Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 74(9): 2290-2295, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33583759

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: One of the most feared complications of rhytidectomy is the formation of hematoma and seroma, which may harm patients' health and compromise the surgical outcome. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of autologous fibrin glue/platelet-poor plasma versus suction drainage in preventing surgical complications such as hematoma and seroma following rhytidectomy procedures. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study was conducted to compare the efficacy of the two interventions. Seventy-two patients were selected and divided into two groups of 36 (autologous fibrin glue versus suction drainage). Forty-eight hours after the procedures, all patients underwent ultrasound examination, always by the same radiologist, to measure the volume of exudate under the facial skin flaps. RESULTS: The mean total volume of exudate was 3.21 mL in the suction drainage group and 1.02 mL in the fibrin glue group, with effect size of 68.1% and confidence interval of 55.3 to 77.2 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Results significantly favor the use of fibrin glue and show that it was 68.1% more effective than suction drainage in preventing hematoma or seroma in rhytidectomy procedures.


Assuntos
Drenagem/métodos , Adesivo Tecidual de Fibrina/uso terapêutico , Hematoma/prevenção & controle , Plasma , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Ritidoplastia/métodos , Seroma/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Sucção
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...