IGF-II promoter methylation and ovarian cancer prognosis.

PURPOSE: The insulin-like growth factor-II (IGF-II) gene has four promoters that produce distinct transcripts which vary by tissue type and developmental stage. Dysregulation of normal promoter usage has been shown to occur in cancer; DNA methylation regulates promoter use. Thus, we sought to examine if DNA methylation varies among IGF-II promoters in ovarian cancer and if methylation patterns are related to clinical features of the disease. STUDY DESIGN: Tumor tissue, clinical data, and follow-up information were collected from 215 patients diagnosed with primary epithelial ovarian cancer. DNA extracted from tumor tissues was analyzed for IGF-II promoter methylation with seven methylation specific PCR (MSP) assays: three for promoter 2 (P2) and two assays each for promoters 3 and 4 (P3 and P4). RESULTS: Methylation was found to vary among the seven assays: 19.3% in P2A, 45.6% in P2B, 50.9% in P2C, 48.4% in P3A, 13.1% in P3B, 5.1% in P4A, and 6.1% in P4B. Methylation in any of the three P2 assays was associated with high tumor grade (P = 0.043), suboptimal debulking (P = 0.036), and disease progression [hazards ratio (HR) = 1.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09-2.74]. When comparing promoter methylation patterns, differential methylation of P2 and P3 was found to be associated with disease prognosis; patients with P3 but not P2 methylation were less likely to have disease progression (HR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.17-0.91) compared to patients with P2 but not P3 methylation. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that methylation varies among three IGF-II promoters in ovarian cancer and that this variation seems to have biologic implications as it relates to clinical features and prognosis of the disease.

Promoter-specific transcription of insulin-like growth factor-II in epithelial ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The IGF-II gene has four promoters (P1-P4); each initiates promoter-specific transcription. Studies have shown that IGF-II promoters normally active during fetal growth, but silent in postnatal life, are reactivated in cancer. In a previous study, we found IGF-II transcription evaluated at a common translated region was associated with ovarian cancer progression. This study was conducted to further determine which IGF-II promoters were responsible for the association. METHODS: Promoter-specific transcription at each IGF-II promoter was analyzed in 201 ovarian tumor samples using quantitative RT-PCR. Cox regression analysis was performed to determine the association of IGF-II promoter-specific expression with patient survival. RESULTS: P3 and P4 transcripts were detected more frequently and at significantly higher levels than the transcripts of P1 and P2. P3 and P4 transcripts were strongly correlated with the common IGF-II translated region and were significantly higher in patients with late stage disease, large residual tumor, suboptimal debulking or serous histology compared to those with early stage, small residual tumor, optimal debulking or non-serous histology. Survival analysis showed that patients with high P3 or P4 expression had a 2-fold increase in risk for death compared to those with low P3 or P4. These associations remained significant after adjustment for patient age at surgery, disease stage, tumor grade and histology. P1 and P2 transcripts, however, were not associated with disease characteristics or survival. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that IGF-II transcription from P3 and P4 promoters is important in ovarian cancer and evaluation of IGF-II promoter-specific transcription may have clinical implications in ovarian cancer prognosis and treatment.

Clinical and pharmacokinetic phase II study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and vinorelbine in heavily pretreated recurrent ovarian carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: This multicenter phase II study evaluated feasibility, clinical efficacy, toxicity and pharmacokinetics of the combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and vinorelbine (VNR) in patients with platinum-paclitaxel pretreated recurrent ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients received prior treatment with platinum and paclitaxel. Thirty-two heavily pretreated (median number of chemotherapy regimens two, range one to six) ovarian cancer patients received treatment with PLD 30 mg/m(2) and VNR 30 mg/m(2) every three weeks for six cycles. Ten patients entered the pharmacokinetic study, five receiving the PLD-VNR and five the VNR-PLD sequence. RESULTS: In 30 patients evaluated for response and toxicity, the overall response rate was 37% and 10% of patients achieved stable disease. Median time to progression and overall survival were 5.5 months (range 1-10) and 9 months (range 2-16), respectively. Toxicity was generally mild and reversible. VNR AUC(tot) and plasma levels were considerably higher in the PLD-VNR sequence. CONCLUSIONS: The PLD-VNR regimen exhibits significant activity in heavily pretreated patients, is well tolerated and is associated with encouraging survival. Preliminary pharmacokinetic results suggest the PLD-VNR sequence for further clinical applications. This regimen should be considered as a treatment option in patients with chemotherapy-resistant ovarian cancer.

Paclitaxel, vinorelbine and 5-fluorouracil in breast cancer patients pretreated with adjuvant anthracyclines.

We investigated the activity and toxicity of a combination of vinorelbine (VNB), paclitaxel (PTX) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) continuous infusion administered as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer patients pretreated with adjuvant anthracyclines. A total of 61 patients received a regimen consisting of VNB 25 mg m(-2) on days 1 and 15, PTX 60 mg m(-2) on days 1, 8 and 15 and continuous infusion of 5-FU at 200 mg m(-2) every day. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. Disease response was evaluated by both RECIST and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Objective responses were recorded in 39 of 61 patients (64.0%) assessed by WHO and in 36 of 50 patients (72.0%) assessable by RECIST criteria. Complete remission occurred in 15 (24.6%) and 14 patients (28.0%), respectively. The median time to progression and overall survival of entire population was 10.6 and 27.3 months, respectively, and median duration of complete response was 14.8 months. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression (leucopenia grade 3/4 in 52.5% of patients). Grade 3/4 nonhaematologic toxicities included mucositis/diarrhoea in 13.1%, skin in 3.3% and cardiac in 1.6% of patients. Grade 2/3 neurotoxicity was observed in five patients (7.2%). The VNB, PTX and 5-FU continuous infusion combination regimen was active and manageable. Complete responses were frequent and durable.

Methylation of tumor suppressor gene p16 and prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Methylation of p16 promoter was evaluated in ovarian cancer to determine the role of p16 methylation in ovarian cancer prognosis. METHODS: Two hundred and forty-nine patients with primary epithelial ovarian cancer were selected for the study; these patients were followed for a median of 31 months. Genomic DNA extracted from fresh frozen tumor tissues were treated with sodium bisulfite and were analyzed for p16 methylation using methylation-specific PCR (MSP). Cox regression survival analysis was performed to examine the associations of p16 methylation with progression-free and overall survivals. RESULTS: Of the 249 patients, 100 (40%) were tested positive for p16 promoter methylation. The status of p16 methylation did not change significantly with patient age, disease stage, histological grade, residual tumor size, and debulking results, although p16 methylation seemed to occur more often in patients with advanced diseases or aggressive tumors. Compared to those without p16 methylation, patients with p16 methylation had significantly higher risk for disease progression (P = 0.01). The relative risk for progression was 1.69 (95% CI: 1.12-2.54), and the association remained statistically significant (RR = 1.54, 95% CI: 1.01-2.34) after adjusting for clinical and pathological variables. The risk for death was also higher in methylation positive patients than in methylation negative patients (RR = 1.33, 95% CI: 0.88-2.00), but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The study suggests that promoter methylation in the p16 gene is associated with ovarian cancer progression, and evaluation of p16 methylation may have values in predicting ovarian cancer prognosis.

Immunofluorometric quantitation and histochemical localisation of kallikrein 6 protein in ovarian cancer tissue: a new independent unfavourable prognostic biomarker.

Human kallikrein 6 protein is a newly discovered human kallikrein. We determined the amount of human kallikrein 6 in extracts of 182 ovarian tumours and correlated specific activity (ng hK6 mg(-1) total protein) with clinicopathological variables documented at the time of surgical excision and with outcome (progression free survival, overall survival) monitored over a median interval of 62 months. Thirty per cent of the tumours were positive for human kallikrein 6 (>35 ng hK6 mg(-1) total protein). Human kallikrein 6-specific immunohistochemical staining of four ovarian tissues that included benign, borderline and malignant lesions indicated a cytoplasmic location of human kallikrein 6 in tumour cells of epithelial origin, although the intensity of staining was variable. Tumour human kallikrein 6 (ng hK6 mg(-1) total protein) was higher in late stage disease, serous histotype, residual tumour >1 cm and suboptimal debulking (>1 cm) (P<0.05). Univariate analysis revealed that patients with tumour human kallikrein 6 positive specific activity were more likely to suffer progressive disease and to die (hazard ratio 1.71 (P=0.015) and 1.88 (P=0.022), respectively). Survival curves demonstrated the same (P=0.013 and 0.019, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that human kallikrein 6 positivity was retained as an independent prognostic variable in several subgroups of patients, namely those with (low) grade I and II tumours (hazard ratio progression free survival 4.3 (P=0.027) and overall survival 4.1 (P=0.023)) and those with optimal debulking (hazard ratio progression free survival 3.8 (P=0.019) and overall survival 5.6 (P=0.011)). We conclude that tumour kallikrein 6 protein levels have utility as an independent adverse prognostic marker in a subgroup of ovarian cancer patients with otherwise apparently good prognosis.

[Expression and prognostic significance in epithelial ovarian cancer]. / Espressione e significato prognostico nel carcinoma ovarico epiteliale.

BACKGROUND: Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) is a glycoprotein with specific binding affinity to peptide hormones insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) which are potent mitogens for a variety of cells. IGFBP-3 can inhibit the activities of IGFs by interfering with the interaction between IGFs and their receptor IGF-IR. Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) tissues express IGFBP-3, IGFs and IGF-IR. Moreover, high levels of IGF-I and IGF-IR have been shown in epithelial ovarian cancer, and IGF-I stimulates the growth of ovarian cancer. METHODS: We measured IGFBP-3 levels in ovarian cancer tissues of 147 consecutive patients and we examined its association with clinical and pathological features of the disease and patient survival. The average age of the patients in the study was 55 years and the median follow-up time was 37 months. IGFBP-3 levels were measured in the tissue extracts by a commercial ELISA kit and non-parametric statistics and the Cox regression survival analysis were used to determine the associations of IGFBP-3 with clinical and pathologic variables as well as with patient survival. RESULTS: High IGFBP-3 levels resulted significantly associated with some of the favorable prognostic features of the disease, including early clinical stage (p=0.048), small size of residual tumor (p=0.007), and optimal debulking result (p=0.007). High IGFBP-3 was also associated with a significantly reduced risk for disease progression (RR=0.52, p=0.034) and we showed an inverse dose-dependent relationship between IGFBP-3 and disease progression-free survival (p=0.033). However, the association with disease progression-free survival was no longer statistically significant in a multivariate analysis. An association between IGFBP-3 and overall survival was not shown. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggest that IGFBP-3 may play a role in the progression of epithelial ovarian cancer.

[Growth factors in epithelial ovarian cancer]. / Fattori di crescita e carcinoma epiteliale ovarico.

The aim of this study was to provide an up-to-date review of the knowledge on the role of the main growth factors involved in the onset and progression of epithelial ovarian cancer (Transforming Growth Factor a-TGFa, Trans-forming Growth Factor-TGFb, Epidermal Growth Factor-EGF, Insulin-Like Growth Factor-IGF, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-VEGF). Relevant articles published between 1991 and 2001 were identified using the Medline database. Publications identified by the search were reviewed and critically evaluated for their relevance to growth factors role in ovarian cancer. This review may be useful for clinicians wishing to study the biological mechanisms involved in epithelial ovarian neoplasms, in order to evaluate the possible value of Growth Factors as prognostic or predictive markers which could lead to novel therapeutic regimens, fitting individual needs based on single biological variations.

Prognostic value of human kallikrein 10 expression in epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Human kallikrein 10 (hK10; also known as the normal epithelial cell-specific 1 gene and protein) is a secreted serine protease, which belongs to the human kallikrein family. It has been reported that hK10 is down-regulated in breast and prostate cancer cell lines and that it may function as a tumor suppressor. Recently, we developed a highly sensitive and specific immunoassay for hK10 and found that this protein is abundantly expressed in ovarian tissue. In this study, we measured quantitatively hK10 levels in ovarian cancer cytosolic extracts and evaluated the prognostic value of this biomarker in ovarian cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Specimens from eight normal ovarian tissues, eight ovarian tissues with benign disease, and 182 ovarian tumors were investigated. RESULTS: hK10 concentration in ovarian tumor cytosols ranged from 0 to 84 ng/mg of total protein, with a median of 2.6. This median was highly elevated in comparison with normal and benign ovarian tissues (P < 0.001). A cutoff of 1.35 ng/mg was selected to categorize tumors as hK10 high and hK10 low. With chi(2) test and Fisher's exact test, high concentration hK10 was found to be associated with advanced disease stage, serous histological type, suboptimal debulking, and large residual tumor (>1 cm; all P < 0.05). hK10 status was additionally correlated with clinical outcome, including progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using the Cox model. In univariate analysis, we found that patients with hK10 high tumors were more likely to die and relapse, in comparison with patients with hK10 low tumors (hazards ratios for PFS and OS were 1.93 and 2.42, respectively; P < 0.05). Although this correlation disappeared after the entire patient population was subjected to multivariate analysis, it remained significant in the subgroup of patients with stage III/IV ovarian cancer (hazards ratios for PFS and OS were 1.98 and 2.12, respectively; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that hK10 is a new, independent, unfavorable prognostic marker, especially for late-stage ovarian cancer.

Higher human kallikrein gene 4 (KLK4) expression indicates poor prognosis of ovarian cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Kallikrein gene 4 (KLK4, also known as prostase/KLK-L1), located on chromosome 19q13.4, is one of the newly discovered members of the human KLK-like gene family. This gene is up-regulated by androgens in the LNCaP prostatic carcinoma cell line and by androgens and progestins in the BT-474 breast cancer cell line. On the basis of its apparent association with hormonally regulated tissues, we have undertaken to examine the prognostic value of KLK4 expression in 147 malignant ovarian tissues. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Tumors were pulverized, total RNA was extracted, and cDNA was prepared by reverse transcription. KLK4 was amplified by PCR using gene-specific primers, and its identity was verified by sequencing. Ovarian tissues were then classified as KLK4-positive or -negative, based on ethidium bromide visualization of the PCR product on agarose gels. RESULTS: KLK4 was found to be expressed in 69 (55%) of 147 of ovarian cancer samples. We found a strong positive association between KLK4 expression and tumor grade (P = 0.02) and clinical stage (P < 0.001). Univariate survival analysis revealed that patients with ovarian tumors positive for KLK4 expression had an increased risk for relapse and death (P = 0.003 and 0.001, respectively). Whereas knowledge of KLK4 status did not significantly increase the prognostic power of the multivariate models, additional analyses did determine that KLK4 was an independent unfavorable prognostic factor in patients with grade 1 and 2 tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that KLK4 expression is associated with more aggressive forms of ovarian cancer.

[Chemoresistance in ovarian cancer. State of the art and future prospects]. / La chemioresistenza nel carcinoma dell'ovaio. Stato dell'arte e prospettive future.

Aim of this study was to provide a review of the basic mechanisms of drug resistance in ovarian cancer and novel strategies to modulate drug resistance. Relevant articles published through August 1999 were identified using the Medline data base. Publications identified by the search were reviewed and evaluated critically for their relevance to drug resistance in ovarian cancer. Ovarian cancer patients have high response rates to initial chemotherapy after cytoreductive surgery. However, most will develop resistance to chemotherapy during the course of their treatment. There are multiple mechanisms resulting in drug resistance. Strategies to modulate drug resistance include dose intensity, various pharmacologic agents, and gene therapy.