Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: results of a comparative, prospective bicenter study--perioperative outcome and long-term efficacy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare bipolar and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in a comparative prospective study at two urology centers. METHODS: Of 212 patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia entered prospectively into the study, 111 underwent bipolar and 101 monopolar TURP. Patients were treated in two consecutive series with each surgical method at both centers. Improvement in peak flow rate, postvoid residual, International Prostate Symptom Score, and quality of life score postoperatively and at 3, 12, 24 and 36 months, as well as long-term adverse events were compared. Regarding safety, duration of surgery, postoperative catheterization and hospitalization time, amount of fluid absorption, frequency of transurethral resection (TUR) syndrome, and risk of hemorrhage were evaluated. RESULTS: Patient characteristics of the two series were comparable. The risk of developing TUR syndrome (p = 0.32) and bleeding tendency (p = 0.52) did not differ significantly between groups. Significant differences were seen for duration of surgery and resection speed. All functional parameters improved significantly during follow-up, with no relevant differences between surgical groups. CONCLUSIONS: Since no major differences in efficacy and safety were seen between the surgical groups, we feel that the monopolar technique still has a valuable place in TURP.

[Therapy of castration-resistant prostate cancer]. / Therapie des kastrationsrefraktären Prostatakarzinoms.

Within the last two years the therapy of castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) has made major advances. Both the COU-AA-301 phase III trial and the TROPIC trial showed a survival benefit for patients after docetaxel failure treated with abiraterone or cabazitaxel, respectively. With rising interest for chemotherapeutic options and novel drugs, our goal was to review within the context of a multidisciplinary team the available evidence and explore the standards for medical treatment of prostate cancer outside of clinical trials. From this background, we are carefully evaluating the current treatment recommendations, based on the available evidence, and highlight potential future treatment options but also discuss important clinical topics like treatment until progression versus the advantage of chemo holidays and definition of particular patient subgroups. Additionally, we focus on novel molecular entities, which will most likely be available in the near future, such as MDV3100 and Sipuleucel T. The role and importance of palliation with radiotherapy and proactive medical management of pain is also discussed, as well as new options for bone directed therapy. The multitude of treatment options for patients with advanced prostate cancer clearly asks for a close collaboration between urologists, medical oncologists and radiation therapists.

Prospective randomized multicenter study comparing prostate cancer detection rates of end-fire and side-fire transrectal ultrasound probe configuration.

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively test the hypothesis that end-fire transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy probes have greater cancer detection rates than side-fire probes. Retrospective studies have suggested that such probes might have greater cancer detection rates. METHODS: The present prospective randomized multicenter trial aimed to compare the prostate cancer detection rates of the end-fire versus side-fire probe configuration during transrectal ultrasound-guided 12-core prostate biopsy. Patients were randomized according to age, prostate-specific antigen level and prostate volume. An interim analysis was planned after the inclusion of 300 patients. RESULTS: At the interim analysis after the inclusion of 297 patients, no differences were found in the mean prostate-specific antigen level (P = .412), mean age (P = .519), mean prostate volume (P = .730), and positive digital rectal examination findings (P = .295). The prostate cancer detection rate did not differ between the end-fire and side-fire probe (34.3% vs 34.4%, P = .972). On multivariate analysis, suspicious digital rectal examination findings (relative risk 8.185, P < .001), prostate-specific antigen level (relative risk 1.051, P = .041), and prostate volume (relative risk 0.973, P < .001), but not probe configuration (relative risk 0.942, P = .831), were independent predictive factors for the detection of prostate cancer. The interim analysis committee suggested that, because no difference of 5 absolute percent was achieved after 300 patients, no additional recruitment was necessary. Therefore, the study was terminated early. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study have shown that the transrectal ultrasound probe configuration does not affect the prostate cancer detection rate during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy.

Contrast-enhanced colour Doppler-targeted vs a 10-core systematic repeat biopsy strategy in patients with previous high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of contrast-enhanced colour Doppler (CECD)-targeted prostate biopsy with a systematic 10-core grey-scale biopsy scheme in patients initially diagnosed with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), as although HGPIN is thought to be a precursor to invasive adenocarcinoma, its diagnosis is no longer considered an indication for repeat prostate biopsy and patients should be followed by prostate-specific antigen levels and a digital rectal examination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 104 patients (aged 45-78 years) diagnosed with HGPIN on initial prostate needle biopsy were referred for a repeat biopsy within 6 months. Two independent examiners evaluated each patient; one used CECD-targeted biopsy (up to five cores) into hypervascular regions in the peripheral zone only, and subsequently the second took a systematic 10-core grey-scale biopsy. Cancer detection rates of both techniques were compared. RESULTS: Overall, 26 of the 104 men (25%) had prostate cancer in the repeated biopsy. Using the CECD technique cancer was detected in 21% (22 of 104). The positive re-biopsy rate using the systematic technique was 9.6% (10 of 104; P < 0.001). The total incidence of HGPIN with no evidence of tumour on re-biopsy was 8.7% (nine of 104). The Gleason score in all 22 cancers detected with the CECD technique varied between 6 and 8. The systematic technique detected cancers with Gleason scores of 6 or 7. There were no adverse events or complications. CONCLUSION: CECD increased the detection rate of prostate cancer, and using fewer biopsy cores than the systematic biopsy technique in patients previously diagnosed with HGPIN.

[Chemotherapy for prostate cancer]. / Chemotherapie beim Prostatakarzinom.

For many years the benefit of chemotherapy in patients with prostate cancer was thought to be limited to palliation of late-stage disease, and thus this treatment option only became involved in patient care towards the end of the disease process, if at all. However, two landmark phase-III trials with docetaxel-based therapy (TAX 327 and Southwest Oncology Group, SWOG, 9916) have shown a survival benefit for patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) thus prompting a change in patterns of care. With raising interest for chemotherapeutic options and clinical trials for new drugs and new indications (neoadjuvant therapy, adjuvant therapy, increasing PSA levels after local treatment, and hormone sensitive cancer) under way our goal was to review within the context of a multidisciplinary team the available evidence and explore the standard for the medical treatment of prostate cancer outside of clinical trials. We are carefully evaluating the current treatment recommendations based on the available evidence and highlight potential future treatment options but also discuss important clinical topics (treatment until progression versus the advantage of chemo holidays, definition of particular patient subgroups and potential second line options) for which there are no clear cut answers to date. The role and importance of radiotherapy, biphosphonate treatment and the medical management of pain and side effects is also discussed. The multitude of treatment options for patients with advanced prostate cancer clearly asks for a close collaboration between urologists, medical oncologists and radiation therapists.

Progression delay in men with mild symptoms of bladder outlet obstruction: a comparative study of phytotherapy and watchful waiting.

To determine the effect of phytotherapy (Serona repens) on the clinical progression in men with mild symptoms of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). A total of 189 patients with mild symptoms of BOO, recruited from four different European clinics, were included in the analysis. Age, prostate specific antigen (PSA), international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life (QOL), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) and total prostate and transitional zone volume were recorded. Clinical progression was defined as change from the mild-IPSS group into the moderate or severe group or the occurrence of urinary retention and need of surgery. Cumulative progression rate was 1, 7, 9 and 16% at 6, 12, 18 and 24 month, respectively, for the active group (Serona repens) as compared to 6, 13, 15 and 24% for the watchful waiting group. (P=0.03) significant improvements in the Qmax, IPSS and QOL were seen in the group receiving Serona repens. Serona repens significantly reduced the clinical progression rates in men with mild symptoms of BOO. It also led to improvements in urinary symptoms, QOL scores and urinary flow rates.

Longitudinal study of men with mild symptoms of bladder outlet obstruction treated with watchful waiting for four years.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the risk of clinical progressions in men with mild lower urinary tract symptoms of bladder outlet obstruction and identify the predictors for progression in this group of men. METHODS: A total of 397 men who presented to the urology clinics with mild symptoms of bladder outlet obstruction (International Prostate Symptom Score less than 8) were analyzed in this longitudinal study conducted during a 4-year period. They began with the watchful waiting protocol and were followed up every 3 months for 48 months. Age, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), divided into obstructive symptom score and irritative symptom score, serum prostate-specific antigen level, total prostate volume, transitional zone volume, urinary flow rates, and postvoid residual urine volume were documented. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of clinical progression, defined as worsening of the IPSS with migration to the moderate symptom group (IPSS 8 to 18) or severe symptom group (IPSS 19 to 35) and an increase in IPSS of more than 2 points, was 6%, 13%, 15%, 24%, 28%, and 31% at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 months, respectively. Nineteen patients (4.9%) developed acute urinary retention within the 48-month follow-up period. Of these 19 patients, only 2 (0.6%) required transurethral resection of the prostate. The variables of importance for disease progression in the artificial neural network analysis were, in order of statistical significance, prostate-specific antigen level, obstructive symptom score, and transitional zone volume. CONCLUSIONS: The risk for men with mild symptoms of bladder outlet obstruction to progress clinically and develop complications such as acute retention of urine is moderate. Prostate-specific antigen, obstructive symptom score, and transitional zone volume were identified as important risk factors.

Can Power Doppler enhanced transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy improve prostate cancer detection on first and repeat prostate biopsy?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of Power Doppler enhanced transrectal ultrasound (PD-TRUS) and its guided prostate biopsies in men with prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels between 2.5 and 10 ng/ml and to evaluate its impact on prostate cancer (PCa) detection in men undergoing first and repeat biopsies. METHODS: A total of 136 consecutive referred men with serum total PSA (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA) levels between 2.5 and 10 ng/ml (mean age 64 +/- 9 years, range 45-82) and a normal digital rectal examination were included. 101 underwent a first biopsy whereas 35 had repeat biopsy. Gray-scale transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), and PD-TRUS (B&K Medical, Denmark) were performed in lithotomy position before and during the biopsy procedure. Vascularity accumulation and perfusion characteristics were recorded and graded as normal or abnormal in the peripheral zone of the prostate. A Vienna-nomogram based biopsy regime was performed in all patients on first biopsy and a special biopsy regime on repeat biopsy plus additional biopsies from abnormal sites on PD-TRUS. RESULTS: Overall PCa detection rate was 34.7% and 25.7% and abnormal accumulation on PD-TRUS was identified in 42.3% and 48.6% on first and repeat biopsy, respectively. The PCa detection rate, on first and repeat biopsy in patients with and without PD-TRUS accumulation were 67.4% versus 10.3% (p < 0.001) and 47.05% versus 5.6% (p = 0.0049), respectively. PD-TRUS directed biopsies were positive in 5.7% and 11.1% on first and repeat biopsy whereas PCa detection using the routine prostate biopsy regime was 94.3% and 88.9% on first and repeat biopsy. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of PD-TRUS signal alone for PCa detection on first biopsy was 82.8%, 78.8%, 87.9% and 89.7%, respectively, and 88.8%, 68.0%, 47.0% and 94.4% on repeat biopsy, respectively. In comparison, the results PD-TRUS guided biopsies were 53.8%, 59.1%, 16.7%, and 89.5%, on first biopsy, respectively, and 20.0%, 13.3%, 23.5%, 11.1% on repeat biopsy, respectively. CONCLUSION: Negative PD-TRUS signal is able to exclude most of the patients without PCa in the PSA range of 2.5-10 ng/ml. As an additional tool at TRUS biopsy PD-TRUS has a high negative predictive value and may help to reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies.

Complexed prostate-specific antigen, complexed prostate-specific antigen density of total and transition zone, complexed/total prostate-specific antigen ratio, free-to-total prostate-specific antigen ratio, density of total and transition zone prostate-specific antigen: results of the prospective multicenter European trial.

This prospective, multicenter European Prostate Cancer Detection study evaluated the value and performance of the molecular forms of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and their derivatives in combination with prostate gland and transition zone volumes in early detection of prostate cancer in patients with PSA levels between 4 and 10 ng/mL. Of 750 men enrolled at 7 different European urology centers into the study between November 2001 and March 2002, 340 (45.3%) had a total PSA (tPSA) between 4 and 10 ng/mL (age range, 46 to 87 years). In all patients, the ratio of complexed PSA (cPSA) to tPSA (c/tPSA), cPSA density (cPSAD), cPSAD of the transition zone, PSA, free PSA (fPSA), ratio of fPSA to tPSA (f/tPSA), tPSA density (PSAD), and PSAD of the transition zone were measured and collected 5 to 10 minutes before the sextant biopsy with 2 additional transition zone cores. Measurements of tPSA and fPSA were done with the AxSYM test, whereas cPSA was measured with the ACS 180 cPSA assay. All patients had a transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant prostate biopsy, and 2 additional transition zone biopsies and total and transition zone volumes were measured at the time of biopsy. Histopathologic findings revealed benign histology in 237 patients and prostate cancer in 103 patients (69.7% and 30.3%, respectively). Statistically significant differences included larger total volumes, larger transition zone volumes, and f/tPSA in patients with benign disease (P = 0.0009, P <0.0001, P <0.0001, respectively). At 90% and 95% sensitivity, specificity of cPSA was significantly greater than that for PSA (P <0.0001). At sensitivity levels of 90% and 95%, the specificity of the cPSA assay using cutoff values of 3.06 and 2.52 ng/mL was 20.3% and 9.1%, respectively. A cPSA cutoff value of 6.95 ng/mL and 7.57 ng/mL afforded 90% and 95% specificity for detecting prostate cancer. The area under the curve (AUC) in the receiver operating characteristics curve of cPSA was statistically significantly higher compared with tPSA (60.8 vs 56.9, P = 0.032). AUC for volume-related parameters PSAD, cPSAD, PSAD of the transition zone, and cPSAD of the transition zone were 62.8%, 63.1%, 63.0%, and 63.6%, respectively. cPSA performs better than tPSA in the differentiation between benign disease and prostate cancer and provides similar information to the f/tPSA ratio. In addition, cPSA and cPSA volume-related parameters (cPSAD, cPSAD of the transition zone) further improved the specificity of PSA in early detection of prostate cancer.