and placebo inhaler after 36 consecutive days of administration in adults with moderate asthma. Beclomethasone dipropionate double-strength was administered as 5 puffs BID and beclomethasone dipropionate regular-strength was administered as 10 puffs BID for the same total daily dose of 840 microg of beclomethasone dipropionate. Oral prednisone was administered by mouth at 10 mg once a day. The potential for hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis suppression was evaluated by an adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation test using cosyntropin 250 microg in 500 mL normal saline infused over six hours on the 36th day of treatment. Sixty-four patients completed this study. RESULTS: No clinically significant post-study findings were observed from physical examination, electrocardiogram, or clinical laboratory evaluation for any treatment group. No serious or unexpected adverse events were reported. On the 36th day of treatment, there was a significant (P < .01) difference in the plasma cortisol concentration response to cosyntropin stimulation between the prednisone and placebo treatment groups at the sixth hour of infusion. There was no significant difference in the plasma cortisol concentration response to cosyntropin stimulation between the beclomethasone dipropionate double-strength and beclomethasone dipropionate regular-strength treatment groups and the placebo group. In addition, comparison of the response between the beclomethasone dipropionate double-strength and beclomethasone dipropionate regular-strength groups showed no significant difference. CONCLUSION: Beclomethasone dipropionate, administered either via a double-strength (84 microg/puff) or regular-strength (42 microg/puff) inhaler dosed at 840 microg/day showed no evidence of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis suppression in adults with moderate asthma.

Comparative pharmacokinetics of oral ceftibuten, cefixime, cefaclor, and cefuroxime axetil in healthy volunteers.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the pharmacokinetics of ceftibuten, cefixime, ceturoxime axetil, and cefaclor after oral administration. DESIGN: Randomized, four-period, crossover study. SETTING: Hospital-based clinical research center. SUBJECTS: Healthy adult men and women volunteers. INTERVENTIONS: Single 400-mg doses of cefixime and ceftibuten, and 500-mg doses of cefuroxime axetil and cefaclor. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Serum concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography methods. The mean oral clearances of cefixime, cefuroxime axetil, and cefaclor were similar, ranging from 20.4-27.0 L/hour; clearance of ceftibuten was approximately 4-fold less, 5.45 L/hour. The serum half-lives of ceftibuten (2.35 hrs) and cefixime (2.38 hrs) were prolonged compared with those of cefuroxime axetil (1.30 hrs) and cefaclor (0.693 hr). These agents also differed in terms of time to maximum concentration, time to peak plasma level, area under the curve, and apparent volume of distribution, the last reflecting differences in biovailability. CONCLUSION: Ceftibuten had a relatively high time to maximum concentration and long half-life, resulting in a 3.5-fold higher area under the curve than cefixime, cefuroxime axetil, and cefaclor. These pharmacokinetic data can be used as a basis to compare the four oral cephalosporins; however, comparative susceptibility data must also be considered.

Effect of felbamate on the pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine.

To assess the possible interaction between lamotrigine and felbamate, a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover study was conducted in 21 healthy male volunteers. Volunteers were given lamotrigine (100 mg every 12 hours) and felbamate (1,200 mg every 12 hours) or matching placebo for 10 days during each period of the crossover. After morning administration on day 10, blood samples were obtained over 12 hours for measurement of lamotrigine. Felbamate increased the maximum concentration (Cmax) and and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 12 hours (AUC0-12) of lamotrigine by 13% and 14%, respectively, compared with placebo. The 90% confidence intervals of the log-transformed pharmacokinetic parameters were within the 80-125% bioequivalance limits, however. Felbamate had no significant effect on the urinary excretion of lamotrigine (total), unconjugated lamotrigine, or the N-glucuronide. One volunteer discontinued the study after developing a rash while taking lamotrigine and placebo. All other adverse events were primarily related to the central nervous system and gastrointestinal tract, with a higher incidence reported during coadministration of lamotrigine and felbamate than with placebo. Overall, felbamate appears to have no clinically relevant effects on the pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine.

Effect of Felbamate on The Pharmacokinetics of Clonazepam.

To assess the possible interaction between clonazepam and felbamate, a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover study was conducted in 18 healthy male volunteers. Volunteers were administered clonazepam (1 mg q12h) and felbamate (1200 mg q12h) or matching placebo for 10 days during each period of the crossover. Following morning dosing on day 10, blood samples were obtained over 12 h for the determination of clonazepam and the metabolites 7-amino-clonazepam and 7-acetamido-clonazepam. Felbamate increased clonazepam's C(max) and AUC(0--12 h) by 17% and 14%, respectively (p < 0.01). The 90% confidence intervals following log-transformation for each of these pharmacokinetic parameters were within the generally accepted interval (80--125%) for bioequivalence. Felbamate had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of 7-amino-clonazepam, whereas 7-acetamido-clonazepam concentrations were below the limit of quantification in all but one subject. Adverse events were mainly central nervous system in nature, with a greater incidence reported during coadministration with felbamate compared with placebo. Overall, felbamate appears to have no clinically relevant effects on the pharmacokinetics of clonazepam.

Effects of felbamate on the pharmacokinetics of a low-dose combination oral contraceptive.

The effects of felbamate on the pharmacokinetics of a low-dose combination oral contraceptive containing 30 micrograms ethinyl estradiol and 75 micrograms gestodene were assessed in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group study in healthy premenopausal female volunteers established in a regimen of oral contraceptive use. They received either placebo or 2400 mg/day felbamate from midcycle (day 15) to midcycle (day 14) of two consecutive oral contraceptive cycles (months 1 and 2). Pharmacokinetic assessments of ethinyl estradiol and gestodene were performed on day 14 of both cycles. To determine whether ovulation occurred, plasma progesterone and urinary luteinizing hormone levels were measured, and diaries recording vaginal bleeding were kept. Felbamate treatment resulted in a significant 42% decrease in gestodene area under the plasma concentration-time curve (0 to 24 hours) (p = 0.018) compared with baseline, whereas a minor but not clinically relevant effect was observed on the pharmacokinetic parameters of ethinyl estradiol. There were no changes in the pharmacokinetics of ethinyl estradiol or gestodene after placebo treatment. No volunteer showed hormonal evidence of ovulation; however, one volunteer reported the onset of intermenstrual bleeding during felbamate treatment. Because of the effect of felbamate on the pharmacokinetics of gestodene and the report of intermenstrual bleeding, it is possible that the contraceptive efficacy of low-dose combination oral contraceptives may be adversely affected during felbamate treatment.

Effects of felbamate on the pharmacokinetics of the monohydroxy and dihydroxy metabolites of oxcarbazepine.

The effects of felbamate on the multiple dose pharmacokinetics of the monohydroxy and dihydroxy metabolites of oxcarbazepine were assessed in a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind crossover study in 18 healthy male volunteers. Oxcarbazepine, 1200 mg/day, was administered on an open basis in combination with double-blind placebo or 2400 mg/day felbamate for two 10-day treatment periods separated by a 14-day washout period. Pharmacokinetic parameters of monohydroxyoxcarbazepine and dihydroxyoxcarbazepine were determined from plasma and urine samples obtained on the tenth day of each treatment period. Felbamate had no effect on monohydroxyoxcarbazepine plasma or urine pharmacokinetics compared with placebo, but it significantly increased values for dihydroxyoxcarbazepine maximum concentration and area under the curve from 0 to 12 hours, as well as urinary excretion of free and total dihydroxyoxcarbazepine. The mechanism that may account for the observations is the induction of oxidative metabolism of monohydroxyoxcarbazepine. Despite these changes, the relative amount of dihydroxyoxcarbazepine is small in comparison to monohydroxyoxcarbazepine, and antiepileptic activity is associated with monohydroxyoxcarbazepine rather than dihydroxyoxcarbazepine. Therefore we conclude that felbamate has no clinically relevant effects on the pharmacokinetics of oxcarbazepine in humans.

Loratadine administered concomitantly with erythromycin: pharmacokinetic and electrocardiographic evaluations.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of coadministration of loratadine and erythromycin on the pharmacokinetics and electrocardiographic repolarization (QTc) pharmacodynamics of loratadine and its metabolite descarboethoxyloratadine in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy volunteers were studied in a prospective, double-blind crossover design while confined in a Clinical Research Center. The primary pharmacodynamic end point of the study was the difference between baseline and day 10 mean QTc intervals obtained from surface electrocardiograms. Plasma concentrations of loratadine, descarboethoxyloratadine, and erythromycin were measured on treatment day 10 for pharmacokinetic analysis. Subjects received in random sequence the following three treatments for 10 consecutive days during three separate study periods: 10 mg loratadine every morning plus 500 mg erythromycin stearate every 8 hours, or 10 mg loratadine every morning plus placebo every 8 hours, or placebo every morning plus 500 mg erythromycin stearate. RESULTS: Concomitant administration of loratadine and erythromycin was associated with increased plasma concentrations of loratadine (40% increase in area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC]) and descarboethoxyloratadine (46% increase in AUC) compared with loratadine alone. Analysis of variance showed no difference between the treatment groups in effect on QTc intervals compared with baseline, and no significant change from baseline was observed. No clinically relevant changes in the safety profile of loratadine were observed, and there were no reports of sedation nor syncope. CONCLUSION: Although concomitant administration of loratadine and erythromycin was associated with increased plasma concentrations of loratadine and descarboethoxyloratadine, no clinically relevant changes in the safety profile of loratadine were observed. In this study, 10 mg loratadine administered orally for 10 consecutive days was well tolerated when coadministered with therapeutic doses of erythromycin stearate.

Effects of felbamate on the pharmacokinetics of phenobarbital.

The effects of felbamate on the pharmacokinetics of phenobarbital and one of its main metabolites, parahydroxyphenobarbital, were assessed in a parallel-group, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, in 24 healthy volunteers. Pharmacokinetic parameters of phenobarbital and parahydroxyphenobarbital were determined from plasma and urine samples obtained after 28 days of daily administration of 100 mg phenobarbital and after a further 9 days of phenobarbital plus 2400 mg/day felbamate or placebo. Felbamate increased phenobarbital values for area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours and maximum concentration by 22% and 24%, respectively, whereas placebo had no effect. This increase was caused by a reduction in parahydroxylation of phenobarbital and possibly through effects on other metabolic pathways. Because felbamate inhibits the S-mephenytoin hydroxylase (CYP2C19) isozyme in vitro, it appears that phenobarbital hydroxylation is mediated in part by this isozyme.

Pharmacokinetic interaction studies between felbamate and vigabatrin.

To assess the possible occurrence of pharmacokinetic interactions between the antiepileptic agents felbamate and vigabatrin, two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover studies were conducted in healthy male volunteers. In Study I, 18 subjects received oral vigabatrin 1000 mg every 12 h for two 8 days periods with felbamate 1200 mg every 12 h or placebo. In Study II, 18 other volunteers were administered oral felbamate 1200 mg every 12 h for two 8 days periods with vigabatrin 1000 mg every 12 h or placebo. On the eighth day of each treatment period, blood and urine samples were collected over 12 h for determination of the active S(+)- and inactive R(-)-vigabatrin enantiomer concentrations (Study I) or felbamate concentrations (Study II). In Study I, the pharmacokinetic parameters of R(-)-vigabatrin were similar during co-administration with felbamate or placebo. Felbamate produced a 13% increase in AUC(0.12 h) and an 8% increase in urinary excretion of S(+)-vigabatrin. Although these changes were statistically significant, their magnitude was small. In Study II, the pharmacokinetic parameters of felbamate were similar during concurrent administration with vigabatrin or placebo. These data indicate that there are no clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions between felbamate and vigabatrin in man.

Lack of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression with once-daily or twice-daily beclomethasone dipropionate aqueous nasal spray administered to patients with allergic rhinitis.

The potential for a newly developed, double-strength (0.084%) beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) aqueous (AQ) nasal suspension to produce effects associated with exposure to systemic corticosteroids was assessed by the plasma cortisol response to cosyntropin stimulation induced by a 6-hour intravenous infusion of 250 micrograms of cosyntropin in 500 mL of normal saline. Sixty-four patients with allergic rhinitis were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly assigned to one of the following four treatment groups: (1) BDP AQ Forte (0.084%) nasal spray 336 micrograms once daily; (2) BDP AQ (0.042%) nasal spray 168 micrograms twice daily; (3) placebo nasal spray twice daily; or (4) oral prednisone 10 mg once daily in the morning. After 36 consecutive days of treatment, there was a significant (P < 0.01) difference in the plasma cortisol response to cosyntropin stimulation between the prednisone and placebo groups; however, there were no significant differences between the BDP AQ Forte or the BDP AQ groups compared with the placebo group. Secondary analyses comparing BDP AQ Forte administered as 336 micrograms once daily with BDP AQ administered as 168 micrograms twice daily showed no significant differences in plasma cortisol responses to cosyntropin stimulation. No serious adverse events were reported. Adverse events consisted of headache, pharyngitis, or nasal irritation, with headache being reported most frequently. These adverse events were similarly distributed among active treatment groups and were similar to placebo. No clinically relevant changes were observed in any treatment group in findings on clinical laboratory tests, physical examination, or electrocardiography. Vital signs, obtained daily, were consistent with values observed in healthy individuals. No patient exhibited signs of oral candidiasis. All patients met the plasma cortisol concentration criteria for discharge relative to expected hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function. In conclusion, there were no significant differences in plasma cortisol responses to cosyntropin stimulation between groups of patients with allergic rhinitis treated with either BDP AQ Forte (0.084%) nasal spray 336 micrograms once daily or BDP AQ (0.042%) nasal spray 168 micrograms twice daily compared with the placebo group. These results indicate that the dosing regimens of BDP AQ nasal suspensions used in this study lack systemic effects and are safe and well tolerated.