Successful heparin-perfusion therapy for complete thrombosis of the intra- and extrahepatic portal and mesenteric vein. A case report and literature review.

The initial treatment of acute and subacute portal vein thrombosis, which is the most common cause of portal vein occlusion, consists of intravenous anticoagulation with heparin, but there is still a huge uncertainty among physicians regarding the role of more invasive therapies. We report a 61-year-old male patient, who presented in our emergency room with a subacute complete thrombosis of the intra- and extrahepatic portal vein, mesenteric vein, with associated venous congestion of 20-30 cm length of the small intestine with a quick and complete remission of the portal vein thrombosis under sole i.v. heparin-perfusor therapy without any complications. Molecular genetic analysis found combined genetic mutations of the gene factor 2 (c.20210G>A, heterozygotic), SERPINE1 (-675 5G>4G, heterozygotic), and the MTHFR gene. Along with this interesting case, we also present the recent status of portal vein thrombosis and portal vein occlusion in the literature.

Outcome Quality After Colorectal Cancer Resection in Certified Colorectal Cancer Centers­Patient-Reported and Short-Term Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: In this observational study, patient-reported outcomes and short-term clinical outcome parameters in patients with colorectal cancer were studied 12 months after the start of treatment. Outcomes were also compared across German Certified Colorectal Cancer Centres. METHODS: Data were collected from 4239 patients with colorectal cancer who had undergone elective tumor resection in one of 102 colorectal cancer centers and had responded to a quality-of-life questionnaire before treatment (EORTC QLQ-C30 and -CR29). 3142 (74.1%) of these patients completed a post-treatment questionnaire 12 months later. Correlation analyses were calculated and case-mix adjusted comparisons across centers were made for selected patient-reported outcomes, anastomotic insufficiency, and 30-day-mortality. RESULTS: At 12 months, mild improvements were seen in mean quality-of-life scores (66 vs. 62 points), constipation (16 vs. 19), and abdominal pain (15 vs. 17). Worsening was seen in physical function (75 vs. 82) and pain (22 vs. 19). Better patient-reported outcomes at 12 months were associated with better scores before treatment. Better results in at least three of the five scores were associated with male sex, higher educational level, higher age, and private health insurance. Major worsening of fecal incontinence was seen among patients with rectal cancer without a stoma. The largest differences across centers were found with respect to physical function. Anastomotic insufficiency was found in 4.3% of colon cancer patients and 8.2% of rectal cancer patients. 1.9% of patients died within 30 days after their resection. CONCLUSION: Clinicians can use these findings to identify patients at higher risk for poorer patient-reported outcomes. The differences among cancer centers that were found imply that measures for quality improvement would be desirable.