European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) guidelines for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (endorsed by European society of intensive care medicine).

SCOPE: These ESCMID guidelines address the targeted antibiotic treatment of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (3GCephRE) and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, focusing on the effectiveness of individual antibiotics and on combination versus monotherapy. METHODS: An expert panel was convened by ESCMID. A systematic review was performed including randomized controlled trials and observational studies, examining different antibiotic treatment regimens for the targeted treatment of infections caused by the 3GCephRE, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Treatments were classified as head-to-head comparisons between individual antibiotics and between monotherapy and combination therapy regimens, including defined monotherapy and combination regimens only. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, preferably at 30 days and secondary outcomes included clinical failure, microbiological failure, development of resistance, relapse/recurrence, adverse events and length of hospital stay. The last search of all databases was conducted in December 2019, followed by a focused search for relevant studies up until ECCMID 2021. Data were summarized narratively. The certainty of the evidence for each comparison between antibiotics and between monotherapy and combination therapy regimens was classified by the GRADE recommendations. The strength of the recommendations for or against treatments was classified as strong or conditional (weak). RECOMMENDATIONS: The guideline panel reviewed the evidence per pathogen, preferably per site of infection, critically appraising the existing studies. Many of the comparisons were addressed in small observational studies at high risk of bias only. Notably, there was very little evidence on the effects of the new, recently approved, ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitors on infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Most recommendations are based on very-low- and low-certainty evidence. A high value was placed on antibiotic stewardship considerations in all recommendations, searching for carbapenem-sparing options for 3GCephRE and limiting the recommendations of the new antibiotics for severe infections, as defined by the sepsis-3 criteria. Research needs are addressed.

Temocillin versus meropenem for the targeted treatment of bacteraemia due to third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (ASTARTÉ): protocol for a randomised, pragmatic trial.

INTRODUCTION: Alternatives to carbapenems are needed in the treatment of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (3GCR-E). Temocillin is a suitable candidate, but comparative randomised studies are lacking. The objective is to investigate if temocillin is non-inferior to carbapenems in the targeted treatment of bacteraemia due to 3GCR-E. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, pragmatic phase 3 trial. Patients with bacteraemia due to 3GCR-E will be randomised to receive intravenously temocillin (2 g three times a day) or carbapenem (meropenem 1 g three times a day or ertapenem 1 g once daily). The primary endpoint will be clinical success 7-10 days after end of treatment with no recurrence or death at day 28. Adverse events will be collected; serum levels of temocillin will be investigated in a subset of patients. For a 10% non-inferiority margin, 334 patients will be included (167 in each study arm). For the primary analysis, the absolute difference with one-sided 95% CI in the proportion of patients reaching the primary endpoint will be compared in the modified intention-to-treat population. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study started after approval of the Spanish Regulatory Agency and the reference institutional review board. Data will be published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04478721.

Author Correction: A nonlinear time-series analysis approach to identify thresholds in associations between population antibiotic use and rates of resistance.

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

Quasiexperimental intervention study protocol to optimise the use of new antibiotics in Spain: the NEW_SAFE project.

INTRODUCTION: Ceftaroline, tedizolid, dalbavancin, ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam are novel antibiotics used to treat infections caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens (MDR). Their use should be supervised and monitored as part of an antimicrobial stewardship programme (ASP). Appropriate use of the new antibiotics will be improved by including consensual indications for their use in local antibiotic guidelines, together with educational interventions providing advice to prescribers to ensure that the recommendations are clearly understood. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will be implemented in two phases. First, a preliminary historical cohort (2017-2019) of patients from 13 Andalusian hospitals treated with novel antibiotics will be analysed. Second, a quasiexperimental intervention study will be developed with an interrupted time-series analysis (2020-2021). The intervention will consist of an educational interview between prescribers and ASP leaders at each hospital to reinforce the proper use of novel antibiotics. The educational intervention will be based on a consensus guideline designed and disseminated by leaders after the retrospective cohort data have been analysed. The outcomes will be acceptance of the intervention and appropriateness of prescription. Incidence of infection and colonisation with MDR organisms as well as incidence of Clostridioides difficile infection will also be analysed. Changes in prescription quality between periods and the safety profile of the antibiotics in terms of mortality rate and readmissions will also be measured. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval will be obtained from the Andalusian Coordinating Institutional Review Board. The study is being conducted in compliance with the protocol and regulatory requirements consistent with International Council of Harmonisation E6 Good Clinical Practice and the ethical principles of the latest version of the Declaration of Helsinki. The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03941951; Pre-results.

Catheter-related bloodstream infections: predictive factors for Gram-negative bacteria aetiology and 30 day mortality in a multicentre prospective cohort.

BACKGROUND: Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) increase morbidity and mortality, prolong hospitalization and generate considerable medical costs. Recent guidelines for CRBSI recommend empirical therapy against Gram-positive bacteria (GPB) and restrict coverage for Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) only to specific circumstances. OBJECTIVES: To investigate predictors of GNB aetiology in CRBSI and to assess the predictors of outcome in patients with CRBSI. METHODS: Patients with CRBSI were selected from the PROBAC cohort, a prospective, observational, multicentre national cohort study including patients with bloodstream infections consecutively admitted to 26 Spanish hospitals in a 6 month period (October 2016-March 2017). Outcome variables were GNB aetiology and 30 day mortality. Adjusted analyses were performed by logistic regression. RESULTS: Six hundred and thirty-one episodes of CRBSI were included in the study. Risk factors independently related to GNB aetiology were central venous catheter (CVC) [OR 1.60 (95% CI: 1.05-2.44), P = 0.028], sepsis/septic shock [OR: 1.76 (95% CI: 1.11-2.80), P = 0.016], antibiotic therapy in the previous 30 days [OR: 1.56 (95% CI: 1.02-2.36), P = 0.037], neutropenia <500/µL [OR: 2.01 (95% CI: 1.04-3.87), P = 0.037] and peripheral vascular disease [OR: 2.04 (95% CI: 1.13-3.68), P = 0.018]. GNB were not associated with increased mortality in adjusted analysis, while removal of catheter [OR: 0.24 (95% CI: 0.09-0.61), P = 0.002] and adequate empirical treatment [OR: 0.37 (95% CI: 0.18-0.77), P = 0.008] were strong protective factors. CONCLUSIONS: Our study reinforces the recommendation that empirical coverage should cover GNB in patients presenting with sepsis/septic shock and in neutropenic patients. Catheter removal and adequate empirical treatment were both protective factors against mortality in patients with CRBSI.

Opportunities for antibiotic optimisation and outcome improvement in patients with negative blood cultures: study protocol for a cluster-randomised crossover trial, the NO-BACT study.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with negative blood cultures (BCx) represent 85%-90% of all patients with BCx taken during hospital admission. This population usually includes a heterogeneous group of patients admitted with infectious diseases or febrile syndromes that require a blood culture. There is very little evidence of the clinical characteristics and antibiotic treatment given to these patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In a preliminary exploratory prospective cohort study of patients with BCx taken, the clinical/therapeutic characteristics and outcomes/antimicrobial stewardship opportunities of a population of patients with negative BCx will be analysed. In the second phase, using a cluster randomised crossover design, the implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship intervention targeting patients with negative BCx will be evaluated in terms of quality of antimicrobial use (duration and de-escalation), length of hospital stay and mortality. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been and registered with clinicaltrials.gov. The findings of our study may support the implementation in clinical practice of an antimicrobial stewardship intervention to optimise the use of antibiotics in patients with negative BCx. The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03535324.

Un paso adelante en la definición de indicadores PROA: Medir bien para trabajar mejor / A step forward in the definition of antimicrobial stewardship indicators: Better measurements, better work

No disponible

A nonlinear time-series analysis approach to identify thresholds in associations between population antibiotic use and rates of resistance.

Balancing access to antibiotics with the control of antibiotic resistance is a global public health priority. At present, antibiotic stewardship is informed by a 'use it and lose it' principle, in which antibiotic use by the population is linearly related to resistance rates. However, theoretical and mathematical models suggest that use-resistance relationships are nonlinear. One explanation for this is that resistance genes are commonly associated with 'fitness costs' that impair the replication or transmissibility of the pathogen. Therefore, resistant genes and pathogens may only gain a survival advantage where antibiotic selection pressures exceed critical thresholds. These thresholds may provide quantitative targets for stewardship-optimizing the control of resistance while avoiding over-restriction of antibiotics. Here, we evaluated the generalizability of a nonlinear time-series analysis approach for identifying thresholds using historical prescribing and microbiological data from five populations in Europe. We identified minimum thresholds in temporal relationships between the use of selected antibiotics and incidence rates of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (Hungary), extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli (Spain), cefepime-resistant E. coli (Spain), gentamicin-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (France) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (Northern Ireland) in different epidemiological phases. Using routinely generated data, our approach can identify context-specific quantitative targets for rationalizing population antibiotic use and controlling resistance. Prospective intervention studies that restrict antibiotic consumption are needed to validate these thresholds.

Extended Infusion of ß-Lactams for Bloodstream Infection in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis: An Observational Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: We analyzed the impact of continuous/extended infusion (C/EI) vs intermittent infusion of piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) and carbapenems on 30-day mortality of patients with liver cirrhosis and bloodstream infection (BSI). METHODS: The BICRHOME study was a prospective, multicenter study that enrolled 312 cirrhotic patients with BSI. In this secondary analysis, we selected patients receiving TZP or carbapenems as adequate empirical treatment. The 30-day mortality of patients receiving C/EI or intermittent infusion of TZP or carbapenems was assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox-regression model, and estimation of the average treatment effect (ATE) using propensity score matching. RESULTS: Overall, 119 patients received TZP or carbapenems as empirical treatment. Patients who received C/EI had a significantly lower mortality rate (16% vs 36%, P = .047). In a Cox-regression model, the administration of C/EI was associated with a significantly lower mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-0.936; P = .04) when adjusted for severity of illness and an ATE of 25.6% reduction in 30-day mortality risk (95% CI, 18.9-32.3; P < .0001) estimated with propensity score matching. A significant reduction in 30-day mortality was also observed in the subgroups of patients with sepsis (HR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06-0.74), acute-on-chronic liver failure (HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.03-0.99), and a model for end-stage liver disease score ≥25 (HR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.08-0.92). At competing risk analysis, C/EI of beta-lactams was associated with significantly higher rates of hospital discharge (subdistribution hazard [95% CI], 1.62 [1.06-2.47]). CONCLUSIONS: C/EI of beta-lactams in cirrhotic patients with BSI may improve outcomes and facilitate earlier discharge.

Predictive value of the kinetics of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein for early clinical stability in patients with bloodstream infections due to Gram-negative bacteria.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the magnitude of the change in procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels between day 1 and day 2 after the blood culture date is associated with early clinical stability (ECS) on day 3 in patients with bacteremia due to Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). MATERIALS/METHODS: A prospective cohort study carried out in a 950-bed tertiary hospital in Spain between March 2013 and May 2014. Patients with GNB bacteremia were included. Changes in PCT and CRP kinetics from day 1 to day 2 (∆%PCT, ∆%CRP) were expressed as percentage of decline in blood levels. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of ECS. Classification and regression tree analysis was performed to identify breakpoints. The discriminatory power of ∆%CRP and ∆%PCT as predictors of ECS was assessed by the area under the ROC (AUROC). RESULTS: 71 patients were included, and 53 (74.56%) reached ECS. Multivariate analyses showed that SOFA score on day 1, ∆%PCT, and ∆%CRP were associated with ECS after controlling for confounders. ∆%PCT ≥ 30% (decline) and ∆%CRP ≥ 10% (decline) predicted ECS only among patients with SOFA≤3 on day 1 (n = 54; 43 reached ECS). In these patients, the AUROCs for the prediction of ECS were 0.96 (95% CI: 0.90-1) for ∆%CRP and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.90-1) for ∆%PCT, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the subgroup of patients with a SOFA score on day 1 ≤3, a ≥30% decline in PCT or a ≥10% decline in CRP between day 1 and day 2 was a very good predictor of ECS (which in turn was associated with a lower 30-day mortality and a greater clinical cure on day 14). Patients who do not achieve this decrease may need more intensive workup. In this subgroup (with a SOFA on day 1 ≤3), CRP may be preferred due to its lower cost.

Management of bloodstream infections by infection specialists: an international ESCMID cross-sectional survey.

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are common, however international guidelines are available only for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia and candidaemia. This international ESCMID cross-sectional survey, open from December 2016 to February 2017, explored the management of BSIs by infection specialists. All infection specialists (senior or trainees) giving at least weekly advice on positive blood cultures could participate. Their practices were evaluated using six clinical vignettes presenting uncomplicated BSI cases. A total of 616 professionals from 56 countries participated [333/616 (54%) infectious diseases specialists, 188/616 (31%) clinical microbiologists], of whom 76% (468/616) were members of an antimicrobial stewardship team. Large variations in practice were noted, in particular for the Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa vignettes. Echocardiography was considered standard of care by 81% (373/459) of participants for MRSA, 78% (400/510) for methicillin-susceptible S. aureus and 60% (236/395) for Candida albicans. Antimicrobial combination therapy was recommended by 2% (8/360) of respondents for C. albicans, 11% (43/378) for E. coli, 27% (114/420) for MRSA and 39% (155/393) for E. faecalis. Intravenous-to-oral switch was considered in 68% (285/418) for MRSA, 79% (306/388) for E. faecalis, 72% (264/366) for P. aeruginosa and 75% (270/362) for C. albicans. In multivariable analysis, IDSA guideline-compliant practice was more frequent among participants belonging to an antimicrobial stewardship team (aOR = 1.7, P = 0.018 for the MRSA vignette; and aOR = 2.0, P = 0.008 for the candidaemia vignette). This survey showed large variations in practice among infection specialists. International guidelines on management of BSI are urgently needed.

Targeted simplification versus antipseudomonal broad-spectrum beta-lactams in patients with bloodstream infections due to Enterobacteriaceae (SIMPLIFY): a study protocol for a multicentre, open-label, phase III randomised, controlled, non-inferiority clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Within the context of antimicrobial stewardship programmes, de-escalation of antimicrobial therapy is one of the proposed strategies for reducing the unnecessary use of broad-spectrum antibiotics (BSA). The empirical treatment of nosocomial and some healthcare-associated bloodstream infections (BSI) frequently includes a beta-lactam with antipseudomonal activity as monotherapy or in combination with other drugs, so there is a great opportunity to optimise the empirical therapy based on microbiological data. De-escalation is assumed as standard of care for experts in infectious diseases. However, it is less frequent than it would desirable. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The SIMPLIFY trial is a multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority phase III randomised controlled clinical trial, designed as a pragmatic 'real-practice' trial. The aim of this trial is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of de-escalation from an empirical beta-lactam with antipseudomonal activity to a targeted narrow-spectrum antimicrobial in patients with BSI due to Enterobacteriaceae. The primary outcome is clinical cure, which will be assessed at the test of cure visit. It will be conducted at 19 Spanish public and university hospitals. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Each participating centre has obtained the approval of the ethics review committee, the agreement of the directors of the institutions and authorisation from the Spanish Regulatory Agency (Agencia Española del Medicamento y Productos Sanitarios). Data will be presented at international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. DISCUSSION: Strategies to reduce the use of BSA should be a priority. Most of the studies that support de-escalation are observational, retrospective and heterogeneous. A recent Cochrane review stated that well-designed clinical trials should be conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of de-escalation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The European Union Clinical Trials Register: EudraCT number 2015-004219-19. Clinical trials.gov: NCT02795949. Protocol version: V.2.0, dated 16 May 2016. All items from the WHO Trial Registration Data Set are included in the registry.

Diagnosis and antimicrobial treatment of invasive infections due to multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Guidelines of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology / / Diagnóstico y tratamiento de las infecciones invasivas causadas por Enterobacteriaceae multirresistentes. Guía de la Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica

The spread of multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae related to the production of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases and carbapenemases is a serious public health problem worldwide. Microbiological diagnosis and therapy of these infections are challenging and controversial. Clinically relevant questions were selected and the literature was reviewed for each of them. The information from the selected articles was extracted and recommendations were provided and graded according to the strength of the recommendations and quality of the evidence. The document was opened to comments from the members from the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, which were considered for inclusion in the final version. Evidence-based recommendations are provided for the use of microbiological techniques for the detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases and carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae, and for antibiotic therapy for invasive/severe infections caused by these organisms. The absence of randomised controlled trials is noteworthy; thus, recommendations are mainly based on observational studies (that have important methodological limitations), pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics models, and data from animal studies. Additionally, areas for future research were identified

La diseminación de Enterobacteriaceae multirresistentes en relación con la producción de beta-lactamasas de espectro extendido y carbapenemasas es un importante problema de salud pública en todo el mundo. Tanto el diagnóstico microbiológico como el tratamiento de estas infecciones son complicados y controvertidos. Los autores seleccionaron preguntas clínicamente relevantes, realizándose una revisión de la literatura para cada una de ellas; se obtuvo información de los artículos seleccionados y se realizaron recomendaciones que se clasificaron de acuerdo con la fuerza de la recomendación y la calidad de la evidencia. El documento estuvo abierto para los comentarios de los socios de la Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica, los cuales se consideraron para su inclusión en la versión final. Se proporcionan recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia para el uso de técnicas microbiológicas cara a la detección de beta-lactamasas de espectro extendido y carbapenemasas en Enterobacteriaceae, y para el tratamiento antimicrobiano de las infecciones graves o invasivas causadas por estos microorganismos. Es llamativa la ausencia de ensayos aleatorizados, por lo que las recomendaciones se basan principalmente en estudios observacionales que tienen importantes limitaciones metodológicas, modelos farmacocinéticos y farmacodinámicos, y datos de estudios en animales. Además, se identificaron áreas prioritarias para la investigación futura

Executive summary of the diagnosis and antimicrobial treatment of invasive infections due to multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Guidelines of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) / / Resumen ejecutivo del diagnóstico y tratamiento de infecciones invasivas causadas por Enterobacteriaceae multirresistentes. Guía de la Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (SEIMC)

The spread of multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae related to the production of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) and carbapenemases is a serious public health problem worldwide. Microbiological diagnosis and therapy of these infections are challenging and controversial. After the selection of clinically relevant questions, this document provides evidence-based recommendations for the use of microbiological techniques for the detection of ESBL- and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, and for antibiotic therapy for invasive infections caused by these organisms. The absence of randomized-controlled trials is noteworthy, thus recommendations are mainly based on observational studies, that have important methodological limitations, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics models, and data from animal studies. Additionally, areas for future research were identified

La diseminación de Enterobacteriaceae multirresistentes en relación con la producción de beta-lactamasas de espectro extendido (BLEE) y carbapenemasas es un importante problema de salud pública en todo el mundo. Tanto el diagnóstico microbiológico como el tratamiento de estas infecciones son complicados y controvertidos. Tras una selección de preguntas clínicamente relevantes, este documento proporciona recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia para el uso de técnicas microbiológicas para la detección de Enterobacteriaceae productoras de BLEE y carbapenemasas, y para el tratamiento antibiótico de las infecciones invasivas causadas por estos microorganismos. Es llamativa la ausencia de ensayos aleatorizados controlados, por lo que las recomendaciones se basan principalmente en estudios observacionales con importantes limitaciones metodológicas, modelos farmacocinéticos y farmacodinámicos y estudios en animales. Además, se han identificado áreas prioritarias de investigación futura

Executive summary of the diagnosis and antimicrobial treatment of invasive infections due to multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Guidelines of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC).

The spread of multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae related to the production of extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBL) and carbapenemases is a serious public health problem worldwide. Microbiological diagnosis and therapy of these infections are challenging and controversial. After the selection of clinically relevant questions, this document provides evidence-based recommendations for the use of microbiological techniques for the detection of ESBL- and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, and for antibiotic therapy for invasive infections caused by these organisms. The absence of randomized-controlled trials is noteworthy, thus recommendations are mainly based on observational studies, that have important methodological limitations, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics models, and data from animal studies. Additionally, areas for future research were identified.

Diagnosis and antimicrobial treatment of invasive infections due to multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Guidelines of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology.

The spread of multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae related to the production of extended-spectrum ß-lactamases and carbapenemases is a serious public health problem worldwide. Microbiological diagnosis and therapy of these infections are challenging and controversial. Clinically relevant questions were selected and the literature was reviewed for each of them. The information from the selected articles was extracted and recommendations were provided and graded according to the strength of the recommendations and quality of the evidence. The document was opened to comments from the members from the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, which were considered for inclusion in the final version. Evidence-based recommendations are provided for the use of microbiological techniques for the detection of extended-spectrum ß-lactamases and carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae, and for antibiotic therapy for invasive/severe infections caused by these organisms. The absence of randomised controlled trials is noteworthy; thus, recommendations are mainly based on observational studies (that have important methodological limitations), pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics models, and data from animal studies. Additionally, areas for future research were identified.

Predictors of early mortality in very elderly patients with bacteremia: a prospective multicenter cohort.

OBJECTIVES: The proportion of very elderly people in the population is increasing, and infectious diseases in this patient group may present with specific characteristics. The objective of this study was to investigate the outcome predictors of bacteremia among the very elderly. METHODS: This was a multicenter prospective cohort study of bloodstream infections (BSI) in patients ≥ 80 years old in 15 hospitals in Spain. The outcome variables were 14-day and 30-day mortality. Multivariate analysis was performed. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty episodes were included. Mortality was 22% (n = 26) on day 14 and 28% (n = 34) on day 30. In the univariate analysis, the variables associated with mortality were neutropenia, recent surgery, Pitt score ≥ 2, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, severe sepsis or shock, and abdominal, unknown, and respiratory tract sources. In the multivariate analysis, variables associated with mortality on day 14 were high-risk source (abdominal, unknown, and respiratory tract sources; odds ratio (OR) 7.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8-33.9), Pitt score ≥ 2 (OR 5.6, 95% CI 1.3-23.3), inadequate empirical treatment (OR 11.24, 95% CI 1.6-80.2), and severe sepsis or shock at presentation (OR 5.3, 95% CI 1.4-20.7); the interaction between empiric treatment and high-risk source was significant. On day 30, mortality was independently related to a high-risk source (OR 2.92, 95% CI 1.1-7.5) and presentation with severe sepsis or shock (OR 3.81, 95% CI 1.2-12.4). CONCLUSIONS: Presentation with severe sepsis or shock and a high-risk source of BSI were independent predictors of 14-day and 30-day mortality. Inadequate empirical treatment was also a predictor of early mortality in patients with a high-risk source.

Evaluating the quality of antimicrobial prescribing: is standardisation possible?

The quality of antimicrobial prescribing refers to the optimal way to use antibiotics in regard to their benefits, safety (e.g., resistance generation and toxicity) and cost. Evaluating the quality of antimicrobial prescribing in a way that focuses not only on reducing antimicrobial consumption but also on using them in a more optimal way allows us to understand patterns of use and to identify targets for intervention. The lack of standardisation is the primary problem to be addressed when planning an evaluation of antimicrobial prescribing. There is little information specifically describing an evaluation methodology. Information related to prescription evaluation can be obtained from the guidelines of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASPs) and from local and international experience. The criteria used to evaluate the quality of prescription should include the indication for antimicrobial therapy, the timeliness of initiation, the correct antibiotic choice (according to local guidelines), the dosing, the duration, the route of administration and the time at which to switch to oral administration. A locally developed guideline on antimicrobial therapy should preferably be the gold standard by which to evaluate the appropriatenes of prescriptions. Various approaches used to carry out the evaluations have been described in the literature. Repeated point-prevalence surveys (PPS) have been proven to be effective in identifying targets for quality improvement. Continuous prospective monitoring allows the identification of more precise intervention points at different times during prescription. The design of the study chosen to perform the evaluation should be adapted according to the resources available in each centre. Evaluating the quality of antimicrobial prescribing should be the first step to designing ASPs, as well as to evaluating their impact and the changes in prescribing trends over time.