Long-Term Survival After Alcohol Septal Ablation for Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy: A 16-Year Experience.

BACKGROUND: Alcohol septal ablation (ASA) is an accepted treatment for medically refractory hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM). The procedural and medium-term outcomes have been reassuring. The iatrogenic targeted septal infarction has raised theoretical concerns about risk of arrhythmia and long-term survival. In this study, we describe the long-term survival in a large cohort of patients from a single referral center and the iterative improvement in procedural technique since its inception. METHODS: This cohort includes 580 consecutive patients who underwent 664 ASA procedures between the years 1999 and 2015. Procedural details and outcomes are described. Long-term survival is compared with expected survival of demographically similar controls. RESULTS: Fifty-four percent were women and 85% were Caucasian. At the time of ablation, mean age was 57 ± 15 years, septal thickness was 2.1 ± 0.5 cm, and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient was 72 ± 40 mm Hg at rest and 102 ± 58 mm Hg with Valsalva provocation. Mean follow-up was 8.0 ± 4.3 years. LVOT gradient reduction >50% was achieved in 94% of patients with reduction in New York Heart Association functional class scores and increase in exercise treadmill duration. Procedural mortality was 0.9%. Over the 16-year period, survival estimates at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years were 98%, 92%, 84%, and 81%, respectively, which are comparable to demographically similar controls. The standardized mortality ratio was 0.84 (95% confidence interval, 0.66-1.06); P=.09. CONCLUSIONS: ASA appears to be a safe and effective treatment for symptomatic HOCM refractory to medical therapy with long-term survival comparable to a demographically similar United States population.

Predicting complete heart block after alcohol septal ablation for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using a risk stratification model and clinical tool.

BACKGROUND: Alcohol septal ablation (ASA) is a proven method of septal reduction for patients with drug refractory, symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM). This procedure is associated with a 6.5-11% risk of complete heart block (CHB). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine factors that predict CHB and to develop a clinical tool for risk stratification of patients. METHODS: Patients were enrolled into an ongoing ASA study. A total of 636 patient procedures were included, 527 of whom were used in the development of the prediction tool, and 109 of whom were used for independent validation. Multivariate analysis was performed with odds ratios used to develop the clinical prediction tool. This was then internally and externally validated. RESULTS: Of the 527 in the prediction cohort, 46 developed CHB. The predictors of CHB were age ≥50 years, pre-ASA left bundle branch block (LBBB), transient procedural high-grade block, post-ASA PR prolongation ≥68 ms, and new bifascicular block. An 11-point clinical prediction tool was developed to classify these factors. Internal validation using a receiver operating characteristic curve revealed an area under the curve of 0.88 for the clinical prediction tool. External validation using 109 contemporary patients revealed a 98% negative predictive value, 24% positive predictive value, 75% sensitivity, and 81% specificity in high-risk patients. CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing ASA, the risk of CHB can be predicted with easily obtained clinical and electrocardiographic factors. This clinical prediction tool allows identification of high-risk patients who may benefit from additional monitoring and therapy.

Patient and Device Selection for Hemodynamic Support in High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Coronary artery disease continues to advance resulting in the development of high-risk percutaneous interventions. This includes treatment of patients with multivessel disease, unprotected left main, acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock, and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction. As a result, mechanical circulatory support devices have evolved but require an understanding of patient hemodynamics, device mechanics, and access management. Trial data regarding device selection are limited by inclusion of cardiogenic shock patients, and observational studies are conflicted by selection bias, site familiarity with devices, and complication management; therefore, clinical judgment is required to treat high-risk patients appropriately.

Gender Disparities in CAD: Women and Ischemic Heart Disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The goal of this article is to review the disparities that exist for women who present for treatment of ischemic heart disease. RECENT FINDINGS: It is well known that women are more likely to present with ischemic heart disease at an advanced age with more comorbidities when compared to male counterparts. Despite correction of risk factors, women experience worse outcomes, even in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease. A review of the literature highlights the importance of a thoughtful approach to medical therapy and revascularization. While most recommendations applied to women are derived mostly from male data, further study of sex-specific differences may lead to approaches which can ultimately reduce disparities for the treatment of ischemic heart disease in women.

A non-contrast self-navigated 3-dimensional MR technique for aortic root and vascular access route assessment in the context of transcatheter aortic valve replacement: proof of concept.

OBJECTIVES: Due to the high prevalence of renal failure in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) candidates, a non-contrast MR technique is desirable for pre-procedural planning. We sought to evaluate the feasibility of a novel, non-contrast, free-breathing, self-navigated three-dimensional (SN3D) MR sequence for imaging the aorta from its root to the iliofemoral run-off in comparison to non-contrast two-dimensional-balanced steady-state free-precession (2D-bSSFP) imaging. METHODS: SN3D [field of view (FOV), 220-370 mm(3); slice thickness, 1.15 mm; repetition/echo time (TR/TE), 3.1/1.5 ms; and flip angle, 115°] and 2D-bSSFP acquisitions (FOV, 340 mm; slice thickness, 6 mm; TR/TE, 2.3/1.1 ms; flip angle, 77°) were performed in 10 healthy subjects (all male; mean age, 30.3 ± 4.3 yrs) using a 1.5-T MRI system. Aortic root measurements and qualitative image ratings (four-point Likert-scale) were compared. RESULTS: The mean effective aortic annulus diameter was similar for 2D-bSSFP and SN3D (26.7 ± 0.7 vs. 26.1 ± 0.9 mm, p = 0.23). The mean image quality of 2D-bSSFP (4; IQR 3-4) was rated slightly higher (p = 0.03) than SN3D (3; IQR 2-4). The mean total acquisition time for SN3D imaging was 12.8 ± 2.4 min. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that a novel SN3D sequence allows rapid, free-breathing assessment of the aortic root and the aortoiliofemoral system without administration of contrast medium. KEY POINTS: • The prevalence of renal failure is high among TAVR candidates. • Non-contrast 3D MR angiography allows for TAVR procedure planning. • The self-navigated sequence provides a significantly reduced scanning time.

Comparison of quantitative stenosis characteristics at routine coronary computed tomography angiography with invasive fractional flow reserve for assessing lesion-specific ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively evaluate quantitative parameters derived from routine coronary CT angiography (cCTA) for predicting lesion-specific ischemia in comparison to invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR). BACKGROUND: The ability of cCTA to gauge lesion-specific ischemia is limited. Several quantitative parameters have been proposed to enhance the specificity of cCTA, such as morphologic indices (lesion length/minimal lumen diameter(4) [LL/MLD(4)]; percentage aggregate plaque volume [%APV]) and a measure of intracoronary contrast gradients (corrected coronary opacification [CCO]). METHODS: Forty-nine patients who had undergone cCTA followed by FFR within 3 months were included. An experienced observer visually assessed all cCTA studies and derived multiple measures characterizing the lesion of interest, including LL, MLD, minimal lumen area (MLA), LL/MLD(4), remodeling index, %APV, and CCO. Lesion-specific ischemia was considered with FFR <0.8. RESULTS: Among 56 lesions, 13 were flow-obstructing by FFR. On univariate analysis, LL, MLD, LL/MLD(4), and CCO showed discriminatory power. The area under the curve of LL/MLD(4) (0.909) was significantly greater compared with MLD (0.802, P = 0.014), LL (0.739, P = 0.041), and CCO (0.809), although the latter did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.175). On multivariate regression, LL/MLD(4) was the only independent predictor of lesion-specific ischemia (odds ratio 2.021, P = 0.001). Moreover, LL/MLD(4) compared favorably to visual cCTA evaluation. CONCLUSION: LL/MLD(4) derived from routine cCTA can enhance the detection of lesion-specific ischemia and may be superior to other described quantitative parameters.

Diagnostic value of quantitative stenosis predictors with coronary CT angiography compared to invasive fractional flow reserve.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of CCTA-derived stenosis predictors including CT-FFR for the detection of ischemia-inducing stenosis compared to invasive FFR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Stenosis parameters were assessed using dual-source CT (DSCT). All patients underwent both CCTA and invasive FFR within 3 months and were retrospectively analyzed. Observers visually assessed all CCTA studies and performed multiple lesion measurements. Lesion length/minimal luminal diameter(4) (LL/MLD(4)), transluminal attenuation gradient (TAG), corrected coronary attenuation (CCO) and CT-FFR were calculated. RESULTS: The cohort included 32 patients (58±12 years, 66%male). Among 32 coronary lesions, 8 (25%) were considered hemodynamically significant with an FFR <0.80. Compared to invasive FFR, the per-vessel sensitivity and specificity of CCTA, CT-FFR, LL/MLD(4), CCO and TAG for detecting hemodynamically significant lesions were 100% and 54%, 100% and 91%, 85% and 92%, 66% and 88%, 37% and 58%, respectively. Receiver operating characteristics analysis resulted in an area under the curve of 0.91 for CT-FFR (p=0.0005), 0.88 for LL/MLD(4) (p<0.0001), 0.85 for CCO (p<0.0001). TAG with an AUC of 0.67 (p=0.152) was unable to discriminate between vessels with or without hemodynamically significant lesions. CONCLUSION: CT-FFR, LL/MLD(4) and CCO provide enhanced diagnostic performance over CCTA analysis alone for discrimination of hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis.

Comparison of diagnostic value of a novel noninvasive coronary computed tomography angiography method versus standard coronary angiography for assessing fractional flow reserve.

Noninvasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) from coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA) correlates well with invasive FFR and substantially improves the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease. However, with current algorithms, computed tomography (CT)-based FFR is derived off-site in an involved time-consuming manner. We sought to investigate the diagnostic performance of a novel CT-based FFR algorithm, developed for time-efficient in-hospital evaluation of hemodynamically indeterminate coronary lesions. In a blinded fashion, CT-based FFR was assessed in 67 coronary lesions of 53 patients. Pressure guidewire-based FFR <0.80 served as the reference standard to define hemodynamically significant stenosis and assess the diagnostic performance of CT-based FFR compared with standard evaluation of cCTA (luminal diameter stenosis of ≥50%). We recorded the time needed for derivation of CT-based FFR. On a per-lesion and per-patient basis, CT-based FFR resulted in a sensitivity of 85% and 94%, a specificity of 85% and 84%, a positive predictive value of 71% and 71%, and a negative predictive value of 93% and 97%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve on a per-lesion basis was significantly greater for CT-based FFR compared with standard evaluation of cCTA (0.92 vs 0.72, p = 0.0049). A similar trend, albeit not statistically significant, was observed on per-patient analysis (0.91 vs 0.78, p = 0.078). Mean total time for CT-based FFR was 37.5 ± 13.8 minutes. In conclusion, the CT-based FFR algorithm evaluated here outperforms standard evaluation of cCTA for the detection of hemodynamically significant stenoses while allowing on-site application within clinically viable time frames.