High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and lack of association with subclinical atherosclerosis in asymptomatic patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus from a Mediterranean area.

AIMS: Several studies linked vitamin D deficiency with coronary artery disease (CAD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) and the presence of early atherosclerosis in asymptomatic Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) patients with no previous history of ischemic heart disease. METHODS: One hundred and forty-five patients with T1D (age 37.8 ± 8 years, 57 % male, all Caucasian, disease duration 20.6 ± 8.3 years, HbA1c 7.6 ± 1.4 % (60.2 ± 11.1 mmol/mol), body mass index (BMI) 25.2 ± 3.5 kg/m2, 52.4 % smokers, 23 % retinopathy, 10 % nephropathy) and 48 controls matched for age, sex, BMI and smoking habit were studied. 25OHD deficiency was defined for values ≤20 ng/mL. A sun exposure questionnaire, carotid ultrasonography to determine carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and the presence of atheroma plaques and cardiac computed tomography for evaluation of calcium artery calcification (CACS) were performed. RESULTS: T1D subjects showed a high proportion of 25OHD deficiency (43.2 % vs. 21.7 %, p = 0.032). Of all, 82 % of T1D patients and 92 % of controls had a calcium score of 0. CIMT was greater in patients with T1D (0.55 ± 0.14 mm vs 0.48 ± 0.15, p = 0.01) compared with controls. T1D subjects showed no differences in the results of CACS or CIMT according to the vitamin D concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: T1D patients have lower concentrations and twice more prevalence of 25OHD deficiency than controls. There was no association between 25OHD concentrations and subclinical CAD.

Plasma ghrelin concentrations in type 1 diabetic patients with autoimmune atrophic gastritis.

OBJECTIVE: Type 1 diabetes mellitus patients (DM1) show increased prevalence of pernicious anaemia, the histological substrate of which is type A chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) in the stomach corpus, the main source of ghrelin. We aimed to compare plasma ghrelin concentrations in DM1 patients with type A CAG (DM1-CAG), DM1 patients without type A CAG and healthy controls and in DM1-CAG group, to ascertain a possible relationship between ghrelin and biochemical markers of gastric mucosa atrophy and/or neuroendocrine (NE) cell hyperplasia and histological gastric biopsy findings. DESIGN AND METHODS: Fifteen DM1-CAG patients were matched for age, sex and body mass index with 15 DM1 patients without type A CAG and 15 controls. Pepsinogen I, pepsinogen II, gastrin, parietal cell antibodies, chromogranin A (CgA) and ghrelin were determined in all subjects. In DM1-CAG patients, immunohistochemical analysis of gastric biopsies using antibodies to CgA and ghrelin was performed. RESULTS: Ghrelin concentrations differed among groups; however, paired comparisons between groups were not significant. In DM1-CAG, no correlation was found between ghrelin and gastric body atrophy markers, pepsinogen I and the pepsinogen I/II ratio. Immunohistochemical studies of DMI-CAG patients showed CgA staining in 12 and ghrelin staining in 6, which was confined to the foci of NE cell hyperplasia. Those patients who stained positive for ghrelin had higher ghrelin concentrations when compared with the negative patients. CONCLUSIONS: Ghrelin concentrations are not decreased in DM1-CAG patients; thus, our data suggest that ghrelin is not a good marker of gastric mucosa atrophy in these patients, given the possible ghrelin synthesis in hyperplastic gastric endocrine/enterochromaffin-like cells.