Short-term oral toxicity of three biodiesels and an ultra-low sulfur diesel in male rats.

Male rats were administered one of three biodiesels - soy oil methyl ester (SoME-2), canola oil methyl ester (CaME-2), and methyl ester of animal frying oil (FrAME-1) at 5, 50 and 500 mg/kg, or ultra-low sulphur diesel (ULSD) at 500 mg/kg. Control was administered the vehicle (corn oil) only. After 4-week treatment, serum methanol and formic acid were unchanged or minimally elevated in all treatment groups. Mild histopathological changes in the liver were observed in animals receiving 500 mg/kg biodiesels and ULSD but hepatomegaly, increased phase I and II drug-metabolizing enzyme activities and urinary ascorbic acid were found only in the ULSD group. The ULSD group had increased kidney weight, changes in kidney histopathology, and increased urinary albumin and N-acetylgluocosaminidase activity. Biodiesels and ULSD caused increase in hepatic acyl-CoA oxidase activity. ULSD and FrAME-1 caused decrease in serum free fatty acid while CaME-2 caused decreases in both serum triglycerides and free fatty acids. FrAME-1 produced an increase in liver protein carbonyls and ULSD caused increased liver glutathione. The results indicated that ULSD caused more histopathological and biochemical effects than biodiesels. Biodiesels produced lipid effects and oxidative stress that were feedstock-dependent. The mechanisms and significance of increased hepatic acyl-CoA oxidase activity required further study.

Effects of three biodiesels and a low sulfur diesel in male rats--a pilot 4-week oral study.

Because of the accessible and renewable nature of feedstock and the potential for the reduction of harmful combustion emissions and greenhouse gases, biodiesels have received increasing interest as an alternate fuel. Oral exposure to biodiesels is a concern because of contact during refuelling, accidental ingestion and exposure through ground water contamination. Although biodiesels from various feedstock are in use commercially and experimentally, very little is known about their potential adverse effects and no data is available on their potential for ground water contamination. A study was performed on male rats following oral treatment with experimental biodiesels (dissolved in corn oil) derived from canola oil (Bio-C), soy oil (Bio-S) and fish oil (Bio-F), at 500 mg/kg body weight/day, 5 days per week, for 4 weeks. Separate groups of animals were treated with low sulfur diesel (LSD) for comparison purpose, and with corn oil alone to serve as control. The potential for ground water contamination by biodiesels was investigated by the preparation of water-accommodated fractions (WAF) followed by gas chromatographic analysis. WAF from Bio-F and Bio-S was found to have the highest level of dichloromethane extractable materials. Gas chromatographic analysis indicated that the extractable materials from biodiesels contained much higher proportion of C15-C30 materials than LSD. Increased liver weight was observed in animal treated with Bio-C, Bio-S and LSD and decreased thymus weight was found in those treated with Bio-S. Histopathological changes typical of male-rat specific hyaline-droplet nephropathy were detected in kidney tubules of animals treated with LSD, Bio-S and Bio-C. Mild adaptive changes were observed in thyroids of animals treated with LSD, Bio-S and Bio-F. Clinical chemical and biochemical changes were confined to Bio-S and LSD treated rats and included elevation in some hepatic phase-I and phase-II drug metabolizing enzymes and hepatic palmitoyl Co-A oxidase, and elevated urinary concentrations of ascorbic acid and albumin. At the given dose level of 500 mg/kg bw/day, the overall treatment-related effects of biodiesels and LSD are mild, and the severity of the treatment effects may be ranked as: LSD>Bio-S>Bio-C>Bio-F. Considered together with the presence of a higher level of water extractable materials, Bio-S may be more of a concern for potential human health than Bio-C and Bio-F in an oral exposure scenario. Further studies are needed to identify and characterize the constituents contributing to the treatment-related effects specific to these experimental biodiesels.

Perceived benefit from child sexual abuse.

People often report perceptions of benefit from adverse life experiences. In this study, adult perceptions of benefit from child sexual abuse were examined in a sample of 154 low-income women who were sexually abused as children. Almost half reported some perceived benefit. The benefits fell into 4 main categories: protecting children from abuse, self-protection, increased knowledge of child sexual abuse, and having a stronger personality. Degree of perceived benefit was associated with several indicators of adult adjustment. In addition, those who perceived themselves as stronger had higher self-esteem, and those who perceived increased sexual abuse knowledge viewed others more favorably and were more comfortable getting close to others, when compared with other respondents.