Prevalence of methanogens and associated factors in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and healthy controls in a Southeastern Mexican population.

INTRODUCTION: Methane (CH4) is an inert gas produced by colonic anaerobes and has been associated with different intestinal diseases, including irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). According to geographic region, the prevalence of methanogens varies, being higher in Africa (80%) and lower in the United States (35-40%). In Mexico, the prevalence of methanogens is unknown. AIM: To evaluate the prevalence of CH4 producers and associated factors in a group of patients with IBS and controls in a Mexican population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A baseline fasting measurement of alveolar H2 and CH4 gas was carried out, by gas chromatography (stationary phase), in consecutive patients diagnosed with IBS and a control group. Subjects with baseline levels of H2 of 0 ppm and CH4 ≥ 5 ppm were classified as methanogenic. RESULTS: A total of 132 controls (53.8% women) and 67 patients with IBS (76% women) were included. The overall prevalence (n = 199) of methanogenic subjects was 38% (n = 76) (95% CI: 0.31-0.45) and they had a greater prevalence of overweight/obesity (56.5 vs 39.8%, P = .028). The prevalence of methanogens in the healthy controls was 41.6% (95% CI: 0.33-0.49), whereas, in the patients with IBS, it was 31.4% (n = 21, 71% IBS-C and 29% IBS-M). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of methanogens in our study on a Mexican population was comparable to that reported in other populations and was associated with overweight/obesity. One-third of the patients with IBS presented with methanogens. Said microorganisms were particularlyassociated with the constipation-predominant IBS subtype.

Intragastric pH effect of 20mg of levo-pantoprazole versus 40mg of racemic pantoprazole the first seven days of treatment in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. / Efecto sobre el pH intragástrico de 20mg de levopantoprazol versus 40mg de pantoprazol racémico durante los primeros 7 días de tratamiento en pacientes con enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico.

INTRODUCTION/AIM: Levo-pantoprazole, the S-enantiomer of pantoprazole, is a proton pump inhibitor that has been shown in animal studies to be faster and stronger than its racemic formulation. There are no studies on humans and therefore our aim was to evaluate the effects of levo-pantoprazole versus racemic pantoprazole on intragastric pH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized controlled study was conducted on patients with erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease that were given 20mg of levo-pantoprazole (n = 15) versus 40mg of racemic pantoprazole (n = 15) for 7 days. Baseline and end-of-treatment symptom evaluation and intragastric pH measurement were carried out. RESULTS: There were no differences between the groups in the baseline evaluations. From 40 to 115min after the first dose of levo-pantoprazole, the mean intragastric pH was higher, compared with that of racemic pantoprazole (p < 0.05). After one week, levo-pantoprazole and racemic pantoprazole significantly reduced intragastric acid production and its esophageal exposure (p < 0.05). Even though there was no statistically significant difference, a larger number of patients that received levo-pantoprazole stated that their heartburn improved within the first 3 days. CONCLUSIONS: The S-enantiomer of pantoprazole (levo-pantoprazole) had a faster and stronger effect with respect to acid suppression, compared with its racemic formulation. Although the effect on symptoms was faster with levo-pantoprazole, occurring within the first days of treatment, it was equivalent to that of the racemate at one week of treatment.

Frequency of human papillomavirus infection in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. / Frecuencia de infección por virus del papiloma humano en pacientes con cáncer del aparato digestivo.

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Cancer is the result of the interaction of genetic and environmental factors. It has recently been related to viral infections, one of which is human papillomavirus. The aim of the present study was to describe the frequency of human papillomavirus infection in patients with digestive system cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, observational study was conducted on patients with gastrointestinal cancer at 2public healthcare institutes in Veracruz. Two tumor samples were taken, one for histologic study and the other for DNA determination of human papillomavirus and its genotypes. Anthropometric variables, risk factors, sexual habits, tumor location, and histologic type of the cancer were analyzed. Absolute and relative frequencies were determined using the SPSS version 24.0 program. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were studied. They had gastrointestinal cancer located in: the colon (62.26%), stomach (18.87%), esophagus (7.55%), rectum (7.55%), and small bowel (3.77%). Human papillomavirus was identified in 11.32% of the patients, 66.7% of which corresponded to squamous cell carcinoma and 33.3% to adenocarcinoma. Only genotype 18 was identified. Mean patient age was 61.8±15.2 years, 56.60% of the patients were men, and 43.40% were women. A total of 15.8% of the patients had a family history of cancer and 31.6% had a personal history of the disease, 38.6% were tobacco smokers, and 61.4% consumed alcohol. Regarding sex, 5.3% of the patients said they were homosexual, 3.5% were bisexual, 29.8% engaged in oral sex, and 24.6% in anal sex. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that human papillomavirus infection was a risk factor for the development of gastrointestinal cancer, especially of squamous cell origin.

Validation and Diagnostic Usefulness of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire in a Primary Care Level in Mexico

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Different non-invasive diagnostics strategies have been used to assess patients with gastroesophageal reflux. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) questionnaire (GerdQ) is a 6-item, easy to use questionnaire that was developed primarily as a diagnostic tool for GERD in primary care. Our aim was to validate and assess diagnostic utility of GerdQ questionnaire in Mexican patients in the primary care setting. METHODS: The study was performed in 3 phases: (1) a questionnaire translation and comprehension study (n = 20), (2) are a reproducibility and validation study (50 patients and 50 controls) and (3) a study to assess the clinical utility in 252 subjects with GERD symptoms. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated using endoscopy and/or pH-metry as the gold standard. RESULTS: Internal consistency measured by the Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.81 for patients and 0.90 for healthy controls, with a mixed coefficient of 0.93. Reproducibility for GerdQ was very good and its discriminating validity was 88%. Most of the patients with erosive reflux and non-erosive reflux with abnormal pH-metry had scores > 8, meanwhile most of the patients with functional heartburn and hypersensitive esophagus had < 8. Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of GerdQ compared to the gold standard were 72%, 72% and 87%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In Mexico, the GerdQ questionnaire Spanish validated version is useful for GERD diagnosis in the primary care setting.

[Fructose intolerance in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: a case-control study]. / Intolerancia a la fructosa en pacientes con síndrome de intestino irritable; un estudio de casos y controles.

INTRODUCTION: Recently it has been reported that prevalence of fructose intolerance (FI) in patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders range between 38% -75%. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of FI in subjects diagnosed with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). METHODS: We studied 25 subjects (17 women, average age 36 years) with IBS (Rome II) and 25 healthy controls (14 women, mean age 37 years) who underwent a breath test after oral loading with fructose (Gastrolyzer ®, Bedfont Scientific Ltd., UK). The load consisted of 25 grams of fructose dissolved in 250 ml of water (10% solution). Breath test analysis of the particles per million (ppm) of hydrogen exhaled were performed every 15 minutes for 3 hours. The fructose breath test was considered positive when concentrations of hydrogen were higher than at 20 ppm or a raising greater than 5 ppm in 3 consecutive samples was detected. RESULTS: According to the Rome II criteria, 10 patients (40%) had IBS-C, 9 (36%) had IBS-D and 6 (24%) had IBS-M. Thirteen (52%) of IBS patients had IF, while only 4 (16%) of control subjects (p = 0.01). Patients with IBS and fructose intolerante tend to suffering from diarrhea predominant IBS (p = 0.053). CONCLUSIONS: Fructose intolerance may be responsible for gastrointestinal symptoms in at least half of IBS patients, especially in the group of patients with IBS-D.