The Royal College of Radiologists Breast Group breast imaging classification.

Standardisation of the classification of breast imaging reports will improve communication between the referrer and the radiologist and avoid ambiguity, which may otherwise lead to mismanagement of patients. Following wide consultation, the Royal College of Radiologists Breast Group has produced a scoring system for the classification of breast imaging. This will facilitate audit and the development of nationally agreed standards for the investigation of women with breast disease. This five-point system is as follows: 1, normal; 2, benign findings; 3, indeterminate/probably benign findings; 4, findings suspicious of malignancy; 5, findings highly suspicious of malignancy. It is recommended that this be used in the reporting of all breast imaging examinations in the UK.

Breast screening: the use of consensus opinion for all recalls.

The quality of a breast-screening programme is measured not only by it's cancer detection rates (sensitivity), but also by it's recall rates and positive predictive values (specificity). False positive screens, which lead to assessments with benign outcomes, can cause psychological and physical morbidity in previously well women. In 1999 the Wiltshire breast-screening programme adopted a novel recall strategy whereby all films marked for recall are subject to consensus opinion--even women "recalled" by both original readers may be returned to routine screening. Since 1999 our recall rates have fallen from above to below the national averages (prevalent 7.2% and incident 3.0% in 2001/02). Specificity has increased over the same period such that approximately one in seven women assessed will be diagnosed with cancer. The consensus meetings provide a forum for teaching and are very popular with our film readers, who all report reduced levels of stress.

Submucous lipoma of the ileocaecal valve presenting as caecal volvulus.

Caecal volvulus is a well described but unusual condition. We report here, a case of caecal volvulus in a 53-year-old Caucasian woman associated with intussuscepted submucous lipoma of the ileocaecal region. The imaging and pathology are presented. Submucous lipoma of the ileocaecal region is uncommon but well described. It can be mistaken as carcinoma of the ascending colon on barium enema and on computed tomography scan. The combination with caecal volvulus is a rare occurrence.

Paracetamol as a prophylactic analgesic for hysterosalpingography: a double blind randomized controlled trial.

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of paracetamol as a prophylactic analgesic for hysterosalpingography (HSG). DESIGN: A prospective double blind randomized controlled trial comparing one 1 g of paracetamol (SmithKline Beecham, Brentford, U.K.) to placebo taken 30 min before HSG. One hundred consecutive out-patients were studied prospectively. The analgesic effectiveness during the procedure and at 24 h and 1 week post procedure was analysed by a postal pain score questionnaire. Additional data on the ethnicity of the patient, sex and level of experience of the radiologist performing the hysterosalpingogram, the parity of the patient, the ease of the procedure, and whether pathology was identified were also recorded. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients (88%) replied, 39 (44%) received paracetamol and 49 placebo (56%). During the procedure 3/39 (7%) of women in the paracetamol group were pain-free compared to 9/49 (18%) in the placebo group, which was not significant (P = 0.11). At 24 h, 15/39 (38%) of women in the paracetamol group were pain-free compared to 20/49 (41%) in the placebo group, which was not significant (P = 0.82). At 1 week, 27/39 (69%) of women in the paracetamol group were pain-free compared to 29/49 (59%) in the placebo group, which was not significant (P = 0.33). No significant difference in mean pain scores was determined during the procedure (P = 0.91), or at 24 h post procedure (P = 0.94). Similarly, no difference in mean pain scores was identified with regard to the ethnicity of the patient, the sex of the radiologist performing the procedure, the level of experience of the radiologist performing the procedure, or whether pathology was present or not. Difficult cannulations were associated with higher mean pain scores, however, there was no difference in mean pain scores between the paracetamol or placebo groups for both easy and difficult cannulations. CONCLUSION: Paracetamol is not effective as a prophylactic analgesic for HSG. If a prophylactic analgesic is considered necessary for pain relief during HSG we recommend that a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) is used.

Juvenile chronic arthritis of the hip: value of contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the value of contrast-enhancement in MR diagnosis of hip joint disease in patients with juvenile chronic arthritis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen hips in seven children (four girls, three boys; mean age, 11 years; range, 7-17 years) with juvenile chronic arthritis for a mean duration of seven years (range, 3-15 years) were imaged on a 0.5T MR unit. One patient had an MR scan repeated after an 8-month interval. Axial and coronal T1-weighted spin-echo, and axial gradient-echo sequences were performed. T1 weighted axial sequences were repeated immediately after 0.1 mmol/kg of intravenous gadopentetate dimeglumine. Patients were assessed clinically for pain in the hip, range of motion at the hip joint, haemoglobin and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Two radiologists, unaware of the patients symptoms, jointly assessed the unenhanced and contrast-enhanced scans for synovial hypertrophy (pannus), cartilage destruction and joint effusion. RESULTS: Pannus was underestimated on 75% of unenhanced MR scans (95% binomial confidence intervals 54% to 93%). Enhancing pannus was seen in 14 of the 16 hip MR scans. Enhancing pannus was associated with articular cartilage destruction in all cases, and joint pain in 13 of 14 scans. Joint effusions were overestimated on unenhanced scans in all cases. Pannus could only reliably be distinguished from joint effusion after contrast enhancement. Both cases of loculated joint effusion were only seen after contrast enhancement. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhancement is recommended to aid MR detection of disease activity and extent in children with juvenile chronic arthritis of the hip.

Pneumoparotitis.

Pneumoparotitis is a rare cause of parotid enlargement. It is due to a reflux of air through Stensen's duct into the acini of the parotid gland with subsequent dilatation. We report a case which followed a long history of autoinflation of the middle ears by the Valsalva manoeuvre. The plain radiographic, sialographic and ultrasound findings are presented.