Characteristics and Patterns of Marijuana Use in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

OBJECTIVES: To understand patterns of marijuana use in community-dwelling older adults in Colorado. DESIGN: Anonymous survey. SETTING: Two academic geriatric primary care clinics. PARTICIPANTS: English-speaking individuals. MEASUREMENTS: We assessed self-reported characteristics and patterns of marijuana use and effect on targeted symptoms. Survey analysis focused on current users, defined as individuals who had used marijuana in the past 3 years. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-five individuals completed the survey (55% response rate); 113 (32%) had used marijuana in the past, of whom 55 (16%) had used since legalization. More than half of current users were aged 75 and older, and one-quarter were aged 85 and older. Most current users were white women. Of current users, 44% used marijuana products at least weekly for common conditions including chronic pain, depression, anxiety, and insomnia, and most found marijuana helpful for these conditions. Most respondents reported obtaining marijuana recreationally (67%) without a prescription. Nine respondents reported negative side effects attributable to marijuana use. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to characterize marijuana use of older adults in a state in which it is legal for medical and recreational use. Marijuana was used for several common geriatric conditions, and respondents reported few side effects. The small number of survey respondents, the lack of generalizability in states where marijuana sales are illegal, and participation bias were the main study limitations. Further research is needed to better understand useful or harmful effects in this population. J Am Geriatr Soc 66:2167-2171, 2018.

Precepting Medical Students in the Patient's Presence: An Educational Randomized Trial in Family Medicine Clinic.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Many medical student-patient encounters occur in the outpatient setting. Conference room staffing (CRS) of student presentations has been the norm in the United States in recent decades. However, this method may not be suitable for outpatient precepting, being inefficient and reducing valuable direct face time between physician and patient. Precepting in the Presence of the Patient (PIPP) has previously been found to be an effective educational model in the outpatient setting but has never been studied in family medicine clinics, nor with non-English speaking patients, nor patients from lower socioeconomic backgrounds with low literacy. METHODS: We used a randomized controlled trial of educational models comparing time spent using PIPP with CRS in two family medicine clinics. Patient, student, and physician satisfaction were also measured using a 5-point Likert scale; total encounter time and time spent precepting were also recorded. RESULTS: PIPP is strongly preferred by attending physicians while patients and students were equally satisfied with either precepting method. PIPP provides an additional 3 minutes of physician-patient face time (17.39 versus 14.08 minutes) in an encounter that is overall shortened by 2 minutes (17.39 versus 19.71 minutes). CONCLUSIONS: PIPP is an effective method for precepting medical students in family medicine clinics, even with non-English speaking patients and those with low literacy. Given the time constraints of family physicians, PIPP should be considered as a preferred, time-efficient method for training medical students that is well received by patients, students, and particularly by physicians.