Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Mutat Res ; 627(1): 36-40, 2007 Feb 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17157054

RESUMO

The Mouse Lymphoma Assay (MLA) Workgroup of the International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT), comprised of experts from Japan, Europe and the United States, met on September 9, 2005, in San Francisco, CA, USA. This meeting of the MLA Workgroup was devoted to reaching a consensus on issues involved with 24-h treatment. Recommendations were made concerning the acceptable values for the negative/solvent control (mutant frequency, cloning efficiency and suspension growth) and the criteria to define an acceptable positive control response. Consensus was also reached concerning the use of the global evaluation factor (GEF) and appropriate statistical trend analysis to define positive and negative responses for the 24-h treatment. The Workgroup agreed to continue their support of the International Committee on Harmonization (ICH) recommendation that the MLA assay should include a 24-h treatment (without S-9) in those situations where the short treatment (3-4 h) gives negative results.


Assuntos
Linfoma/genética , Testes de Mutagenicidade/métodos , Mutação , Timidina Quinase/genética , Animais , Camundongos , Mutagênicos/toxicidade , Fatores de Tempo
2.
Environ Mol Mutagen ; 47(1): 1-5, 2006 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15991242

RESUMO

The Mouse Lymphoma Assay (MLA) Workgroup of the International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT), comprised of experts from Japan, Europe, and the United States, met on August 29, 2003, in Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom. This meeting of the MLA Workgroup was devoted to reaching a consensus on the appropriate approach to data evaluation and on acceptance criteria for both the positive and negative/vehicle controls. The Workgroup reached consensus on the acceptance criteria for both the agar and microwell versions of the MLA. Recommendations include acceptable ranges for mutant frequency, cloning efficiency, and suspension growth of the negative/vehicle controls and on criteria to define an acceptable positive control response. The recommendation for the determination of a positive/negative test chemical response includes both the requirement that the response exceeds a defined value [the global evaluation factor (GEF)] and that there also be a positive dose-response (evaluated by an appropriate statistical method).


Assuntos
Bioensaio/normas , Testes de Mutagenicidade/normas , Timidina Quinase/genética , Animais , Linfoma/enzimologia , Linfoma/genética , Camundongos , Mutação
3.
Mutat Res ; 557(1): 85-97, 2004 Jan 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14706521

RESUMO

Both positive and negative effects have been found in classical genetic toxicology assays with capsaicin. However, the capsaicin tested in most studies has been derived from pepper plant extracts, which is likely to display varying degrees of purity and possibly diverse impurity profiles. Therefore, the objective of the series of studies reported here was to test the genotoxic potential of pure, synthetic trans-capsaicin (the only naturally occurring geometric isomer of capsaicin), using four genotoxicity assays widely used to evaluate drug substances. These included the Ames, mouse lymphoma cell mutation, mouse in vivo bone marrow micronucleus and chromosomal aberration in human peripheral blood lymphocytes (HPBL) assays. In the Ames assay, pure trans-capsaicin was not mutagenic to Salmonella typhimurium or Escherichia coli when dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide and tested at concentrations extending into the toxic range. trans-Capsaicin was weakly mutagenic in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells, in the presence of S9 mix, when dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide and tested at concentrations extending into the toxic range. Limited evidence for very weak activity was also obtained in the absence of S9 mix. trans-Capsaicin did not induce micronuclei in bone marrow cells when tested to the maximum tolerated dose of 800 mg/kg per day in male and 200 mg/kg per day in female CD-1 mice using a 0 h plus 24 h oral dosing and 48 h sampling regimen. Finally, trans-capsaicin did not induce structural or numerical chromosomal aberrations when evaluated for its ability to induce clastogenicity in blood lymphocytes. Taken together, these data suggest that the genotoxic potential of pure trans-capsaicin is very low, especially as the clinical significance of weak mutagenicity in the mouse lymphoma assay for catechol-moiety containing compounds is unclear. Moreover, the different genotoxicity profiles of pure trans-capsaicin and purified chili pepper extracts suggest that the purity and source of capsaicin should always be an important consideration for toxicological evaluations.


Assuntos
Capsaicina/toxicidade , Mutagênicos/toxicidade , Animais , Capsaicina/farmacocinética , Aberrações Cromossômicas , Feminino , Linfoma/genética , Masculino , Camundongos , Testes para Micronúcleos , Testes de Mutagenicidade , Mutação , Salmonella typhimurium/efeitos dos fármacos , Salmonella typhimurium/genética , Estereoisomerismo
4.
Mutat Res ; 540(2): 127-40, 2003 Oct 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14550497

RESUMO

The Mouse Lymphoma Assay (MLA) Workgroup of the International Workshop on Genotoxicity Tests (IWGT) met on June 28th and 29th, 2002, in Plymouth, England. This meeting of the MLA group was devoted to discussing the criteria for assay acceptance and appropriate approaches to data evaluation. Prior to the meeting, the group conducted an extensive analysis of data from both the microwell and soft agar versions of the assay. For the establishment of criteria for assay acceptance, 10 laboratories (6 using the microwell method and 4 using soft agar) provided data on their background mutant frequencies, plating efficiencies of the negative/vehicle control, cell suspension growth, and positive control mutant frequencies. Using the distribution curves generated from this data, the Workgroup reached consensus on the range of values that should be used to determine whether an individual experiment is acceptable. In order to establish appropriate approaches for data evaluation, the group used a number of statistical methods to evaluate approximately 400 experimental data sets from 10 laboratories entered into a database created for the earlier MLA Workshop held in New Orleans [Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 40 (2002) 292]. While the Workgroup could not, during this meeting, make a final recommendation for the evaluation of data, a general strategy was developed and the Workgroup members agreed to evaluate this new proposed approach using their own laboratory data. This evaluation should lead to a consensus global approach for data evaluation in the near future.


Assuntos
Bioensaio/normas , Linfoma/metabolismo , Timidina Quinase/análise , Animais , Camundongos , Testes de Mutagenicidade/normas
5.
Environ Mol Mutagen ; 40(4): 292-9, 2002.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12489120

RESUMO

The Mouse Lymphoma Assay (MLA) Workgroup of the International Workshop on Genotoxicity Test Procedures held a second harmonization meeting just prior to the U.S. Environmental Mutagen Society Meeting in New Orleans, LA, in April 2000. The discussion focused on several important aspects of the MLA, including: 1) cytotoxicity measures and their determination, 2) use of a 24-hr treatment, 3) the ability of the assay to detect aneugens, and 4) concentration selection. Prior to the meeting the group developed Microsoft Excel Workbooks for data entry. Ten laboratories entered their data into the workbooks (primarily as coded chemicals). The Excel Workbooks were used to facilitate data analysis by generating an extensive set of graphs that were evaluated by the meeting participants. Based on the Workgroup's previous agreement that a single cytotoxicity measure should be established for both the microwell and soft agar versions of the assay, the Workgroup analyzed the submitted data and unanimously agreed that the relative total growth (RTG) should be used as the cytotoxicity measure for concentration selection and data evaluation. The Workgroup also agreed that the various cytotoxicity measures should be calculated using the same methods regardless of whether the soft agar or microwell version of the assay was used. In the absence of sufficient data to make a definitive determination, the Workgroup continued to endorse the International Committee on Harmonization recommendation for the use of 24-hr treatment and made some specific 24-hr treatment protocol recommendations. The Workgroup recognized the ability of the MLA to detect at least some aneugens and also developed general guidance and requirements for appropriate concentration selection.


Assuntos
Linfoma/enzimologia , Testes de Mutagenicidade/métodos , Mutação , Timidina Quinase/genética , Animais , Educação , Guias como Assunto , Camundongos , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...