Prevalence of Maxillary Sinus Pathology Based on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Evaluation of Multiethnicity Dental School Population.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of the study was to evaluate prevalence of maxillary sinus pathology among populations considered for possible sinus augmentation procedures for dental implants. STUDY DESIGN: Eight hundred twenty-one cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were retrospectively evaluated for prevalence of maxillary sinus pathology. Scans were classified based on the type of sinus pathology detected. Categories of sinus findings were healthy, mucosal thickening larger than 3 mm, polypoidal mucosal thickening, partial opacification, complete opacification, and others. Age, sex, ethnicity, and dentition status were evaluated to determine associated relationships with the incidence of pathology. RESULTS: Sixty-two percent (62.79%) of scans presented with bilateral healthy sinuses and 37.21% of scans exhibited pathology. 73.38% of sinuses were classified as clinical healthy, 14.93% presented with mucosal thickening, 8.53% with polypoidal mucosal thickening, 2.13% with partial opacification, 0.66% with complete opacification, and 0.37% with a foreign body. Sex is found to be a significant factor with higher pathology incidence rates in male patients. Age is a significant factor with higher pathology incidence rates in older subjects. Dentition status and ethnicity did not have a significant association with pathology incidence rates. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of maxillary sinus pathologies and associations with age, sex, ethnicity, and dentition status were obtained. Thirty-seven percent of scans would require further medical consultation before proceeding with maxillary sinus augmentation surgery for dental implants.

Prevalence of maxillary sinus pathology in patients considered for sinus augmentation procedures for dental implants.

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of maxillary sinus pathology in patients presenting for implant rehabilitation involving sinus augmentation procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-dimensional images of 275 patients were evaluated. Age and gender were recorded to see if they had any relationship to the prevalence of pathology. Scans were classified into 1 of the 5 categories based on the type of sinus pathology detected: healthy, mucosal thickening > 5mm, polypoidal mucosal thickening, partial opacification and/or air fluid level, and complete opacification. RESULTS: Overall, 54.9% scans were classified as healthy, and 45.1% scans were classified as exhibiting sinus pathology. Men were more likely to exhibit pathology compared with females (P < 0.01). However, age did not seem to have any relation on the prevalence of sinus pathology. Of the patients who presented with evidence of sinus pathology, 56.5% had mucosal thickening (≥ 5 mm), 28.2% with polypoidal thickening, 8.9% partial opacification and/or air/fluid level, and 6.5% complete opacification. CONCLUSIONS: It is proposed that, based on the findings of this study, 45.1% patients would require further consultation before proceeding with maxillary sinus augmentation surgery.

Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists consensus report.

PURPOSE: The International Congress of Oral Implantologists has supported the development of this consensus report involving the use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) in implant dentistry with the intent of providing scientifically based guidance to clinicians regarding its use as an adjunct to traditional imaging modalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The literature regarding CBCT and implant dentistry was systematically reviewed. A PubMed search that included studies published between January 1, 2000, and July 31, 2011, was conducted. Oral presentations, in conjunction with these studies, were given by Dr. Erika Benavides, Dr. Scott Ganz, Dr. James Mah, Dr. Myung-Jin Kim, and Dr. David Hatcher at a meeting of the International Congress of Oral Implantologists in Seoul, Korea, on October 6-8, 2011. RESULTS: The studies published could be divided into four main groups: diagnostics, implant planning, surgical guidance, and postimplant evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: The literature supports the use of CBCT in dental implant treatment planning particularly in regards to linear measurements, three-dimensional evaluation of alveolar ridge topography, proximity to vital anatomical structures, and fabrication of surgical guides. Areas such as CBCT-derived bone density measurements, CBCT-aided surgical navigation, and postimplant CBCT artifacts need further research. ICOI RECOMMENDATIONS: All CBCT examinations, as all other radiographic examinations, must be justified on an individualized needs basis. The benefits to the patient for each CBCT scan must outweigh the potential risks. CBCT scans should not be taken without initially obtaining thorough medical and dental histories and performing a comprehensive clinical examination. CBCT should be considered as an imaging alternative in cases where the projected implant receptor or bone augmentation site(s) are suspect, and conventional radiography may not be able to assess the true regional three-dimensional anatomical presentation. The smallest possible field of view should be used, and the entire image volume should be interpreted.

Mandibular nerve neurosensory impairment after dental implant surgery: management and protocol.

More than 70% of dentists have experienced patients with postoperative paresthesia/dysesthesia or anesthesia as a result of dental procedures. The most common nerve affected is the mandibular nerve, which may be injured during either implant surgery or bone grafting procedures. However, no organized protocol directed specifically for general dentists, or for the vast majority of specialists, has been published. The protocol presented in this article is divided into 5 periods: during surgery (1) nerve injury is suspected or (2) known nerve transection, post-operative period (3) 1 week and (4) 12 weeks. The appropriate treatment (pharmacology, monitoring, etc.) for each period is suggested, including the referral to a nerve specialist when appropriate.

Prophylactic antibiotic regimens in oral implantology: rationale and protocol.

The use of antimicrobials reduces the incidence of surgical wound infection in oral implantology. Antimicrobial prophylaxis is indicated in all Class 2 (clean-contaminated) surgical procedures, which include sufficient blood levels at the time of bacterial contamination of dental implant and bone graft procedures. Timing and dosage are critical to the efficacy of antibiotics. Antibiotic selection is determined mainly by the bacteria which is most likely to cause an infection from the specific procedure. The authors have developed a classification and protocol that allows the dental practitioner to properly prescribe medication based on procedural, local host and systemic factors.

A prospective multicenter clinical investigation of a bone quality-based dental implant system.

This article reports the 5-year interim results of an independently monitored, prospective, multicenter clinical trial of a bone quality-based implant design. At six study centers, 495 implants were placed in 151 cases with an average follow-up period of 1.6 years (range: 1.0-3.6 years) after prosthesis delivery. The majority of the implants were placed in D2 or D3 bone to support fixed partial dentures or implant-supported overdentures. Using strict success criteria, there were three implant failures, resulting in a cumulative 99.5% success rate according to Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Radiographic analysis revealed a mean bone loss of 0.06 mm at 1 year and a bone gain of 0.04 mm at 2 years after prosthesis loading. There were no statistical differences in the results by center, implant type, bone density, area of the mouth, or prosthesis type. The results of this 5-year study revealed a high success rate and limited crestal bone loss in all bone densities by the use of an implant specifically designed for the varying biomechanical conditions and bone quality associated with the human maxilla and mandible.