Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Waste Manag ; 28(4): 741-6, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18061434

RESUMO

We compared alternate uses of cereal straw (4.25t dry matter ha(-1) containing 1.7t carbon (C)) for their effectiveness in relation to climate change mitigation. The scenarios were (1) incorporation into soil to increase soil organic carbon (SOC) content ("carbon sequestration") and (2) combustion to generate electricity. The Rothamsted Carbon Model was used to estimate SOC accumulation in a silty clay loam soil under the climatic conditions of north-west Europe. Using straw for electricity generation saved seven times more CO2 than from SOC accumulation. This comparison assumed that electricity from straw combustion displaced that generated from coal and used the mean annual accumulation of SOC over 100yr. SOC increased most rapidly in the early years, but then more slowly as a new equilibrium value was approached. We suggest that increased SOC from straw incorporation does not represent genuine climate change mitigation through carbon sequestration. In Europe, most straw not already incorporated in the field where it is grown is subsequently returned elsewhere, e.g., after use for animal bedding and production of manure. Only additional retention of C in soil compared to the alternative use represents sequestration. Maintenance of SOC for soil functioning is a more appropriate rationale for returning straw to soil than climate change mitigation. This analysis shows that considerably greater climate change mitigation is achieved through saved CO2 emissions by burning straw for electricity generation, replacing some use of fossil fuel.


Assuntos
Poluição do Ar/prevenção & controle , Carbono/análise , Grão Comestível , Fontes Geradoras de Energia , Efeito Estufa , Solo/análise , Agricultura , Poluentes Atmosféricos/análise , Dióxido de Carbono/análise , Conservação dos Recursos Naturais , Europa (Continente)
2.
Bioresour Technol ; 83(2): 115-24, 2002 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12056486

RESUMO

Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) and coastal panic grass (Panicum amarum A.S. Hitchc. & Chase) are perennial grasses indigenous to North America. Switchgrass has been shown to have good potential as a biofuel crop in both the US and Canada. In the study reported here, seven varieties of switchgrass and one panic grass were evaluated for 5 years under the temperate maritime conditions in Southern England. Both species had 0 or 60 kg N ha(-1) applied annually in spring as treatment. Yield was measured after flowering and when stems were dead in the winter. Yield increased annually for 4-5 years except for the variety Dacotah, and in the fifth year dead stem yields ranged from 8.82 to 13.97 t dm ha(-1). There was no response to N except for one variety in one year. Mineral concentration in biomass was higher at flowering than at dead stem harvest and delaying harvesting further provided more time for P, K and Cl to be leached but yield also declined.


Assuntos
Fontes Geradoras de Energia , Poaceae , Agricultura , Cloro , Inglaterra , Fósforo , Potássio , Estações do Ano , Solo , Temperatura , Fatores de Tempo , Tempo (Meteorologia)
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...