A simple method for assessing free brain/free plasma ratios using an in vitro model of the blood brain barrier.

Historically, the focus has been to use in vitro BBB models to optimize rate of drug delivery to the CNS, whereas total in vivo brain/plasma ratios have been used for optimizing extent. However, these two parameters do not necessarily show good correlations with receptor occupancy data or other pharmacological readouts. In line with the free drug hypothesis, the use of unbound brain concentrations (Cu,br) has been shown to provide the best correlations with pharmacological data. However, typically the determination of this parameter requires microdialysis, a technique not ideally suited for screening in early drug development. Alternative, and less resource-demanding methodologies to determine Cu,br employ either equilibrium dialysis of brain homogenates or incubations of brain slices in buffer to determine fraction unbound brain (fu,br), which is subsequently multiplied by the total brain concentration to yield Cu,br. To determine Cu,br/Cu,pl ratios this way, still requires both in vitro and in vivo experiments that are quite time consuming. The main objective of this study was to explore the possibility to directly generate Cu,br/Cu,pl ratios in a single in vitro model of the BBB, using a co-culture of brain capillary endothelial and glial cells in an attempt to mimick the in vivo situation, thereby greatly simplifying existing experimental procedures. Comparison to microdialysis brain concentration profiles demonstrates the possibility to estimate brain exposure over time in the BBB model. A stronger correlation was found between in vitro Cu,br/Cu,pl ratios and in vivo Cu,br/Cu,pl obtained using fu,br from brain slice than with fu,br from brain homogenate for a set of 30 drugs. Overall, Cu,br/Cu,pl ratios were successfully predicted in vitro for 88% of the 92 studied compounds. This result supports the possibility to use this methodology for identifying compounds with a desirable in vivo response in the CNS early on in the drug discovery process.

Cerebrovascular protection as a possible mechanism for the protective effects of NXY-059 in preclinical models: an in vitro study.

NXY-059, a polar compound with limited transport across the blood-brain barrier, has demonstrated neuroprotection in several animal models of acute ischemic stroke but failed to confirm clinical benefit in the second phase III trial (SAINT-II). To improve the understanding of the mechanisms responsible for its neuroprotective action in preclinical models a series of experiments was carried out in an in vitro blood-brain barrier (BBB) model. A clinically attainable concentration of 250 mumol/L of NXY-059 administered at the onset or up to 4 h after oxygen glucose deprivation (OGD) produced a significant reduction in the increased BBB permeability caused by OGD. Furthermore, OGD produced a huge influx of tissue plasminogen activator across the BBB, which was substantially reduced by NXY-059. This study suggests that the neuroprotective effects of NXY-059 preclinically, may at least in part be attributed to its ability to restore functionality of the brain endothelium.

Modelling of the blood-brain barrier in drug discovery and development.

The market for neuropharmaceuticals is potentially one of the largest sectors of the global pharmaceutical market owing to the increase in average life expectancy and the fact that many neurological disorders have been largely refractory to pharmacotherapy. The brain is a delicate organ that can efficiently protect itself from harmful compounds and precisely regulate its microenvironment. Unfortunately, the same mechanisms can also prove to be formidable hurdles in drug development. An improved understanding of the regulatory interfaces that exist between blood and brain may provide novel and more effective strategies to treat neurological disorders.

In vitro blood-brain barrier permeability and cerebral endothelial cell uptake of the neuroprotective nitrone compound NXY-059 in normoxic, hypoxic and ischemic conditions.

The free radical trapping nitrone compounds alpha-phenyl-N-tert-butylnitrone (PBN), 2-sulfophenyl-N-tert-butylnitrone (S-PBN) and disodium 2,4-disulfophenyl-N-tert-butyl nitrone (NXY-059) are effective neuroprotective agents in experimental models of both transient and permanent focal ischemia. A recent in vivo study suggested that NXY-059 had poor brain uptake in a transient ischemia model. We have now examined its blood-brain barrier permeability and cerebral endothelial uptake during hypoxic and ischemic conditions using an in vitro model of the blood-brain barrier. The in vitro blood-brain barrier permeability and cerebral endothelial uptake of NXY-059 and S-PBN were low during normoxic conditions. In contrast, PBN had very high blood-brain barrier penetration in vitro which confirmed earlier in vivo results. The permeability of [14C]NXY-059 increased 3.5 times after 9 h of hypoxia or 3 h of ischemia. There was, respectively, a 5-fold and more than 10-fold increase, after 6 and 9 h of ischemia. The control molecule [3H]inulin (M(r) approximately 5000) showed a similar increase in permeability under the same experimental conditions indicating a major change in the transport properties of the endothelium. There was a 60% reduction in the ATP levels of astrocytes after 3 h of ischemia and a 90% reduction after 9 h. The reduction in ATP levels in endothelial cells was somewhat lower. The uptake of NXY-059 in cerebral endothelial cells under normoxic, hypoxic or 9 h of ischemic conditions was negligible. NXY-059, S-PBN and PBN showed no effects on vesicular transport or the integrity of the blood-brain barrier in normoxic or ischemic conditions, nor did the compounds induce any change in the ATP levels of the cells. In conclusion, it is possible that the increase in blood-brain barrier permeability of [14C]NXY-059 which occurs during prolonged ischemia in vitro reflects a change which may be of importance to the neuroprotective effects of this nitrone free radical trapping agent.

Prediction of drug transport through the blood-brain barrier in vivo: a comparison between two in vitro cell models.

PURPOSE: Studies were conducted to evaluate whether the use of an in vitro model of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) resulted in more accurate predictions of the in vivo transport of compounds compared to the use of a human intestinal cell line (Caco-2). METHODS: The in vitro BBB model employs bovine brain capillary endothelial cells co-cultured with primary rat astrocytes. The Caco-2 cells originate from a human colorectal carcinoma. The rat was used as experimental animal for the in vivo studies. RESULTS: Strong correlations (r = 0.93-0.95) were found between the results generated by the in vitro model of the BBB and two different methodologies to measure the permeability across the BBB in vivo. In contrast, a poor correlation (r = 0.68) was obtained between Caco-2 cell data and in vivo BBB transport. A relatively poor correlation (r = 0.74) was also found between the two in vitro models. CONCLUSION: The present study illustrates the limitations of the Caco-2 model to predict BBB permeability of compounds in vivo. The results emphasize the fact that the BBB and the intestinal mucosa are two fundamentally different biologic barriers, and to be able to make accurate predictions about the in vivo CNS penetration of potential drug candidates, it is important that the in vitro model possesses the main characteristics of the in vivo BBB.

The use of in vitro cell culture models for mechanistic studies and as permeability screens for the blood-brain barrier in the pharmaceutical industry--background and current status in the drug discovery process.

Successful drug delivery to the central nervous system (CNS) is highly dependent on DMPK as well as physicochemical properties and it is therefore important to characterise these properties and take them into account when designing chemical lead series that act at CNS targets. Since the drug discovery/development process is becoming increasingly focused on reducing the time required to enter molecules into the market, industrial DMPK scientists have emerged from their traditional supportive role in drug development to provide valuable support in the drug discovery process, using novel methods to meet the demands of combinatorial chemistry and bioscience groups.