The Landmark Series-Addressing Disparities in Breast Cancer Screening: New Recommendations for Black Women.

Randomized, clinical trials have established the efficacy of screening mammography in improving survival from breast cancer for women through detection of early, asymptomatic disease. However, disparities in survival rates between black women and women from other racial and ethnic groups following breast cancer diagnosis persist. Various professional groups have different, somewhat conflicting, guidelines with regards to recommended age for commencing screening as well as recommended frequency of screening exams, but the trials upon which these recommendations are based were not specifically designed to examine benefit among black women. Furthermore, these recommendations do not appear to incorporate the unique epidemiological circumstances of breast cancer among black women, including higher rates of diagnosis before age 40 years and greater likelihood of advanced stage at diagnosis, into their formulation. In this review, we examined the epidemiologic and socioeconomic factors that are associated with breast cancer among black women and assess the implications of these factors for screening in this population. Specifically, we recommend that by no later than age 25 years, all black women should undergo baseline assessment for future risk of breast cancer utilizing a model that incorporates race (e.g., Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool [BCRAT], formerly the Gail model) and that this assessment should be conducted by a breast specialist or a healthcare provider (e.g., primary care physician or gynecologist) who is trained to assess breast cancer risk and is aware of the increased risks of early (i.e., premenopausal) and biologically aggressive (e.g., late-stage, triple-negative) breast cancer among black women.

Racial Disparities in Time to Treatment Persist in the Setting of a Comprehensive Breast Center.

BACKGROUND: Racial disparities in breast cancer care have been linked to treatment delays. We explored whether receiving care at a comprehensive breast center could mitigate disparities in time to treatment. METHODS: Retrospective chart review identified breast cancer patients who underwent surgery from 2012 to 2018 at a comprehensive breast center. Time-to-treatment intervals were compared among self-identified racial and ethnic groups by negative binomial regression models. RESULTS: Overall, 2094 women met the inclusion criteria: 1242 (59%) White, 262 (13%) Black, 302 (14%) Hispanic, 105 (5%) Asian, and 183 (9%) other race or ethnicity. Black and Hispanic patients more often had Medicaid insurance, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores, advanced-stage breast cancer, mastectomy, and additional imaging after breast center presentation (p < 0.05). After controlling for other variables, racial or ethnic minority groups had consistently longer intervals to treatment, with Black women experiencing the greatest disparity (incidence rate ratio 1.42). Time from initial comprehensive breast center visit to treatment was also significantly shorter in White patients versus non-White patients (p < 0.0001). Black race, Medicaid insurance/being uninsured, older age, earlier stage, higher ASA score, undergoing mastectomy, having reconstruction, and requiring additional pretreatment work-up were associated with a longer time from initial visit at the comprehensive breast center to treatment on multivariable analysis (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Racial or ethnic minority groups have significant delays in treatment even when receiving care at a comprehensive breast center. Influential factors include insurance delays and necessity of additional pretreatment work-up. Specific policies are needed to address system barriers in treatment access.

Changing practice patterns of adjuvant radiation among elderly women with early stage breast cancer in the United States from 2004 to 2014.

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have challenged the need for routine radiation therapy (RT) in women ≥ age 70 with favorable early stage breast cancer (BC) due to modest improvement in local control and no survival benefit. We studied practice patterns in RT among elderly women in the United States. We analyzed data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) of women ≥age 70 diagnosed with T1 or T2 and N0 invasive BC treated with breast conservation surgery (BCS) between 2004 and 2014. Patients were divided into four groups: (1) no RT, (2) partial breast irradiation (PBI); (3) hypofractionation (HF); and (4) conventional whole breast RT (CWBI). Univariable and multivariable analyses (MVA) were performed to compare characteristics among the four RT groups. A subgroup analysis of women with favorable disease (T1N0 ER + HER2-) was also performed with similar statistical comparisons. Of the 66,126 meeting eligibility, 9,570 (14.5%) had PBI, 16,340 (24.7%) had HF, and 40,117 (60.7%) had CWBI. Only 99 patients (0.15%) had RT omitted. Omission of RT increased marginally from 0.04% in 2004 to 0.24% in 2014. MVA identified older age (OR 1.18, CI 1.08-1.28), more comorbidities (Charlson-Deyo Score of 1) (OR 3.36, CI 1.29-8.72), and no hormone therapy (OR 22.07, CI 5.79-84.07) as more likely to have RT omitted. The use of HF increased from 3.9% to 47.0%, P < .001 with a concomitant decrease in CWBI from 88% to 41%, P < .001. MVA identified older age, treatment location, and omission of chemotherapy as associated with HF. No significant differences from the larger cohort were found among the T1N0 subgroup analysis. Despite RCT evidence, omission of RT was rare in the United States, suggesting that more effective outreach methods to disseminate clinical guideline information may be needed.

Practice Changing Potential of TAILORx: A Retrospective Review of the National Cancer Data Base from 2010 to 2015.

BACKGROUND: Uncertainty regarding chemotherapy benefit among breast cancer patients with intermediate Oncotype Dx® recurrence scores (RS; 11-25) led to the TAILORx study. We evaluated chemotherapy use in patients with intermediate RS to determine practice change potential based on the TAILORx results. METHODS: National Cancer Data Base patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, N0 breast cancer were identified and were divided into three groups: Group A, ≤ 50 years of age (RS 11-15); Group B, ≤ 50 years of age (RS 16-25); and Group C, > 50 years of age (RS 11-25). Demographic and clinical factors were compared using Chi square tests and Poisson regression models to determine predictors of chemotherapy receipt. RESULTS: Overall, 37,087 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 6.3% in Group A and 11.7% in Group C having received chemotherapy that may have been avoided based on TAILORx. The majority of Group B (64.7%) did not receive chemotherapy, whereas TAILORx showed potential benefit from treatment. Chemotherapy use decreased over time for all intermediate RS patients. T2 tumors, high grade, and treatment before 2012 increased the likelihood of chemotherapy receipt among both groups. Younger patients with the lower intermediate RS (Group A) were more likely to receive chemotherapy if they had treatment at community or comprehensive centers, whereas moderate grade was also a significant factor to receive chemotherapy in Group B. Significant factors in older patients (Group C) were Black race, estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-negative, and moderate/high grade. CONCLUSIONS: The most potential impact of TAILORx findings on practice change is for patients ≤ 50 years of age with RS of 16-25 who did not receive chemotherapy but may benefit. These findings may serve as a baseline for future analysis of practice patterns related to TAILORx.

Is Age Trumping Genetic Profiling in Clinical Practice? Relationship of Chemotherapy Recommendation and Oncotype DX Recurrence Score in Patients Aged < 50 Years versus ≥ 50 Years, and Trends Over Time.

BACKGROUND: Oncotype DX (oDX) is used to predict recurrence and indicate response to chemotherapy in patients with early-stage breast cancer (BC). We evaluated the relationship between age (< 50 vs. ≥ 50 years), recurrence score (RS), chemotherapy use, and trends of oDX testing over time. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database, we identified women with T1/T2, N0, estrogen receptor-positive BC from 2009 to 2014. We stratified patients by age (< 50 and ≥ 50 years) and RS (low: < 18; intermediate: 18-30; and high: > 30), and compared demographics, tumor characteristics, and chemotherapy recommendations. Management trends were also assessed. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2014, a total of 377,725 cases met the eligibility criteria for oDX testing; 115,052 (30.5%) patients had oDX, and 60,804 (16.1%) were < 50 years of age. The majority had low RS and T1N0 disease. Patients < 50 years of age were more likely to be recommended chemotherapy than those ≥ 50 years of age, regardless of RS (p ≤ 0.001), and were more likely to ultimately undergo chemotherapy (p < 0.001). When stratified by year, oDX utilization increased. There was a decreasing trend in chemotherapy recommendations in both the low- and intermediate-RS groups for both age groups (all p = 0.001), with no change in the high-RS group (< 50 years: p = 0.52; ≥ 50 years: p = 0.67). Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that patients < 50 years of age and those with a higher RS were more likely to be recommended chemotherapy (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The testing of oDX in BC has significantly increased since first implemented. Results from additional studies such as TAILORx will clarify the current discordant practice patterns between low oDX RSs and adjuvant chemotherapy recommendations.

Factors Affecting the Completion of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Despite the survival benefit associated with adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer, many do not complete treatment. This study identified factors associated with noncompletion of adjuvant chemotherapy among a select population of women with early-stage breast cancer. METHODS: The study sample was obtained from a multicenter study designed to evaluate patient-assistance program usage among early-stage breast cancer patients requiring adjuvant therapy. In this study, 333 patients with stages I and II breast cancer undergoing surgery from October 2006 to September 2009 completed 6-month follow-up surveys assessing their experiences with care, health status, social support, self-efficacy, and treatment beliefs. In- and outpatient medical records were abstracted to assess treatment completion. Of the 333 patients, 198 initiated adjuvant chemotherapy and formed our study cohort. The study compared patients who did and did not complete adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: The median patient age was 53 years (range 28-86 years). According to self-identification, 41 % of the patients were non-Hispanic white and 21 % were black. A total of 13 patients (7 %) did not complete adjuvant chemotherapy. In the bivariate analysis, the patients not completing chemotherapy were more likely to be black and unmarried women with low emotional social support and a poor body image after treatment. In the multivariate analysis, black race [odds ratio (OR) 5.62; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.63-20.36] and poor body image (OR 9.75; 95 % CI 2.12-95.95) were independently associated with noncompletion of chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Overall chemotherapy noncompletion rates were low among women exposed to patient-assistance programs. However, poor body image and black race were independent predictors of uncompleted chemotherapy. The true impact of race in this group may result from social factors that occur more often among black women, including poor social support.