Choice of Laboratory Rodent Diet May Confound Data Interpretation and Reproducibility.

The reproducibility of experimental data is challenged by many factors in both clinical and preclinical research. In preclinical studies, several factors may be responsible, and diet is one variable that is commonly overlooked, especially by those not trained in nutrition. In particular, grain-based diets contain complex ingredients, each of which can provide multiple nutrients, non-nutrients, and contaminants, which may vary from batch to batch. Thus, even when choosing the same grain-based diet used in the past by others, its composition will likely differ. In contrast, purified diets contain refined ingredients that offer the ability to control the composition much more closely and maintain consistency from one batch to the next, while minimizing the presence of non-nutrients and contaminants. In this article, we provide several different examples or scenarios showing how the diet choice can alter data interpretation, potentially affecting reproducibility and knowledge gained within any given field of study.

Effects of Rodent Diet Choice and Fiber Type on Data Interpretation of Gut Microbiome and Metabolic Disease Research.

Poor diet reporting and improperly controlling laboratory animal diet continues to reduce our ability to interpret data effectively in animal studies. In order to make the best use of our resources and improve research transparency, proper reporting methods that include a diet design are essential to improving our understanding of the links between gut health and metabolic disease onset. This unit will focus on the importance of diet choice in laboratory animal studies, specifically as it relates to gut health, microbiome, and metabolic disease development. The two most commonly used diet types, grain-based (GB) diets, and purified ingredient diets, will each be described, with particular emphasis on their differences in dietary fiber. A further description of how these diet types and fiber can affect gut morphology and microbiota will be provided as well as how purified ingredient diets may be improved upon. © 2018 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Correction to: The common use of improper control diets in diet-induced metabolic disease research confounds data interpretation: the fiber factor.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1186/s12986-018-0243-5.].

The common use of improper control diets in diet-induced metabolic disease research confounds data interpretation: the fiber factor.

Diets used to induce metabolic disease are generally high in fat and refined carbohydrates and importantly, are usually made with refined, purified ingredients. However, researchers will often use a low fat grain-based (GB) diet containing unrefined ingredients as the control diet. Such a comparison between two completely different diet types makes it impossible to draw conclusions regarding the phenotypic differences driven by diet. While many compositional differences can account for this, one major difference that could have the greatest impact between GB and purified diets is the fiber content, both in terms of the level and composition. We will review recent data showing how fiber differences between GB diets and purified diets can significantly influence gut health and microbiota, which itself can affect metabolic disease development. Researchers need to consider the control diet carefully in order to make the best use of precious experimental resources.

Acute and chronic regulation of leptin synthesis, storage, and secretion by insulin and dexamethasone in human adipose tissue.

Serum leptin levels are upregulated in proportion to body fat and also increase over the short term in response to meals or insulin. To understand the mechanisms involved, we assessed leptin synthesis and secretion in samples of adipose tissue from subjects with a wide range of BMI. Tissue leptin content and relative rates of leptin biosynthesis, as determined by metabolic labeling, were highly correlated with each other and with BMI and fat cell size. To understand mechanisms regulating leptin synthesis in obesity, we used biosynthetic labeling to directly assess the effects of insulin and glucocorticoids (dexamethasone) on leptin synthesis and secretion in human adipose tissue. Chronic treatment (1-2 days in organ culture) with insulin increased relative rates of leptin biosynthesis without affecting leptin mRNA levels. In contrast, dexamethasone increased leptin mRNA and biosynthesis in parallel. Acute treatment with insulin or dexamethasone (added during 1-h preincubation and 45-min pulse labeling) did not affect relative rates of leptin biosynthesis, but pulse-chase studies showed that addition of insulin nearly doubled the release of [35S]leptin after a 1-h chase. We conclude that the higher leptin stores in adipose tissue of obese humans are maintained by chronic effects of insulin and glucocorticoids acting at pre- and posttranslational levels and that the ability of insulin to increase the release of preformed leptin may contribute to short-term variations in circulating leptin levels.

Isoproterenol decreases leptin release from rat and human adipose tissue through posttranscriptional mechanisms.

In vivo and in vitro studies indicate that beta-adrenergic receptor agonists decrease leptin release from fat cells in as little as 30 min. Our objective was to determine whether alterations in leptin biosynthesis or secretion were involved in the short-term adrenergic regulation of leptin in human and rat adipose tissue. Isoproterenol (Iso) decreased leptin release from incubated adipose tissue of both nonobese and obese subjects to similar extent (-28 vs. -21% after 3 h). Inhibition of protein synthesis with cycloheximide did not block the effect of Iso on leptin release from human adipose tissue, suggesting that the Iso effect is independent of leptin synthesis. Iso also tended to increase tissue leptin content at the end of the 3-h incubation, as expected from the observed inhibition of release. Consistent with a posttranslational mechanism, Iso treatment did not affect leptin mRNA levels or relative rate of leptin biosynthesis as directly assessed by [35S]methionine incorporation into immunoprecipitable leptin. In contrast to these results in human adipose tissues, Iso did not decrease basal leptin release from rat adipose tissue. However, Iso did decrease insulin-stimulated leptin release by inhibiting the ability of insulin to increase leptin biosynthesis without detectably affecting leptin mRNA levels. Thus, in both human and rat, adrenergic regulation of posttranscriptional events (secretion in humans, translation in rats) may contribute to the rapid decline in circulating leptin that occurs when the sympathetic nervous system is activated, such as during fasting and cold exposure. Furthermore, the rat does not provide an ideal model to study mechanisms of cellular leptin regulation in humans.

Ontogeny of diet-induced obesity in selectively bred Sprague-Dawley rats.

Outbred Sprague-Dawley rats selectively bred for their propensity to develop diet-induced obesity (DIO) become heavier on low-fat diet than those bred to be diet resistant (DR) beginning at approximately 5 wk of age. Here we assessed the development of metabolic and neural functions for insights into the origins of their greater weight gain. From week 5 to week 10, chow-fed DIO rats gained 15% more body weight and ate approximately 14% more calories but had only slightly greater adiposity and plasma leptin than DR rats. From day 3 through week 10, DIO and DR rats had similar mRNA expression of arcuate nucleus neuropeptide Y, proopiomelanocortin, agouti-related peptide, and all splice variants of the leptin receptor (OB-R). When fed a high-energy (HE; 31% fat) diet, 7-wk-old DIO rats had a 240% increase in plasma leptin levels after only 3 days. Despite this early leptin rise, they maintained a persistent hyperphagia and became more obese than chow-fed DIO rats and DR rats fed chow or HE diet. Their failure to reduce caloric intake, despite high levels of leptin, suggests that selectively bred DIO rats might have reduced leptin sensitivity similar to that seen in the outbred DIO parent strain.