Math-free guides for glycerin and allergens at variable subcutaneous injection volumes: How's my dosing? Update.

BACKGROUND: Current summaries of effective maintenance dose ranges for subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) are based on administration of 0.5-mL volumes. Extract formulations delivering equivalent dose ranges for practices using different injection volumes have not been reported, and calculation of the final glycerin concentrations in these solutions remains an inconvenient and repetitive process. OBJECTIVE: To create math-free guides for allergen doses and glycerin concentrations that identify the extract concentrate volumes required to deliver doses within the ranges cited in the 2011 immunotherapy practice parameters for clinicians using 5.0-mL maintenance vials and injection volumes ranging from 0.2 to 1.0 mL. METHODS: Algebraic calculations were performed to determine the specific combinations of extract concentrate strengths, volumes of these products in patient vaccines, and injection volumes needed for administration of target allergen doses spanning the current SCIT practice parameter recommendations. RESULTS: For each product or group (nonstandardized extracts), tables were constructed to define the allergen doses provided by various combinations of extract concentrate volumes and injection volumes. The values within the effective dose ranges for each product were highlighted to facilitate comparisons of specific conditions relevant to allergy specialists. Glycerin tables were also created to permit convenient assessments of the final concentrations of this stabilizer in patient prescriptions. CONCLUSION: SCIT dosing and glycerin tables are useful tools to assist allergists with practice decisions that involve variable patient formulas and injection volumes and can help identify suitable conditions for treatment of patients presenting with diverse allergen sensitivities and specificity profiles.

Impact of systemic lupus erythematosus on health, family, and work: the patient perspective.

OBJECTIVE: Qualitative research among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) can identify aspects of the disease relevant to clinical research and practice. A phenomenological, mixed-method approach was used to investigate these disease-driven health issues. METHODS: A convenience sample of patients with SLE from Los Angeles County, California was recruited from a private, community-based rheumatology practice for participation in focus groups and interviews. Semistructured discussions explored disease manifestations and impact. A self-administered questionnaire evaluated the occurrence and importance of disease issues previously identified from literature. Patient health issues were identified through convergence using 1) qualitative analysis of focus group transcripts and 2) quantitative analysis of the questionnaire. Patients were also asked about their ability to accurately recall disease experiences. RESULTS: Focus group participants (n = 23) had a mean age of 43 years and a mean disease duration of 8 years; 19 (83%) were women and 14 (61%) were white. The most frequent health issues identified by focus group transcript analysis were pain (83%), fatigue (61%), work or school impairment (48%), skin manifestations (43%), and skin sensitivity (43%). Questionnaire findings were similar: the most frequent health issues were inability to do previous activities (87%), fatigue (87%), pain (87%), and work or school impairment (83%). Most interviewed patients (7 of 10) reported an ability to accurately recall disease issues between 24 hours and 7 days. CONCLUSION: SLE patients reported signs and symptoms that could significantly impact their functioning in daily life. Treatments that substantially improve these disease manifestations would offer considerable benefit to patients, treating physicians, and general society.

Systemic sclerosis prevalence and comorbidities in the US, 2001-2002.

OBJECTIVE: Large, population-based assessments of systemic sclerosis (SSc) prevalence and comorbidity in the United States (US) are rare. We explored autoimmune disease and other comorbidity patterns among SSc patients in the US from 2001 to 2002 and compared these with controls. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Two US datasets with patient-level medical and drug claims were used to assess SSc prevalence and comorbidity: IMS Health Integrated Administrative Claims Database (IMS Health) and the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database (MarketScan). SSc patients and comorbidities were identified by International Classification of Diseases (ICD), 9th revision diagnostic codes appearing on medical claims. Patients without SSc diagnostic codes (controls) were selected and matched 4:1 to SSc patients based on sex, age, Census Bureau region, and previous insurance coverage. The prevalence relative risk (RR) statistic compared comorbidity occurrence between SSc patients and controls, with 95% confidence intervals estimated using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Several sensitivity analyses tested methods used for identifying SSc cases and the prevalence of comorbidities. RESULTS: In both databases, SSc prevalence was 0.05% using the standard population model, 0.03% under sensitivity analysis. Among SSc patients the risks for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and multiple sclerosis (MS) were notably higher across datasets than for those without SSc: RR 3.2-6.6 for MS, RR 2.1-2.2 for IBD, in MarketScan and IMS Health, respectively (p < 0.05 for all). The chronic disease burden of SSc patients was much higher than that of controls, as confirmed by two chronicity measures (Chronic Disease Score, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index). The risks for cardiovascular, renal, liver and several neuropsychiatric diseases were higher for SSc patients across both datasets. Sensitivity analyses supported these findings. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide a population-based estimate of US prevalence of SSc and document the higher risk for certain other autoimmune diseases among SSc patients when compared to controls. Patients with SSc also had a higher chronic disease burden than those without SSc. These findings are limited by the unknown validity of ICD-9 codes for SSc case identification, unbalanced regional representation, and a likely 'healthy worker' effect in these databases.

Autoimmune disease concomitance among inflammatory bowel disease patients in the United States, 2001-2002.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may share an underlying pathogenesis with other autoimmune diseases. METHODS: Two United States data sets with patient-level medical and drug claims were used to explore the occurrence of autoimmune diseases in patients with IBD, particularly Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), with that in controls. From 2001 to 2002 IBD patients were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, diagnosis codes in the IMS Health Integrated Administration Claims Database and the Market Scan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database. Controls were selected by matching on sex, age, Census Bureau region, and length of previous medical insurance coverage. Odds ratios (ORs) evaluated the risk relationship between IBD patients and controls within an estimated Mantel-Haenszel 95% confidence interval. Sensitivity analysis tested the case identification method used to select IBD patients. RESULTS: The risk for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) was substantially increased across both data sets: OR (95% confidence interval [CI]) of 7.8 (5.6-10.8) in IMS Health and 5.8 (3.9-8.6) in MarketScan. The risk for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was 2.7 (2.4-3.0) and 2.1 (1.8-2.3), respectively; for multiple sclerosis (MS); the ORs were 1.5 (1.2-1.9) and 1.6 (1.2-2.1), respectively. There was no increased risk for type 1 diabetes mellitus, and the results for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) were inconsistent. The sensitivity analysis supported these findings. CONCLUSIONS: A much higher risk for RA, AS, PsA, and MS was observed in IBD patients compared with controls. Prospective epidemiologic studies are needed to confirm these findings and explore the pathogenic mechanism of this relationship.