Donor matters: Donor selection impact on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation outcomes in Hispanic patients with B-cell acute lymphocytic leukemia: Insights from a myeloablative HSCT study.

BACKGROUND: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a pivotal treatment for high-risk acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), although limited by suitable human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donors (MSD). This study evaluates the impact of donor selection on outcomes in post-HSCT Hispanic B-cell ALL patients. METHODOLOGY: This single-center retrospective study evaluates outcomes in 88 adult Hispanic B-cell ALL patients who underwent haploidentical, MSD, or MUD myeloablative HSCT between 2013 and 2023. RESULTS: Compared to Haploidentical transplants, MSD exhibited worse cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) (HR = 3.39; P = 0.014) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 2.44; P = 0.048) whereas MUD outcomes did not differ. This effect persisted even when controlling for pre-HSCT stage and Minimal residual disease (MRD) status. In addition, Ph-like was a significant predictor of worse DFS (HR = 3.60; P=0.014) and CIR (HR = 2.97; P=0.035) on multivariate analysis. Older donor age correlated with worse GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) in haploidentical transplants (HR = 1.05; P=0.036). CONCLUSION: Our data highlights improved outcomes with younger, haploidentical donors among Hispanic B-cell ALL patients undergoing myeloablative HSCT. This underscores the importance of donor selection in optimizing outcomes for ALL patients.

Midtrimester Ultrasound Predictors of Small-for-Gestational-Age Neonates.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a specific estimated fetal weight (EFW) or abdominal circumference (AC) measurement percentile at the 18-to 24-week ultrasound (US) examination is associated with a small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonate. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was conducted including women with uncomplicated singleton gestations who delivered a term SGA neonate identified as having a birth weight (BW) below the 10th percentile on the Olsen growth curve and had an 18- to 24-week US examination in our database. The study period was October 2011 to January 2018. A similar number of control charts were requested randomly over the same time with BW in the 10th to 90th percentiles, all which had an 18-to 24-week US examination in our database. After all neonates meeting BW criteria were identified, a chart review was performed to specifically evaluate biometric parameters from the US at 18 to 24 weeks to determine a potential correlation with the EFW percentile and AC percentile. Pregnancy, neonatal outcomes, and maternal demographic characteristics were collected. RESULTS: A total of 549 term neonates with a BW below the 10th percentile, and 593 control term neonates with BW in the of 10th to 90th percentiles were reviewed. Our analyses revealed that the AC and EFW percentiles were poor predictors of BW (<10th percentile; areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves, 0.68 and 0.69, respectively). A similar low ability of AC and EFW to predict BW below the 5th percentile was noted. CONCLUSIONS: (1) No tipping point or cutoff for the EFW or AC percentile at the 18- to 24-week US examination was identified to predict a term SGA neonate. (2) These data are helpful when counseling women in midgestation about specific parameters, their importance, and the potential need for follow up imaging.

Less Than Total Excision of Infected Prosthetic PTFE Graft Does Not Increase the Risk of Reinfection.

BACKGROUND: Traditional treatment of infected polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts consist of removal of the entire prosthesis. Closure of the native vessels may compromise vascular patency. We examined the outcomes for patients in whom a PTFE remnant of an infected graft was retained on the vessel. METHODS: We reviewed the operating room log from 2000 to 2011 and identified all patients who had partial removal of an infected PTFE graft used for hemodialysis or peripheral bypass. These patients were examined for subsequent complications. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients underwent 30 partial graft excisions with mean follow-up of 27 months. A total of 17% (5 of 30) of the partial graft resection procedures resulted in complications. Of 48 total remnants left behind at the arterial or venous anastomoses, reinfection occurred in 15%. CONCLUSIONS: Leaving a well-incorporated small 1-to 5-mm PTFE remnant at the arterial or venous anastomoses can be performed safely with a low risk of complications.

Effects of cilostazol on arterial wound healing: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: The vasodilator cilostazol (Pletal(®)), a phosphodiesterase-3 inhibitor, is approved in the United States for treatment of intermittent claudication. This study was aimed at evaluating its efficacy as an adjunct in the management of arterial ulceration. METHODS: The clinical records of patients treated with cilostazol from 2000 to 2010 at one institution were obtained. Of the 561 patients treated with cilostazol, we identified 82 (101 limbs) who started on therapy only after wounds were present and whose records were sufficient to assess healing. Only if all wounds in a limb completely healed without intervening arterial reconstruction, amputation, primary closure, or skin grafting, the limb was deemed healed with the assistance of cilostazol. With bilateral involvement, both limbs had to heal for the patient to be judged healed. Subjects who were lost to follow-up, died, or underwent surgical interventions other than debridement were deemed failures. Age, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), creatinine, diabetes, insulin therapy, hemodialysis, smoking history, congestive heart failure, cilostazol dose, and length of therapy were compared, as well as, the number of wounds, size of largest wound, chronicity, ankle-brachial index, the presence of exposed bone/tendon/joint, or the presence of gangrene. RESULTS: Overall 30 of 82 patients (36.6%) and 41 of 101 (40.6%) limbs were deemed healed without surgical intervention or revascularization (open or endovascular). When 9 limbs that healed after skin grafts (n = 2) or foot-sparing amputations (n = 7) but without revascularization were considered, the overall rate of lower extremity limb salvage was 50.5%. Demographic characteristics were similar in the 2 groups except healed patients tended to be taller and weigh more but had similar BMI. The incidence of diabetes was higher in nonhealed limbs (73.3% vs. 50.0%, P = 0.0587). Gangrene was less common in healed patients (22.6% vs. 49.1%, P = 0.059) and healed limbs (22.0% vs. 48.3%, P = 0.027). Most subjects received 200 mg of cilostazol daily (healed:177 ± 53 mg vs. nonhealed: 172 ± 47 mg). Mean length of therapy in healed patients was 278 ± 302 days compared with 108 ± 129 days in nonhealed subjects before discontinuation of drug therapy or surgery, death, or loss to follow-up intervened. CONCLUSIONS: The observed limb healing rate with cilostazol compares favorably to the ~20% rate observed in subjects treated with placebo in multicenter trials of another vasodilator, iloprost. Although gangrene and diabetes correlate with lower prospects for healing, our data suggest that cilostazol helps promote healing of wounds when arterial insufficiency is present.