RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Vascular access site management is crucial to safe, efficient and comfortable diagnostic or interventional transfemoral percutaneous coronary procedures. Two new femoral access site closure devices, Perclose and Angio-Seal , have been proposed as alternative methods to manual compression (MC). We compared these two devices and tested them in reference to standard MC for safety, effectiveness and patient preference. METHODS: Prospective demographic, peri-procedural, and late follow-up data for 1,500 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures were collected from patients receiving femoral artery closure by MC (n = 469), Perclose (n = 492), or Angio-Seal (n = 539). Peri-procedural, post-procedural, and post-hospitalization endpoints were: 1) safety of closure method; 2) efficacy of closure method; and 3) patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Patients treated with Angio-Seal experienced shorter times to hemostasis (p < 0.0001, diagnostic and interventional) and ambulation (diagnostic, p = 0.05; interventional, p < 0.0001) than those treated with Perclose. Those treated with Perclose experienced greater access site complications (Perclose vs. Angio-Seal, p = 0.008; Perclose vs. MC, p = 0.06). Patients treated with Angio-Seal reported greater overall satisfaction, better wound healing and lower discomfort (each vs. Perclose or vs. MC, all p < or = 0.0001). For diagnostic cath only, median post-procedural length of stay was reduced by Angio-Seal (Angio-Seal vs. MC, p < 0.0001; Angio-Seal vs. Perclose, p = 0.009). No difference was seen in length of stay for interventional cases. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, Angio-Seal performed better than Perclose or MC in reducing time to ambulation and length of stay among patients undergoing diagnostic procedures. There was a higher rate of successful deployment and shorter time to hemostasis for Angio-Seal, and this was accomplished with no increase in bleeding complications throughout the follow-up. Additionally, Angio-Seal performed better than Perclose in exhibiting a superior 30-day patient satisfaction and patient assessment of wound healing with less discomfort.
Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão , Artéria Femoral/cirurgia , Doenças Vasculares Periféricas/psicologia , Doenças Vasculares Periféricas/terapia , Abciximab , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Doença das Coronárias/complicações , Doença das Coronárias/terapia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hemostasia/fisiologia , Técnicas Hemostáticas/instrumentação , Humanos , Fragmentos Fab das Imunoglobulinas/uso terapêutico , Incidência , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Satisfação do Paciente , Doenças Vasculares Periféricas/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/psicologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Punções/instrumentação , Punções/psicologia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
A 4-month-old girl with Kawasaki disease, large coronary artery aneurysms, and coronary thrombi was treated with standard therapy followed by abciximab, a platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist, in addition to standard heparin and warfarin sodium anticoagulation and low-dose aspirin. She did not develop evidence of ischemia, had no complications from the therapy, and showed resolution of the aneurysms and thrombi after 6 wk of therapy.
Assuntos
Aneurisma Coronário/tratamento farmacológico , Trombose Coronária/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome de Linfonodos Mucocutâneos/complicações , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Complexo Glicoproteico GPIIb-IIIa de Plaquetas/antagonistas & inibidores , Abciximab , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Aneurisma Coronário/complicações , Aneurisma Coronário/diagnóstico , Angiografia Coronária , Trombose Coronária/complicações , Trombose Coronária/diagnóstico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Ecocardiografia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Fragmentos Fab das Imunoglobulinas/uso terapêutico , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapêutico , Lactente , Síndrome de Linfonodos Mucocutâneos/sangue , Síndrome de Linfonodos Mucocutâneos/diagnóstico , Contagem de PlaquetasRESUMO
UNLABELLED: Fluorine-18-fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) is trapped in hypoxic but viable canine myocardium. Because of the potential for its use as a marker of myocardial viability, we compared FMISO activity to [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) activity in the same myocardial samples from eight dogs subjected to 3 hr of moderate regional myocardial ischemia. METHODS: Tritiated FMISO was injected 15-30 min after onset of regional ischemia (40%-70% reduction in systolic wall thickening) which was maintained for 3 hr. FDG was injected after 2 hr of ischemia. Myocardial blood flow (MBF) was measured by the radiolabeled microsphere technique at the time of each radiotracer injection. At 3 hr of ischemia, the heart was excised and cut into short-axis slices. One slice encompassing both ischemic and normal tissue was cut into 64 samples. FMISO and FDG activity in each sample were normalized to the mean normal zone activity and further expressed as a function of regional MBF. RESULTS: FMISO uptake was consistently greater than FDG uptake, although this was significantly different only for MBF, between 40%-60% of normal. When analyzed relative to endocardial-epicardial location, endocardial FMISO uptake was significantly greater in all hypoperfused samples. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that FMISO is as sensitive as FDG for detecting myocardial ischemia and could be used for identification of viable myocardium.
Assuntos
Desoxiglucose/análogos & derivados , Radioisótopos de Flúor , Misonidazol/análogos & derivados , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico por imagem , Animais , Circulação Coronária , Desoxiglucose/farmacocinética , Cães , Radioisótopos de Flúor/farmacocinética , Fluordesoxiglucose F18 , Coração/diagnóstico por imagem , Misonidazol/farmacocinética , Isquemia Miocárdica/metabolismo , Isquemia Miocárdica/fisiopatologia , Cintilografia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Trítio/farmacocinéticaRESUMO
The binding of spiroperidol and bromospiroperidol, in vivo, was studied over a wide range of drug dosages. It was found that while spiroperidol and bromospiroperidol bind selectively in vivo to tissues known to be high in dopamine receptor binding sites, this specificity of binding does not persist at very low doses. Such anomalous binding behavior can have implications for the non-invasive imaging of these drugs.