Real-world treatment patterns and effectiveness outcomes in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer.

Background: This retrospective, observational study examined real-world treatment patterns and effectiveness outcomes in 450 patients with stage II-IIIB early-stage triple-negative breast cancer treated in the community oncology setting. Methods: Kaplan-Meier methods were used to evaluate event-free survival (EFS), time to recurrence and overall survival (OS). Cox regression models were used to evaluate predictors of EFS and OS by pathological complete response (pCR) status. Results: Among patients receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy only, pCR was a predictor of EFS and OS. Conclusion: These results highlight the unmet need for therapies that improve outcomes for patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer including increasing rates of pCR among patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy.

Lay abstract This study included 450 patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer treated in the USA at community oncology practices. Patients were female, 18 years or older, diagnosed with stage II, IIIA or IIIB breast cancer between March 2008 and March 2016, and the breast cancer was determined to be triple negative (i.e., negative for estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors and excess HER2 protein). The study looked at the treatments received, whether those treatments worked and the response to treatment at the time of surgery. The study findings align with findings from other studies that complete response in tissue samples is associated with improved clinical outcomes. Triple-negative breast cancer remains challenging to treat, and there is a clear need for innovation in treatment options. Intervening in the early stages of triple-negative breast cancer is critical to improving outcomes.

Healthcare resource utilization and cost among patients treated for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer.

Background: This retrospective, observational study examined real-world healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs in 308 patients diagnosed with early-stage (II-IIIB) triple-negative breast cancer between 1 March 2008 and 31 March 2016. Methods: HCRU and costs were evaluated for two time periods: from neoadjuvant treatment start date to surgery (Time 1) and after surgery to recurrence or death (Time 2). Results: The sample included 236 patients who received neoadjuvant treatment without subsequent adjuvant treatment (Neo) and 72 patients who received neoadjuvant treatment followed by adjuvant treatment (Neo + adj). Mean monthly HCRU events and mean monthly costs per patient were higher in Time 1 compared with Time 2 for both groups. Conclusion: These results demonstrate the economic burden of early-stage triple-negative breast cancer especially during neoadjuvant treatment phase.

Lay abstract This study included 308 patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer treated in the USA at community oncology practices. Patients were female, 18 years or older and diagnosed with stage II, IIIA or IIIB breast cancer between March 2008 and March 2016, and the breast cancer was determined to be triple negative (i.e., negative for estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors and excess HER2 protein). There were 236 patients who received neoadjuvant treatment without subsequent adjuvant treatment (the Neo group) and 72 patients who received neoadjuvant treatment followed by adjuvant treatment (the Neo + adj group). The study looked at healthcare resource use and costs of care during two time periods: from neoadjuvant treatment start date to surgery (Time 1) and after surgery to recurrence or death (Time 2). Average monthly healthcare resource use and average monthly costs of care per patient were higher in Time 1 compared with Time 2 for both groups. These results demonstrate the economic and resource burden of early-stage triple-negative breast cancer especially in the time from neoadjuvant treatment initiation until surgery.

Stakeholder perspectives on costs and resource expenditures: tools for addressing economic issues most relevant to patients, providers, and clinics.

Cost and other resources required are often primary considerations in whether a potential program or policy will be adopted or implemented and an important element in determining value. However, few economic analyses are conducted from the perspective of patient/family or small-scale stakeholders such as local clinics. We outline and discuss alternative cost assessment and resource expenditures options from the perspective of these small, proximal stakeholders. The perspective of these persons differs from larger societal or health plan perspectives, and often differs across individuals in terms of what they value and the types of expenditures about which they are concerned. We discuss key features of the perspectives of patients, health care clinics, and local leaders, and present brief examples and sample templates for collection of consumer/stakeholder relevant cost and return on investment issues. These tools can be used prospectively and iteratively during program planning, intervention delivery, summative analysis, and preparation for dissemination stages. There is an important need for this type of feasible, pragmatic, rapid, and iterative cost and resource expenditure analysis directly relevant to patients/families, small local stakeholders and their organizations. Future research on and use of these approaches is recommended.

Guideline-Driven Care Improves Outcomes in Patients with Traumatic Rib Fractures.

There is no established national standard for rib fracture management. A clinical practice guideline (CPG) for rib fractures, including monitoring of pulmonary function, early initiation of aggressive loco-regional analgesia, and early identification of deteriorating respiratory function, was implemented in 2013. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of the CPG on hospital length of stay. Hospital length of stay (LOS) was compared for adult patients admitted to the hospital with rib fracture(s) two years before and two years after CPG implementation. A separate analysis was done for the patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Over the 48-month study period, 571 patients met inclusion criteria for the study. Pre-CPG and CPG study groups were well matched with few differences. Multivariable regression did not demonstrate a difference in LOS (B = -0.838; P = 0.095) in the total study cohort. In the ICU cohort (n = 274), patients in the CPG group were older (57 vs 52 years; P = 0.023) and had more rib fractures (4 vs 3; P = 0.003). Multivariable regression identified a significant decrease in LOS for those patients admitted in the CPG period (B = -2.29; P = 0.019). Despite being significantly older with more rib fractures in the ICU cohort, patients admitted after implementation of the CPG had a significantly reduced LOS on multivariable analysis, reducing LOS by over two days. This structured intervention can limit narcotic usage, improve pulmonary function, and decrease LOS in the most injured patients with chest trauma.

Treating Decompression Sickness: Military Flight Simulation Site-Community Hospital Partnership.

BACKGROUND: High-altitude flight simulation familiarizes military trainees with the symptoms of hypoxia to prepare them for emergency situations. Decompression sickness (DCS) can occur as a result of these simulations. In cases when ground-level supplemental oxygen does not resolve symptoms, hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy is indicated. Many military hyperbaric chambers have been closed because of cost reductions, necessitating partnerships with community hospitals to ensure access to treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This article describes the unique arrangement between a community hospital in Colorado and a military training site to treat DCS cases emergently. We gathered cost data from the community hospital to estimate and compare the cost of providing HBO therapy in the hospital versus a standalone chamber similar to the former military hyperbaric chamber. RESULTS: Since the closure of the military hyperbaric chamber, the community hospital treated an estimated 50 patients with DCS requiring HBO therapy attributed to high-altitude flight simulation between October 2003 and April 2015. Cost to the institution providing HBO treatment varies widely on the basis of patient volume. Assuming a volume of five treatments, per-treatment cost at a standalone center is $95,380. In contrast, per-treatment cost at the hospital assuming a volume of 1,000 treatments commensurate with the hospital's ability to bill for other services is $698 per treatment. CONCLUSION: The cost analysis demonstrates that the per-treatment cost of operating a standalone HBO therapy center may be greater than 100 times that of operating a center at a community hospital, suggesting the arrangement is beneficial to the military.