Comparative assessment of radiation therapy-induced vasculitis using [18F]FDG-PET/CT in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with proton versus photon radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To assess radiation therapy (RT)-induced vasculitis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by examining changes in the uptake of 18F-fluoro-D-deoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) by positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) images of the ascending aorta (AA), descending aorta (DA), and aortic arch (AoA) before and after proton and photon RT. METHOD: Thirty-five consecutive locally advanced NSCLC patients were definitively treated with proton (n = 27) or photon (n = 8) RT and concurrent chemotherapy. The patients were prospectively enrolled to undergo [18F]FDG-PET/CT imaging before and 3 months after RT. An adaptive contrast-oriented thresholding algorithm was applied to generate mean standardized uptake values (SUVmean) for regions of interest (ROIs) 3 mm outside and 3 mm inside the outer perimeter of the AA, DA, and AoA. These ROIs were employed to exclusively select the aortic wall and remove the influence of blood pool activity. SUVmeans before and after RT were compared using two-tailed paired t-tests. RESULTS: RT treatments were associated with increased SUVmeans in the AA, DA, and AoA-1.9%, 0.3%, and 1.3% for proton and 15.8%, 9.5%, and 15.5% for photon, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the ∆SUVmean (post-RT SUVmean - pre-RT SUVmean) in patients treated with photon RT when compared to ∆SUVmean in patients treated with proton RT in the AA (p = 0.043) and AoA (p = 0.015). There was an average increase in SUVmean that was related to dose for photon patients (across structures), but that was not seen for proton patients, although the increase was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that patients treated with photon RT for NSCLC may exhibit significantly more RT-induced inflammation (measured as ∆SUVmean) in the AA and AoA when compared to patients who received proton RT. Knowledge gained from further analyses in larger cohorts could aid in treatment planning and help prevent the significant morbidity and mortality associated with RT-induced vascular complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02135679.

Growth rates of pulmonary metastases after liver transplantation for unresectable colorectal liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: The previously reported SECA study demonstrated a dramatic 5-year survival improvement in patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM) treated with liver transplantation (LT) compared with chemotherapy. The objective of this study was to assess whether immunosuppressive therapy accelerates the growth of pulmonary metastases in patients transplanted for unresectable CLM. METHODS: Chest CT scans from 11 patients in the SECA study resected for 18 pulmonary metastases were reviewed retrospectively. Tumour diameter, volume and CT characteristics were registered and tumour volume doubling time was calculated. Findings in the SECA group were compared with those of a control group consisting of 12 patients with non-transplanted rectal cancer resected for 26 pulmonary metastases. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after first pulmonary resection were determined. RESULTS: Median doubling time based on tumour diameter and volume in the SECA and control groups were 125 and 130 days (P = 0·658) and 110 and 129 days (P = 0·632) respectively. The metastases in both groups were distributed to all lung lobes and were mostly peripheral. Median DFS after LT in the SECA group and after primary pelvic surgery in the control group was 17 (range 6-42) and 18 (2-57) months respectively (P = 0·532). In the SECA group, estimated 5-year DFS and OS rates after first pulmonary resection were 39 and 51 per cent respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients treated by LT for unresectable CLM have a good prognosis following resection of pulmonary metastases. Doubling time did not appear to be worse with the immunosuppression used after LT.

Combined positron emission tomography/computed tomography in sunitinib therapy assessment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

AIM: To assess the clinical benefit of combined functional imaging with [(18)F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with mRCC were prospectively enrolled in this study. All patients underwent PET/CT before receiving at least two cycles of sunitinib treatment. Three months after the onset of sunitinib treatment, a second PET/CT was carried out. The metabolic response evaluated from the PET (standard uptake value; SUV) was compared with the CT component of the PET/CT. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours criteria were used to assess the CT response and modified European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria were used to assess the PET response. RESULTS: Three main results were obtained: (1) Patients with relatively low 18F-FDG uptake before treatment (SUV<5) had a longer progression-free survival than those with a relatively high 18F-FDG uptake (P=0.006). (2) Patients with a partial metabolic response or stable metabolic disease after two courses of sunitinib had improved prognosis as compared with those with progressive metabolic disease (P=0.031). (3) There was a clear discrepancy between PET and CT as a tool for the evaluation of treatment response after two courses of sunitinib. PET indicated progressive disease in three patients, a partial response in six patients and stable disease in four patients. In contrast, CT concluded with progression in only one patient and stable disease in all other patients. CONCLUSION: In patients with mRCC, a high baseline 18F-FDG uptake indicates aggressive disease, and the degree of reduction in 18F-FDG uptake after sunitinib treatment adds valuable prognostic information. Hence, the inclusion of PET results seems to improve the clinical counselling of patients with mRCC. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.