Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Radiol ; 143: 109914, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34509881

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To perform anintra-patient comparison betweena single-pass protocol (SP) and a portal venous phase (PVP) by means ofboth quantitative and qualitative analysis of image quality. METHODS: Forty patients (31 M; 9F; aged 20-77 years; BMI 23 ± 4 Kg/m2) underwent both a SP and a PVP using a 64-rows multi-detector CT with a median interval time of 56 days (range5-903). All patients underwent i.v. bolus injection (2.0 cc/sec) of 1.7 cc/Kg of a non ionic iodinated contrast-media (370 mgI/ml) with scan delays of 67 ± 8 and 90 s for the SP and the PVP, respectively. Signal- (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were calculated for most visceral organs and for both abdominal aorta (AA) and main portal vein (MPV). For qualitative analysis, reproduction of abdominal viscera and vascular structures was blindly evaluated and inter-observer agreement calculated by the weighted Cohen k-analysis. RESULTS: Attenuation values (H.U.) of AA (232 ± 53vs180 ± 36) and MPV (215 ± 39vs187 ± 42) were significantly (p < 0.001) higher in the SP than in PVP, respectively. At qualitative analysis, reproduction of mostabdominal viscerawas also significantly sharper (p < 0.001) with the SP than the PVPwith inter-observer agreement scores (k)ranging from 0.60 to 0.88 for all but one imaging criteria. CONCLUSIONS: As the SP resulted in a significantly higher vascular enhancement and in a sharper reproduction of most abdominal viscera, it may be better suited than a PVP for the CT evaluation of non traumatic acute abdomen.


Assuntos
Meios de Contraste , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Abdome , Humanos , Veia Porta/diagnóstico por imagem , Doses de Radiação
2.
Acta Biomed ; 89(1-S): 111-123, 2018 01 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29350641

RESUMO

Radiography remains the imaging standard for fracture detection after trauma. The radiographic diagnosis of most fractures and dislocations poses little difficulty to radiologists: however, occasionally these injuries are quite subtle or even impossible to detect on radiographs. Missed diagnoses of fracture potentially have important consequences for patients, clinicians, and radiologists. Radiologists play a pivot role in the diagnostic assessment of the trauma patients: emergency radiologists who are more practiced at seeking out and discerning traumatic fractures can provide an invaluable service to their clinical colleagues by ensuring that patients do not endure delayed diagnoses. This is a narrative review article aims to highlight the spectrum of fractures in adults potentially missed on plain radiographs, the causes of error in diagnosis of fractures in the emergency setting and the key elements to reduce misdiagnosis of fractures.


Assuntos
Erros de Diagnóstico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Fraturas Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Erros de Diagnóstico/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Radiografia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...