Trainee experience of 'out of hours' surgical working in the UK: A cross-sectional analysis.

BACKGROUND: Changes to working practices and increasing service demand have contributed to low morale amongst UK surgical trainees, with pressures particularly acute 'out of hours' (OOH). Surgeons may be expected to be 'on call' for multiple hospitals, or to provide remote consultations, yet healthcare systems may undermine their professional safety and patient care. This cross-sectional study sought to define the perceptions of UK-based Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (RCSEd) affiliated trainees of OOH surgical care and training. METHODS: The RCSEd Trainees' Committee conducted a design-thinking exercise to produce an online questionnaire. Non-consultant grade RCSEd Members and Fellows were invited to participate. Quantitative data was analysed using descriptive statistics, and qualitative data was coded to identify emergent themes. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-five surgeons participated. Of those surgeons working in multiple hospitals OOH (n = 16), many did not receive access cards (12[75%]) or site-specific induction (13[81%]), and 8(50%) were not confident in using local electronic investigation and records systems. Only 14/114 (12%) of the surgeons providing remote opinion had access to a consultation record system, and most perceived dissatisfaction with the system. Emergent themes from qualitative data revealed that trainee surgeons desire specific training in OOH working, concerns that OOH work experience is diminishing, and that hospital infrastructure such as IT and communications, rest facilities and catering were inadequate in facilitating safe care. CONCLUSIONS: The participants perceived that the systems supporting delivery of safe surgical care OOH were inadequate. Hospital leaders should ensure that systems minimise risk to staff and patients.

Systematic review of the prevalence, impact and mitigating strategies for bullying, undermining behaviour and harassment in the surgical workplace.

BACKGROUND: Bullying, undermining behaviour and harassment (BUBH) have been reported in entertainment, politics and sport. Such behaviours may also be common in surgery, and are frequently associated with poor patient care and inferior outcomes. The aim was to define the prevalence and impact of this behaviour in the international surgical workplace, and to explore counterstrategies. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted by searching EMBASE, Medline, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews in August 2017. Original research studies (Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine levels 1-4) investigating the prevalence and impact of BUBH in surgery, and/or counterstrategies, were eligible for inclusion. The review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Of 2692 papers, 32 were eligible for inclusion. Twenty-two reported the prevalence of BUBH in surgery, 11 studied the impact of this behaviour and six investigated counterstrategies. Prevalence data showed that BUBH are common in the surgical workplace. Their impact can be profound, compromising mental health, reducing job satisfaction, and inducing suicidal ideation. Formal reporting systems were perceived as ineffective and even potentially harmful to victims. CONCLUSION: Bullying, undermining behaviour and harassment are highly prevalent within surgery, and extremely damaging to victims. There is little high-quality research into counterstrategies, although professionalism training using simulated scenarios may be useful.