Metastatic renal cancer and patient survival as a criterion of treatment response.

Advanced metastatic renal cancer is an incurable disease, unless a successful excision of metastatic lesions can be performed. No effective treatment has yet been found. In the last few years, targeting therapies have been developed. In the past, the main treatment was based on cytokines (interferon-alpha or interleukin-2). Our objective was to determine the median and overall survival in the 66 patients who were studied and reviewed. All had histologically confirmed advanced renal cancer. There were 41 male and 25 female patients, with a median age of 60 years. In 68.18% of the patients, the treatment was mainly interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) given 3 times a week for a median time duration of 6 months (range 3-12 months). Four patients received interleukin-2 (IL-2) and 17 patients received chemotherapy, 15 of whom had hormonal treatment. Eleven patients underwent palliative radiation therapy (in the bone or brain). Seven patients received no treatment apart from supportive care. A partial response was achieved in 11.11% of the patients treated with IFN-alpha. No response was observed in patients treated with chemotherapy or hormonal therapy. The median survival of all the patients was 20 months (95% CI 14.96-25.04). These results are discussed in comparison with the survival results of modern targeting treatment studies. In the latter studies, despite the high response rates (31-40%), the survival was 16.4 months. Our data indicate that the response rate as a criterion is not adequate in determining drug effectiveness.

Efficacy and tolerability of oxaliplatin plus irinotecan 5-fluouracil and leucovorin regimen in advanced stage colorectal cancer patients pretreated with irinotecan 5-fluouracil and leucovorin.

OBJECTIVES: Oxaliplatin has been introduced in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer during the past few years. The pre-existing treatment of leucovorin-5-fluorouracil-irinotecan (IFL), although reasonably effective, has needed novel, active agents to increase the response rate and overall survival. We planned this phase 2 study in patients pretreated with IFL, adding oxaliplatin as second-line treatment: our objectives were to determine response rate and overall survival. METHODS: All patients (median age 65) were designated to receive 6 cycles of chemotherapy: leucovorin 200 mg/m2 infused for 60 minutes, 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 bolus at 30 minutes from the start of the previous infusion, irinotecan 135 mg/m2 infused for 90 minutes, and oxaliplatin 135 mg/m2 for 90 minutes, infused sequentially on day 1 and repeated every 3 weeks. Standard ondansetron antiemetic treatment and dexamethasone 8 mg were administered to all patients. No prophylactic recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was permitted. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients were recruited and 54 were evaluable for response, survival, and toxicity. All patients had advanced, inoperable, metastatic disease in the liver and/or lungs, abdominal cavity, and multiple sites. All patients had undergone IFL pretreatment and had no response; 40 had disease progression and 14 had stable disease when entering the present study; 302 chemotherapy cycles (mean 5.92) were administered. There was no treatment delay caused by toxicity (either neutropenia or diarrhea). Irinotecan and oxaliplatin were reduced by 25% in 6 (11.1%) patients. No complete responses were observed; 21 (38.9%) patients achieved partial response, 26 (48.2%) had stable disease, and 7 (13%) had disease progression. Median duration of response was 6 months, time to tumor progression (TTP) 8 months, and median overall survival after the initiation of second-line treatment was 10 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.5-12.6). CONCLUSION: The addition of oxaliplatin to IFL as second-line treatment rendered a prolongation of survival and a response rate of 38.9% in patients in whom IFL pretreatment had failed.

Mesothelioma: treatment and survival of a patient population and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Our purpose was to evaluate the survival of patients with pleural and intraperitoneal malignant mesothelioma and, particularly, to estimate the efficacy of chemotherapy as well as radiotherapy and surgery. A review of the literature with respect to these parameters is included. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients with malignant mesothelioma (28 with pleural and 7 with intraperitoneal) were enrolled. Twenty-eight patients underwent chemotherapy, 7/35 radiation and 9/35 surgery (2 with pleural and 7 with abdominal disease). Combination chemotherapy included cisplatin-gemcitabine, cisplatin (or carboplatin) with premetrexed and doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide. RESULTS: In 2/28 patients with pleural mesothelioma the tumor was excised and in 7 with intraperitoneal disease, surgical therapy was palliative and there was survival prolongation. Radiotherapy was only palliative. Chemotherapy produced a very low response: 2/28 (7.14%) patients achieved a partial response. The median survival was 17 months, 4-year survival, 24.4% and 5-year survival, 12.12%. No serious toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION: Malignant mesothelioma of the pleura and intraperitoneum is a slow-growing disease which is indicated by the long survival, despite the failure of chemotherapy, radiation therapy and surgery.

Long-term survival of patients with advanced colorectal cancer may not be due to the response to chemotherapy.

Our primary objective was to determine the median and overall survival and secondarily the response rate to first- and second-line chemotherapy of patients with advanced colorectal metastatic disease. Three-hundred and seventy-nine patients (median age 60 years, range 30-87 years) were enrolled from April 1993 to March 2000. Median follow-up was 6 years (range 3-10 years), until July 2003. All patients were evaluable for survival and 342 were evaluable for response and toxicity. Thirty-seven patients did not undergo chemotherapy. All patients had confirmed histology as well as metastatic disease based on radiological tests. First-line treatment was administered to 342 patients: leucovorin (LV) 30 mg/m2 and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 425 mg/m2. Three different combinations were given as second-line treatment during different chronological periods: i) 5-FU, mitomycin-C and doxorubicin (FAM); ii) 5-FU and cisplatin (CDDP) and iii) 5-FU, LV and irinotecan (CPT-II). Responses were observed as follows: first-line treatment 16.37%, after FAM 25%, following 5-FU-CDDP 26.83% and after 5-FU-LV-CPT-II, 30.61%. Survival of all patients was as follows: median 25 months (range 16.1-33.9 months). The longest survival was of patients on 5-FU-LV-CPT-II. Median survival of patients with stable disease was 19 months and of untreated patients 12 months. Patients with advanced colorectal cancer have a long median (25 months) and overall survival, despite low responsiveness to chemotherapy.

Weekly administration of topotecan and paclitaxel in pretreated advanced cancer patients: a phase I/II study.

PURPOSE: This study was a phase I/II, cohort, dose-escalation trial of topotecan and paclitaxel. Its aim was to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of the combination and to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), as a recommended dose for phase II, as well as to get preliminary data on the efficacy (activity) of the drug in pretreated patients with ovarian cancer, small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Included in the study were 52 pretreated patients, 19 with ovarian cancer, 20 with SCLC and 13 with NSCLC. The doses of topotecan were escalated from 1.25 to 2 mg/m2 and of paclitaxel from 60 to 80 mg/m2. A minimum of four patients were included at each of the six levels of dose escalation. RESULTS: We found that DLT due to grade 3 and 4 myelotoxicity was at levels 5 and 6 at doses of 1.75 and 80 mg/m2 (level 5) and 2 and 80 mg/m2 (level 6) for topotecan and paclitaxel, respectively. The MTD and recommended accepted doses are 1.75 mg/m2 for topotecan and 70 mg/m2 for paclitaxel. Of the 52 patients, 17 (33%) showed a response: 1 complete response (1.92%) and 16 partial responses (30.77%). CONCLUSIONS: Topotecan combined with paclitaxel administered once weekly for three consecutive weeks repeated for every 28 days resulted in well-tolerated toxicity at doses of 1.75 and 70 mg/m2, respectively, and a response rate of 33% in pretreated cancer patients.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride (PLD) and paclitaxel in recurrent or metastatic head and neck carcinoma: a phase I/II study conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG).

A phase I pharmacokinetics and dose-finding study and a phase II study of the combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin HCl (PLD) and paclitaxel were conducted in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer (HNC). Sixty patients with recurrent or metastatic disease were enrolled in the study: 11 patients in the phase I study and 49 patients in the phase II study. In the phase I study, the initial dose level of PLD was 35 mg/m as a 1-h infusion with escalating increments of 5 mg/m until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was reached. A fixed dose of paclitaxel (175 mg/m) was administered as a 3-h infusion. The combination was administered every 28 days. Pharmacokinetic studies performed on 10 patients indicated that the sequence of drug administration did not cause clinically significant modifications in the pharmacokinetics of either drug. The MTD for PLD was 45 mg/m (dose level 3) and the dose-limiting toxicity was febrile neutropenia, occurring in three of five patients. The phase II dose of PLD was 40 mg/m (dose level 2) and a total of 214 cycles were delivered. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was observed in 26% patients and febrile neutropenia occurred in 16% of patients. Grade 3 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) was recorded in only one patient. The overall response rate was 28% for patients with non-nasopharyngeal tumors [95% confidence interval (CI) 15-45%] and 28.6% for the study population (95% CI 17-43%). The median survival for the study population was 9.7 months; 1-year survival was 38%. We conclude that the recommended dose for the combination of PLD and paclitaxel is 40 and 175 mg/m every 28 days, without granulocyte colony stimulating factor support. The combination of paclitaxel with PLD demonstrated activity in recurrent or metastatic HNC, a favorable toxicity profile and relative ease of administration.

Paclitaxel and liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx) combination in advanced breast cancer patients: a phase II study.

Due to the cumulative cardiotoxicity of doxorubicin in cancer treatment, the tendency of the physician to find a substitute has led to the use of liposomal encapsulated doxorubicin, as well as other similar compounds. Doxorubicin and paclitaxel, two of the most active agents for breast cancer, have often been used in combination for this condition. In the present study we combined liposomal doxorubicin with paclitaxel with the intention of diminishing the toxicity of the cardiac muscle. Twenty-three patients were evaluated for response rate, survival and toxicity. All patients had metastatic disease and were chemotherapy-naïve after generalization of the disease. Liposomal doxorubicin was infused at a dose of 30 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel at a dose of 175 mg/m(2) once every 3 weeks. The response rate was complete in 2 patients (8.70%) and partial in 14 patients (60.87%) totalling 69.57%. The median duration of response was 6 months (range 2-13+) and median survival was 10 months (range 4-20+). Cardiotoxicity, myelotoxicity and gastrointestinal toxicity were well-tolerated. The high hand-foot adverse reaction (47.83%) inhibited the continuation of treatment in half of the patients and due to this toxicity the trial was terminated after the 23rd patient.

Paclitaxel and vinorelbine combination in advanced inoperable adenocarcinoma of the lung: a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of paclitaxel (PCT) combined with vinorelbine (VRL) in adenocarcinoma of the lung. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Untreated inoperable patients with metastatic disease were enrolled and underwent front-line treatment with a new combination as follows: a 30-minute infusion of VRL at a dose of 25 mg/m2 followed by a 3-hour infusion of PCT 135 mg/m2. Chemotherapy was repeated every 2 weeks with the intention of administering 9 cycles. RESULTS: Fifty-four out of 58 enrolled patients were assessable; the median age was 63 years (range 48-81). All patients were chemotherapy-naïve and all had histologically- or cytologically- confirmed adenocarcinoma. Twenty-seven patients (50%) responded: 5 with complete response (9.3%) and 22 with partial response (40.7%); 17 patients had stable disease (31.5%) and 10 showed disease progression (18.5%). Median response duration was 6 months (range 2-14.5) and median survival was 10 months (range 2-35+). The main adverse reaction was myelotoxicity in 87% of the patients, of whom only 8 (14.8%) had grade 4 neutropenia which in 4 cases (7.4%) was febrile. No patient required dose reduction, but treatment was postponed by one week in 4 patients a total of nine times. Patients received 98.6% of the planned dose. CONCLUSION: The PCT and VRL combination is an active first-line treatment for lung adenocarcinoma. These two cytotoxic drugs produce acceptable toxicity when repeated every 2 weeks.

Investigation of doxorubicin tissue toxicity: does amifostine provide chemoprotection? An experimental study.

This experimental animal study of 12-weeks' duration, involving Wistar rats, tested the possible chemoprotection of Doxorubicin (adriamycin), cardiomyopathy and other toxicities by Amifostine. One hundred and five animals were divided into 3 groups: Groups A, B and C, which had Doxorubicin, simultaneous Doxorubicin and Amifostine treatment and normal saline for control, respectively. Treatment was administered once weekly for 12 consecutive weeks. The doses of each drug were appropriately calculated on the basis of other experiments in the literature and given in analogous dosage to human kilograms of body weight. Euthanasias and autopsies of six animals at a time from each animal group were performed on weeks 3, 6, 8, 10 and 12. The blood, heart, lung, liver, aorta, thymus, spleen, kidneys, adrenals, testis and ovaries and muscle and lipoid tissue were examined macroscopically and microscopically. Biochemical liver and kidney examinations, full blood count and serum lipids were examined before and during the weeks of treatment and autopsies. Increased cholesterol and triglycerides from the 6th week towards the end of the experiment and a gradual increase in cardiomyopathy were found, particularly in Group A. The findings were similar in Group B, except for the timing (the increase of serum lipids and the serious cardiac lesions were delayed by two weeks). No abnormalities were detected in the controls, Group C. In conclusion, Amifostine does not seem to be cardioprotective when administered with Doxorubicin, since it only delays the onset of cardiac lesions. In in vitro testing, Amifostine was found to be a scavenger of the oxygen-free radicals which are produced by Doxorubicin.

Phase II trial of biweekly administration of vinorelbine and gemcitabine in pretreated advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of gemcitabine (GEM) plus vinorelbine (VRL) administered biweekly in pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Advanced breast cancer patients without response, with stable disease, or with recurrence within 6 months of prior treatment were given GEM 1,000 mg/m(2) and VRL 25 mg/m(2), once every 2 weeks for at least six cycles. RESULTS: Of the 51 patients enrolled, 50 (median, age 58 years; range, 34 to 76 years) were assessable. All patients had prior chemotherapy with an anthracycline-related regimen that included taxanes in 50% of the cases. Four patients (8%) had a complete response (CR) and 23 (46%) had a partial response (PR), for an overall response rate of 54%; 16 (32%) had stable disease and 7 (14%) experienced disease progression. Response occurred mainly in patients with soft tissue (83.3%) and lung metastasis (66.7%). Response duration was 4 to 8+, 4 to 9+, and 4 to 9 months for those with CR, PR, and stable disease, respectively. The regimen was well tolerated, with grade 1 to 2 myelotoxicity and asthenia reported. No patient required a dose reduction. Gastrointestinal side effects were negligible. Patients received 99.7% (range, 93.0% to 100.0%) of the planned dose-intensity of each drug. CONCLUSION: GEM in combination with VRL is an active regimen for advanced breast cancer patients, and biweekly administration significantly reduces myelotoxicity.