Effect of magnesium sulphate on the intracranial pressure of preeclampsia patients using ultrasound-guided optic nerve sheath diameter: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Increased intracranial pressure (ICP) is a known complication of pre-eclampsia with severe features. The use of magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) is the standard treatment and is associated with marked reduction of cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) and prevention of cerebral damage. Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) ultrasonography is a bedside tool used to reflect changes in the ICP. The aim of this study is to detect the effect of MgSO4 administration on ICP in severe preeclampsia through measuring changes in the ONDS. METHODS: Thirty pregnant female patients suffering from severe pre-eclampsia were enrolled in this prospective pilot study. Ultrasound measurement of ONSD was measured before the commencement of MgSO4 and after 1, 6, and 24 h after the administration. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in ONSD measurements between that at baseline and post magnesium administration at 1, 6, and 24 h (P-value 0.001). Additionally, a significant difference in measurements between 1 and 6 and 6 and 24 h after magnesium initiation (P-value 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound ONSD measurement in patients with severe preeclampsia is a non-invasive easy tool to detect increased intracranial pressure and monitor the response to magnesium sulphate infusion.

Faultless impressive results: How can I do it?

The result section of the research presents your actual work. The results could be either support or invalidate the research hypothesis. Writing in a scientific, impressive and faultless way increases the chance of acceptance in high impact factors journal. The result would be in a descriptive style around 3-4 paragraphs. The first paragraph is normally an illustration of the studied population. Followed by the second paragraph, which is a description of the main results. Expressing the secondary outcome is usually the next paragraph. Additional results not directly related to the research question are mentioned in the last paragraph. Chosen the correct format for the data (Tables and Figures) is mentioned in this review.

Does neck circumference help to predict difficult intubation in obstetric patients? A prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Failed intubation in obstetrics remains the most common cause of death directly related to anesthesia. Neck circumference has been shown to be a predictor for difficult intubation in morbidly obese patients. The aim of this study was to determine an optimal cutoff point of neck circumference for prediction of difficult intubation in obstetric patients. METHODS: Ninety-four parturients scheduled for cesarean section under general anesthesia were included in the study. Preoperative airway assessment and neck circumference were measured. Difficult intubation was the primary outcome according to the intubation difficulty scale (IDS), intubation reported difficult if the IDS score was ≥5. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed that Mallampati score and neck circumference were positive predictors for difficult intubation (P = 0.005 and P = 0.011, respectively). Mouth opening, thyromental distance, sternomental distance, and the hyomental distance ratio were not useful predictors (P = 0.68, P = 0.87, P = 0.48, and P = 0.27, respectively). Logistic regression for the Mallampati score and neck circumference negative results as independent predictors of difficult intubation in obstetric (P = 0.53). Sensitivity analysis showed that neck circumference of 33.5 cm is the cutoff point to detect difficult intubation with 100% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI]: 69.2-100) and 50% specificity (95% CI: 38.9-61.1). The area under the curve for neck circumference was 0.746 (95% CI: 0.646-0.830) with a positive predictive value of 19.2 (95% CI: 9.6-32.5), a negative predicative value of 100 (95% CI: 91.6-100), and a P < 0.0001. CONCLUSIONS: In obstetric patients, a neck circumference ≥33.5 cm is a sensitive predictor for difficult intubation.

Development and validation of Arabic version of the postoperative quality of recovery scale.

INTRODUCTION: The postoperative quality of recovery scale (PostopQRS) is a widely used tool to assess the postoperative quality of recovery. Our aim was to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the PostopQRS questionnaire in Arabic. METHODOLOGY: A systematic translation process was used to translate the original English PostopQRS into Arabic. After the pilot study, the translated version was validated among patients who underwent different types of surgeries. We examined the reliability (using internal consistency) and validity of the translated version. To examine the responsiveness of the translated PostopQRS, the questionnaire was administered 6 times among the same group of patients (once before surgery as baseline measure, and 5 times after surgery, up to 1 week after surgery). RESULTS: A total of 190 patients (10 men, 180 women) were included. Internal consistencies vary across each domain and overtime, with mostly good to excellent reliability. Most patients found the PostopQRS questions to be clear and easy to understand and thought the questionnaire items covered all their problem areas regarding their quality of recovery. In general, patients showed recovery across all five domains starting from postoperative day 1 (POD1). Patients showed the fastest recovery in the emotional domain, and the proportion of recovered patients remained stable over time. Most patients were recovered in the cognitive domain by POD1. Although only a small proportion of patients were recovered in the physiological and activities of daily living domains in POD1, most patients were recovered by POD3. The proportion of patients recovered in the nociceptive domain declined initially, but more patients showed recovery by POD3 and most were recovered by POD7. Furthermore, quality of recovery was related to the extent of surgery (major vs. minor). CONCLUSION: Our translated version of PostopQRS was reliable and valid for use among Arabic-speaking patients. In addition, we showed that the PostopQRS was able to track the changes in recovery among patients in our study.

Development and validation of Arabic version of the postoperative quality of recovery-40 questionnaire.

INTRODUCTION: The postoperative quality of recovery-40 (QoR-40) is one of the most frequently used tools to assess the quality of recovery after surgery. The aim of the current study was to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the QoR-40 questionnaire in Arabic. METHODS: A systematic translation process was used to translate the original English QoR-40 into Arabic. After the pilot study, the translated version was validated among patients who underwent different types of surgeries. The reliability (using internal consistency) and validity of our translated Arabic version was examined. To investigate the responsiveness of the translated QoR-40, the questionnaire was administered five times among the same group of patients (once before surgery as baseline measure, and four times after surgery, up to 1 week after surgery). RESULTS: A total of 182 participants (7 men, 175 women) were included in the study. The QoR-40 total scale and all subscales showed excellent internal consistencies over time, with the exception of the QoR-40 pain subscale at postoperative day 1. The QoR-40 total and subscale scores were inversely associated with patients' self-report pain scores but positively correlated with patients' self-report recovery scores. Patients' QoR-40 total, comfort, emotions, and physical subscale scores increased over time after surgery, indicating a general trend of recovery over time. Patients' scores in the QoR-40 pain and support subscales remained stable over time, suggesting no substantial changes were reported in these two domains. Quality of recovery was also found to be related to patients' ages, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status, and the extent of surgery (major vs. minor). Most patients found the Arabic QoR-40 questions to be clear and easy to understand and thought the questionnaire items covered all their problem areas regarding their quality of recovery. CONCLUSION: Our translated version of QoR-40 was reliable and valid for use among Arabic-speaking patients. In addition, the QoR-40 was able to assess the quality of recovery in several domains among patients who underwent surgical procedures.

Optimal propofol induction dose in morbidly obese patients: A randomized controlled trial comparing the bispectral index and lean body weight scalar.

PURPOSE: Propofol dosing based on total body weight (TBW) can lead to overdosing in morbidly obese (MO) patients. Our aim was to determine whether an induction dose of propofol based on a bispectral index (BIS) target is better for achieving loss of consciousness in MO patients than dosing based on lean body weight (LBW). METHODS: Sixty MO patients with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥ 40 kg·m-2 were randomized to either BIS- or LBW-based propofol dosing groups. Anesthesia was induced with a propofol infusion of 100 mg·kg-1·hr-1 to an initial target endpoint of a BIS of 50 (BIS group) or until a precalculated dose of 2.6 mg·kg-1 LBW based on the Janmahasatian equation was administered (LBW group). Induction was assessed using the observer's assessment alertness/sedation scale (OAA/S). If an OAA/S score of 0 was not achieved, infusions continued until it reached 0. The groups were compared for the primary outcome which was the difference in the propofol doses at the initial target endpoint. RESULTS: The median [interquartile range] OAA/S score at the initial target endpoint was lower in the BIS group than in the LBW group (0 [0-0] vs 1 [0-3], respectively; median difference 1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0 to 3; P = 0.001). The number of patients requiring additional propofol doses was also higher for the LBW group [1 vs 18 patients, respectively; relative risk of requiring additional propofol 18; 95% CI 3 to 126; P = 0.001]. The mean (SD) propofol dose at the target endpoint was significantly lower in the LBW group than in the BIS group [164 (36) mg vs 225 (44) mg, respectively; mean difference 61 mg; 95% CI 41 to 83 mg; P = 0.002]. There was no difference between the two groups, however, regarding the total induction dose of propofol needed for the OAA/S to reach 0 (P = 0.07). CONCLUSION: The induction dose of propofol based on the BIS index was different from the induction dose based on LBW in MO patients. Patients in the LBW group required additional propofol to achieve an OAA/S of 0.

Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Pain After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Effective postoperative analgesia after cesarean delivery enhances early recovery, ambulation, and breastfeeding. In a previous study, we established the effectiveness of the quadratus lumborum block in providing pain relief after cesarean delivery compared with patient-controlled analgesia (morphine). In the current study, we hypothesized that this method would be equal to or better than the transversus abdominis plane block with regard to pain relief and its duration of action after cesarean delivery. METHODS: Between April 2015 and August 2015, we randomized 76 patients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia to receive the quadratus lumborum block or the transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative pain relief. This trial was registered prospectively (NCT 02489851) [corrected]. RESULTS: Patients in the quadratus lumborum block group used significantly less morphine than the transversus abdominis plane block group (P < 0.05) at 12, 24, and 48 hours but not at 4 and 6 hours after cesarean delivery. This group also had significantly fewer morphine demands than the control group (P < 0.05) at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after cesarean delivery. No significant differences in visual analog scale results were shown between the 2 groups at rest or with movement. Calculated total pain relief at rest and with movement were similar (P < 0.001) in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The quadratus lumborum block was more effective in reducing morphine consumption and demands than transversus abdominis plane blocks after cesarean section. This effect was observed up to 48 hours postoperatively.

Neck circumference as a predictor of difficult intubation and difficult mask ventilation in morbidly obese patients: A prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: There is conflicting evidence as to whether obesity and neck circumference are predictors of difficult intubation in the surgical population. In addition, the cut-off neck circumference related to difficult intubation has not been clearly identified. OBJECTIVES: The primary study objective was to determine whether neck circumference and obesity were predictors of difficult intubation in morbidly obese surgical patients. Secondary outcomes included difficult mask ventilation. DESIGN: A prospective, noninterventional study. SETTING: Canadian tertiary care surgical centre between October 2012 and August 2013. PATIENTS: A total of 104 morbidly obese surgical patients (BMI ≥40  kg  m(-2)) were included in the study. Eighty-eight patients were women and 16 were men. Exclusions were known difficult airway and emergency surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome of the study was difficult tracheal intubation. An Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) was derived using seven parameters and difficult intubation was defined as IDS of at least 5. The secondary outcome was difficult mask ventilation; mask ventilation was graded as easy or difficult (inadequate, desaturation, two-handed or impossible). RESULTS: Univariate analyses showed that difficult intubation was associated with neck circumference, males, BMI more than 50  kg  m(-2), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status and waist circumference, and difficult mask ventilation with neck circumference, males, BMI more than 50  kg  m(-2) and thyromental distance. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that neck circumference more than 42  cm (P = 0.044) and BMI more than 50  kg  m(-2) (P = 0.017) were independent predictors of difficult intubation. Male sex (P = 0.004) and BMI more than 50  kg  m(-2) (P = 0.031) were independent predictors of difficult mask ventilation.

Influence of GlideScope assisted endotracheal intubation on intraocular pressure in ophthalmic patients.

BACKGROUND: Traditional Macintoch laryngoscopy is known to cause a rise in intraocular pressure (IOP), tachycardia and hypertension. These changes are not desirable in patients with glaucoma and open globe injury. GlideScope is a video laryngoscope that functions independent of the line of sight, reduces upward lifting forces for glottic exposure and requires less cervical neck movement for intubation, making it less stimulating than Macintosh laryngoscopy. AIM: The aim was to assess the variations in IOP and hemodynamic changes after GlideScope assisted intubation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After approval of the local Institutional Research and Ethical Board and informed patient consent, 50 adult American Society of Anesthesiologist I and II patients with normal IOP were enrolled in a prospective, randomized study for ophthalmic surgery requiring tracheal intubation. In all patients, trachea was intubated using either GlideScope or Macintoch laryngoscope. IOP of nonoperated eye, heart rate and blood pressure were measured as baseline, 1 min after induction, 1 min and 5 min after tracheal intubation. RESULTS: IOP was not significantly different between groups before and after anesthetic induction and 5 min after tracheal intubation (P = 0.217, 0.726, and 0.110 respectively). The only significant difference in IOP was at 1 min after intubation (P = 0.041). No significant difference noted between groups in mean arterial pressure (P = 0.899, 0.62, 0.47, 0.82 respectively) and heart rate (P = 0.21, 0.72, 0.07, 0.29, respectively) at all measurements. CONCLUSION: GlideScope assisted tracheal intubation shown lesser rise in IOP at 1 min after intubation in comparison to Macintoch laryngoscope, suggesting that GlideScope may be preferable to Macintosh laryngoscope.

Three dimensional MRI study: Safety of short versus long needle peribulbar anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: The standard technique of Peribulbar block is to use 25 g 25 mm needle at the junction between the lateral one third and medial two third of the lower orbital rim in the infero-temporal quadrant of the orbit. Theoretically, insertion of longer needles increases the potential of injury to important structure; however, safety of the shorter needle had never been demonstrated. This study describes the anatomy of the orbital structures with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using the three-dimensional constructive interference in steady state (3D CISS) sequence to present a morphological basis for needle entry at 12.5 and 25 mm lengths. Statistical comparisons were performed at the 12.5 versus 25 mm depths. Statistical significance was indicated by P < 0.05. METHOD: Fifty patients free of orbital pathology with normal axial length were selected for MRI with the 3D CISS sequence. Original axial and multiplanar image reconstruction (MPR) images were selected for image interpretation. Orbital structures were identified at 12.5 and 25 mm depths from the orbital rim to compare significant differences in anatomy between the two imaging planes at the expected needle depth and to assess the size of the globe and the orbit. RESULTS: The cross sectional area of the extraocular muscles were statistically significantly smaller at the 12.5 mm plane (P = 0.001). The area of inferotemporal fat was statistically significantly larger at the 12.5 mm plane (P = 0.033). There was no statistical difference in the inferonasal and superonasal fat areas at different depths (P = 0.34, P = 0.35 respectively). The size of the orbit and globe was significantly larger at 12.5 mm (P = 0.001). There was no difference between depths in the presence or absence of neurovascular bundles and supporting structures including the intramuscular septae. CONCLUSION: There is a larger structure-free space at a depth of 12.5 mm than at 25 mm. Therefore, the inference is that a needle inserted in the infero-temporal zone to a depth of 12.5 mm is less likely to injure the eyeball or extra-ocular muscles than one advanced to 25 mm.

Selection of obese patients undergoing ambulatory surgery: a systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of obesity has increased over the past 2 decades. In recent years, several studies have assessed perioperative outcomes in obese patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. However, this evidence has not been reviewed and evaluated systematically. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of studies published between 1948 and May 2012, assessing perioperative outcome in adult obese patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. All studies were eligible for inclusion if they reported perioperative complications including unplanned hospital admission and readmission. RESULTS: A literature search revealed 23 studies (13 prospective and 10 retrospective), and 1 systematic review assessing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. A total of 106,119 patients were included in the analysis with 62,476 patients included in the prospective trials and 43,643 patients included in the retrospective trials (not including the systematic review of laparoscopic bariatric surgery). Of these, 39,548 patients underwent bariatric surgery. The super obese (body mass index [BMI] >50 kg/m) appear to be at higher risk of complications. Patients undergoing nonbariatric surgery had a lower degree of obesity (BMI approximately 30 kg/m). Patients undergoing bariatric surgery were morbidly obese (BMI >40 kg/m), which is associated with a higher comorbidity burden. However, the lack of increase in unanticipated admission rate in this patient population may be related to thorough preoperative assessment and avoidance of patients with comorbid conditions. DISCUSSION: The literature lacks adequate information to make strong recommendations regarding appropriate selection of the obese patients scheduled for ambulatory surgery. The literature does indicate that the super obese (BMI >50 kg/ m) do present an increased risk for perioperative complications, while patient with lower BMIs do not seem to present any increased risk as long as any comorbidities are minimal or optimized before surgery. This review also identifies knowledge gaps and recommends future research required to guide optimal selection of obese patients scheduled for ambulatory surgery.

New supraglottic airway with built-in pressure indicator decreases postoperative pharyngolaryngeal symptoms: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Excessive supraglottic airway cuff pressure increases postoperative pharyngolaryngeal symptoms such as sore throat, dysphonia, and dysphagia. A new supraglottic airway, AES Ultra CPV™ (CPV), has a built-in intracuff pressure indicator. We hypothesized that using the CPV would reduce postoperative symptoms when compared with the LMA Classic™ (LMA) without intracuff pressure guidance. METHODS: Ambulatory patients undergoing general anesthesia were randomized to either CPV or LMA. A size 3/4/5 was inserted according to manufacturer guidelines. Nitrous oxide was not used. In the LMA Group, the cuff was inflated according to manufacturer's guidelines. In the CPV Group, a CPV was inserted and the cuff inflated until the indicator was in the green zone (30-44 mmHg). Intracuff pressures were measured at five minutes and 20 min post-insertion in both groups. The primary outcome was the incidence of pharyngolaryngeal symptoms, defined as sore throat, dysphonia, and/or dysphagia at one, two, and/or 24 hr postoperatively. Continuous data were compared using Student's t test and categorical data were analyzed using Chi square analysis. RESULTS: The study included 170 patients, 85 per group. The mean (SD) intracuff pressure in the CPV group was significantly lower [44 (4) mmHg] than in the LMA Group [87 (37) mmHg]; P < 0.001. The incidence of pharyngolaryngeal symptoms was significantly lower in the CPV Group than in the LMA Group (26% vs 49%; P = 0.002). The absolute risk reduction was 24%, and the number-needed-to-treat was 4.3. CONCLUSION: The incidence of postoperative pharyngolaryngeal symptoms in the CPV Group with a cuff pressure-guided strategy was significantly lower than in the LMA Group with standard practice. ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01800344).

Anesthesia for pars plana vitrectomy with insulin needle, is it possible?

Peribulbar block is commonly used for ocular posterior segment surgery. This work aimed to compare the efficacy of using 12.5 mm to 25 mm standard needle length in performing single injection peribulbar block for retinal surgery. Peribulbar block was performed in 120 patients using either standard 25 mm or 12.5 mm 30 G needle (insulin needle). While applying digital pressure around the needle hub, 8-10 mL of local anesthetic are injected. Ocular movement was assessed at 5 and 10 min using simple akinesia score (0-8). If after 10 min score was >1, supplementary injection was given. Visual analogue scale (0-10) was used at the end of the procedure to assess surgeons' satisfaction and patients' intraoperative pain. No differences in akinesia score at 5 & 10 min (P = 0.34 and 0.36, resp.). Initial volume injected was comparable between groups (P = 0.31), however total volume of local anesthesia and supplementary injections were significantly higher in 12.5 mm group (P = 0.03 and 0.01, resp.). No difference as regard surgeons' satisfaction and patients' intraoperative pain (P = 1.0 and 0.18, resp.). Peribulbar block with 12.5 mm needle together with digital compression is a suitable alternative to the standard block with 25 mm needle length for retinal surgery.

Comparison of metal and flexible sub-Tenon cannulas.

PURPOSE: To compare metal posterior, flexible posterior, and flexible medium sub-Tenon cannulas for akinesia and anesthesia. SETTING: King Khaled Specialist Eye Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. DESIGN: Prospective blind randomized comparison. METHOD: Patients having cataract surgery under sub-Tenon block received a mixture of bupivacaine and lidocaine with hyaluronidase. The patients were divided into 3 groups based on whether a metal posterior sub-Tenon cannula, flexible posterior sub-Tenon cannula, or flexible medium sub-Tenon cannula was used. Pain during injection, akinesia, anesthesia, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: The study enrolled 159 patients. The akinesia score, superior oblique muscle activity, lid movements, and pain during injection were significantly lower in the metal posterior cannula group 2 minutes after injection (P=.002, P=.008, P=.097, and P=.001, respectively); there was no significant difference at 4 minutes, 6 minutes, 8 minutes, and 10 minutes. The incidence of intraoperative pain was low in all groups (P=.607). Chemosis was significantly less in the flexible posterior cannula group (P=.003); however, there was no significant difference in the site of chemosis (P=.460). There was no significant difference in the incidence, site, or severity of subconjunctival hemorrhage (P=.087, P=.072, and P=.331, respectively). No serious complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Rigid posterior, flexible posterior, and flexible medium cannulas produced effective and equivalent anesthesia. The flexible cannulas may be safer than the rigid cannulas. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Comparison of levobupivacaine 0.5% or bupivacaine 0.5% both in a mixture with lidocaine 2% for superficial extraconal blockade.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the quality and efficacy of Peribulbar blockade for superficial extraconal anesthesia with levobupivacaine 0.5% versus bupivacaine 0.5%, both combined with lidocaine 2% for patients undergoing phacoemulsification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective, double blind study, 150 patients were randomly divided into two groups: group-1 received a Peribulbar block (PB) with a mixture of evobupivacaine 0.5% and lidocaine 2% while group-2 received a PB with a mixture of bupivacaine 0.5% and lidocaine 2%. The block was performed by insertion of a short needle (15 mm) in infra-temporal space just above inferior orbital notch. An initial volume of 6 9 ml of either mixture was injected until total upper eyelid drop. Akinesia score was assessed at 2, 5, and 10 min after the block. The degree of pain was assessed by a verbal rating scale immediately after block, at the end of surgery and 4 h postoperatively. The patients and surgeons were asked to rate their satisfaction level of the quality of block postoperatively. Data were analyzed with the unpaired, two-tailed t-test and the Chi-square test as appropriate. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups with respect to the akinesia score (P = 0.2) at 2, 5, and 10 min, the number of supplementary injections (P = 0.84) and initial and total required volume of local anesthetics (P = 0.80 and 0.81, respectively). There was no significant difference between the groups regarding surgeon and patient satisfaction (P = 0.53 and P = 0.74, respectively). Similarly the verbal rating scales assessed at three different occasions were not significantly different between the groups (P > 0.05 all cases). The need for additional intra-operative topical anesthetic was also similar between the groups. (P = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS: Superficial extra-conal block with a mixture of levobupivicaine 0.5% and lidocaine 2% or bupivicaine 0.5% and lidocaine 2% provides similar block quality and efficacy.

A novel method for laryngeal mask airway size selection in paediatric patients.

CONTEXT: The successful use of the laryngeal mask airway in children partly depends on the correct selection of size. Most anaesthesiologists rely on the weight-based table which is often difficult to remember. A simple method allowing an adequate choice of the correct size may be highly desirable. OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that the size of the external ear (pinna) of the child may be used as proxy for the required size of laryngeal mask airway. DESIGN: A descriptive study. SETTING: King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. PATIENTS: Two hundred and ten paediatric patients aged 6 months to 15 years, of either sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1-2 and scheduled for routine ophthalmological procedures from 1 March to 31 December 2010. Emergency cases, patients with a full stomach or with a history of any oropharyngeal lesion other than tonsillar hypertrophy were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The size of the external ear was measured with a ruler in vertical and horizontal dimensions in the first 30 patients, and visually evaluated for the remaining patients. For all, the nearest corresponding size of partially inflated laryngeal mask airway was chosen and inserted after induction. The correct placement was assessed using predefined criteria. RESULTS: Insertion and good ventilation was achieved in 196 (93.3%) on first attempt. Fourteen patients (6.7%) required a second attempt and the main reason for failure was an audible leak because of smaller size. CONCLUSION: Choosing the size of the laryngeal mask airway in children according to the size of the external ear was associated with a success rate of 93% which is comparable with that reported in the literature when the tables are used. This simple method may allow a rapid choice of the correct size of laryngeal mask airway and may eliminate the need to remember different tables or formulae.

Ophthalmic regional blockade complication rate: a single center audit of 33,363 ophthalmic operations.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and contributing factors of complications for patients receiving regional ophthalmic anesthesia. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: Tertiary-care eye center. MEASUREMENTS: Anesthesia records of ophthalmic blocks performed from January 2003 to June 2009 were reviewed. The frequency of block-related complications and details of each complication were recorded. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 33,363 peribulbar blocks were performed, with a total incidence of 0.12% (41 cases). These complications may be divided into systemic complications, 18 cases (0.053%) and needle-related complications, 23 cases (0.068%). CONCLUSION: Peribulbar block complications were rare. In this series, experience of caregivers and axial and needle length were not contributing factors.

Airtraq™ versus Macintoch laryngoscope in intubation performance in the pediatric population.

PURPOSE: Airtraq™ is an optical laryngoscope that allows viewing of the vocal cords without a direct line of sight. The main objective of this prospective, randomized, controlled trial was to evaluate Airtraq intubation characteristics, mainly intubation time and cardiovascular changes in the pediatric patients. METHODS: Fifty children of American Society of Anesthesiologists class I, 2-10 years of age were divided into 2 groups using sealed envelope technique. Children were premedicated with midazolam. Anesthesia was induced with sevoflurane, fentanyl, and atracurium. Patients were randomly allocated to be intubated with either Airtraq (Airtraq group) or Macintosh laryngoscope (Macintosh group). Intubation time, number of intubation attempts, optimization maneuvers, and ease of intubation were recorded. Hemodynamic variables were recorded before and after anesthetic induction, 1, 3, and 5 min after tracheal intubation. RESULTS: The mean age of children was 6.1 years. Compared with Macintosh group, the use of Airtraq was associated with shorter intubation time (51.6±26.7 s vs 22.8±6.1 s, respectively, P=0.001), less median number of intubation attempts 2 (1-2) versus 1 (1-1), P=0.001), more ease of intubation [2 (1-3) versus 1 (1-1), P=0.001] and less increase in the heart rate 5 min after intubation (P=0.007). No optimization maneuvers required for Airtraq laryngoscope (P=0.001). CONCLUSION: Airtraq decreases intubation time, number of attempts, and optimization maneuvers, less heart rate changes during intubation compared with Macintosh laryngoscope.