Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Transplant ; 27(4): E478-83, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23795745

RESUMO

Nowadays, laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) has become the gold standard to procure live donor kidneys. As the relationship between donor and recipient loosens, it becomes of even greater importance to optimize safety and comfort of the surgical procedure. Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum has been shown to reduce pain scores after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Live kidney donors may also benefit from the use of low pressure during LDN. To evaluate feasibility and efficacy to reduce post-operative pain, we performed a randomized blinded study. Twenty donors were randomly assigned to standard (14 mmHg) or low (7 mmHg) pressure during LDN. One conversion from low to standard pressure was indicated by protocol due to lack of progression. Intention-to-treat analysis showed that low pressure resulted in a significantly longer skin-to-skin time (149 ± 86 vs. 111 ± 19 min), higher urine output during pneumoperitoneum (23 ± 35 vs. 11 ± 20 mL/h), lower cumulative overall pain score after 72 h (9.4 ± 3.2 vs. 13.5 ± 4.5), lower deep intra-abdominal pain score (11 ± 3.3 vs. 7.5 ± 3.1), and a lower cumulative overall referred pain score (1.8 ± 1.9 vs. 4.2 ± 3). Donor serum creatinine levels, complications, and quality of life dimensions were not significantly different. Our data show that low-pressure pneumoperitoneum during LDN is feasible and may contribute to increase live donors' comfort during the early post-operative phase.


Assuntos
Falência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Transplante de Rim , Laparoscopia/normas , Doadores Vivos/psicologia , Nefrectomia/normas , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Pneumoperitônio , Coleta de Tecidos e Órgãos/normas , Método Duplo-Cego , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Rejeição de Enxerto/prevenção & controle , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Prognóstico , Padrão de Cuidado
3.
Anaesthesia ; 62(10): 1024-8, 2007 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17845654

RESUMO

The application of ultrasonography in guiding and controlling the path of the stimulating needle to the brachial plexus via the posterior approach (Pippa technique) was studied. In 21 ASA physical status 1 and 2 patients, scheduled for surgery of the shoulder or upper arm, needle insertion was monitored by ultrasonography and the interaction between needle, surrounding structures and brachial plexus was followed. During injection, the spread of local anaesthetic was visualised and a prediction of block success was made. One failure was predicted. Complete block was achieved in 20 (95%) patients. One potential complication, puncture of the carotid artery, was prevented using ultrasound. Ultrasound is a useful tool in the training and performance of a neurostimulation-guided brachial plexus block by the posterior approach. Ultrasonographic guidance may prevent serious complications associated with this approach to the brachial plexus.


Assuntos
Anestesiologia/educação , Plexo Braquial/diagnóstico por imagem , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Bloqueio Nervoso/efeitos adversos , Bloqueio Nervoso/normas , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...