A composite index; socioeconomic deprivation and coverage of reproductive and maternal health interventions.

Objective: To examine inequalities in the coverage of reproductive and maternal health interventions in low- and middle-income countries and territories using a composite index of socioeconomic deprivation status. Methods: We obtained data on education and living standards from national household surveys conducted between 2015 and 2019 to calculate socioeconomic deprivation status. We assessed the coverage of reproductive and maternal health interventions, using three indicators: (i) demand for family planning satisfied with modern methods; (ii) women who received antenatal care in at least four visits; and (iii) the presence of a skilled attendant at delivery. Absolute and relative inequalities were evaluated both directly and using the slope index of inequality and the concentration index. Findings: In the 73 countries and territories with available data, the median proportions of deprivation were 41% in the low-income category, 11% in the lower-middle-income category and less than 1% in the upper-middle-income category. The coverage analysis, conducted for 48 countries with sufficient data, showed consistently lower median coverage among deprived households across all health indicators. The coverage of skilled attendant at delivery showed the largest inequalities, where coverage among the socioeconomically deprived was substantially lower in almost all countries. Antenatal care visits and demand for family planning satisfied with modern methods also showed significant disparities, favouring the less deprived population. Conclusion: The findings highlight persistent disparities in the coverage of reproductive and maternal health interventions, requiring efforts to reduce those disparities and improve coverage, particularly for skilled attendant at delivery.

Prelacteal feeding and its relationship with exclusive breastfeeding and formula consumption among infants in low- and middle-income countries.

Background: Early feeding practices are important determinants of optimal feeding patterns later in life. We aimed to investigate if giving any fluids or foods other than breast milk during the first three days after birth (prelacteal feeds) affects exclusive breastfeeding and consumption of formula among children under six months of age in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from 85 nationally representative Demographic Health Surveys (DHS) and Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS) in LMICs (2010-2019). We considered three exposures: any prelacteal feeding (PLF), milk-based only prelacteal feeding (MLK), and water-based only prelacteal feeding (WTR), according to the DHS/MICS definition. The outcomes were exclusive breastfeeding, based on the World Health Organization definition, and consumption of formula among infants under six months of age. We used Poisson models adjusting for sociodemographic indicators, antenatal care, birth assistance, and early initiation of breastfeeding to estimate the effects of the exposures on the outcomes. Findings were grouped by each country, as well as by regions of the world and national income classification. Results: We included data from 91 282 children. PLF, MLK, and WTR had a prevalence of 33.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 33.6-34.2), 22.2% (95% CI = 21.9-22.4), and 9.4% (95% CI = 9.2-9.6), respectively. Exclusive breastfeeding and consumption of formula had a prevalence of 35.2% (95% CI = 34.9-35.5) and 27.7% (95% CI = 27.4-28.0), respectively. In the crude analysis, children who were given PLF were 40% less likely to be exclusively breastfed (prevalence ratio (PR) = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.56-0.64) and nearly twice more likely to receive formula (PR = 1.89; 95% CI = 1.72-2.08); the direction of the associations was the same across income groups and regions of the world. In the adjusted analysis, the observed crude effects were only slightly reduced (exclusive breastfeeding - PR = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.59-0.66, consumption of formula - PR = 1.72; 95% CI = 1.59-1.85). MLK showed a stronger impact on the outcomes than PLF, especially for formula consumption (adjusted PR = 1.81; 95% CI = 1.67-1.97) and in low-income countries. WTR was only negatively associated with exclusive breastfeeding (adjusted PR = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.63-0.75), but not with formula consumption (adjusted PR = 1.09; 95% CI = 0.99-1.20). Conclusions: Feeding babies prelacteal foods shortens exclusive breastfeeding duration and increases the likelihood of formula consumption in children under six months of age in LMICs. Pro-breastfeeding interventions must be prioritized during antenatal care and throughout the stay in the maternity facility to properly protect, support, and promote exclusive breastfeeding since birth.

Rural-urban differences in physical activity and TV-viewing in Brazil.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to compare differences regarding physical activity (PA) indicators and TV viewing according to location of residence and sociodemographic variables in Brazil. METHODS: This cross-sectional study with individuals aged 18 years or older using data from the Brazilian National Health Survey was carried out in 2013. PA (total and domains) and TV viewing (≥3 hours) were measured by self-report. Stratifiers were location of residence, sex, age, wealth quintiles and regions of the country. RESULTS: This study included 60 202 individuals (49 245 from urban areas). In general, total PA was not different according to location of residence (urban 59.4%; rural 57.4%). Higher differences were found for leisure-time PA (urban 24.1%; rural 13.9%), work-based PA (urban 12.9%; rural 21.1%) and TV viewing of more than 3 hours (urban 30.1%; rural 21.4%). The differences between urban and rural areas were enhanced according to sex, age and wealth quintiles. CONCLUSION: The differences between urban and rural areas vary according to PA domains and population groups. To explore specific domains of PA in each location of residence may improve the understanding of the analyzed outcomes in different communities and consequently guide future interventions.

Validity assessment of a portable anthropometer to measure length in 24-month children from the 2015 Pelotas Birth Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the validity of a portable anthropometer against the gold standard among 2-year-old infants from the 2015 Pelotas (Brazil) Birth Cohort. DESIGN: Birth cohort study. SETTING: A fixed Harpenden® infant anthropometer was considered as the gold standard for measuring infant length due to its greater precision and stability. The portable SANNY® (model ES2000) anthropometer was the instrument to be validated. The acceptable mean difference in length between the anthropometers was 0·5 cm. In order to compare length estimates, the interviewers carried out two length measures for each of the anthropometers (fixed and portable) and for each child. The mean of the two lengths was calculated for each anthropometer, and their difference was calculated. PARTICIPANTS: A subsample of 252 24-month-old members of the 2015 Pelotas (Brazil) birth cohort study. RESULTS: Children's mean age was 23·5 months. According to Bland-Altman plot, there were no differences in overall lengths between the portable and the fixed anthropometers, or in lengths according to sex. There was a high overall concordance between the length estimates of the fixed and portable anthropometers (ρ = 0·94; 95 % CI 0·92, 0·95). CONCLUSIONS: The portable anthropometer proved to be accurate to measure the length of 24-month-old infants, being applicable to studies using the same standardised protocol used in the present study.