What Program Directors Think About Resident Recruitment: Results of the 2023 Spring Survey of the Association of Program Directors in Radiology (APDR) Part I.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The Association of Program Directors in Radiology (APDR) administers an annual survey to assess issues and experiences related to residency program management and education. Our purpose is to provide the response data from the 2023 survey and discuss its insights on the impact of COVID-19 on resident recruitment (Part I) and education (Part II), which can be used to facilitate planning and resource allocation for the evolving needs of programs and their leadership. In Part I, we consider the effects of ERAS preference signaling, the virtual interview format, and the potential of a universal interview release date. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional study of the APDR membership was performed using a web-based survey consisting of 45 questions, 23 of which pertain to virtual recruitment and are discussed in Part I of a two-part survey analysis. All active APDR members (n = 393) were invited to participate in the survey. RESULTS: The response rate was 32% (124 of 393). 83% reported that signaling increased the likelihood of an interview offer. 96% reported only offering virtual interviews; however, 59% intended to offer virtual-only interviews in the future. 53% would adhere to a universal interview release date but an additional 44% would do so depending on the agreed date, Results were tallied using Qualtrics software and qualitative responses were tabulated or summarized as comments. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual recruitment is expected to continue for many programs and most respondents would accept a universal interview release date. Preference signaling and geographic signaling are considered positive additions to the application process.

What Program Directors Think About Resident Education: Results of the 2023 Spring Survey of the Association of Program Directors in Radiology (APDR) Part II.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The Association of Program Directors in Radiology (APDR) administers an annual survey to assess issues and experiences related to residency program management and education. Response data from the 2023 survey provides insights on the impact of COVID-19 on resident recruitment (Part I) and education (Part II), which can be used to facilitate planning and resource allocation for the evolving needs of programs and their leadership. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional study of the APDR membership was performed using a web-based survey consisting of 45 questions, 12 of which pertain to resident education in the post-pandemic era and are discussed in Part II of a two-part survey analysis. All active APDR members (n = 393) were invited to participate in the survey. RESULTS: The response rate was 32% (124 of 393). Results were tallied using Qualtrics software and qualitative responses were tabulated or summarized as comments. CONCLUSIONS: The primary challenges to resident education are faculty burnout, rising case volumes, and remote instruction. However, most program leaders report that in-person readouts are much more common than remote readouts. The ability to offer both in-person and remote AIRP sessions is viewed positively. Most program leaders require Authorized User certification, although many do not think all residents need it. Assessment of procedural competence varies by the type of procedure and is similar to graduates' self-assessment of competence.

Exploring measurement tools used to assess knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of pregnant women toward prenatal screening: A systematic review.

There is a lack of standardized measurement tools globally to assess knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of expecting women toward prenatal screening. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify reasons women pursue or decline prenatal screening and compare the strengths and limitations of available measurement tools used to assess pregnant women's perceptions, knowledge, and attitudes toward prenatal screening. This review followed the five-step York methodology by Arksey and O'Malley and incorporated recommendations from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis checklist for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results. The five steps consisted of: (1) identification of the research questions; (2) searching for relevant studies; (3) selection of studies relevant to the research questions; (4) data charting; and (5) collation, summarization, and reporting of results. Four online databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) were selected after the librarian's development of a detailed search strategy. The Rayyan platform was used between June 2023 and August 2023 to epitomize the articles produced from our search. A total of 68 eligible studies were included in the analysis. The top five major reasons for declining prenatal screening uptake included (1) being unsure of the risk of prenatal screening and harm to the baby or miscarriage (n = 15), (2) not considering action such as termination of pregnancy for prenatal screening to be considered as necessary (n = 14), (3) high cost (n = 12), (4) lack of knowledge about testing procedures and being anxious about the test (n = 10), and (5) being worried about probability of false negative or false positive results (n = 6). Only 32 studies utilized scientifically validated instruments. Difficulties in capturing representative, adequately sized samples inclusive of diverse ethnicities and demographics were pervasive. Findings highlight the need for rigorous validation of research measurement methodologies to ensure the accuracy and applicability of resulting data regarding the assessment of prenatal screening perceptions, knowledge, and attitudes across diverse female populations.Registration: N/A.

Measurement tools used to assess knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of pregnant women toward prenatal screeningThe following systematic review provides a comprehensive summary and quality evaluation of measurement tools used globally to assess the role of knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of pregnant women in seeking prenatal tests.

Medical Malpractice and Diagnostic Radiology: Challenges and Opportunities.

Medicolegal challenges in radiology are broad and impact both radiologists and patients. Radiologists may be affected directly by malpractice litigation or indirectly due to defensive imaging ordering practices. Patients also could be harmed physically, emotionally, or financially by unnecessary tests or procedures. As technology advances, the incorporation of artificial intelligence into medicine will bring with it new medicolegal challenges and opportunities. This article reviews the current and emerging direct and indirect effects of medical malpractice on radiologists and summarizes evidence-based solutions.

Inhalational Heroin Use and Leukoencephalopathy: A Case Report.

Heroin-induced leukoencephalopathy (HLE) is a rare condition with acute and chronic outcomes ranging from mild neurological symptoms to severe neurological deficits and death. HLE is caused by cerebral white matter damage secondary to exposure to toxic agents such as chemotherapeutic drugs, environmental toxins, and drugs of abuse. Here, we present the case of a 20-year-old woman with a past medical history significant for bipolar disorder and opioid use who presented to the emergency department with ataxia, involuntary movements, and altered mental status secondary to inhalational heroin use. The patient presented with symptoms including agitation, tremors, speech difficulty, confusion, memory loss, and weakness. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed diffuse cerebral atrophy and electroencephalography (EEG) was significant for cerebral dysfunction in the left hemisphere and diffuse encephalopathy. The patient was treated with intravenous (IV) steroids, vitamins, and fluids but failed to show improvement. She was subsequently discharged to hospice 17 days after admission. There are few reported cases of toxic leukoencephalopathy due to heroin inhalation. The patient's young age and presentation following one month of abstinence are particularly unique as she suffered an acute decompensation with severe, lasting neurological deficits. This case highlights a potential presentation of HLE and seeks to increase clinical recognition in patients with a recent history of substance use and unexplained neurological symptoms.

Hands-On Ultrasound Training for Radiology Residents: The Impact of an Ultrasound Scanning Curriculum.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Radiologists are responsible for interpreting ultrasound (US) images accurately, troubleshooting, aiding sonographers, and advancing technology and research. Despite this, most radiology residents do not feel confident performing US independently. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of an abdominal US scanning rotation and digital curriculum on radiology residents' confidence and skills in performing US. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All residents who were rotating in pediatric US at our institution for the first time were included (PGY 3-5). Those who agreed to participate were recruited sequentially from July 2018 to 2021 into (A) control and (B) intervention. B had a 1-week US scanning rotation and US digital course. Both groups completed a pre-and post-confidence self-assessment. Pre-and post-skills were objectively assessed by an expert technologist while participants scanned a volunteer. At completion, B completed an evaluation of the tutorial. Descriptive statistics summarized the demographics and closed questions. Pre-and post-test results were compared using paired-T tests, and effect size (ES) with Cohen's d. Open-ended questions were thematically analyzed. RESULTS: PGY-3 and 4 residents participated, and were enrolled in A (N = 39) and B (N = 30). Scanning confidence significantly improved in both groups, with a greater ES in B (p < 0.01). Scanning skills significantly improved in B (p < 0.01) but not A. Eighty per cent of questionnaire responders used the integrative US tutorial and found it helpful. Free text responses were grouped into themes: 1) Technical issues, 2) Didn't complete course, 3) Didn't understand project, 4) Course was detailed and thorough. CONCLUSIONS: Our scanning curriculum improved residents' confidence and skills in pediatric US and may encourage consistency in training, thus promoting stewardship of high-quality US.

Pitfalls in the interpretation of pediatric head CTs: what the emergency radiologist needs to know.

Pediatric radiology studies can be some of the most anxiety-inducing imaging examinations encountered in practice. This can be in part due to the wide range of normal anatomic appearances inherent to the pediatric population that create potential interpretive pitfalls for radiologists. The pediatric head is no exception; for instance, the inherent greater water content within the neonatal brain compared to older patients could easily be mistaken for cerebral edema, and anatomic variant calvarial sutures can be mistaken for skull fractures. This article reviews potential pitfalls emergency radiologists may encounter in practice when interpreting pediatric head CTs, including trauma, extra-axial fluid collections, intra-axial hemorrhage, and ventriculoperitoneal shunt complications.

Validation of Sonographic Fronto-Occipital Ratio Based on Anatomical Landmarks Compared to MR/CT-Derived Indexes in Children with Chiari II and Ventriculomegaly.

INTRODUCTION: Ultrasound (US)-based indexes such as fronto-occipital ratio (FOR) can be used to obtain an acceptable estimation of ventricular volume. Patients with colpocephaly present a unique challenge due to the shape of their ventricles. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the validity and reproducibility of the modified US-FOR index in children with Chiari II-related ventriculomegaly. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we evaluated Chiari II patients younger than 1 year who underwent head US and MR or CT scans for ventriculomegaly evaluation. MR/CT-based FOR was measured in the axial plane by identifying the widest diameter of frontal horns, occipital horns, and the interparietal diameter (IPD). US-based FOR (US-FOR) was measured using the largest diameter based on the following landmarks: frontal horn and IPD in the coronal plane at the level of the foramen of Monro, IPD just superior to the Sylvian fissures, and occipital horn posterior to the thalami and inferior to the superior margins of the thalami. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to evaluate inter-rater reliability, and Pearson correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots were applied to assess agreement between US and other two modalities. RESULTS: Sixty-three paired US and MR/CT exams were assessed for agreement between US-FOR and MR/CT-FOR measurements. ICC showed an excellent inter-rater reliability for US-FOR (ICC = 0.99, p < 0.001) and MR/CT-FOR (ICC = 0.99, p < 0.001) measurements. The mean (range) values based on US-FOR showed a slight overestimation in comparison with MR/CT-FOR (0.51 [0.36-0.68] vs. 0.46 [0.34-0.64]). The Pearson correlation coefficient showed high cross-modality agreement for the FOR index (r = 0.83, p < 0.001). The Bland-Altman plot showed excellent concordance between US-FOR and MR/CT-FOR with a bias of 0.05 (95% CI: -0.03 to 0.13). CONCLUSION: US-FOR in the coronal plane is a comparable tool for evaluating ventriculomegaly in Chiari II patients when compared with MR/CT-FOR, even in the context of colpocephaly.

Educational Case: Osteoid Osteoma.

The following fictional case is intended as a learning tool within the Pathology Competencies for Medical Education (PCME), a set of national standards for teaching pathology. These are divided into three basic competencies: Disease Mechanisms and Processes, Organ System Pathology, and Diagnostic Medicine and Therapeutic Pathology. For additional information, and a full list of learning objectives for all three competencies, see http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2374289517715040.1.

Clinical Manifestations and Medical Imaging of Osteogenesis Imperfecta: Fetal Through Adulthood.

The aim of this paper is to describe the varying clinical and imaging manifestations of Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI) in the fetus, the child, and the adult. OI is a genetic disorder with mutation of Type 1 and non-type 1 collagen genes that results in disruption of multiple collagen based organ systems, most notably bones, often leading to "brittle bones". Additional features such as blue sclera, dentinogenesis imperfecta, joint and ligamentous hyperlaxity, hearing loss and cardiac defects may be present. Currently, there are at least 30 recognized genetic forms of OI. Given the multiple genes involved, variable genetic inheritance, and the wide range in phenotype, diagnosis can be challenging. While OI may sometimes be diagnosed in the fetus, patients with mild forms of OI may be diagnosed in childhood or even in adulthood. Imaging, including ultrasound, radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, plays an important role in the diagnoses of OI in the fetus, the child, and the adult. Imaging is also crucial in identifying the many multisystem manifestations of OI. In particular, imaging can help differentiate manifestations of OI from injuries sustained in non-accidental trauma. Age, severity and manner of presentation of OI vary broadly depending on the specific genetic mutation involved, mode of inheritance, and age of the patient. Successful diagnosis of OI hinges on a detailed knowledge of the variable presentation and complications that may be encountered with this disease. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, OI comprises a heterogeneous group of genetic disorders responsible for bone fragility and additional connective tissue disorders, which can result in specific clinical and imaging findings in the fetus, the child, and the adult.

Educational Case: Ewing Sarcoma of Bone.

The following fictional case is intended as a learning tool within the Pathology Competencies for Medical Education (PCME), a set of national standards for teaching pathology. These are divided into three basic competencies: Disease Mechanisms and Processes, Organ System Pathology, and Diagnostic Medicine and Therapeutic Pathology. For additional information, and a full list of learning objectives for all three competencies, seehttp://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2374289517715040. 1.

Transitioning from Radiology Training to Academic Faculty: Defining Your Role and Interests.

Transitioning from radiology training to academic faculty presents many challenges. In this review, we discuss strategies to navigate this process and to facilitate success through appropriate selection of career tracks. Various modern avenues include roles as a Clinician-Educator, Clinician-Investigator, and Clinician-Administrator. Selection of the appropriate career track based on personal interests and institutional culture is critical for early and long-term career satisfaction.

Transitioning From Radiology Training to Academic Faculty: The Importance of Mentorship.

Transitioning from radiology residency to academic faculty presents many challenges. In this review, we discuss the importance of introspection and mentorship to successfully navigate this process. Key points include alignment of goals with those of the institution, formation of a mentorship program, and periodic reassessment of career goals. These tips and tools can help make the transition from residency to academic faculty more seamless.

JOURNAL CLUB: Redefining the Radiology Curriculum in Medical School: Vertical Integration and Global Accessibility.

OBJECTIVE: Radiology interconnects medical disciplines given that a working understanding of imaging is essential to clinicians of every specialty. Using online education, we created a globally accessible, web-based undergraduate medical radiology curriculum modeled after the National Medical Student Curriculum in Radiology program of the Alliance of Medical Student Educators in Radiology. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Seventy-four radiology faculty-mentored video modules were produced, 50 of which were integrated into the 1st-year anatomy course. We administered tests to medical students before and after students saw the videos to assess the effectiveness of the modules. We surveyed students on their interests in pursuing radiology as a career before and after participating in this curriculum. RESULTS: On the preexamination questions, the mean score was 58.0%, which increased to 83.6% on the pair-matched imaging-related questions on the actual examination. Before participating in the new curriculum, 88% of students did not express an interest in radiology, and 9% were undecided about radiology as a future career. There was an increase in students who reported that they would definitely or most likely pursue a career in radiology (7%) after they had viewed the lectures. CONCLUSION: Radiology education is now available to a greater number of multidisciplinary learners worldwide. This project produced a comprehensive, globally accessible radiology curriculum in a self-paced, flexible learning format for new generations of physicians.

Structured Reporting in Radiology.

Radiology reports are vital for patient care as referring physicians depend upon them for deciding appropriate patient management. Traditional narrative reports are associated with excessive variability in the language, length, and style, which can minimize report clarity and make it difficult for referring clinicians to identify key information needed for patient care. Structured reporting has been advocated as a potential solution for improving the quality of radiology reports. The Association of University Radiologists-Radiology Research Alliance Structured Reporting Task Force convened to explore the current and future role of structured reporting in radiology and summarized its finding in this article. We review the advantages and disadvantages of structured radiology reports and discuss the current prevailing sentiments among radiologists regarding structured reports. We also discuss the obstacles to the use of structured reports and highlight ways to overcome some of those challenges. We also discuss the future directions in radiology reporting in the era of personalized medicine.