Secondary prevention for coronary artery disease: are we following the guidelines?

BACKGROUND: Secondary prevention pharmacotherapy in post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients reduces the risk of subsequent coronary events and overall mortality. International guidelines recommend use of aspirin, beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors and statins in post-MI patients. AIMS: We performed this audit to review the compliance of prescribing practices, in a regional hospital in Ireland, with international guidelines for secondary prevention of coronary artery disease. METHODS: We performed a retrospective case review of 172 patients diagnosed with MI during a 1-year period between January and December 2007. RESULTS: A total of 134 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. On discharge, aspirin was prescribed to 131 (97.76%) patients, clopidogrel to 126 (94%), beta-blockers to 117 (87%), ACE inhibitor to 87 (65%), ARB to 10 (7%) and statins to 116 (87%). CONCLUSION: Our audit shows that targets for prescription of secondary prevention medications were not met in a small but significant proportion of patients and calls for review of discharge practices and education to improve compliance with guidelines.

Acceptability of routine enquiry regarding domestic violence in the antenatal clinic.

Domestic Violence poses a significant health risk for the woman and her baby. We wished to determine the acceptability of routine questioning for domestic violence in the maternity hospital setting. A non-anonymised questionnaire was completed by 481 women attending for booking antenatal appointment in a maternity hospital antenatal clinic. The doctor asked four questions regarding experience of partner abuse, The acceptability of these questions was determined. 468 (99%) patients found the questions acceptable and said it would be helpful to ask all patients. Sixty-one (12.9%) women gave a history of at least one form of partner abuse. We concluded that routine enquiry about domestic violence during hospital antenatal visits is acceptable to women and perceived by them to be worthwhile.

Writing to patients: 'putting the patient in the picture'.

We have explored consultant, general practitioner and patient attitudes toward the proposal that following an outpatient consultation, consultants should consider communicating directly with patients in the form of a summary letter, with a copy to the referring general practitioner or other professionals as appropriate. We conducted in-depth interviews with a purposive sample of 20 consultants, 16 patients and 12 general practitioners. The consultants and general practitioners were both involved in the care of participating patients. Patients highlighted the likely value of summary letters including, increased knowledge, improvement recall of the clinical encounter, and reassurance. Clinicians were concerned that patients would not understand letters from consultants. Additional concerns included the impact of letter on consultant-general practitioner relationship and medico-legal issues. These findings reflect fundamental differences in expectations about the nature and quality of communications between doctors and their patients.