The Learning Curve of Total Breast Reconstruction With Autologous Fat Transfer.

INTRODUCTION: Total breast reconstruction with autologous fat transfer (AFT) is a relatively new breast reconstruction method. Although AFT was predominantly used to correct postsurgical defects, the surgical skills of a total breast reconstruction with AFT are different and can be facilitated for novices to accelerate their learning process. This study aims to assess the learning curve of plastic surgeons in total breast reconstruction with AFT in the Netherlands. METHODS: A mixed-methods study was performed based on the multicenter randomized clinical BREAST trial data. For the qualitative analysis, semistructured interviews were conducted. To test hypotheses derived from the qualitative data, retrospective data analysis was performed using multilevel linear regression analysis of the patients undergoing AFT as a total breast reconstruction method. RESULTS: The interviews revealed that plastic surgeons need to perform the procedure several times to learn and experience the technical details of total breast reconstruction with AFT. Learning and improving this technique works best by scrubbing in with an expert. Before plastic surgeons learn the optimal volume of fat reinjection over time, they tend to inject too little fat and subsequently too much fat over multiple procedures. With more experience, the rigottomy technique becomes more important. Besides technical details, managing patient expectations before starting treatment is paramount. Multilevel linear regression revealed a significant decrease (P < 0.001) in the number of surgical procedures and the total injected volume (P = 0.002) to complete a total breast reconstruction with AFT. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study that explores the learning curve involved in using AFT as a total breast reconstruction method. The feeling of when fat transfer is sufficient, and how to release scars for a good result without causing seromas, is best learned by scrubbing in with experienced colleagues during several procedures, interchanged with starting one's own practice.

Imaging findings after a total reconstructed breast with autologous fat transfer: what the radiologist needs to know.

Autologous fat transfer (AFT) is an upcoming technique for total breast reconstruction. Consequently, radiological imaging of women with an AFT reconstructed breast will increase in the coming years, yet radiological experience and evidence after AFT is limited.The surgical procedure of AFT and follow-up with imaging modalities including mammography (MG), ultrasound (US), and MRI in patients with a total breast reconstruction with AFT are summarized to illustrate the radiological normal and suspicious findings for malignancy.Imaging after a total breast reconstruction with AFT appears to be based mostly on benign imaging findings with an overall low biopsy rate. As higher volumes are injected in this technique, the risk for the onset of fat necrosis increases. Imaging findings most often are related to fat necrosis after AFT. On MG, fat necrosis can mostly be seen as oil cysts. The occurrence of a breast seroma after total breast reconstruction with AFT is an unfavourable outcome and may require special treatment. Fat deposition in the pectoral muscle is a previously unknown, but benign entity. Although fat necrosis is a benign entity, it can mimic breast cancer (recurrence).In symptomatic women after total breast reconstruction with AFT, MG and US can be considered as first diagnostic modalities. Breast MRI can be used as a problem-solving tool during later stage. Future studies should investigate the most optimal follow-up strategy, including different imaging modalities, in patients treated with AFT for total breast reconstruction.

Evidence for the use of peri- and post-operative antibiotic prophylaxis in autologous breast reconstruction: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Autologous breast reconstruction has become standard of care, but there is no consensus on prophylactic antibiotic regimens for this surgical procedure. This review aims to present evidence on the best prophylactic antibiotic protocol to lower the risk of surgical site infections in autologous breast reconstructions. METHODS: The search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library on 25th of January 2022. Data on the number of surgical site infections, breast reconstruction type (pedicled or free flap) and reconstruction timing (immediate or delayed), as well as data on the type, dose, route of administration, timing, and duration of antibiotic treatment were extracted. All included articles were additionally assessed for potential risk of bias by using the revised RTI Item Bank tool. RESULTS: 12 studies were included in this review. No evidence is found that giving post-operative antibiotics for a prolonged period longer than 24 h after surgery is useful in lowering infection rates. This review could not distinguish between the best choice of antimicrobial agent. DISCUSSION: Although this is the first study that collected current evidence on this topic, the quality of evidence is limited due to a small number of available studies (N = 12) with small study populations. The included studies have high heterogeneity, no adjustment for confounding, and interchangeably used definitions. Future research is highly recommended with predefined definitions, and a sufficient number of included patients. CONCLUSION: Antibiotic prophylaxis up to a maximum of 24 h is useful in lowering infection rates in autologous breast reconstructions.

Causes for Medical Errors in Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

Background: Quality strategies, interventions, and frameworks have been developed to facilitate a better understanding of healthcare systems. Reporting adverse events is one of these strategies. Gynaecology and obstetrics are one of the specialties with many adverse events. To understand the main causes of medical errors in gynaecology and obstetrics and how they could be prevented, we conducted this systematic review. Methods: This systematic review was performed in compliance with the Prisma 2020 guidelines. We searched several databases for relevant studies (Jan 2010-May 2023). Studies were included if they indicated the presence of any potential risk factor at the hospital level for medical errors or adverse events in gynaecology or obstetrics. Results: We included 26 articles in the quantitative analysis of this review. Most of these (n = 12) are cross-sectional studies; eight are case-control studies, and six are cohort studies. One of the most frequently reported contributing factors is delay in healthcare. In addition, the availability of products and trained staff, team training, and communication are often reported to contribute to near-misses/maternal deaths. Conclusions: All risk factors that were found in our review imply several categories of contributing factors regarding: (1) delay of care, (2) coordination and management of care, and (3) scarcity of supply, personnel, and knowledge.

Bilateral breast infection following total breast reconstruction with autologous fat transfer (AFT): A case report.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Total breast reconstruction with autologous fat transfer (AFT) has a low complication rate. Fat necrosis, infection, skin necrosis and hematoma are the most common complications. Infections are usually mild and manifested by a unilateral red painful breast and treated with oral antibiotics with or without superficial irrigation of the wound. CASE PRESENTATION: One of our patients reported an ill-fitting pre-expansion device several days after surgery. This was due to a severe bilateral breast infection following a session of total breast reconstruction with AFT despite perioperative and postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. Surgical evacuation was performed in combination with both systemic and oral antibiotic treatment. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Most infections can be prevented in the early post-operative period with antibiotic prophylaxis. If an infection does occur, it is treated with antibiotics or superficial irrigation of the wound. A delay in identification of an alarming course could be reduced by monitoring the fit to the EVEBRA device, implementing video consultations on indication, limiting the means of communication and better informing the patient on what complications to monitor. The recognition of an alarming course following a subsequent session of AFT is not guaranteed after a session without complication. CONCLUSION: Besides temperature and redness of the breast, a pre-expansion device that doesn't fit can be an alarming sign. Patient communication should be adapted as severe infections can be insufficiently recognized by phone. Evacuation should be considered when an infection does occur.