Episodic cluster headache in a community: clinical features and treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To study the clinical features and treatment given to episodic cluster headache patients in the Calgary region. PATIENTS: Fifty-one (51) patients who responded to a media campaign, had previously been diagnosed by their family physicians, and who met International Headache Society (IHS) criteria for episodic cluster headache, formed the population for this study. METHODS: The media campaign consisted of newspaper advertisements and radio publicity including physician interviews and talk shows. Patients were required to complete by 200-item questionnaire detailing clinical features and treatment of their cluster headache syndrome. Each patient was also interviewed by our research nurse for clarification and proper completion of questionnaire. RESULTS: Fifty-one percent (51%) of our patients had short headache attacks lasting one hour or less. Almost one-half (45%) had three or four attacks per 24 hour period. Eighty-six percent (86%) had been referred to a neurologist. Sixty-nine percent (69%) had never used oxygen, but of those who had, one-half were still using it. Sumatriptan by injection had been tried by 26% of patients and of these, 93% considered it effective. Subcutaneous dihydroergotamine had been tried by 8%. For prophylaxis, 41% had tried methysergide, 31% prednisone, and 4% verapamil. Many patients had been prescribed migraine prophylactic drugs which are ineffective for cluster headache, and some had also undergone dental procedures or nasal and sinus surgeries. CONCLUSIONS: Many cluster headache patients had not, to their knowledge, been prescribed or used the best symptomatic and prophylactic treatments for cluster headache. This should be addressed through educational programs and through making up-to-date information on the treatment of cluster headache readily available to physicians and patients.

Effectiveness of subcutaneous dihydroergotamine by home injection for migraine.

The effectiveness of dihydroergotamine administered by home subcutaneous injection by the patient or family for severe headache attacks was assessed retrospectively in 51 patients. Average follow-up was 21 weeks. Twenty-one patients had intermittent migraine attacks, 27 had transformed migraine with chronic daily headache, and 3 had chronic tension-type headache. Of the 51 patients taught home injection, 35% had an excellent overall response, 18% had a good response, 12% had a poor response but continued to use dihydroergotamine, and 35% had discontinued dihydroergotamine use. Side effects were the main reason for stopping dihydroergotamine. These included nausea or vomiting or both, limb pain or numbness or both, chest or throat tightness or both, and soreness at the injection site. Thirty-three patients (65%) continued to use dihydroergotamine at the end of the follow-up period. In patients who previously required injections from medical personnel for headache crises and in whom home injection of dihydroergotamine was effective, a dramatic reduction occurred in hospital emergency room and physician office utilization. Dihydroergotamine use by home injection can be an effective treatment for a significant proportion of patients with severe migraine including patients with transformed migraine and medication overuse.