Exposure of remote organs and associated cancer risks from tangential and multi-field breast cancer radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: With the ever-increasing cure rates in breast cancer, radiotherapy-induced cancers have become an important issue. This study aimed to estimate secondary cancer risks for different treatment techniques, taking into account organs throughout the body. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Organ doses were evaluated for a tangential three-dimensional conformal (3D-CRT) and a multi-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plan using a validated, Monte Carlo-based treatment planning system. Effects of wedges and of forward versus inverse planning were systematically investigated on the basis of phantom measurements. Organ-specific cancer risks were estimated using risk coefficients derived from radiotherapy patients or from the atomic bomb survivors. RESULTS: In the 3D-CRT plan, mean organ doses could be kept below 1 Gy for more remote organs than the lung, heart, and contralateral breast, and decreased to a few cGy for organs in the lower torso. Multi-field IMRT led to considerably higher mean doses in organs at risk, the difference being higher than 50% for many organs. Likewise, the peripheral radiation burden was increased by external wedges. No difference was observed for forward versus inverse planning. Despite the lower doses, the total estimated secondary cancer risk in more remote organs was comparable to that in the lung or the contralateral breast. For multi-field IMRT it was 75% higher than for 3D-CRT without external wedges. CONCLUSION: Remote organs are important for assessment of radiation-induced cancer risk. Remote doses can be reduced effectively by application of a tangential field configuration and a linear accelerator set-up with low head scatter radiation.

[Head and Neck Cancer in Pregnancy - Recommendations for Diagnosis and Therapy With Case Report]. / Kopf-Hals-Krebs in der Schwangerschaft ­ Empfehlungen zu Diagnostik und Therapie mit Fallbericht.

Objective: The diagnosis of cancer in pregnancy is rare, but might become more relevant even for head and neck cancer patients due to a shift of age of primipara towards the last third of reproductive years. Unsureness exists about the risk and benefit of diagnostic and therapeutic cancer modalities for the unborn and established recommendations are still missing. But, according to recent data, even multimodal therapeutic approaches (e. g. surgery, radiation, chemotherapy) seem possible in face of pregnancy and should be traded against the risk of prematurity. Material and Methods: Our findings are discussed on the basis of a case report of a pregnant woman with advanced carcinoma of the outer ear canal and therapy options are formulated. Results: Sufficient performed diagnostic modalities do not reach imperilling uterus dosages. A growing number of case reports und studies did not detect any developmental disadvantage of children of prenatal exposed mothers by radiation or chemotherapy, whereas long-term impairments of premature infants are proven. Conclusion: In cancer in pregnancy, an immediate start of well-established therapy modalities like surgery and/or cisplatin-based chemoradiation seems to be possible without unjustifiable risks for the unborn.