Application of immunocapture and nanoflow LC-MS/MS to overcome the barriers to the quantitation of oxytocin in plasma of women in third stage labour.

AIMS: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is the leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide. To prevent PPH, the WHO recommends administration of oxytocin (OT) immediately after birth, i.e. during the third stage of labour (TSL). Previous studies demonstrate that methods to quantify OT in biological matrices, e.g. enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), radioimmunoassays (RIA) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) lack the specificity and/or sensitivity to accurately quantify OT in plasma from women administered OT during TSL. This is due to increased metabolic clearance of OT in late-stage pregnancy and at the time of childbirth, resulting in extremely low OT plasma concentrations. This study describes the development of an ultra-sensitive bioanalytical method that overcomes the issues previously reported and enables accurate pharmacokinetic analyses of exogenously administered OT in TSL. METHODS: A selective and sensitive assay to quantify OT in TSL plasma was developed. Immunoprecipitation (IP) was applied to selectively extract OT from the TSL plasma, thereby generating clean extracts compatible with nanoflow LC (nLC). nLC-MS/MS was chosen for its high sensitivity and ability to differentiate between OT and potentially co-captured OT-like immunoreactive products. RESULTS: The presented methodology is accurate and precise, with a good linear fit between 100-10 000 fg mL-1 OT. TSL plasma samples from a clinical phase 1 study (NCT02999100) were analysed successfully, enabling OT quantification down to 100 fg mL-1. CONCLUSIONS: The presented IP-nLC-MS/MS method succeeded in overcoming the sensitivity challenge related to the assay of OT in TSL plasma and thereby revealing the PK profiles of OT in TSL plasma clinical study samples.

Sub-MIC levels of bedaquiline and clofazimine can select Mycobacterium tuberculosis mutants with increased MIC.

Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) patients not cured at the time of stopping treatment are exposed to Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and sub-MIC levels for many months after discontinuing bedaquiline (BDQ) or clofazimine (CFZ) treatment. In vitro cultures treated with BDQ and CFZ sub-MIC concentrations clearly showed enrichment in the Rv0678 mutant population, demonstrating that pre-existing Rv0678 mutants can be selected by sub-MIC concentrations of BDQ and CFZ if not protected by an alternative MDR-TB treatment.

Translational evaluation of novel selective orexin-1 receptor antagonist JNJ-61393215 in an experimental model for panic in rodents and humans.

Orexin neurons originating in the perifornical and lateral hypothalamic area project to anxiety- and panic-associated neural circuitry, and are highly reactive to anxiogenic stimuli. Preclinical evidence suggests that the orexin system, and particularly the orexin-1 receptor (OX1R), may be involved in the pathophysiology of panic and anxiety. Selective OX1R antagonists thus may constitute a potential new treatment strategy for panic- and anxiety-related disorders. Here, we characterized a novel selective OX1R antagonist, JNJ-61393215, and determined its affinity and potency for human and rat OX1R in vitro. We also evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic properties of JNJ-61393215 in first-in-human single- and multiple-ascending dose studies conducted. Finally, the potential anxiolytic effects of JNJ-61393215 were evaluated both in rats and in healthy men using 35% CO2 inhalation challenge to induce panic symptoms. In the rat CO2 model of panic anxiety, JNJ-61393215 demonstrated dose-dependent attenuation of CO2-induced panic-like behavior without altering baseline locomotor or autonomic activity, and had minimal effect on spontaneous sleep. In phase-1 human studies, JNJ-61393215 at 90 mg demonstrated significant reduction (P < 0.02) in CO2-induced fear and anxiety symptoms that were comparable to those obtained using alprazolam. The most frequently reported adverse events were somnolence and headache, and all events were mild in severity. These results support the safety, tolerability, and anxiolytic effects of JNJ-61393215, and validate CO2 exposure as a translational cross-species experimental model to evaluate the therapeutic potential of novel anxiolytic drugs.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Antiviral Effects of Multiple Doses of the Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Fusion Protein Inhibitor, JNJ-53718678, in Infants Hospitalized With RSV Infection: A Randomized Phase 1b Study.

BACKGROUND: This phase 1b study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and antiviral effects of the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-specific fusion inhibitor JNJ-53718678 (JNJ-8678) in hospitalized RSV-infected patients aged > 1 to ≤24 months. METHODS: Patients categorized by age (cohort 1: ≥6 to ≤24 months; cohort 2: ≥3 to < 6 months; cohort 3: > 1 to < 3 months) were randomized to oral JNJ-8678 or placebo once daily for 7 days. Dose increases followed data review committee recommendations (cohort 1: 2/6/8/9 mg/kg; cohort 2: 1.5/4.5/6 mg/kg; cohort 3: 1/3/5 mg/kg). Cohort 1 included a 9 mg/kg dose, as target exposures were not reached at lower doses. Sparse pharmacokinetic samples were assessed using population pharmacokinetics modeling. Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs), laboratory tests, and electrocardiograms. To assess antiviral effects, RSV RNA viral load from nasal swabs was quantified over time using reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Patients received JNJ-8678 (n = 37) or placebo (n = 7). Pharmacokinetic parameters were similar at the highest doses for cohorts 1-3 (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time of administration up to 24 hours postdosing at day 7: 35 840, 34 980, and 39 627 ng × hour/mL, respectively). Two grade 3 AEs were reported (both bronchiolitis; 1 JNJ-8678, 1 placebo), reported as serious AEs; all other AEs were grade 1 or 2. Two additional serious AEs were reported (rhinitis [JNJ-8678]; pneumonia [placebo]). No deaths, grade 4 AEs, or AEs leading to discontinuation were reported. Median RSV viral load change from baseline in JNJ-8678 vs placebo by day 3 was -1.98 vs -0.32 log10 copies/mL. CONCLUSIONS: In RSV-infected infants, JNJ-8678 was well tolerated. Target exposures were reached and antiviral activity was observed. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02593851.

Integrating Duodenal Sampling in a Human Mass Balance Study to Quantify the Elimination Pathways of JNJ-53718678, a Respiratory Syncytial Virus Fusion Protein Inhibitor.

INTRODUCTION: The study objective was to characterize the excretion and metabolic profile of the respiratory syncytial virus fusion protein inhibitor, JNJ-53718678. Prior animal and in vitro studies suggested three main elimination pathways: N-glucuronidation to M8; CYP(3A4) metabolism leading to circulating metabolites M5, M12, M19 and M37; and JNJ-53718678 biliary excretion. To gain insight into the relative contribution of JNJ-53718678 and M8 biliary excretion, duodenal fluid sampling was incorporated into this mass balance study. METHODS: A single oral dose of 500 mg 14C-JNJ-53718678 was administered to six healthy male subjects. Four hours after study drug intake, gallbladder contraction was stimulated and duodenal fluid samples were collected. JNJ-53718678, its key circulating metabolites and total radioactivity (TR) were quantified in plasma, feces, urine and duodenal fluid. Safety was monitored throughout. RESULTS: JNJ-53718678 and M12 represented 47.4% and 17.8%, respectively, of TR area under the curve (AUC)∞ in plasma. M37 (9.6%), M19 (5.2%), M5 (4.3%) and M8 (1.4%) were minor metabolites; 70.6% of TR was recovered in feces and 19.9% in urine. Duodenal fluid concentrations (% of TR) were highest for JNJ-53718678 (11.6%) followed by M8 (10.4%), M5 (5.9%) and M12 (1.1%). In feces, 10-16% of TR was JNJ-53718678, 5-8% M5, < 1% M12 and < 1% M8. N-glucuronidation to M8 and direct biliary excretion of JNJ-53718678 represented 7% and 8% of drug clearance, respectively. JNJ-53718678 was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: JNJ-53718678 is primarily eliminated through CYP3A4-mediated metabolism. By integrating duodenal sampling, N-glucuronidation was confirmed as another metabolic pathway despite the low amount of M8 excreted in urine and feces. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Eudract no. 2016-002664-14.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Paliperidone Palmitate (Once-Monthly Formulation) in Japanese, Korean, and Taiwanese Patients With Schizophrenia.

The paliperidone pharmacokinetics after intramuscular administration of once-monthly paliperidone palmitate in Japanese patients were studied in 3 phase 1 studies and in 2 phase 3 studies performed in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. These data (Japanese, n = 509; Korean, n = 31; Taiwanese, n = 47) were used to describe the paliperidone palmitate pharmacokinetics in Japanese, to compare with non-Japanese, and to validate the historical population pharmacokinetic (Pop-PK) model for paliperidone palmitate, developed using data from studies in patients with schizophrenia outside Japan. The final historical Pop-PK model, including all significant patient covariates of Japanese studies, was used to simulate paliperidone plasma concentration-time data using nonlinear mixed effects, followed by comparison with actual data. Visual predictive checks displayed considerable overlap between predicted and actual plasma concentrations; the majority of observations were within the 90% prediction interval. Japanese, Korean, and Taiwanese patients had comparable plasma concentrations. Covariate distributions demonstrated comparatively lower median body mass index in Japanese, Korean, and Taiwanese patients versus rest-of-world population. Prediction errors for the data set used for external validation were within cutoff values, confirming accuracy/precision of the model. Paliperidone pharmacokinetics were adequately predicted for Japanese studies using the historical Pop-PK model, confirming its robustness. Pharmacokinetics in Japanese, Korean, and Taiwanese patients with schizophrenia were comparable with rest-of-world population.

A Receiver Operating Characteristic Framework for Non-adherence Detection Using Drug Concentration Thresholds-Application to Simulated Risperidone Data in Schizophrenic Patients.

Non-adherence to antipsychotic medication is a primary factor in disease relapse in schizophrenic patients. We sought to evaluate if plasma concentrations of the antipsychotic risperidone can be used as a predictor of treatment adherence and to identify the optimal plasma concentration threshold to reliably distinguish between adherent and non-adherent patients. A population pharmacokinetic model was used to simulate plasma risperidone steady-state trough concentrations in 1000 virtual patients, where 60% of the patients were 100% adherent to their medication, while 40% of the patients were non-adherent to their medication. The probability of adherence was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis on Ctrough. The area under the ROC curve (AUCROC) was used to identify the optimal Ctrough threshold. Single vs multiple Ctrough at steady state was also evaluated. After a single risperidone Ctrough measurement, the AUCROC (95% CI) was estimated to be 0.71 (0.69-0.72) and the optimal Ctrough threshold accounting for the lowest number of adherent and non-adherent misclassifications was estimated to be 11.9 ng/mL. After multiple Ctrough measurements, the AUCROC (95% CI) increased up to 0.85 (0.84-0.87) for three Ctrough measurements. The optimal probability threshold to reliably discriminate between adherent and non-adherent patients was estimated to be 0.51. Using this model which is reflective of typical adherence to antipsychotic medication, we found that three consecutive steady-state Ctrough measurements are needed for an accurate and precise diagnostic test to discriminate between patients who are adherent or non-adherent to treatment.

Relationship between antipsychotic blood levels and treatment failure during the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) study.

OBJECTIVE: Antipsychotic blood levels (ABLs) may help identify patients at risk for treatment failure. Reference ranges (RR) for plasma concentrations of ABLs that account for between-patient variability were developed for risperidone and olanzapine based on population pharmacokinetic models. The Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) collected clinical outcomes and ABLs, allowing testing of the relationship of ABLs with outcomes. METHODS: ABLs from 694 patients who were randomized to olanzapine or risperidone were compared to the 80% RRs and were assessed as below or within/above the RR. Treatment failure was defined per any of these criteria: (1) emergency room visit for psychiatric reasons, (2) hospitalization for psychiatric reasons, (3) adverse event of completed suicide, suicidal ideation, or suicide attempt, (4) assaultive behavior, (5) arrested or jailed, (6) 2-point increase from baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity score, (7) 25% increase in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score. Patients assessed with treatment failure within 100 days of drug concentration measurement were analyzed. RESULTS: Treatment failure occurred in 126 of 323 patients. The proportion of patients with ABLs below RR was 18.3% (59/323) compared to 10% expected in a fully adherent population. Among the 59 with ABLs below RR, 50.8% had treatment failure (compared to 36.4% for the 264 with ABLs within/above RR). The difference between groups was significant (odds ratio = 1.810; 95% CI = 1.025, 3.197; p = 0.0408). CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of CATIE data showed that ABLs within the context of RRs may identify patients with higher risk of relapse.

Antiviral Activity of Oral JNJ-53718678 in Healthy Adult Volunteers Challenged With Respiratory Syncytial Virus: A Placebo-Controlled Study.

Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) disease has no effective treatment. JNJ-53718678 is a fusion inhibitor with selective activity against RSV. Methods: After confirmation of RSV infection or 5 days after inoculation with RSV, participants (n = 69) were randomized to JNJ-53718678 75 mg (n = 15), 200 mg (n = 17), 500 mg (n = 18), or placebo (n = 17) orally once daily for 7 days. Antiviral effects were evaluated by assessing RSV RNA viral load (VL) area under the curve (AUC) from baseline (before the first dose) until discharge, time-to-peak VL, duration of viral shedding, clinical symptoms, and quantity of nasal secretions. Results: Mean VL AUC was lower for individuals treated with different doses of JNJ-53718678 versus placebo (203.8-253.8 vs 432.8 log10 PFUe.hour/mL). Also, mean peak VL, time to peak VL, duration of viral shedding, mean overall symptom score, and nasal secretion weight were lower in each JNJ-53718678-treated group versus placebo. No clear exposure-response relationship was observed. Three participants discontinued due to treatment-emergent adverse events of grade 2 and 1 electrocardiogram change (JNJ-53718678 75 mg and 200 mg, respectively) and grade 2 urticaria (placebo). Conclusions: JNJ-53718678 at all 3 doses substantially reduced VL and clinical disease severity, thus establishing clinical proof of concept and the compound's potential as a novel RSV treatment. Clinical trials registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02387606; EudraCT number: 2014-005041-41.

Determination of plasma concentration reference ranges for oral aripiprazole, olanzapine, and quetiapine.

BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia is a common disease which is commonly managed using antipsychotic medications (APS). Inadequate response and lack of adherence often prevent optimal therapeutic effectiveness. Monitoring APS concentrations can be useful to help improve outcomes for the patient. AIMS: The aim of this study was to develop "reference ranges" for oral aripiprazole, olanzapine, and quetiapine to allow clinicians to understand expected variability in patients treated with APS. The reference ranges were constructed to account for different oral doses, sampling times, and variability both between, and within, subjects. METHODS: Population pharmacokinetic models were used to simulate plasma concentrations over time under different doses and population demographics. The references were validated against external data both numerically and graphically. RESULTS: Reference ranges for oral aripiprazole, olanzapine, and quetiapine were derived and successfully validated against the external data. The 80% reference range for aripiprazole following a 2-mg oral dose was 14.7-41.6 ng/mL 0-4 h post dose and 10.6-37.1 ng/mL 20-24 h post dose. These ranges increased to 221-624 ng/mL 0-4 h post dose following administration of a 30-mg dose, and 159-557 ng/mL 20-24 h post dose. The 80% reference range 0-4 h post dose was 22.5-67.1 ng/mL following a 15-mg dose once daily of oral olanzapine, and 179-768 ng/mL following a 150-mg dose once daily of oral quetiapine. CONCLUSIONS: Comparing individual patients' APS levels with reference ranges, along with a full clinical assessment, could provide important insights to help a clinician optimize APS therapy.

Comparison of Capillary and Venous Drug Concentrations After Administration of a Single Dose of Risperidone, Paliperidone, Quetiapine, Olanzapine, or Aripiprazole.

Risperidone, paliperidone, quetiapine, olanzapine, and aripiprazole are antipsychotic drugs approved for treating various psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia. The objective of this randomized, parallel-group, open-label study was to compare finger-stick-based capillary with corresponding venous whole-blood and plasma concentrations for these drugs after administration of a single dose to healthy volunteers. All whole-blood and plasma drug concentrations were measured with validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods. Capillary and venous concentrations (both in plasma and whole blood) were in close agreement, although a time-dependent difference was observed, most obviously for olanzapine and paliperidone, with slightly higher capillary versus venous drug concentrations during the first hours after administering a single dose. The observed difference between capillary and venous plasma drug concentrations is expected not to be relevant in clinical practice, considering the wide window of therapeutic concentrations and the wide range of drug concentrations in the patient population for a given dose. Based on these results, finger-stick-based capillary drug concentrations have been shown to approximate venous drug concentrations.

Comparison of Capillary and Venous Plasma Drug Concentrations After Repeated Administration of Risperidone, Paliperidone, Quetiapine, Olanzapine, or Aripiprazole.

Quantification of blood levels of antipsychotic drugs may be useful for managing medication therapy. This open-label, parallel-group study was performed to compare finger-stick-based capillary with corresponding venous plasma concentrations for risperidone, paliperidone, quetiapine, olanzapine, and aripiprazole and their major metabolites after repeated dosing in patients with schizophrenia or related illnesses. Finger-stick-based capillary and venous blood samples were collected at various times within a dosing interval. All drug concentration measurements in the derived plasma samples were performed with validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods. Finger-stick-based capillary and venous plasma drug concentrations after repeated dosing were generally similar. Olanzapine capillary plasma concentrations, however, were on average approximately 20% higher than venous concentrations, with a trend for a relatively greater difference occurring shortly after dosing. In addition, smaller capillary-venous differences were observed for extended-release and long-acting intramuscular formulations and for aripiprazole, a drug with a long half-life, compared with drugs administered as an immediate-release formulation (risperidone, olanzapine). After repeated dosing, plasma derived from finger-stick-based blood was observed to be predictive of the venous concentrations. Capillary sampling may be an appropriate alternative to venous sampling to readily evaluate systemic drug concentrations.

Prospective dose selection and acceleration of paliperidone palmitate 3-month formulation development using a pharmacometric bridging strategy.

AIMS: To prospectively select the dose of the paliperidone palmitate 3-month (PP3M) formulation, using a pharmacometric bridging strategy based on the paliperidone palmitate 1-month (PP1M) formulation previously approved for schizophrenia treatment. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic (PK) data from a 6-month interim analysis of a single dose PP3M Phase I clinical trial was integrated with a previously developed PP1M population-PK model. The model was updated to incorporate formulation as a covariate on absorption parameters and to explore the most critical design element of the Phase III study: the PP1M-to-PP3M dose multiplier for patients switching formulations. Plasma paliperidone concentrations were measured at predetermined intervals during Phase III, enabling comparison of the multiple-dose PK between PP1M and PP3M. Exposure matching was assessed graphically to determine whether paliperidone plasma concentrations from the two formulations overlapped. RESULTS: Prospective steady-state PK simulations revealed that a 3.5 multiple of the PP1M dose would yield a corresponding PP3M dose with comparable exposure. The prospective pharmacometric simulation and observed Phase III PK data agreed closely. Phase III results confirmed the hypothesis that efficacy of PP3M was noninferior to that of PP1M. The similarity in exposures between the two formulations was likely a key determinant of the equivalent efficacy between the two products observed in the Phase III study. CONCLUSIONS: Successful prospective PP3M Phase III clinical trial dose selection was achieved through the use of pharmacometric bridging, without conducting a Phase II study and using only limited Phase I data for PP3M. We estimate that this strategy reduced development time by 3-5 years and may be applicable to other drug development projects.

Drug-Drug Interaction Studies of Paliperidone and Divalproex Sodium Extended-Release Tablets in Healthy Participants and Patients with Psychiatric Disorders.

The objective of these 2 phase 1, open-label, 2-treatment, single-sequence studies was to evaluate the effect of repeated oral doses of divalproex sodium extended-release (ER) on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a single dose of paliperidone ER in healthy participants (study 1), and the effect of multiple doses of paliperidone ER on the steady-state PK of valproic acid (VPA) in patients with psychiatric disorders (study 2), respectively. In study 1 healthy participants received, in a fixed sequential order, treatment A, paliperidone ER 12 mg (day 1); treatment B, VPA 1000 mg (2 × 500 mg divalproex sodium ER) once daily (days 5 to 18) and paliperidone ER 12 mg (day 15). In study 2 patients received treatment A, VPA (days 1-7); treatment B, VPA + paliperidone ER 12 mg (days 8-12). Divalproex sodium ER doses (study 2) were individualized such that systemic therapeutic VPA exposure from prior treatment was maintained on entry into the study. PK assessments were performed at prespecified time points (paliperidone days 1 and 15 [study 1]; VPA days 7 and 12 [study 2]). The oral bioavailability of paliperidone was increased by an estimated 51% (Cmax ) and 51%-52% (AUCs) when coadministered with divalproex sodium ER. No effect on the steady-state plasma concentration of VPA was observed following repeated coadministration with paliperidone ER: the 90%CI around the VPA exposure ratios for the 2 treatments was within the 80%-125% bioequivalence criteria for Cmax,ss and AUCτ . Both VPA and paliperidone ER were well tolerated, and no new safety concerns were identified.

Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of paliperidone palmitate 3-month formulation in patients with schizophrenia: A phase-1, single-dose, randomized, open-label study.

This multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, phase-1 study assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of the investigational intramuscular paliperidone palmitate 3-month (PP3M) formulation in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. A total of 328 patients (men or women, aged 18-65 years) were enrolled in 1 of 4 separately conducted panels (A to D). Each panel had 2 single-dose treatment periods (period 1, 1 mg intramuscular paliperidone immediate release [IR]; period 2, intramuscular PP3M 75-525 mg eq) separated by a washout of 7-21 days. Overall, 245 of 308 (79.5%) PP3M-dosed patients completed the study. Because the PK studies of panels A and C were compromised by incomplete injection in some patients, PK data from only panels B and D are presented. Safety data from all panels are presented. Peak paliperidone plasma concentration was achieved between 23 and 34 days, and apparent half-life was ∼2-4 months. Mean plasma AUC∞ and Cmax of paliperidone appeared to be dose-proportional. Relative bioavailability in comparison with paliperidone was ∼100% independent of the dose and injection site. Headache and nasopharyngitis were the most common (>7%) treatment-emergent adverse events. Overall, safety and tolerability were similar to those of the 1-month formulation. Results support a once-every-3-months dosing interval in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

Efficacy and Safety of the 3-Month Formulation of Paliperidone Palmitate vs Placebo for Relapse Prevention of Schizophrenia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Treatment nonadherence and relapse are common problems in patients with schizophrenia. The long-acting 3-month formulation of paliperidone palmitate, owing to its extended elimination half-life, may offer a valuable therapeutic option for these patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the 3-month formulation of paliperidone palmitate vs placebo in delaying time to relapse of schizophrenia symptoms. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized, multicenter trial conducted from April 26, 2012, through April 9, 2014, in 8 countries consisted of 4 phases: 3-week screening phase, flexible-dose 17-week open-label transition phase, 12-week open-label maintenance phase, and open-ended double-blind (DB) phase. Of the 506 patients enrolled (aged 18-70 years; DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of schizophrenia), 305 were randomized to 3-month paliperidone palmitate (n = 160) or placebo (n = 145) in the DB phase. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received once-monthly doses of the 1-month formulation of paliperidone palmitate (50, 75, 100, or 150 mg eq) during the transition phase, followed by a single dose of the 3-month formulation (3.5 times the stabilized dose of once-monthly paliperidone palmitate) during the maintenance phase. Stabilized patients were randomized to receive either a fixed dose of 3-month paliperidone palmitate (175, 263, 350, or 525 mg eq) or placebo once every 3 months during the DB phase. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Time from randomization to the first relapse event (time to relapse) in the DB phase. RESULTS: In the interim analysis, time to first relapse was significantly different in favor of the paliperidone palmitate group vs the placebo group (hazard ratio = 3.45; 95% CI, 1.73-6.88; P < .001); median time to relapse was 274 days for placebo but not estimable for 3-month paliperidone palmitate. An independent data monitoring committee recommended early study termination due to efficacy. In the DB phase, 183 of 305 patients (62% with 3-month paliperidone palmitate; 58% with placebo) had at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event; those noted more frequently in the group receiving paliperidone palmitate than in the placebo group were headache (9% vs 4%), weight increased (9% vs 3%), nasopharyngitis (6% vs 1%), and akathisia (4% vs 1%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Compared with placebo, the 3-month formulation of paliperidone palmitate administered 4 times yearly significantly delayed time to relapse in patients with schizophrenia. The 3-month formulation was generally tolerable and has a safety profile consistent with other marketed paliperidone formulations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:NCT01529515.

Pharmacokinetic profile after multiple deltoid or gluteal intramuscular injections of paliperidone palmitate in patients with schizophrenia.

Paliperidone palmitate (PP) is a once-monthly long-acting injectable antipsychotic approved for the treatment of schizophrenia in many countries. To evaluate the different injection-site options, we compared the pharmacokinetic profile of paliperidone after multiple injections of PP 100 mg eq. (156 mg of PP, equivalent to 100 mg of paliperidone) on days 1, 8, 36, and 64 into the deltoid (n = 24) or gluteal muscle (n = 25) in patients with schizophrenia. After four injections in the deltoid muscle, paliperidone exposure was higher for AUCτ and Cmax , compared with the gluteal muscle (geometric mean AUCτ -based ratio: 120% [90% CI: 93.1-154.7%], and geometric mean Cmax -based ratio: 130% [90% CI: 100.6-168.9%]). The mean [SD] fluctuation index was higher, with a larger interpatient variability, after deltoid-injections (75.9% [30.9%]) than gluteal-injections (58.5% [14.3%]). The median tmax was similar for both sites. PP was generally tolerable in patients, with more favorable local-site tolerability for gluteal-injection. In conclusion, to achieve therapeutic-concentrations quickly, the first-two injections of PP are best administered into the deltoid muscle, whereas thereafter maintenance-injections can be administered either in the deltoid or gluteal muscle.

A single-dose, open-label, parallel, randomized, dose-proportionality study of paliperidone after intramuscular injections of paliperidone palmitate in the deltoid or gluteal muscle in patients with schizophrenia.

Paliperidone palmitate (PP) is a long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic, developed for monthly intramuscular (i.m.) administration into deltoid/gluteal muscle, approved for the treatment of schizophrenia in many countries. To assess the options for i.m. injection sites, dose-proportionality of PP was investigated after injection of a single dose (25-150 mg eq.) of PP in either gluteal (n = 106) or deltoid (n = 95) muscle of schizophrenic patients. Overall, mean (geometric) area under plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC∞ ) of paliperidone increased proportionally with increasing PP doses, regardless of injection site. Mean maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) was slightly less than dose-proportional for both injection sites at PP doses >50 mg eq. Mean Cmax was higher after injection in the deltoid compared with the gluteal muscle, except for the 100 mg eq. dose, while AUC∞ for both injection sites was comparable at all doses. Median time to reach Cmax (tmax ) ranged from 13-14 days after deltoid and 13-17 days after gluteal injection across all doses. Single PP injections in deltoid and gluteal muscles in the dose range of 25-150 mg eq. were generally tolerable both locally and systemically.

Effect of carbamazepine on the pharmacokinetics of paliperidone extended-release tablets at steady-state.

Given the potential concomitant use of carbamazepine and paliperidone extended-release (ER) in the treatment of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, this open-label, two-treatment sequential study investigated the effect of repeated administration of carbamazepine on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of paliperidone. Sixty-four patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia or bipolar-I disorder received the following treatments in a fixed sequential order, without washout between treatments: (i) paliperidone ER 6 mg tablet once daily for 7 days, and (ii) paliperidone ER 6 mg once daily concomitantly with carbamazepine 200 mg twice daily for the subsequent 21 days. Upon coadministration with carbamazepine, paliperidone steady-state total exposure (AUC24 h ) and peak plasma concentrations (Cmax ) decreased by approximately 37% [LSM ratio-AUC24 h : 63.4 (90% CI: 57.19; 70.29); Cmax : 62.47 (90% CI: 55.77; 69.98)]. This decrease is accounted for to a substantial degree by a 35% increase in renal clearance of paliperidone, likely as a result of induction of renal P-glycoprotein by carbamazepine. A 14% decrease in the amount of drug excreted unchanged in the urine suggests that carbamazepine coadministration has a limited effect on the intestinal absorption or cytochrome metabolism of paliperidone.

Expansion of guidance for the day 8 initiation dose of paliperidone palmitate to avoid a missed dose.

BACKGROUND: Paliperidone palmitate (PP) is a long-acting injectable formulation of an atypical antipsychotic, paliperidone. Its dose can be expressed in milligram or milligram equivalents (mg eq) of active paliperidone (39, 78, 117, 156, and 234 mg of PP correspond to 25, 50, 75, 100, and 150 mg eq of paliperidone). The recommended initiation dosing regimen for PP is 150 [day 1]/100[day 8] mg eq. Labeling guidance allowed a ± 2 day window for the day 8 injection that provides more flexibility with patient scheduling and avoids missing the day 8 initiation dose. Recently, expansion of the day 8 dosing window from ±2 to ±4 days has been approved in the United States based on results obtained from the model-based simulations and review of safety data presented here. METHODS: The predicted exposure for the recommended initiation regimen of PP was compared with day 1/day 4, and day 1/day 12 dosing scenarios; each scenario was compared with the highest clinically evaluated initiation regimen (150[day 1]/150[day 8] mg eq) and to the recommended 6 mg/day oral dose of extended-release paliperidone. RESULTS: Simulated exposures with PP 150 mg eq on day 1 and 100 mg eq on days 4, 8, or 12 overlap considerably, with ±3 ng/mL variation in median maximum plasma concentrations. Based upon pharmacokinetic bridging/bracketing, the peak concentration with PP 150/100 mg eq [days 1/4] was lower than that with the highest initiation regimen. Exposures for PP 150 mg eq on day 1 and 100 mg eq on days 4, 8, or 12 were maintained close to those of 6 mg of paliperidone extended-release. CONCLUSION: These simulations indicate that using the expanded dosing window of ±4 days has little effect on paliperidone exposure. A review of the overall pattern of treatment-emergent adverse events did not identify any new safety risks associated with the expanded dosing window.