Reliability of a Photo-Based Modified Foot Posture Index (MFPI) in Quantifying Severity of Foot Deformity in Children With Cerebral Palsy.

INTRODUCTION: Children with cerebral palsy (CP) have high rates of foot deformity. Accurate assessment of foot morphology is crucial for therapeutic planning and outcome evaluation. This study aims to evaluate the reliability of a novel photo-based Modified Foot Posture Index (MFPI) in the evaluation of foot deformity in children with CP. METHODS: Thirteen orthopaedic surgeons with neuromuscular clinical focus from 12 institutions evaluated standardized standing foot photographs of 20 children with CP, scoring foot morphology using the MFPI. Raters scored the standardized photographs based on five standard parameters. Two parameters assessed the hindfoot: curvature above and below the malleoli and calcaneal inversion/eversion. Three parameters assessed the midfoot and forefoot: talonavicular congruence, medial arch height, and forefoot abduction/adduction. Summary MFPI scores range from -10 to +10, where positive numbers connote planovalgus, whereas negative numbers connote a tendency toward cavovarus. Intra- and interrater reliability were calculated using a 2-way mixed model of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) set to absolute agreement. RESULTS: Feet spanned the spectrum of potential pathology assessable by the MFPI, including no deformity, mild, moderate, and severe planovalgus or cavovarus deformities. All scored variables showed high intrarater reliability with ICCs from 0.891 to 1. ICCs for interrater reliability ranged from 0.965 to 0.984. Hindfoot total score had an ICC of 0.979, with a 95% CI, 0.968-0.988 (P<0.001). The forefoot total score had an ICC of 0.984 (95% CI, 0.976-0.991, P<0.001). Mean total score by the MFPI was 3.67 with an ICC of 0.982 (95% CI, 0.972-0.990, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The photo-based MFPI demonstrates high intra- and interrater reliability in assessing foot deformities in children with CP. Its noninvasive nature and ease of use make it a promising tool for both clinical and research settings. MFPI should be considered as part of standard outcomes scores in studies regarding the treatment of CP-associated foot deformities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Anterior Displacement of Tibial Spine Fractures: Does Anatomic Reduction Matter?

Background: Operative treatment of displaced tibial spine fractures consists of fixation and reduction of the fragment in addition to restoring tension of the anterior cruciate ligament. Purpose: To determine whether residual displacement of the anterior portion of a tibial spine fragment affects the range of motion (ROM) or laxity in operatively and nonoperatively treated patients. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Data were gathered from 328 patients younger than 18 years who were treated for tibial spine fractures between 2000 and 2019 at 10 institutions. ROM and anterior lip displacement (ALD) measurements were summarized and compared from pretreatment to final follow-up. ALD measurements were categorized as excellent (0 to <1 mm), good (1 to <3 mm), fair (3 to 5 mm), or poor (>5 mm). Posttreatment residual laxity and arthrofibrosis were assessed. Results: Overall, 88% of patients (290/328) underwent operative treatment. The median follow-up was 8.1 months (range, 3-152 months) for the operative group and 6.7 months (range, 3-72 months) for the nonoperative group. The median ALD measurement of the cohort was 6 mm pretreatment, decreasing to 0 mm after treatment (P < .001). At final follow-up, 62% of all patients (203/328) had excellent ALD measurements, compared with 5% (12/264) before treatment. Subjective laxity was seen in 11% of the nonoperative group (4/37) and 5% of the operative group (15/285; P = .25). Across the cohort, there was no association between final knee ROM and final ALD category. While there were more patients with arthrofibrosis in the operative group (7%) compared with the nonoperative group (3%) (P = .49), this was not different across the ALD displacement categories. Conclusion: Residual ALD was not associated with posttreatment subjective residual laxity, extension loss, or flexion loss. The results suggest that anatomic reduction of a tibial spine fracture may not be mandatory if knee stability and functional ROM are achieved.

Rectus femoris transfers with and without a hamstring lengthening will not change hip kinematics in children with cerebral palsy.

BACKGROUND: A rectus femoris transfer (RFT) surgery with and without a hamstring lengthening (HSL) is used to treat stiff-knee gait in children with cerebral palsy (CP). While current literature has reported that a RFT surgery improves the kinematics at the knee, little is known about the kinematic changes at the hip. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does a RFT surgery change hip joint kinematics in children with CP? METHODS: This retrospective study included children (<18 years old) diagnosed with CP, who underwent a RFT procedure, and who were seen at our institution's accredited clinical motion laboratory. Patients with both pre- and post-operative gait analysis were identified and comparison between those analyses were performed to identify kinematic differences at the hip and knee. A total of 66 legs from 46 children (mean age: 11.1 ± 3.6) met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Overall results revealed that a RFT did not change kinematics at the hip [p > 0.05], however, a RFT did increase the maximum knee flexion during the swing period [Mean Difference Post - Pre: 8.3°, 95% CI: 4.9-11.8, p < 0.0001]. Additionally, it was found that changes in hip extension during the terminal stance phase were significantly different between the combined RFT and HSL compared to solely an RFT. The results of this study also revealed that children whose stiff-knee gait did not improve, tended to have increased hip external rotation during terminal stance and swing and greater hip extension during terminal stance, compared to children whose stiff-knee gait did improve. SIGNIFICANCE: Overall, a RFT with and without a HSL surgery improves hip and knee kinematics in the sagittal plane, however, improvements at the hip were not clinically significant. As a result, a RFT or a combined RFT with HSL should not be used to change hip kinematics in children with CP.

Postoperative Immobilization After Hip Reconstruction in Cerebral Palsy: No Difference Between Hip Spica and Abduction Pillow.

Purpose: This study aims to compare radiographic outcomes and complication rates of immobilization with an abduction pillow to spica casting for postoperative care after a hip reconstruction with varus derotational proximal femur osteotomy (VDRO) with or without pelvic osteotomy for children with cerebral palsy (CP). Methods: 233 children (1-18 years old) diagnosed with CP that underwent VDRO with or without pelvic osteotomy were identified, of which 188 patients were immobilized with a spica cast and 45 were immobilized with an abduction pillow, based on surgeon preference. 123 (65%) in the Spica group and 21 (47%) in the pillow group had pelvic osteotomies. Demographic data and complication rates were collected. Radiographic parameters, including anatomic medial proximal femoral angle (aMPFA), acetabular index (AI) and migration percentage (MP), were measured for each patient at the completion of surgery, six weeks post-operatively, and one year post-operatively. Results: There was not a statistically significant difference in BMI (p = 0.285), gender distribution (p = 0.984), or median follow-up time (p = 0.314) between groups. Rates of complications were consistent among groups with no differences in instances of delayed unions (p = 0.10), subluxations (p = 0.55), infection (p = 0.71), or non-unions (p = 0.10). There was no statistically significant difference in number of patients with an ideal aMPFA, AI, or MP (p = 0.44, p = 0.19, p = 1.00) at one year post-operatively. Conclusions: Immobilization with an abduction pillow is a safe and effective alternative to hip spica casting following hip reconstruction.

What Are the Causes and Consequences of Delayed Surgery for Pediatric Tibial Spine Fractures? A Multicenter Study.

Background: The uncommon nature of tibial spine fractures (TSFs) may result in delayed diagnosis and treatment. The outcomes of delayed surgery are unknown. Purpose: To evaluate risk factors for, and outcomes of, delayed surgical treatment of pediatric TSFs. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The authors performed a retrospective cohort study of TSFs treated surgically at 10 institutions between 2000 and 2019. Patient characteristics and preoperative data were collected, as were intraoperative information and postoperative complications. Surgery ≥21 days after injury was considered delayed based on visualized trends in the data. Univariate analysis was followed by purposeful entry multivariate regression to adjust for confounders. Results: A total of 368 patients (mean age, 11.7 ± 2.9 years) were included, 21.2% of whom underwent surgery ≥21 days after injury. Patients who experienced delayed surgery had 3.8 times higher odds of being diagnosed with a TSF at ≥1 weeks after injury (95% CI, 1.1-14.3; P = .04), 2.1 times higher odds of having seen multiple clinicians before the treating surgeon (95% CI, 1.1-4.1; P = .03), 5.8 times higher odds of having magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) ≥1 weeks after injury (95% CI, 1.6-20.8; P < .007), and were 2.2 times more likely to have public insurance (95% CI, 1.3-3.9; P = .005). Meniscal injuries were encountered intraoperatively in 42.3% of patients with delayed surgery versus 21.0% of patients treated without delay (P < .001), resulting in 2.8 times higher odds in multivariate analysis (95% CI, 1.6-5.0; P < .001). Delayed surgery was also a risk factor for procedure duration >2.5 hours (odds ratio, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.4-7.9; P = .006). Patients who experienced delayed surgery and also had an operation >2.5 hours had 3.7 times higher odds of developing arthrofibrosis (95% CI, 1.1-12.5; P = .03). Conclusion: Patients who underwent delayed surgery for TSFs were found to have a higher rate of concomitant meniscal injury, longer procedure duration, and more postoperative arthrofibrosis when the surgery length was >2.5 hours. Those who experienced delays in diagnosis or MRI, saw multiple clinicians, and had public insurance were more likely to have a delay to surgery.

Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fracture AAOS Appropriate Use Criteria: Does Treatment at a Pediatric Level I Trauma Center Comply?

BACKGROUND: The primary purpose of this analysis was to compare supracondylar humerus fracture (SCHF) treatment patterns at a single quaternary pediatric hospital relative to the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) appropriate use treatment recommendation(s). METHODS: Among all fractures included in the cohort (n=571), the observed treatment approach was evaluated relative to the AAOS "Appropriate" treatment recommendation(s). The proportion, and corresponding 95% confidence interval, of cases that agreed with the "Appropriate" treatment recommendation was estimated. Demographics and clinical characteristics among cases that were managed in accordance with the "Appropriate," "May be Appropriate," or "Rarely Appropriate" were compared. RESULTS: All fractures were treated according to the "Appropriate," "May be Appropriate," or "Rarely Appropriate" AAOS treatment guidelines. The observed treatment among fractures included in the cohort agreed with AAOS "Appropriate" recommendations in 92.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 89.6%-94.2%] of the cases. Fracture type differed significantly between patients treated according to AAOS "Appropriate" recommendations compared to those treated according to "May be Appropriate," or "Rarely Appropriate" recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment approach implemented at a single level 1 trauma center was in concordance with the appropriate use criteria treatment recommendations in a significant majority of cases. Fractures not treated according to "Appopriate" recommendations were primarily type IIA injuries, and were treated with closed reduction and casting instead of the recommended closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Does Insurance Status Affect Treatment of Children With Tibial Spine Fractures?

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported disparities in orthopaedic care resulting from demographic factors, including insurance status. However, the effect of insurance on pediatric tibial spine fractures (TSFs), an uncommon but significant injury, is unknown. PURPOSE: To assess the effect of insurance status on the evaluation and treatment of TSFs in children and adolescents. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of TSFs treated at 10 institutions between 2000 and 2019. Demographic data were collected, as was information regarding pre-, intra-, and postoperative treatment, with attention to delays in management and differences in care. Surgical and nonsurgical fractures were included, but a separate analysis of surgical patients was performed. Univariate analysis was followed by purposeful entry multivariate regression to adjust for confounding factors. RESULTS: Data were collected on 434 patients (mean ± SD age, 11.7 ± 3.0 years) of which 61.1% had private (commercial) insurance. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was obtained at similar rates for children with public and private insurance (41.4% vs 41.9%, respectively; P≥ .999). However, multivariate analysis revealed that those with MRI performed ≥21 days after injury were 5.3 times more likely to have public insurance (95% CI, 1.3-21.7; P = .02). Of the 434 patients included, 365 required surgery. Similar to the overall cohort, those in the surgical subgroup with MRI ≥21 days from injury were 4.8 times more likely to have public insurance (95% CI, 1.2-19.6; P = .03). Children who underwent surgery ≥21 days after injury were 2.5 times more likely to have public insurance (95% CI, 1.1-6.1; P = .04). However, there were no differences in the nature of the surgery or findings at surgery. Those who were publicly insured were 4.1 times more likely to be immobilized in a cast rather than a brace postoperatively (95% CI, 2.3-7.4; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Children with public insurance and a TSF were more likely to experience delays with MRI and surgical treatment than those with private insurance. However, there were no differences in the nature of the surgery or findings at surgery. Additionally, patients with public insurance were more likely to undergo postoperative casting rather than bracing.

A Comparison of Nonoperative and Operative Treatment of Type 2 Tibial Spine Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Tibial spine fractures (TSFs) are typically treated nonoperatively when nondisplaced and operatively when completely displaced. However, it is unclear whether displaced but hinged (type 2) TSFs should be treated operatively or nonoperatively. PURPOSE: To compare operative versus nonoperative treatment of type 2 TSFs in terms of overall complication rate, ligamentous laxity, knee range of motion, and rate of subsequent operation. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: We reviewed 164 type 2 TSFs in patients aged 6 to 16 years treated between January 1, 2000, and January 31, 2019. Excluded were patients with previous TSFs, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, femoral or tibial fractures, or grade 2 or 3 injury of the collateral ligaments or posterior cruciate ligament. Patients were placed according to treatment into the operative group (n = 123) or nonoperative group (n = 41). The only patient characteristic that differed between groups was body mass index (22 [nonoperative] vs 20 [operative]; P = .02). Duration of follow-up was longer in the operative versus the nonoperative group (11 vs 6.9 months). At final follow-up, 74% of all patients had recorded laxity examinations. RESULTS: At final follow-up, the nonoperative group had more ACL laxity than did the operative group (P < .01). Groups did not differ significantly in overall complication rate, reoperation rate, or total range of motion (all, P > .05). The nonoperative group had a higher rate of subsequent new TSFs and ACL injuries requiring surgery (4.9%) when compared with the operative group (0%; P = .01). The operative group had a higher rate of arthrofibrosis (8.9%) than did the nonoperative group (0%; P = .047). Reoperation was most common for hardware removal (14%), lysis of adhesions (6.5%), and manipulation under anesthesia (6.5%). CONCLUSION: Although complication rates were similar between nonoperatively and operatively treated type 2 TSFs, patients treated nonoperatively had higher rates of residual laxity and subsequent tibial spine and ACL surgery, whereas patients treated operatively had a higher rate of arthrofibrosis. These findings should be considered when treating patients with type 2 TSF.

Pediatric Type II Tibial Spine Fractures: Addressing the Treatment Controversy With a Mixed-Effects Model.

BACKGROUND: Tibial spine fractures, although relatively rare, account for a substantial proportion of pediatric knee injuries with effusions and can have significant complications. Meyers and McKeever type II fractures are displaced anteriorly with an intact posterior hinge. Whether this subtype of pediatric tibial spine fracture should be treated operatively or nonoperatively remains controversial. Surgical delay is associated with an increased risk of arthrofibrosis; thus, prompt treatment decision making is imperative. PURPOSE: To assess for variability among pediatric orthopaedic surgeons when treating pediatric type II tibial spine fractures. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment was conducted to determine the patient and injury attributes that influence the management choice. A convenience sample of 20 pediatric orthopaedic surgeons reviewed 40 case vignettes, including physis-blinded radiographs displaying displaced fractures and a description of the patient's sex, age, mechanism of injury, and predominant sport. Surgeons were asked whether they would treat the fracture operatively or nonoperatively. A mixed-effects model was then used to determine the patient attributes most likely to influence the surgeon's decision, as well as surgeon training background, years in practice, and risk-taking behavior. RESULTS: The majority of respondents selected operative treatment for 85% of the presented cases. The degree of fracture displacement was the only attribute significantly associated with treatment choice (P < .001). Surgeons were 28% more likely to treat the fracture operatively with each additional millimeter of displacement of fracture fragment. Over 64% of surgeons chose to treat operatively when the fracture fragment was displaced by ≥3.5 mm. Significant variation in surgeon's propensity for operative treatment of this fracture was observed (P = .01). Surgeon training, years in practice, and risk-taking scores were not associated with the respondent's preference for surgical treatment. CONCLUSION: There was substantial variation among pediatric orthopaedic surgeons when treating type II tibial spine fractures. The decision to operate was based on the degree of fracture displacement. Identifying current treatment preferences among surgeons given different patient factors can highlight current variation in practice patterns and direct efforts toward promoting the most optimal treatment strategies for controversial type II tibial spine fractures.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury at the Time of Anterior Tibial Spine Fracture in Young Patients: An Observational Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Anterior tibial spine fractures (ATSF) in the skeletally immature parallel anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears in adult patients, yet these injuries are generally regarded as mutually exclusive. Biomechanical analysis suggests that intrinsic ACL damage occurs during ATSF, and long-term clinical studies demonstrate residual anteroposterior knee laxity following ATSF. We aim to describe prevalence, demographics, and characteristics of pediatric patients who sustained ATSF with concomitant ACL injury. METHODS: We included 129 patients with ATSF over a 16-year period. Age, sex, injury mechanism, ATSF type, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation, treatment modality, ACL injury, and concomitant meniscal/chondral injuries were analyzed. Concurrent ACL injury was confirmed either from MRI or intraoperatively. RESULTS: Nineteen percent (n=25) of ATSF patients had concomitant ACL injury, with ACL injury significantly more likely in type II or type III ATSF compared with type I ATSF (P=0.03). Patients with combined ATSF/ACL injury were significantly older (P=0.02) and more likely to be male (P=0.01). Mechanism of ATSF injury was not associated with ACL injury (P=0.83). Preoperative MRI had low sensitivity (0.09) for recognizing ACL injury at the time of ATSF relative to intraoperative assessment. Half of ATSF/ACL-injured patients had additional meniscal or chondral injury, with meniscal repair or debridement required in 37.5% of the type II ATSF/ACL injury. CONCLUSIONS: There are demographic characteristics, such as age (older) and sex (male), associated with a higher risk of concomitant ACL injury at the time of ATSF. Type II and type III ATSF patterns had a higher prevalence of ACL injury. MRI failed to correctly identify ACL injury at the time of ATSF. Concomitant ACL injury at the time of ATSF is highly prevalent in the skeletally immature, occurring in 19.4% of patients with ATSF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-case series.