Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
JAMA ; 312(18): 1931, 2014 Nov 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25387197
3.
J Psychoactive Drugs ; 43(2): 128-35, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21858958

RESUMO

Marijuana is a currently illegal psychoactive drug that many physicians believe has substantial therapeutic uses. The medical literature contains a growing number of studies on cannabinoids as well as case studies and anecdotal reports suggesting therapeutic potential. Fifteen states have passed medical marijuana laws, but little is known about the growing population of patients who use marijuana medicinally. This article reports on a sample of 1,746 patients from a network of nine medical marijuana evaluation clinics in California. Patients completed a standardized medical history form; evaluating physicians completed standardized evaluation forms. From this data we describe patient characteristics, self-reported presenting symptoms, physician evaluations, other treatments tried, other drug use, and medical marijuana use practices. Pain, insomnia, and anxiety were the most common conditions for which evaluating physicians recommended medical marijuana. Shifts in the medical marijuana patient population over time, the need for further research, and the issue of diversion are discussed.


Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Cannabis , Fumar Maconha/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/legislação & jurisprudência , California , Etnicidade , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Médicos , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Adulto Jovem
6.
Int J Drug Policy ; 20(1): 28-37, 2009 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18367390

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This paper explores user perceptions and practices in contrasting legal-policy milieux-Amsterdam (de facto decriminalization) and San Francisco (de jure criminalization) on four policy issues: sources of cannabis and separation of markets for it and other drugs; user perceptions of effects of price on consumption; effects of potency on consumption; and perceived risk of arrest and accessibility of cannabis. METHODS: Questions on these issues were added to surveys on career use patterns amongst representative samples of experienced cannabis users using comparable methods. RESULTS: Most San Francisco respondents obtained cannabis through friends who knew dealers, whereas most Amsterdam respondents obtained it from regulated shops. Only one in seven Amsterdam respondents but half the San Francisco respondents could obtain other drugs from their cannabis sources. Majorities under both systems had never found cannabis "too expensive." Amsterdam respondents preferred milder cannabis whilst San Francisco respondents preferred stronger; majorities in both cities reported self-titrating with potent cannabis. Risk and fear of arrest were higher in San Francisco, but most in both cities perceived arrest as unlikely. Estimated search times were somewhat longer in San Francisco, but a majority reported being able to access it within half a day. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial separation of markets in the Dutch system. Policies designed to increase cannabis prices appear unlikely to impact consumption. Decriminalization was associated with a preference for milder cannabis, but under both policy regimes most respondents self-titrated when using more potent strains. Criminalization was associated with somewhat higher risk and fear of arrest and somewhat longer search times, but these did not appear to significantly impede access for most respondents.


Assuntos
Usuários de Drogas , Controle de Medicamentos e Entorpecentes , Regulamentação Governamental , Drogas Ilícitas , Abuso de Maconha , Fumar Maconha , Características de Residência , Adulto , Crime , Usuários de Drogas/psicologia , Usuários de Drogas/estatística & dados numéricos , Controle de Medicamentos e Entorpecentes/estatística & dados numéricos , Medo , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Drogas Ilícitas/economia , Drogas Ilícitas/legislação & jurisprudência , Drogas Ilícitas/farmacologia , Drogas Ilícitas/provisão & distribuição , Aplicação da Lei , Masculino , Abuso de Maconha/epidemiologia , Abuso de Maconha/psicologia , Fumar Maconha/epidemiologia , Fumar Maconha/legislação & jurisprudência , Fumar Maconha/psicologia , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Percepção , Assunção de Riscos , São Francisco/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo
7.
Am J Public Health ; 94(5): 836-42, 2004 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15117709

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We tested the premise that punishment for cannabis use deters use and thereby benefits public health. METHODS: We compared representative samples of experienced cannabis users in similar cities with opposing cannabis policies-Amsterdam, the Netherlands (decriminalization), and San Francisco, Calif (criminalization). We compared age at onset, regular and maximum use, frequency and quantity of use over time, intensity and duration of intoxication, career use patterns, and other drug use. RESULTS: With the exception of higher drug use in San Francisco, we found strong similarities across both cities. We found no evidence to support claims that criminalization reduces use or that decriminalization increases use. CONCLUSIONS: Drug policies may have less impact on cannabis use than is currently thought.


Assuntos
Controle de Medicamentos e Entorpecentes , Drogas Ilícitas/legislação & jurisprudência , Abuso de Maconha/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , São Francisco/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...