Effect of statins on Alzheimer's disease biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid.

BACKGROUND: Treatment with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors ("statins") has been variably associated with a reduced risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in epidemiologic studies and reduced amyloid-beta (Abeta) deposition in animal models of AD. Putative neuroprotective effects of statins may vary in relation to their ability to penetrate into the central nervous system (CNS). METHODS: We measured levels of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) AD biomarkers following 14 weeks of treatment with simvastatin (a CNS permeant statin; n=10) at 40 mg/day or pravastatin (a CNS impermeant statin; n=13) at 80 mg/day in hypercholesterolemic subjects without dementia. RESULTS: Simvastatin, but not pravastatin, reduced CSF levels of phospho-tau-181 (p-tau181) in all subjects. There were no differences in CSF levels of total tau, Abeta42, Abeta40, soluble amyloid beta protein precursor (sAbetaPP) alpha or beta, or F2-isoprostanes. CONCLUSIONS: Statins may modulate the phosphorylation of tau in humans and this effect may depend on the CNS availability of the statin. These results suggest another mechanism by which statins may act to reduce the risk of AD.

Statins of different brain penetrability differentially affect CSF PLTP activity.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Phospholipid transfer protein (PLTP) and apolipoprotein E (apoE) are key proteins involved in lipoprotein metabolism in the peripheral circulation and in the brain. Several epidemiological studies suggested that use of 3-hydroxyl-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) reduces risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the effects of statins of differing blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetrability on brain-derived molecules in cognitively normal individuals are largely unknown. METHODS: To assess the effect of statins on these indices as a function of BBB penetration, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma PLTP activity and apoE concentration were measured in cognitively intact, modestly hypercholesterolemic adults randomly allocated to treatment with either pravastatin, which does not penetrate BBB (80 mg/day, n = 13), or simvastatin, which penetrates BBB (40 mg/day, n = 10). RESULTS: Simvastatin significantly increased CSF PLTP activity (p = 0.005). In contrast, pravastatin had no such effect. In the pravastatin-treated group, CSF apoE concentration decreased significantly (p = 0.026), while the simvastatin-treated group showed a tendency towards lower CSF apoE levels, with CSF apoE concentration lowered in 8 of 10 subjects. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that statins differentially affect two key lipid transfer proteins in the brain, and that effect on PLTP activity depends on statin BBB penetrability.

Lewy body pathology in late-onset familial Alzheimer's disease: a clinicopathological case series.

BACKGROUND: Lewy body pathology (LBP) is a common finding in Alzheimer's disease (AD), but the pathophysiology for this coexistent pathology remains unclear. METHODS: We ascertained late-onset dementia (mean age > 60 years old) families with at least 3 autopsies. We then conducted systematic alpha-synuclein (SNCA) immunostaining to determine the frequency and distribution of LBP in families with late-onset AD. RESULTS: All 32 subjects met NIA-Reagan neuropathological criteria for "high likelihood" of having AD. Hematoxylin and eosin staining detected LBP in the substantia nigra (SN) in 8 (25%) individuals. SNCA immunostaining detected LBP in 21 individuals (66%). While all subjects with SN LBP had co-existent amygdala LBP, many (9/21, 43%) of the cases with amygdala LBP did not have coexistent SN LBP (McNemar's chi-square test, p=0.008). Each family had at least two cases with LBP, but no family had LBP in all autopsied cases. CONCLUSIONS: Presence of significant AD pathology in one family member was highly predictive of similar pathology in other family members. However, despite the use of more sensitive SNCA immunohistochemistry, the presence of LBP was variable within all 7 families. Consistent with previous studies in sporadic and familial AD, the amygdala appeared to be the most vulnerable region for LBP in AD. Additional clinical, neuropathologic, and genetic studies are necessary to determine the clinical and pathological significance of LBP in AD.

Propranolol for disruptive behaviors in nursing home residents with probable or possible Alzheimer disease: a placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: Enhanced behavioral responsiveness to central nervous system (CNS) norepinephrine (NE) in Alzheimer disease (AD) may contribute to the pathophysiology of disruptive behaviors such as aggression, uncooperativeness with necessary care, irritability, and pressured pacing. We evaluated the efficacy of the beta-adrenergic antagonist propranolol for treatment-resistant disruptive behaviors and overall behavioral status in nursing home residents with probable or possible AD. METHODS: Thirty-one subjects (age 85 +/- 8 [SD]) with probable or possible AD and persistent disruptive behaviors that interfered with necessary care were randomized to propranolol (n = 17) or placebo (n = 14) in a double-blind study. Stable doses of previously prescribed psychotropics were maintained at pre-study dose during the study. Following a propranolol or placebo dose titration period of up to 9 days (per a dosing algorithm), subjects were maintained on maximum achieved dose for 6 weeks. Primary outcome measures were the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) and the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC). RESULTS: Propranolol augmentation (mean achieved dose 106 +/- 38 mg/d) was significantly more effective than placebo for improving overall behavioral status on the total NPI score and CGIC. Improvement in individual NPI items within propranolol subjects was significant only for "agitation/aggression" and "anxiety," and reached borderline statistical significance favoring propranolol over placebo only for "agitation/aggression." Pressured pacing and irritability did not appear responsive to propranolol. In propranolol subjects rated "moderately improved" or "markedly improved" on the CGIC at the end of the double-blind study phase, improvement of overall behavioral status had diminished substantially after 6 months of open-label propranolol treatment. CONCLUSION: Short-term propranolol augmentation treatment appeared modestly effective and well tolerated for overall behavioral status in nursing home residents with probable or possible AD complicated by disruptive behaviors. Propranolol may be helpful specifically for aggression and uncooperativeness (the behaviors assessed by the NPI "agitation/aggressiveness" item). However, the usefulness of propranolol in this very old and frail population was limited by the high frequency of relative contraindications to beta-adrenergic antagonist treatment and diminution of initial behavioral improvements over time.

Effect of vascular lesions on cognition in Alzheimer's disease: a community-based study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether clinical and neuropathological differences exist between Alzheimer's disease (AD) cases with and without vascular lesions neuropathologically diagnosed using Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) criteria. DESIGN: Descriptive observational study. SETTING: A community-based registry that identified incident dementia cases. PARTICIPANTS: Of the 124 subjects with available clinical and neuropathological assessments, 30 had AD lesions alone, and 18 had AD with vascular lesions. Patients with other neuropathological findings were excluded. MEASUREMENTS: Dependent measures included demographic, clinical, and neuropathological characteristics. Neuropathological diagnoses were made using the CERAD criteria and Braak and Braak staging. RESULTS: Of the 124 autopsied cases, 85 cases were diagnosed with neuropathological AD. Of these, 30 had pathology consistent with "pure" AD, whereas 18 had AD pathology with significant vascular lesions (AD/V). There were no differences in age, sex, or education between groups. AD/V cases had higher baseline and final Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores than pure AD cases, but after adjusting for education, differences in MMSE scores were not statistically significant. The AD/V group had significantly lower Braak staging than the pure AD group, after adjusting for education and final MMSE scores. CONCLUSION: In this comparison study of AD cases with and without vascular lesions, AD/V cases had less severe AD pathology than those with AD alone, indicating that cerebrovascular disease likely contributes to the severity of cognitive impairment in those with AD. Controlling for vascular risk factors in patients with AD may have a significant effect on severity of dementia.