Effect of delay in cord clamping 45 versus 60 s on very preterm singleton infants.

BACKGROUND: In the range of timing suggested by American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 30 to 60 s, preterm infants may potentially derive more short and long-term benefits with delayed cord clamping (DCC) for at least 60 s. However, there are concerns with longer resuscitation delay in this vulnerable population. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical consequences of 45 versus 60 s delay in umbilical cord clamping in singleton infants born between 230/7 to 316/7 weeks gestation. STUDY DESIGN: We implemented DCC process in very preterm singleton infants, initially for 45 s and later, modified the policy to increase the delay to 60 s. We compared the infants born and received DCC (n = 60) during the 45 s study period (DCC-45 cohort), from Aug.19, 2013, to Aug.18, 2014 to the infants born and received DCC (n = 63) during the 60 s study period (DCC-60 cohort), from Feb.1, 2015, to Jan.31, 2016. RESULTS: The incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis in DCC-60 cohort was 0% compared to 8% in the DCC-45 cohort (P = 0.02). Similarly, incidence of culture-positive sepsis was significantly lower in the DCC-60 cohort compared to DCC-45 cohort (8% versus 18%; P = 0.04). Incidence of mortality and other major morbidities were similar between both groups. Length of stay was significantly lower in DCC-60 cohort compared to DCC-45 cohort. CONCLUSION: DCC for 60 s in very preterm singleton infants was safe, feasible and not associated with any adverse maternal or neonatal short-term outcomes compared to DCC for 45 s.

Effect of delayed cord clamping on very preterm infants.

OBJECTIVE: Despite significant proposed benefits, delayed umbilical cord clamping (DCC) is not practiced widely in preterm infants largely because of the question of feasibility of the procedure and uncertainty regarding the magnitude of the reported benefits, especially intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) vs the adverse consequences of delaying the neonatal resuscitation. The objective of this study was to determine whether implementation of the protocol-driven DCC process in our institution would reduce the incidence of IVH in very preterm infants without adverse consequences. STUDY DESIGN: We implemented a quality improvement process for DCC the started in August 2013 in infants born at ≤32 weeks' gestational age. Eligible infants were left attached to the placenta for 45 seconds after birth. Neonatal process and outcome data were collected until discharge. We compared infants who received DCC who were born between August 2013 and August 2014 with a historic cohort of infants who were born between August 2012 and August 2013, who were eligible to receive DCC, but whose cord was clamped immediately after birth, because they were born before the protocol implementation. RESULTS: DCC was performed on all the 60 eligible infants; 88 infants were identified as historic control subjects. Gestational age, birthweight, and other demographic variables were similar between both groups. There were no differences in Apgar scores or admission temperature, but significantly fewer infants in the DCC cohort were intubated in delivery room, had respiratory distress syndrome, or received red blood cell transfusions in the first week of life compared with the historic cohort. A significant reduction was noted in the incidence of IVH in the DCC cohort compared with the historic control group (18.3% vs 35.2%). After adjustment for gestational age, an association was found between the incidence of IVH and DCC with IVH was significantly lower in the DCC cohort compared with the historic cohort; an odds ratio of 0.36 (95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.84; P < .05). There were no significant differences in deaths and other major morbidities. CONCLUSION: DCC, as performed in our institution, was associated with significant reduction in IVH and early red blood cell transfusions. DCC in very preterm infants appears to be safe, feasible, and effective with no adverse consequences.