Oesophagectomy in End-Stage Achalasia.

Presentation A 53 year old male with known Chicago Classification type II achalasia, and successful pneumatic dilatation five years previously, presented with severe dysphagia and 17.5 kg weight loss over 3 months. Diagnosis He underwent OGD and contrast imaging to reveal a mega oesophagus secondary to progressive achalasia. Treatment After initial nutritional pre-habilitation with naso-enteric feeding, he underwent a laparoscopic heller's myotomy with clinical and radiological improvement. However quick relapse of symptoms and a failed, atonic, massively dilated oesophagus lead to the decision to proceed to transhiatal oesophagectomy. Discussion Achalasia is a spectrum of motility disorder, and where it has progressed to mega-oesophagus, the success of standard therapeutic approaches is limited. End stage achalasia in this context, with nutritional failure or recurrent pneumonia/bronchiectasis, can be safely treated with an oesophageal resection which is curative, removing a "failed" oesophagus in its entirety.

Nutrient Intakes and Gastrointestinal Symptoms Among Esophagogastric Cancer Survivors up to 5 Years Post-Surgery.

A cross-sectional analysis explored nutritional intakes and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms among esophagogastric cancer survivors up to 12, 13-36, and 37+ months post-surgery. Participants were identified from the Upper GI Cancer Registry at St James' Hospital, Ireland. The Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire, European Prospective Investigation of Cancer Food Frequency Questionnaire, World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) Score, and Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale assessed malnutrition risk, nutritional intake, adherence to (secondary) cancer prevention recommendations, and GI symptoms, respectively. Most (82.5%, n33) participants (n40) were male. Mean age was 65.5 ± 9.3 years. Time post-surgery ranged from 6-62 months. Half (50.0%, n20) had a BMI in the healthy range. A quarter (27.5%, n11) were at risk of malnutrition. Intakes of meat and meat products exceeded recommendations and intakes of fruits, vegetables, and fiber were below recommendations, with no significant between-group differences. The mean WCRF/AICR score was 3.6 ± 1.1, indicating adherence to 3.6 of 7 cancer prevention recommendations. It was not significantly different between subgroups. Minor to mild GI discomfort was reported, with no significant between-group differences in symptoms. As rates of long-term survivorship continue to increase, survivors must be supported to sustain behaviors that enhance quality of life and reduce secondary cancer risk.

Patient-reported outcomes after oesophagectomy in the multicentre LASER study.

BACKGROUND: Data on the long-term symptom burden in patients surviving oesophageal cancer surgery are scarce. The aim of this study was to identify the most prevalent symptoms and their interactions with health-related quality of life. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional cohort study of patients who underwent oesophageal cancer surgery in 20 European centres between 2010 and 2016. Patients had to be disease-free for at least 1 year. They were asked to complete a 28-symptom questionnaire at a single time point, at least 1 year after surgery. Principal component analysis was used to assess for clustering and association of symptoms. Risk factors associated with the development of severe symptoms were identified by multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of 1081 invited patients, 876 (81.0 per cent) responded. Symptoms in the preceding 6 months associated with previous surgery were experienced by 586 patients (66.9 per cent). The most common severe symptoms included reduced energy or activity tolerance (30.7 per cent), feeling of early fullness after eating (30.0 per cent), tiredness (28.7 per cent), and heartburn/acid or bile regurgitation (19.6 per cent). Clustering analysis showed that symptoms clustered into six domains: lethargy, musculoskeletal pain, dumping, lower gastrointestinal symptoms, regurgitation/reflux, and swallowing/conduit problems; the latter two were the most closely associated. Surgical approach, neoadjuvant therapy, patient age, and sex were factors associated with severe symptoms. CONCLUSION: A long-term symptom burden is common after oesophageal cancer surgery.

Radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and the tumour microenvironment: Turning an immunosuppressive milieu into a therapeutic opportunity.

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has revolutionised the treatment of solid tumours, yet most patients do not derive a clinical benefit. Resistance to ICB is often contingent on the tumour microenvironment (TME) and modulating aspects of this immunosuppressive milieu is a goal of combination treatment approaches. Radiation has been used for over a century in the management of cancer with more than half of all cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. Here, we outline the rationale behind combining radiotherapy with ICB, a potential synergy through mutually beneficial remodelling of the TME. We discuss the pleiotropic effects radiation has on the TME including immunogenic cell death, activation of cytosolic DNA sensors, remodelling the stroma and vasculature, and paradoxical infiltration of both anti-tumour and suppressive immune cell populations. These events depend on the radiation dose and fractionation and optimising these parameters will be key to develop safe and effective combination regimens. Finally, we highlight ongoing efforts that combine radiation, immunotherapy and inhibitors of DNA damage response, which can help achieve a favourable equilibrium between the immunogenic and tolerogenic effects of radiation on the immune microenvironment.

Exaggerated postprandial GLP-1 secretion following esophagectomy is not associated with gastric emptying and intestinal transit.

Esophagectomy causes postprandial symptoms associated with an exaggerated postprandial gut hormone response. This study aimed to compare the gastrointestinal transit time of patients 1 year after esophagectomy with unoperated controls, including its relation to satiety gut hormone release. In this cross-sectional study, consecutive, disease-free patients after esophagectomy with pyloroplasty were compared with unoperated control subjects to assess gastric emptying (GE) and cecal arrival time (CAT). Serial plasma samples were collected before, and for 300 minutes after, a mixed-meal challenge. Body composition was assessed, and symptom scores were calculated. Eleven patients 1 year post-esophagectomy (age: 62.6 ± 9.8, male: 82%) did not show a significantly different GE pattern compared with 10 control subjects (P = 0.245). Rather, patients could be categorized bimodally as exhibiting either rapid or slow GE relative to controls. Those with rapid GE trended toward a higher postprandial symptom burden (P = 0.084) without higher postprandial glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) secretion (P = 0.931). CAT was significantly shorter after esophagectomy (P = 0.043) but was not significantly associated with GE, GLP-1 secretion, or symptom burden. Neither early nutrient delivery to the proximal small intestine nor to the colon explains the exaggerated postprandial GLP-1 response after esophagectomy. GE varies significantly in these patients despite consistent pyloric management.

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Oesophagogastric Surgery: a Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) can objectively measure fitness and oxygen uptake at anaerobic threshold. The relationship between fitness and postoperative outcomes after upper gastro-intestinal surgery is unclear. The aim of the present review is to assess the prognostic ability of CPX in predicting postoperative outcome associated with oesophagogastric surgery. METHODS: Relevant studies were identified through a systematic search of EMBASE, Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to July 2019. The eligibility criteria for studies included prognostic studies of upper gastro-intestinal surgery among adult populations using a preoperative CPX and measurement of postoperative outcome (mortality or morbidity or length of stay). Risk of bias was assessed using the QUIPS Quality in Prognostic Studies validated tool. RESULTS: Thirteen papers with a total of 1735 participants were included in data extraction. A total of 7 studies examined the association between CPX variables and postoperative mortality. Patients undergoing gastro-intestinal surgery with lower anaerobic threshold values were found to have an increased risk of postoperative mortality. Similarly, a lower rate of oxygen consumption was found to be associated with higher mortality. There was conflicting evidence regarding the association between CPX variables and postoperative morbidity. The evidence did not demonstrate any association between preoperative CPX variables and hospital length of stay. CONCLUSION: Studies report an association between CPX variables and postoperative mortality; however, there is conflicting evidence regarding the association between CPX variables and postoperative morbidity.

Diagnostic accuracy of SUVmax in predicting malignancy of supraclavicular lymph nodes from primary oesophageal cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy and optimum cut-off value of SUVmax on PET to predict malignancy of supraclavicular lymph nodes (SCLNs) in patients with oesophageal carcinoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All diagnosed cases of oesophageal cancer were retrospectively reviewed (2010-2016). Patients that had a confirmed diagnosis of oesophageal cancer with avid SCLNs on staging PET were included in the study. 33 SCLNs that subsequently underwent ultrasound guided biopsy for staging were analysed. The maximum uptake values (SUVmax) of the SCLNs and primary tumours were measured. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the optimum cut off of SUVmax in predicting malignancy. RESULTS: 24/33 PET-detected SCLNs were malignant. ROC analysis identified the best nodal SUVmax cut-off to be 3.0. The diagnostic accuracy of PET was 76.0 % (sensitivity = 78.9 %, specificity = 66.6 %). For SCLNs with SUVmax > 3.0, PET showed a positive predictor value of 88.2 %; for SCLNs < 3.0, PET showed a negative predictor value of 50 %. The median SUVmax of pathologically negative and positive nodes were 2.8 (range 1.8-6.0) and 5.3 (range 1.9-13.4). The median primary tumour SUVmax was 13.8 (range 3.7-30.0). The SUVmax of metastatic lymph nodes were significant higher than those of benign lesions (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our study revealed an accuracy rate of 76 % for PET detected SCLNs in patients with oesophageal carcinoma. For SCLNs with SUVmax > 3.0, PET had a high PPV (88 %), which can minimize the need for further diagnostic tests.

Prophylactic negative wound therapy in laparotomy wounds (PROPEL trial): randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Superficial surgical site infections are a common post-operative complication. They also place a considerable financial burden on healthcare. The use of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy has been advocated to reduce wound infection rates. However, there is debate around its routine use. The purpose of this trial is to determine if prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy reduces post-operative wound complications in patients undergoing laparotomy. METHODS/DESIGN: This multi-centre randomised controlled trial will compare standard surgical dressings (control) to two competing negative pressure wound therapy dressings (Prevena™ and PICO™). All patients will be over 18 years, who are undergoing an emergency or elective laparotomy. It is intended to enrol a total of 271 patients for the trial. DISCUSSION: The PROPEL trial is a multi-centre randomised controlled trial of patients undergoing laparotomy. The comparison of standard treatment to two commercially available NPWT will help provide consensus on the routine management of laparotomy wounds. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT number NCT03871023).

Measuring the impact of oesophagectomy on physical functioning and physical activity participation: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Oesophagectomy remains the only curative intervention for oesophageal cancer, with defined nutritional and health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) consequences. It follows therefore that there is a significant risk of decline in physical wellbeing with oesophagectomy however this has been inadequately quantified. This study prospectively examines change in physical functioning and habitual physical activity participation, from pre-surgery through 6-months post-oesophagectomy. METHODS: Patients scheduled for oesophagectomy with curative intent were recruited. Key domains of physical functioning including exercise tolerance (six-minute walk test (6MWT)) and muscle strength (hand-grip strength), and habitual physical activity participation, including sedentary behaviour (accelerometry) were measured pre-surgery (T0) and repeated at 1-month (T1) and 6-months (T2) post-surgery. HR-QOL was measured using the EORTC-QOL C30. RESULTS: Thirty-six participants were studied (mean age 62.4 (8.8) years, n = 26 male, n = 26 transthoracic oesophagectomy). Mean 6MWT distance decreased significantly from T0 to T1 (p = 0.006) and returned to T0 levels between T1 and T2 (p < 0.001). Percentage time spent sedentary increased throughout recovery (p < 0.001) and remained significantly higher at T2 in comparison to T0 (p = 0.003). In contrast, percentage time spent engaged in either light or moderate-to-vigorous intensity activity, all reduced significantly (p < 0.001 for both) and remained significantly lower at T2 in comparison to T0 (p = 0.009 and p = 0.01 respectively). Patients reported deficits in multiple domains of HR-QOL during recovery including global health status (p = 0.04), physical functioning (p < 0.001) and role functioning (p < 0.001). Role functioning remained a clinically important 33-points lower than pre-operative values at T2. CONCLUSION: Habitual physical activity participation remains significantly impaired at 6-months post-oesophagectomy. Physical activity is a measurable and modifiable target for physical rehabilitation, which is closely aligned with patient-reported deficits in role functioning. Rehabilitation aimed at optimising physical health in oesophageal cancer survivorship is warranted.

Effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiation on preoperative pulmonary physiology, postoperative respiratory complications and quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: It remains controversial whether neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) for oesophageal cancer influences operative morbidity, in particular pulmonary, and quality of life. This study combined clinical outcome data with systematic evaluation of pulmonary physiology to determine the impact of nCRT on pulmonary physiology and clinical outcomes in locally advanced oesophageal cancer. METHODS: Consecutive patients treated between 2010 and 2016 were included. Three-dimensional conformal radiation was standard, with a lung dose-volume histogram of V20 less than 25 per cent, and total radiation between 40 and 41·4 Gy. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) were assessed at baseline and 1 month after nCRT. Radiation-induced lung injury (grade 2 or greater), comprehensive complications index (CCI) and pulmonary complications were monitored prospectively. Health-related quality of life was assessed among disease-free patients in survivorship. RESULTS: Some 228 patients were studied. Comparing pulmonary physiology values before with those after nCRT, FEV1 decreased from mean(s.d.) 96·8(17·7) to 91·5(20·4) per cent (-3·6(10·6) per cent; P < 0·001), FVC from 104·9(15·6) to 98·1(19·8) per cent (-3·2(11·9) per cent; P = 0·005) and DLCO from 97·6(20·7) to 82·2(20·4) per cent (-14·8(14·0) per cent; P < 0·001). Five patients (2·2 per cent) developed radiation-induced lung injury precluding surgical resection. Smoking (P = 0·005) and increased age (P < 0·001) independently predicted percentage change in DLCO. Carboplatin and paclitaxel with 41·4 Gy resulted in a greater DLCO decline than cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil with 40 Gy (P = 0·001). On multivariable analysis, post-treatment DLCO predicted CCI (P = 0·006), respiratory failure (P = 0·020) and reduced physical function in survivorship (P = 0·047). CONCLUSION: These data indicate that modern nCRT alters pulmonary physiology, in particular diffusion capacity, which is linked to short- and longer-term clinical consequences, highlighting a potentially modifiable index of risk.

ANTECEDENTES: El tema de si en el cáncer de esófago la quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante (neoadjuvant chemoradiation, nCRT) repercute sobre la morbilidad postoperatoria, especialmente sobre la morbilidad pulmonar y la calidad de vida de los pacientes que sobreviven sigue siendo controvertido. Este estudio combina datos sobre resultados clínicos con una evaluación sistemática de la fisiología pulmonar para determinar el impacto de la nCRT sobre la fisiología pulmonar y los resultados clínicos en el cáncer de esófago localmente avanzado. MÉTODOS: Se incluyeron pacientes consecutivos tratados entre 2010-2016. La radioterapia conformal 3D fue la estándar, con un histograma dosis-volumen del pulmón V20 < 25% y radiación entre 40-41,4 Gy. Se evaluaron el volumen espiratorio forzado (forced expiratory volume, FEV1), la capacidad vital forzada (forced vital capacity, FVC) y la capacidad de difusión del monóxido de carbono (diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide, DLCO) al inicio y un mes tras la nCRT. La lesión pulmonar inducida por la radioterapia (EORTC grado ≥ 2), el índice de complicaciones integral (comprehensive complications index, CCI), grado de Clavien-Dindo, y complicaciones pulmonares fueron analizadas de manera prospectiva. Se evaluó la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud entre los pacientes supervivientes libres de enfermedad (EORTC QLQ-C30, OG25, OES18). RESULTADOS: Se estudiaron un total de 228 pacientes. Al comparar los valores de la fisiología pulmonar antes y después de la nCRT respectivamente, la FEV1 disminuyó de 96,8 ± 17,7% a 91,5 ± 20,4% (-3,6 ± 10,6%, P = 0,0002), la FVC de 104,9 ± 15,6 a 98,1 ± 19,8% (-3,2 ± 11,9%, P = 0,005) y la DLCO de 97,6 ± 20,7 a 82,2 ± 20,4% (-14,8 ± 14,0%, P < 0,0001). Cinco pacientes (2,2%) desarrollaron lesión pulmonar relacionada con la radioterapia impidiendo la resección quirúrgica. Los factores predictores independientes de %ΔDLCO fueron el hábito tabáquico (P = 0,005) y la edad avanzada (P < 0,001). El tratamiento con carboplatino/paclitaxel/41,4Gy determinó un mayor descenso de la DLCO en comparación con cisplatino/5-fluorouracilo/40Gy (P = 0,001). En el análisis multivariable, la DLCO tras el tratamiento fue una variable predictora de CCI (P = 0,006), fracaso respiratorio/intubación prolongada (P = 0,020) y reducción de la función física en los supervivientes (P = 0,047). CONCLUSIÓN: Estos datos indican que la moderna nCRT altera la fisiología pulmonar, especialmente la difusión pulmonar, con consecuencias clínicas a corto y largo plazo. La DLCO podría constituir un factor de riesgo potencialmente modificable.

Cardiorespiratory Comorbidity and Postoperative Complications following Esophagectomy: a European Multicenter Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The impact of cardiorespiratory comorbidity on operative outcomes after esophagectomy remains controversial. This study investigated the effect of cardiorespiratory comorbidity on postoperative complications for patients treated for esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A European multicenter cohort study from five high-volume esophageal cancer centers including patients treated between 2010 and 2017 was conducted. The effect of cardiorespiratory comorbidity and respiratory function upon postoperative outcomes was assessed. RESULTS: In total 1590 patients from five centers were included; 274 (17.2%) had respiratory comorbidity, and 468 (29.4%) had cardiac comorbidity. Respiratory comorbidity was associated with increased risk of overall postoperative complications, anastomotic leak, pulmonary complications, pneumonia, increased Clavien-Dindo score, and critical care and hospital length of stay. After neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, respiratory comorbidity was associated with increased risk of anastomotic leak [odds ratio (OR) 1.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-3.04], pneumonia (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.10-2.47), and any pulmonary complication (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.04-2.22), an effect which was not observed following neoadjuvant chemotherapy or surgery alone. Cardiac comorbidity was associated with increased risk of cardiovascular and pulmonary complications, respiratory failure, and Clavien-Dindo score ≥ IIIa. Among all patients, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio > 70% was associated with reduced risk of overall postoperative complications, cardiovascular complications, atrial fibrillation, pulmonary complications, and pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that cardiorespiratory comorbidity and impaired pulmonary function are associated with increased risk of postoperative complications after esophagectomy performed in high-volume European centers. Given the observed interaction with neoadjuvant approach, these data indicate a potentially modifiable index of perioperative risk.

Changes in gut hormones, glycaemic response and symptoms after oesophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Oesophagectomy is associated with reduced appetite, weight loss and postprandial hypoglycaemia, the pathophysiological basis of which remains largely unexplored. This study aimed to investigate changes in enteroendocrine function after oesophagectomy. METHODS: In this prospective study, 12 consecutive patients undergoing oesophagectomy were studied before and 10 days, 6, 12 and 52 weeks after surgery. Serial plasma total fasting ghrelin, and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), insulin and glucose release following a standard 400-kcal mixed-meal stimulus were determined. CT body composition and anthropometry were assessed, and symptom scores calculated using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaires. RESULTS: At 1 year, two of the 12 patients exhibited postprandial hypoglycaemia, with reductions in bodyweight (mean(s.e.m.) 17·1(3·2) per cent, P < 0·001), fat mass (21.5(2.5) kg versus 25.5(2.4) kg before surgery; P = 0·014), lean body mass (51.5(2.2) versus 54.0(1.8) kg respectively; P = 0·003) and insulin resistance (HOMA-IR: 0.84(0.17) versus 1.16(0.20); P = 0·022). Mean(s.e.m.) fasting ghrelin levels decreased from postoperative day 10, but had recovered by 1 year (preoperative: 621·5(71·7) pg/ml; 10 days: 415·1(59·80) pg/ml; 6 weeks: 309·0(42·0) pg/ml; 12 weeks: 415·8(52·1) pg/ml; 52 weeks: 547·4(83·2) pg/ml; P < 0·001) and did not predict weight loss (P = 0·198). Postprandial insulin increased progressively at 10 days, 6, 12 and 52 weeks (mean(s.e.m.) insulin AUC0-30 min : fold change 1·7(0·4), 2·0(0·4), 3·5(0·7) and 4·0(0·8) respectively; P = 0·001). Postprandial GLP-1 concentration increased from day 10 after surgery (P < 0·001), with a 3·3(1·8)-fold increase at 1 year (P < 0·001). Peak GLP-1 level was inversely associated with the postprandial glucose nadir (P = 0·041) and symptomatic neuroglycopenia (Sigstad score, P = 0·017, R2 = 0·45). GLP-1 AUC predicted loss of weight (P = 0·008, R2 = 0·52) and fat mass (P = 0·010, R2 = 0·64) at 1 year. CONCLUSION: Altered enteroendocrine physiology is associated with early satiety, weight loss and postprandial hypoglycaemia after oesophagectomy.

Effect of preoperative inspiratory muscle training on physical functioning following esophagectomy.

This study aims to examine the effect of preoperative inspiratory muscle training (IMT) on pre- and postoperative functional exercise performance in patients undergoing esophagectomy. A subcohort of patients recruited to the PREPARE randomized control trial were studied. Following evaluation of respiratory muscle function (spirometry, maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), and inspiratory muscle endurance), postoperative mobilization (accelerometry) and postoperative physical functioning (6-minute walk test (6MWT)), participants scheduled for esophagectomy were randomly assigned to either 2 weeks of preoperative IMT or a control group. Measures were repeated on the day before surgery and postoperatively. Sixty participants (mean (standard deviation) age 64.13 (7.8) years; n = 42 male; n = 43 transthoracic esophagectomy; n = 17 transhiatial esophagectomy) were included in the final analysis (n = 28 IMT; n = 32 control). There was a significant improvement in preoperative MIP (P = 0.03) and inspiratory muscle endurance (P = 0.04); however preoperative 6MWT distance did not change. Postoperatively, control participants were more active on postoperative day (POD)1, and from POD1-POD5 (P = 0.04). Predischarge, 6MWT distance was significantly lower in the IMT group (305.61 (116.3) m) compared to controls (380.2 (47.1) m, P = 0.03). Despite an increase in preoperative respiratory muscle function, preoperative IMT does not improve pre- or postoperative physical functioning or postoperative mobilization following esophagectomy.

Quantifying postoperative mobilisation following oesophagectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Early mobilisation is in integral component of postoperative recovery following complex surgical procedures such as oesophageal cancer resections, however evidence to guide early mobilisation protocols in critical care settings is limited. Furthermore, little is known about actual mobilisation levels postoperatively. This study quantified postoperative mobilisation post- oesophagectomy and investigated barriers to mobility. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Postoperative critical care setting in a tertiary care referral centre for oesophagectomy. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty participants (mean age 65 (SD 7) years, n=19 males) scheduled for oesophagectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome, postoperative physical activity, was measured objectively using the Actigraph GT3X+. Medical records were examined for a range of outcomes including medical status, pain scores and physiotherapy comments to identify factors which may have influenced mobility. RESULTS: During postoperative day (POD) 1-5, participants spent the majority of time (>96%) sedentary. Participation in light intensity activity was low but did increase daily from a median of 12 (IQR 19) minutes/day on POD1 to a median of 53 (IQR 73.25) minutes/day on POD5 p<0.001), with a corresponding increase in daily step count. Haemodynamic instability was the most common reason reported by physiotherapists for either not attempting mobility or limiting postoperative mobilisation levels. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that despite daily physiotherapy, there are multiple challenges to postoperative mobilisation. Haemodynamic instability, likely related to thoracic epidurals, was the key limitation to early mobilisation. Goal-directed mobilisation in collaboration with the multidisciplinary team may play a considerable role in overcoming modifiable barriers to postoperative mobilisation.

Point Prevalence of Adult Intestinal Failure in Republic Of Ireland.

Parenteral Nutrition (PN) is a life-saving treatment used for patients with Intestinal Failure (IF). PN is complex and demands highly specialised care to avoid serious complications in the home setting. All tertiary centres in the Republic of Ireland (ROI) were contacted to assess the prevalence of IF requiring PN and complications, over a one year period. Sixty-seven patients were treated across 15 centres: a period prevalence of 14.6 and 9.6 patients per million for long-term PN and home PN respectively. Three-quarters of patients experienced at least one major complication with 18% mortality rate over the study period. There were 2.86 admissions per HPN patient, each lasting mean 13.4 days. One-third experienced catheter-related infections. There was a reduced length of stay during emergency re-admissions in high volume centres (mean 31 v 43 days, p=0.17). The establishment of a National Centre for IF/HPN in ROI is integral to reducing PN-associated complications.

Multicentre randomized clinical trial of inspiratory muscle training versus usual care before surgery for oesophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Up to 40 per cent of patients undergoing oesophagectomy develop pneumonia. The aim of this study was to assess whether preoperative inspiratory muscle training (IMT) reduces the rate of pneumonia after oesophagectomy. METHODS: Patients with oesophageal cancer were randomized to a home-based IMT programme before surgery or usual care. IMT included the use of a flow-resistive inspiratory loading device, and patients were instructed to train twice a day at high intensity (more than 60 per cent of maximum inspiratory muscle strength) for 2 weeks or longer until surgery. The primary outcome was postoperative pneumonia; secondary outcomes were inspiratory muscle function, lung function, postoperative complications, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of hospital stay and physical functioning. RESULTS: Postoperative pneumonia was diagnosed in 47 (39·2 per cent) of 120 patients in the IMT group and in 43 (35·5 per cent) of 121 patients in the control group (relative risk 1·10, 95 per cent c.i. 0·79 to 1·53; P = 0·561). There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative outcomes between the groups. Mean(s.d.) maximal inspiratory muscle strength increased from 76·2(26·4) to 89·0(29·4) cmH2 O (P < 0·001) in the intervention group and from 74·0(30·2) to 80·0(30·1) cmH2 O in the control group (P < 0·001). Preoperative inspiratory muscle endurance increased from 4 min 14 s to 7 min 17 s in the intervention group (P < 0·001) and from 4 min 20 s to 5 min 5 s in the control group (P = 0·007). The increases were highest in the intervention group (P < 0·050). CONCLUSION: Despite an increase in preoperative inspiratory muscle function, home-based preoperative IMT did not lead to a decreased rate of pneumonia after oesophagectomy. Registration number: NCT01893008 (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Patient experiences of a physiotherapy-led multidisciplinary rehabilitative intervention after successful treatment for oesophago-gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: To qualitatively explore the perceived impact of a 12-week rehabilitative intervention for oesophago-gastric cancer survivors on their physical, mental and social wellbeing. METHODS: Of the 21 participants who completed the intervention, 19 took part in a semi-structured focus group interview. Four audio-taped focus groups were held, ranging in size from two to eight participants. Focus groups were transcribed and analysed using a descriptive qualitative approach. RESULTS: At recruitment, participants were 23.5 ± 15.2 months post-surgery and all had suboptimal fitness levels. Participants reported improvements in their physical capacity and ability to carry out activities of daily living during the intervention. These improvements led to increased confidence and social connectivity. Other participants were a valuable source of information and reassurance, while support from family members was variable. Future interventions should educate participants on how to maintain gains achieved during the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Participating in an exercise-based multidisciplinary rehabilitative intervention reduces isolation and helps oesophago-gastric cancer survivors to safely negotiate their physical, emotional and social needs as they move further down the path of recovery.

Sarcopenia during neoadjuvant therapy for oesophageal cancer: characterising the impact on muscle strength and physical performance.

PURPOSE: Preoperative chemo(radio)therapy for oesophageal cancer (OC) may have an attritional impact on body composition and functional status, impacting postoperative outcome. Physical decline with skeletal muscle loss has not been previously characterised in OC and may be amenable to physical rehabilitation. This study characterises skeletal muscle mass and physical performance from diagnosis to post-neoadjuvant therapy in patients undergoing preoperative chemo(radio)therapy for OC. METHODS: Measures of body composition (axial computerised tomography), muscle strength (handgrip), functional capacity (walking distance), anthropometry (weight, height and waist circumference), physical activity, quality-of-life and nutritional status were captured prospectively. Sarcopenia status was defined as pre-sarcopenic (low muscle mass only), sarcopenic (low muscle mass and low muscle strength or function) or severely sarcopenic (low muscle mass and low muscle strength and low muscle function). RESULTS: Twenty-eight participants were studied at both time points (mean age 62.86 ± 8.18 years, n = 23 male). Lean body mass reduced by 4.9 (95% confidence interval 3.2 to 6.7) kg and mean grip strength reduced by 4.3 (2.5 to 6.1) kg from pre- to post-neoadjuvant therapy. Quality-of-life scores capturing gastrointestinal symptoms improved. Measures of anthropometry, walking distance, physical activity and nutritional status did not change. There was an increase in sarcopenic status from diagnosis (pre-sarcopenic n = 2) to post-treatment (pre-sarcopenic n = 5, severely sarcopenic n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Despite maintenance of body weight, functional capacity and activity habits, participants experience declines in muscle mass and strength. Interventions involving exercise and/or nutritional support to build muscle mass and strength during preoperative therapy, even in patients who are functioning normally, are warranted.