Whole-genome sequencing of Staphylococcus epidermidis bloodstream isolates from a prospective clinical trial reveals that complicated bacteraemia is caused by a limited number of closely related sequence types.

OBJECTIVES: The significance of isolating Staphylococus epidermidis from a blood culture is highly heterogeneous, ranging from contamination to an indication of a serious infection. Herein we sought to determine whether there is a relationship between S. epidermidis genotype and clinical severity of bacteraemia. METHODS: S. epidermidis bacteraemias from a prospective, multicentre trial at 15 centres in the United States and one in Spain were classified as simple (including possible contamination), uncomplicated, and complicated. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed on 161 S. epidermidis isolates, and clinical outcomes were correlated with genotypic information. RESULTS: A total of 49 S. epidermidis sequence types (STs) were identified. Although strains of all 49 STs were isolated from patients with either simple or uncomplicated infection, all strains causing complicated infections were derived from five STs: ST2, ST5, ST7, ST16, and ST32. ST2 and ST5 isolates were significantly more likely to cause uncomplicated and complicated bloodstream infections compared to simple bacteraemia (odds ratio 2.0, 95%CI 1.1-3.9, p 0.04). By multivariate regression analysis, having an ST2 or ST5 S. epidermidis bacteraemia was an independent predictor of complicated bloodstream infection (odds ratio 3.7, 95%CI 1.2-11.0, p 0.02). ST2/ST5 strains carried larger numbers of antimicrobial resistance determinants compared to non-ST2/ST5 isolates (6.34 ± 1.5 versus 4.4 ± 2.5, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: S. epidermidis bacteraemia was caused by a genetically heterogeneous group of organisms, but only a limited number of STs-particularly multidrug-resistant ST2 and ST5 strains-caused complicated infections.

Chelator-based catheter lock solutions in eradicating organisms in biofilm.

Two different chelator-based antimicrobial catheter lock solutions, methylene blue-citrate-parabens (MB-CIT) and minocycline-EDTA-25% ethanol (M-EDTA-25% ETOH), were compared in 2-h biofilm eradication experiments. Eradication of both mature and immature Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and fungal biofilms was assessed. M-EDTA-25% ETOH was able to fully eradicate all biofilms within 2 h. MB-CIT was only effective against immature biofilms but was unable to fully eradicate most of the mature biofilms tested.

Utility of galactomannan enzyme immunoassay and (1,3) beta-D-glucan in diagnosis of invasive fungal infections: low sensitivity for Aspergillus fumigatus infection in hematologic malignancy patients.

Previous studies have reported that galactomannan (GM) enzyme immunoassay and 1,3 beta-glucan (BG) assay may be useful diagnostic tools, but their sensitivities are variable. We compared the performances of both tests. Between October 2002 and May 2005, 82 patients were prospectively monitored for 12 weeks. A total of 414 samples were tested by GM assay and 409 samples were tested by BG assay for the following four groups of patients: those with invasive aspergillosis (IA), those with other mold infections (Fusarium, scedosporium, zygomycosis, etc.), those with candidemia, and control patients. Blood samples were obtained twice on week 1 and once every other week for a total of 12 weeks. Patients in the invasive fungal infection groups had comparable risk factors. The sensitivity of the GM test was significantly higher for patients with IA due to non-fumigatus Aspergillus species than for patients with IA due to Aspergillus fumigatus (49% versus 13%; P < 0.0001) or with other mold infections (49% versus 6%; P < 0.0001). However, the sensitivity range (47% to 64%) and specificity (88%) of the BG assay were comparable among all patients tested, regardless of the infecting pathogen. The performance of GM-based diagnosis appears to be better for detecting non-fumigatus Aspergillus species. The diagnostic marker BG was shown to have a higher sensitivity than that of GM in detecting IA and other mold infections in hematologic malignancy patients.

Anti-adherence activity and antimicrobial durability of anti-infective-coated catheters against multidrug-resistant bacteria.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the anti-adherence and antimicrobial durability of anti-infective catheters against multidrug-resistant (MDR) Staphylococcus aureus (resistant to vancomycin, rifampicin and methicillin) and MDR Gram-negative bacteria (Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Acinetobacter baumannii/calcoaceticus and Enterobacter agglomerans) that are often associated with catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs). METHODS: Catheters impregnated with minocycline and rifampicin (M/R) or with silver-platinum and carbon (SPC) or with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine (CHX/SS) were compared with non-coated catheters. Adherence of organisms was tested by using an established biofilm colonization model. All isolates were rifampicin-resistant. Antimicrobial durability was tested by soaking 1 cm segments of the catheter in serum and determining zones of inhibition against the tested organisms at weekly intervals. RESULTS: The M/R catheters showed significantly superior anti-adherence activity and more prolonged antimicrobial durability when compared with CHX/SS-central venous catheter (CVC), SPC-CVC and uncoated control catheters against MDR and vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (MDR VRSA) (all P values < or = 0.02), MDR S. maltophilia (all P values < 0.005) and MDR A. baumannii/calcoaceticus (all P values < 0.002), respectively. M/R-CVC and CHX/SS-CVC had comparable anti-adherence and antimicrobial durability against MDR E. agglomerans, and these two were superior to SPC-CVC and the uncoated control catheters (all P values < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: M/R-CVC demonstrated superior anti-adherence activity and more prolonged antimicrobial durability when compared with other approved anti-infective catheters against MDR VRSA and/or MDR Gram-negative bacteria that are often associated with CRBSIs. This finding could explain their efficacy and better performance in clinical studies.