Airway responsiveness measured by forced oscillation technique in severely obese patients, before and after bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: The influence of obesity on airway responsiveness remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to investigate airway responsiveness, airway inflammation, and the influence of sleep apnea syndrome (SAS), in severely obese subjects, before and after bariatric surgery. METHODS: A total of 120 non-asthmatic obese patients were referred consecutively for pre-bariatric surgery evaluation. Lung function, airway responsiveness to methacholine, exhaled nitric oxide measurement, and sleep studies were performed. Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) was defined as a 50% or greater increase in respiratory resistance measured using the forced oscillation technique in response to a methacholine dose ≤ 2000 µg. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was measured after the last methacholine dose. Airway responsiveness was reevaluated after weight loss in patients with a pre-surgery AHR. RESULTS: AHR was found in 16 patients. The percent FEV1 decrease or percent respiratory resistance increase in response to methacholine was related to baseline expiratory airflow (forced expiratory flow at 50%) (r = 0.26, p < .006 and r = 0.315, p = .0005, respectively) but not to body mass index (BMI) or exhaled nitric oxide. Both airway responsiveness parameters were significantly related to forced expiratory flow at 25-75%/forced vital capacity, a measure of airway size relative to lung size (r = 0.27, p < .005 and r = 0.25, p < .007, respectively). Sleep apnea was not significantly associated with AHR or airway inflammation. About 11 patients with AHR were reevaluated 18 months to 2 years after surgery, with no change in AHR associated with weight loss. CONCLUSION: Airway responsiveness is not related to BMI or to SAS. AHR in severely obese patients might be related to distal airway obstruction or low relative airway size.

Usefulness of nasal provocation tests in occupational rhinitis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine whether Nasal Provocation Tests (NPT) could help in the diagnosis of occupational rhinitis (OR). METHODS: Changes in nasal airway resistance (NAR), measured by posterior rhinomanometry during specific nasal challenge associated with per and post test clinical scores, were compared to a prior probability, based on the patient's history, determined by occupational physicians, in 41 hairdressers and 33 bakers referred for suspected OR. RESULTS: A DeltaNAR >or= 150% defined the positivity of the NPT. DeltaNAR demonstrated 50% sensitivity and a 86% specificity in hairdressers and a 95% sensitivity with 100 % specificity in bakers. DeltaNAR presented significant positive correlations with both per (p = 0.0003, r = 0.48) and post test clinical scores (p < 0.005, r = 0.39). The addition of clinical scores increased the sensitivity to 100% in hairdressers with 81% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: The NPT constitutes a safe procedure of nasal reactivity with good levels of sensitivity and specificity in both hairdressers and bakers when nasal resistance and clinical scores are taken into account.

Alveolar nitric oxide and effect of deep inspiration during methacholine challenge.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To assess whether the dual anatomic origin of exhaled nitric oxide (NO), namely alveolar and bronchial, could explain the link between exhaled NO and airway responsiveness, and could participate in the bronchodilatory effect of deep inspiration (DI) that may be evidenced during methacholine challenge. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective study in a laboratory performing pulmonary function tests of an academic hospital. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Patients underwent multiple flow analysis of exhaled NO, allowing calculation of total maximum airway NO flux (J'awno) and NO concentration of expansible compartment (CAno), and received a cumulative methacholine dose of 2,000 microg. DI effect was assessed by continuous measurement of the resistance of respiratory system using the forced oscillation technique before and after DI. RESULTS: In a first phase involving 23 patients, a positive correlation between log values of J'awno and CAno was demonstrated with the degree of airway responsiveness (percentage of FEV(1) decrease). In a second phase involving 38 patients, only log CAno was correlated with responsiveness, and no significant relationship was demonstrated between J'awno or CAno and the effect of DI. Patients with smaller airways and/or distal airflow limitation exhibited a constrictive response to DI. CONCLUSION: Airway responsiveness is mainly associated with an increase in distal origin of NO output, and no relationship between exhaled NO and the effect of DI was evidenced.