Endoscopic and External Dacryocystorhinostomy: Long Term Result from a Tertiary Center in Portugal.

Dacryocystorhinostomy is the gold-standard for distal lacrimal obstructions. This study aims to report the demography, clinical presentation, influence of agger nasi opening, uncinectomy and septoplasty, the use of silicone stent tubes, complications and success of endoscopic and external dacryocystorhinostomy over a period of 11 years. Retrospective review of clinical records, from January 2012 to December 2022, at a tertiary center in Portugal. A total of 249 procedures, 6 external and 243 endoscopic, were performed, including 39 revision cases. There was a female predominance (79.9%) with a mean age at diagnosis of 66.4 years. Recurrent acute dacryocystitis, reported by 33.3%, was associated with higher success (p = 0.053). Agger nasi opening, uncinectomy and septoplasty were performed in 17.7%, 6.0% and 15.3% respectively, although associated with higher success rates, no statistically significant difference was found. Minor complication rates for both external and endoscopic approach was 33.3% and 32.1% respectively. Functional and anatomical success was 100% and 83.3%, respectively, for external dacryocystorhinostomy, and 91.4% and 85.1%, respectively, for endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Revision surgery was associated with a worse anatomical success (p = 0.05). Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy is an effective and safe alternative to the external approach. Minor procedures can increase the success rate, but multicentre studies need to be performed for a statistically significant result.

Bone cement in ossicular chain reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the hearing outcomes of ossicular chain reconstruction using bone cement versus other materials such as prostheses and autografts. METHODS: This study included articles that compared hearing outcomes in patients with conductive hearing loss who underwent stapes revision surgery or chronic otitis media surgery. A systematic search for articles from January 2000 to February 2022 was conducted in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Only articles in English were included. An effective postoperative air-bone gap (ABG) was defined as ≤20 dB. A bias assessment tool was developed according to Cochrane guidelines, and the chi-square test was used to evaluate the mean age of the samples. RESULTS: Of the 418 studies that met the selection criteria, only seven were eligible for this study, consisting of 187 patients in the bone cement group and 173 in the non-bone cement group. Ossiculoplasty using bone cement yielded significantly better results, with a combined odds ratio (OR) of 2.03 (95% CI: 1.16-3.55, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the effectiveness of bone cement in ossiculoplasty was greater than that of other materials in chronic otitis media surgery or stapes revision surgery, with a higher number of patients achieving ABG ≤20 dB.

Tracheostomy in COVID-19 Patients: Experience at a Tertiary Center in the First 11 Months of the Pandemic.

This study aimed to evaluate the experience of tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients in a Southern Europe tertiary hospital. Retrospective observational study in tracheostomized patients from April 1, 2020 to February 28, 2021. Data related to tracheostomy were evaluated in patients with and without COVID-19, including infections in healthcare professionals involved in patient care. Forty-two tracheostomies were performed in COVID-19 patients aged 68.4 ± 11.1 years, predominantly men (71%) and caucasians (81%). They had at least 1 comorbidity (93%), on average 3. The most frequent were heart disease (71%), age > 65 years (67%) diabetes (40%) and obesity (33%). The greater number of comorbidities was associated with the lesser probability of the patient's recovery (p = .001). Age (p = .047) and renal failure (p = .013) were associated with higher mortality. Patients were tracheostomized by prolonged endo-tracheal intubation (50%), pneumonia (33%) and extubation failure (10%). Ventilation time before the tracheostomy (22.9 ± 6.5 days) was higher than ventilation time after the tracheostomy (7.1 ± 15.1 days) (p < 0.001). No differences were found in ventilation time (p = 0.094) and tracheostomy time (p = 0.514) in the different indications. There were 3 minor complications (7.1%), 25 discharges (60%) and 11 deaths (26%). During the same period 49 tracheostomies were performed in patients without COVID-19, with a homogeneous gender and age distribution, 31% without comorbidities, with an average of 1 comorbidity per patient and higher mortality (43%). Tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients proved to be a safe procedure for both patients and healthcare professionals and improves the clinical outcome of patients with severe infection. The 21-day procedure timing seems adequate. Comorbidities played an essential role in patient´s recovery. Age and renal failure are associated with a worse vital prognosis.

Contralateral Occlusion Test (COT): the effect of external ear canal occlusion with aging.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of complete external ear canal occlusion on hearing thresholds with aging. The goal was to decide which tuning fork is more appropriate to use for the contralateral occlusion test (COT), in individuals of different ages. METHODS: Forty-two normal hearing subjects between 21 and 67 years were divided into three age groups (20-30 years, 40-50 years, and 60-70 years). Participants underwent sound field audiometry tests with warble tones, with and without ear canal occlusion. Each ear was tested with the standard frequencies (250, 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz). The contralateral ear was suppressed by masking. RESULTS: Hearing thresholds showed an increase as the frequency increased from 20.85 dB (250 Hz, 20-30 years group) to 48 dB (2000 Hz, 60-70 years group). The threshold differences between occlusion and no occlusion conditions were statistically significant and increased ranging from 11.1 dB (250 Hz, 20-30 years group) to 32 dB (2000 Hz, 20-30 years group). We found statistically significant differences for the three age groups and for all evaluations except to 500 Hz difference and average difference. The mean hearing loss produced by occlusion at 500 Hz was approximately 19 dB. We found no statistically significant differences between right and left ears and gender for all measurements. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the use of the 512 Hz tuning fork is the most suitable for COT, and its use may allow clinicians to distinguish mild from moderate unilateral conductive hearing loss.

Contralateral Occlusion Test (COT): the effect of external ear canal occlusion with aging / Teste de Oclusão Contralateral (TOC): o efeito da oclusão do canal auditivo externo com a idade

ABSTRACT Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the effects of complete external ear canal occlusion on hearing thresholds with aging. The goal was to decide which tuning fork is more appropriate to use for the contralateral occlusion test (COT), in individuals of different ages. Methods Forty-two normal hearing subjects between 21 and 67 years were divided into three age groups (20-30 years, 40-50 years, and 60-70 years). Participants underwent sound field audiometry tests with warble tones, with and without ear canal occlusion. Each ear was tested with the standard frequencies (250, 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz). The contralateral ear was suppressed by masking. Results Hearing thresholds showed an increase as the frequency increased from 20.85 dB (250 Hz, 20-30 years group) to 48 dB (2000 Hz, 60-70 years group). The threshold differences between occlusion and no occlusion conditions were statistically significant and increased ranging from 11.1 dB (250 Hz, 20-30 years group) to 32 dB (2000 Hz, 20-30 years group). We found statistically significant differences for the three age groups and for all evaluations except to 500 Hz difference and average difference. The mean hearing loss produced by occlusion at 500 Hz was approximately 19 dB. We found no statistically significant differences between right and left ears and gender for all measurements. Conclusion We conclude that the use of the 512 Hz tuning fork is the most suitable for COT, and its use may allow clinicians to distinguish mild from moderate unilateral conductive hearing loss.

RESUMO Objetivo O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o efeito da oclusão completa do canal auditivo externo nos limiares auditivos, em indivíduos de idades distintas, para apurar qual o diapasão mais adequado na realização do teste de oclusão contralateral (TOC). Método 42 indivíduos normo-ouvintes (21-67 anos) foram divididos em três grupos etários (20-30, 40-50 e 60-70 anos). Os participantes foram avaliados com testes de audiometria tonal liminar em campo livre, com e sem oclusão completa do canal auditivo externo. Cada ouvido foi testado para as frequências 250, 500, 1000 e 2000 Hz. No ouvido contralateral, foi realizado mascaramento, para evitar a ocorrência de audição contralateral. Resultados Verificou-se aumento dos limiares auditivos, diretamente proporcional ao aumento da frequência (desde 20.85 até 48 dB). A diferença nos limiares auditivos entre a condição de oclusão e de não oclusão foi estatisticamente significativa em todas as frequências e aumentou de forma diretamente proporcional com a frequência (desde 11.1 até 32 dB). Foram também encontradas diferenças estatisticamente significativas para os três grupos etários, em todos os parâmetros, exceto na diferença a 500 Hz e na diferença total média. A perda auditiva média resultante da oclusão aos 500 Hz foi de 19 dB. Não se encontraram diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre o ouvido direito e o esquerdo, e entre o gênero. Conclusão A utilização do diapasão de 512 Hz é a mais adequada para o TOC. A sua utilização pode permitir aos clínicos, em ambiente de consulta e de forma rápida, a distinção entre perda condutiva de grau leve a moderada.

Epidemiology of epistaxis in the emergency department of a southern European tertiary care hospital.

OBJECTIVE: Epistaxis is the most common rhinological emergency seen in the emergency department. The purpose of this study was to evaluate epidemiological data of epistaxis in a southern European tertiary care hospital. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted during the period between January 2009 and December 2015. We analyzed the distribution by cross-referencing the demographic variables, destination after medical discharge, inpatient characteristics (major comorbid diseases, medication, bleeding localization and treatment) and health-care costs with the disease. RESULTS: Epistaxis accounted for approximately 1 in 30 visits to the ED and 77 out of a population of 100,000 was served by that ED. Overall, 71,624 patients were treated and 2371 patients presented with epistaxis (3.31%). One-thousand three-hundred and twenty-seven cases were male and 1044 female (p <.001). The mean age was 56 years (±26). Age distribution was bimodal, with peaks among those <10 years and >70 (p <.001). Epistaxis was more common in the winter months (p < 0.001). The main referral destinations (6.8%) included outpatient (2.9%) and inpatient (1.9%) services. Hospitalization was more frequent between the ages of 60 and 80 years (p =.029), and the major comorbidity was hypertension (47.8%). Medication interfering with haemostasis was documented in 30.4%. Most inpatient epistaxis was managed in a non-interventional manner and only. 5% of patients needed surgery. The mean total health-care cost was 69.8 € per episode. CONCLUSION: Emergency epistaxis was more frequent in men, the elderly, patients with underlying comorbidities, during the winter months, and showed a higher risk of referral and hospitalization with increasing age (as a result of an aging population in western countries). The main hospital expenses for epistaxis are related to hospitalization and health care costs.

Contralateral Occlusion Test: The effect of external ear canal occlusion on hearing thresholds.

INTRODUCTION AND GOALS: Bedside testing with tuning forks may decrease turnaround time and improve decision making for a quick qualitative assessment of hearing loss. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effects of ear canal occlusion on hearing, in order to decide which tuning fork frequency is more appropriate to use for quantifying hearing loss with the Contralateral Occlusion Test. METHODS: Twenty normal-hearing adults (forty ears) underwent sound field pure tone audiometry with and without ear canal occlusion. Each ear was tested with the standard frequencies. The contralateral ear was suppressed with by masking. Ear occlusion was performed by two examiners. RESULTS: Participants aged between 21 and 30 years (25.6±3.03 years) showed an increase in hearing thresholds with increasing frequencies from 19.94dB (250Hz) to 39.25dB (2000Hz). The threshold difference between occluded and unoccluded conditions was statistically significant and increased from 10.69dB (250Hz) to 32.12dB (2000Hz). There were no statistically significant differences according to gender or between the examiners. CONCLUSION: The occlusion effect increased the hearing thresholds and became more evident with higher frequencies. The occlusion method as performed demonstrated reproducibility. In the Contralateral Occlusion Test, 256Hz or 512Hz tuning forks should be used for diagnosis of mild hearing loss, and a 2048Hz tuning fork should be used for moderate hearing loss.

Effect of speechreading in presbycusis: Do we have a third ear?

INTRODUCTION: Evidence regarding the effect of speechreading is lacking in age-related hearing loss (presbycusis). Thus, in individuals with presbycusis, this study determined whether speechreading would improve word intelligibility. Moreover, the study investigated the effect of speechreading on word intelligibility depending on hearing impairment severity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This analytical, cross-sectional study involved two groups of individuals aged > 65 years that were enrolled by convenience sampling: 29 individuals with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss compatible with presbycusis (n=58 ears; mean age, 74.1±9.4 years) and 10 controls with at-most-mild hearing loss (n=58 ears; mean age, 73.8±8.5 years). All participants underwent a comprehensive medical and audiological evaluation, which included speech audiometry with and without observation of the audiologist's face, i.e. speechreading. Within each group, the effect of speechreading was determined as a change in the speech reception threshold. For all statistical analyses, p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Both in individuals with presbycusis and controls, speechreading significantly improved speech discrimination (p<.001<.05); however, compared to controls, this effect of speechreading on speech discrimination was more pronounced in individuals with presbycusis (p<.001). DISCUSSION: Individuals with presbycusis or hearing impairment displayed improved spoken-word intelligibility when spoken-word recognition was coupled with speechreading. Thus, speechreading may serve as a "third ear".

Presbycusis: do we have a third ear? / Presbiacusia: será que temos uma terceira orelha?

Abstract Introduction: Age-related hearing changes are the most frequent cause of sensorineural hearing loss in adults. In the literature no studies exist concerning the importance of speechreading in individuals with presbycusis. Equally, no such studies have been carried out with speakers of the Portuguese (Portugal) language. Objectives: To evaluate whether the intelligibility of words in presbycusis is improved by speechreading, in such a way that looking at the interlocutor's face while he is talking functions like a “third ear”, and to determine the statistical relevance of the intelligibility improvement by speechreading. Methods: Eleven individuals (22 ears) with bilateral and symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss compatible with presbycusis were evaluated. The subjects were aged between 57 and 82 years, with an average of 70 ± 11.51 years and median of 69.5 years. A complete medical and audiological profile of each patient was created and all patients were submitted to a vocal audiogram, without and with observation of the audiologist's face. A descriptive and analytical statistical analysis was performed (Shapiro-Wilk and t pairs tests) adopting the significance level of 0.05 (5%). Results: We noticed better performance in intelligibility with speechreading. The p-value was zero (p < 0.05), so we rejected the null hypothesis, showing that there was statistically significant difference with speechreading; the same conclusion was obtained by analysis of the confidence intervals. Conclusions: Individuals with presbycusis in this study, performed better on spoken word intelligibility when the hearing of those words was associated with speechreading. This phenomenon helps in such a way that observation of the interlocutor's face works like a "third ear".

Resumo Introdução: As alterações auditivas relacionadas com a idade são a causa mais frequente de perda auditiva neurossensorial em adultos. Não há estudos na literatura sobre a importância da leitura orofacial em indivíduos com presbiacusia e, considerando as particularidades de cada língua, que abordem esse tema em falantes de português de Portugal. Objetivo: Avaliar se a inteligibilidade das palavras na presbiacusia é melhorada pela leitura orofacial, de tal forma que olhar para o rosto do interlocutor enquanto ele está falando funcione como uma "terceira orelha". Determinar a relevância estatística da melhora na inteligibilidade pela leitura orofacial. Método: Ao todo, 11 indivíduos (22 orelhas) com perda auditiva neurossensorial bilateral e simétrica compatível com presbiacusia, idades entre 57 e 82 anos (média de 70 ± 11,51 anos e mediana de 69,5 anos) foram avaliados. Um perfil médico e audiológico completo de cada paciente foi realizado, e todos foram submetidos a um audiograma vocal, sem e com a visualização do rosto do fonoaudiólogo. Uma análise estatística descritiva e analítica foi realizada (teste de Shapiro-Wilk e teste t pareado), adotando o nível de significância de 0,05 (5%). Resultados: Verificámos melhor desempenho na inteligibilidade com a leitura orofacial. O valor p foi zero (p < 0,05), pelo que rejeitámos a hipótese nula, indicando que houve diferença estatisticamente significativa com a leitura orofacial. A mesma conclusão foi obtida por análise dos intervalos de confiança. Conclusões: Os indivíduos com presbiacusia tiveram melhor desempenho na inteligibilidade das palavras faladas quando a audição foi associada à visualização do rosto do interlocutor. Essa parceria auxilia de tal maneira que parece funcionar como uma "terceira orelha".

Presbycusis: do we have a third ear?

INTRODUCTION: Age-related hearing changes are the most frequent cause of sensorineural hearing loss in adults. In the literature no studies exist concerning the importance of speechreading in individuals with presbycusis. Equally, no such studies have been carried out with speakers of the Portuguese (Portugal) language. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether the intelligibility of words in presbycusis is improved by speechreading, in such a way that looking at the interlocutor's face while he is talking functions like a "third ear", and to determine the statistical relevance of the intelligibility improvement by speechreading. METHODS: Eleven individuals (22 ears) with bilateral and symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss compatible with presbycusis were evaluated. The subjects were aged between 57 and 82 years, with an average of 70±11.51 years and median of 69.5 years. A complete medical and audiological profile of each patient was created and all patients were submitted to a vocal audiogram, without and with observation of the audiologist's face. A descriptive and analytical statistical analysis was performed (Shapiro-Wilk and t pairs tests) adopting the significance level of 0.05 (5%). RESULTS: We noticed better performance in intelligibility with speechreading. The p-value was zero (p<0.05), so we rejected the null hypothesis, showing that there was statistically significant difference with speechreading; the same conclusion was obtained by analysis of the confidence intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with presbycusis in this study, performed better on spoken word intelligibility when the hearing of those words was associated with speechreading. This phenomenon helps in such a way that observation of the interlocutor's face works like a "third ear".

The controversial p.Met34Thr variant in GJB2 gene: Two siblings, one genotype, two phenotypes.

INTRODUCTION: Recent advances in molecular genetics have increased the identification of genes and mutations responsible for inherited forms of hearing loss (HL), enabling early detection of these cases. Approximately, 60% of early-onset HL cases are due to genetic causes, of which 70% are non-syndromic. Of these, 75-80% are inherited in an autosomal recessive pattern (DFNB). Mutations in GJB2 gene, coding for connexin 26 (Cx26), are the major cause of autosomal recessive hereditary HL, but some GJB2 mutations are yet of unclear or controversial significance. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to identify the etiology of hearing loss, and correlate genotype-phenotype, in two Portuguese siblings with profound and moderate non-syndromic sensorineural bilateral HL. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The affected subjects and their parents underwent audiological and genetic study. Molecular analysis of GJB2 gene was performed, searching for mutations in the coding region and receptor splicing site by automated sequencing. RESULTS: The onset and the degree of HL were different in the two affected subjects. However, the same GJB2 genotype [p.Met34Thr]+[p.Arg184Pro] was identified in both siblings. The c.551G>C (p.Arg184Pro) and c.101T>C (p.Met34Thr) missense variants were inherited from the father and mother, respectively, both heterozygous carriers of these variants. CONCLUSION: The clinical and genetic data here presented suggest that the non-syndromic sensorineural HL of these two Portuguese siblings might be due to the presence of p.Met34Thr and p.Arg184Pro variants in compound heterozygosity. If so, p.Met34Thr variant could have function as a hypomorphic allele that may cause HL depending on the opposing GJB2 allele. The observed phenotypic variability may not, however, be solely explained by variable expression of this genotype. A putative modifier gene or mutations in another HL-associated gene could probably be contributing to the severe HL in one of the siblings.