Risk of Hepatic Artery Complications After Liver Transplantation in Patients Who Received Pretransplant Transarterial Chemoembolization Therapy: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Pretransplant transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been associated with an increased risk of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) after liver transplantation (LT). Innovative surgical LT and interventional vascular radiology TACE techniques may mitigate the risk of HAT. We sought to investigate the incidence of HAT after LT in patients who received pre-transplant TACE at our center. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective review of all LT patients, >18 years of age, from October 1, 2012, to May 31, 2018. Outcomes were compared between patients who received pre-LT TACE and those who did not. Median follow-up was 26 months. RESULTS: Among the 162 LT recipients, 110 (67%) patients did not receive pre-LT TACE (Group I), while 52 (32%) received pre-LT TACE (Group II). The <30-day incidence rates of post-LT HAT were as follows: Group I = 1.8% and Group II = 1.9% (P = .9). Most hepatic arterial complications occurred >30 days after LT. Based on competing risks regression analysis, TACE was not associated with an increased risk of HAT. Patient or graft survivals were comparable between the 2 groups (P = .1 and .2, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows a similar incidence of hepatic artery complications post-LT in patients who received TACE before LT compared with those who did not. In addition, we suggest that the surgical technique of early vascular control of the common hepatic artery during LT, in combination with a super-selective vascular intervention radiology approach, has clinical utility in reducing the risk of HAT in patients requiring pre-transplant TACE.

Chemical Shift MRI Monitoring of Chemoembolization Delivery for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Multicenter Feasibility of Initial Clinical Translation.

Purpose To demonstrate the feasibility of using chemical shift fat-water MRI methods to visualize and measure intrahepatic delivery of ethiodized oil to liver tumors following conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE). Materials and Methods Twenty-eight participants (mean age, 66 years ± 8 [SD]; 22 men) with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with cTACE were evaluated with follow-up chemical shift MRI in this Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant prospective, institutional review board-approved study. Uptake of ethiodized oil was evaluated at 1-month follow-up chemical shift MRI. Measurements of tumor size (MRI and CT), attenuation and enhancement (CT), fat content percentage, and tumor:normal ratio (MRI) were compared by lesion for responders versus nonresponders, as assessed with modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria. Adverse events and overall survival by the Kaplan-Meier method were secondary end points. Results Focal tumor ethiodized oil retention was 46% (12 of 26 tumors) at 24 hours and 47% (18 of 38 tumors) at 1 month after cTACE. Tumor volume at CT did not differ between EASL-defined responders and nonresponders (P = .06). Tumor ethiodized oil volume measured with chemical shift MRI was statistically significantly higher for EASL-defined nonresponders (P = .02). Doxorubicin dosing (P = .53), presence of focal fat (P = .83), and a combined end point of focal fat and low doxorubicin dosing (P = .97) did not stratify overall survival after cTACE. Conclusion Chemical shift MRI allowed for assessment of tumor delivery of ethiodized oil out to 1 month after cTACE in participants with HCC and demonstrated tumor ethiodized oil volume as a potential tool for stratification of tumor response by EASL criteria. Keywords: MRI, Chemical Shift Imaging, CT, Hepatic Chemoembolization, Ethiodized Oil Clinicaltrials.gov registration no.: NCT02173119 Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2023.

Wide Variability in Catecholamine Levels From Adrenal Venous Sampling in Primary Aldosteronism.

INTRODUCTION: While adrenal venous sampling (AVS) differentiates between the unilateral and bilateral disease in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA), it is unknown if AVS can determine laterality of pheochromocytoma in patients with bilateral adrenal masses. This study analyzes adrenal vein (AV) epinephrine and norepinephrine levels in nonpheochromocytoma patients to determine the "normal" range. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed patients who underwent AVS for PA between 2009 and 2019 at a single institution; pheochromocytoma was excluded. Aldosterone, cortisol, epinephrine, and norepinephrine levels were obtained from the inferior vena cava (IVC), left adrenal vein (LAV), and right adrenal vein (RAV). Successful AV cannulation was defined by an AV/IVC cortisol ratio of ≥3:1 or an AV epinephrine level ≥364 pg/mL. Plasma measurements (pg/mL) are median values with interquartile ranges; normal ranges for epinephrine and norepinephrine are 10-200 pg/mL and 80-520 pg/mL, respectively. RESULTS: AVS was performed in 172 patients in 405 AVs (173 LAV and 232 RAV). Median epinephrine levels were IVC = 19 (14 and 34), LAV = 3811 (1870 and 6915), and RAV = 2897 (1500 and 5288). Median norepinephrine levels were IVC = 325 (186 and 479), LAV = 1450 (896 and 2050), and RAV = 786 (436 and 1582). There was a difference between LAV and RAV epinephrine levels (P = 0.024) and between LAV and RAV norepinephrine (P = 0.002) levels. CONCLUSIONS: This extensive experience with AVS demonstrated a wide range of "normal" AV catecholamine levels in patients without pheochromocytoma, which suggests that the utility of AVS to determine disease laterality in patients with pheochromocytoma and bilateral adrenal nodules is likely to be limited.

Utility of Epinephrine Levels in Determining Adrenal Vein Cannulation During Adrenal Venous Sampling for Primary Aldosteronism.

OBJECTIVE: In patients with primary aldosteronism, adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is performed to determine the presence of unilateral or bilateral adrenal disease. During AVS, verification of catheter positioning within the left adrenal vein (AV) and the right AV by comparison of AV and inferior vena cava (IVC) cortisol levels can be variable. The objective of this study was to determine the utility of AV epinephrine levels in assessing successful AV cannulation. METHODS: This was a single institution, retrospective review of patients who underwent AVS with cosyntropin stimulation for primary aldosteronism between 2009 and 2018. Successful cannulation of the AV was defined by an AV/IVC cortisol ratio selectivity index (SI) ≥3:1. Epinephrine thresholds to predict catheter placement in the AV were determined using logistic regression. The calculated epinephrine thresholds were compared with previously published thresholds. RESULTS: AVS was performed on 101 consecutive patients and, based on the SI, successful cannulation of the left AV and right AV occurred in 98 (97%) and 91(90%) patients, respectively. The calculated optimal epinephrine threshold to predict AV cannulation was 364 pg/mL (sensitivity, 92.1%; specificity, 94.6%) and the calculated optimal AV/IVC epinephrine ratio threshold was 27.4, (sensitivity, 92.1%; specificity, 91.3%). Among the 14 patients with failed AV cannulation, 3 patients would have been considered to have successful AVS using AV epinephrine levels >364 pg/mL and AV/IVC epinephrine ratio >27.4 thresholds. CONCLUSION: Obtaining 2 right AV samples routinely as well as AV and IVC epinephrine levels during AVS could prevent unnecessary repeat AVS in patients with failed AV cannulation based on cortisol-based SI <3:1.

Quality of Life and Cost Considerations: Y-90 Radioembolization.

Objective Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) offers a minimally invasive and safe treatment option for primary and metastatic hepatic malignancies. The benefits of TARE are manifold including prolonged overall survival, low associated morbidities, and improved time to progression allowing prolonged treatment-free intervals. The rapid development of new systemic therapies including immunotherapy has radically changed the treatment landscape for primary and metastatic liver cancer. Given the current climate, it is critical for interventional oncologists to understand the benefits of TARE relative to these other therapies. Therefore, this report aims to review quality-of-life outcomes and the cost comparisons of TARE as compared with systemic therapies.

Biliary-Caval Fistula following Y90 Radioembolization.

The safety of radioembolization with yttrium-90 ( 90 Y) is well documented and major complications are rare. Previous studies have demonstrated that biliary complications following 90 Y, including bile duct injury and hepatic abscess formation, occur at an increased rate in patients who have had prior biliary surgery and interventions. This article reviews a case of a patient who developed recurrent cholangitis and sepsis as well as a biliary-caval fistula following radioembolization. Additionally, we review current data regarding biliary complications following radioembolization in patients with prior biliary intervention.

VenaTech Convertible Vena Cava Filter 6 Months after Conversion Follow-up.

PURPOSE: To report device-related adverse events 6 months after placement or conversion of the VenaTech convertible vena cava filter (VTCF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review of 6-month follow-up data of an investigational device exemption multicenter, prospective, single-arm study was performed. The VTCF was implanted in 149 patients. Conversion was attempted in 64.4% of those patients (n = 96) and successfully in 96.9% of the patients (n = 93). A total of 76 patients completed imaging evaluation at 6 months after filter conversion. Patients who required continued venous thromboembolism prophylaxis at 6 months did not undergo a conversion attempt and were designated as nonconverted filter subjects. A total of 28 nonconverted filter subjects completed imaging evaluation at 6 months after implantation. RESULTS: Evaluation of patients at 6 months after conversion demonstrated 1 of 76 (1.3%) inferior vena cava (IVC) perforations with a filter strut greater than 3 mm outside of the caval lumen. No cases of recurrent PE, clinically significant filter migration, filter fracture, or IVC thrombosis were reported in the converted subjects. In the nonconverted filter subjects, there was a 14.3% (4 of 28) complete or nearly complete rate of IVC thromboses. There were no cases of recurrent pulmonary embolism, penetration, fracture, or spontaneous conversion in the nonconverted filter subjects. There was a significant reduction in the rate of IVC thrombosis and migration in the converted cohort compared to that in the nonconverted cohort. CONCLUSIONS: At 6 months, the VTCF demonstrated low adverse event rates in the converted configuration, whereas a minority of patients with the nonconverted configuration demonstrated a high risk of IVC thrombosis.

Management of Acute Cholecystitis during Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Patients with localized pancreatic cancer (PC) can develop acute cholecystitis during neoadjuvant therapy; optimal management remains undefined. METHODS: Consecutive patients with localized PC who had indwelling biliary stents and received neoadjuvant therapy were reviewed. Time from stent placement to the development of acute cholecystitis was calculated. Patients were categorized as having surgical versus nonoperative management of cholecystitis. Time to PC resection was defined as the time from the start of treatment to pancreatic resection. RESULTS: Of the 283 patients with indwelling biliary stents, acute cholecystitis occurred in 17 (6%) patients. The median time from the date of stent placement to the development of cholecystitis was 2.3 months [interquartile range (IQR) 4.6 months]. Acute cholecystitis was managed with cholecystostomy tube placement in 15 (88%) patients and cholecystectomy in 2 (12%). In total, 189 (67%) of the 283 patients completed all intended neoadjuvant therapy and surgery; 10 (59%) of the 17 patients with cholecystitis (10 of 15 managed with a cholecystostomy tube and 0 of 2 managed with cholecystectomy) and 179 (67%) of the 266 patients without cholecystitis (p = 0.47). The median time to PC resection was 3.2 months for the 179 patients without cholecystitis and 3.6 months for the 10 patients with cholecystitis (p = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Acute cholecystitis occurred in 6% of patients with indwelling biliary stents during neoadjuvant therapy. Management with a cholecystostomy tube did not delay the completion of neoadjuvant therapy and surgery and should be considered the optimal management of this complication.

A Multi-institutional Comparison of Adrenal Venous Sampling in Patients with Primary Aldosteronism: Caution Advised if Successful Bilateral Adrenal Vein Sampling is Not Achieved.

INTRODUCTION: In patients with primary aldosteronism (PA), adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is recommended to differentiate between unilateral (UNI) or bilateral (BIL) adrenal disease. A recent study suggested that lateralization could be predicted, based on the ratio of aldosterone/cortisol levels (A/C) between the left adrenal vein (LAV) and inferior vena cava (IVC), with a 100% positive predictive value (PPV). This study aimed to validate those findings utilizing a larger, multi-institutional cohort. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients with PA who underwent AVS from 2 tertiary-care institutions. Laterality was predicted by an A/C ratio of >3:1 between the dominant and non-dominant adrenal. AVS results were compared to LAV/IVC ratios utilizing the published criteria (Lt ≥ 5.5; Rt ≤ 0.5). RESULTS: Of 222 patients, 124 (57%) had UNI and 98 (43%) had BIL disease based on AVS. AVS and LAV/IVC findings were concordant for laterality in 141 (64%) patients (69 UNI, 72 BIL). Using only the LAV/IVC ratio, 54 (24%) patients with UNI disease on AVS who underwent successful surgery would have been assumed to have BAH unless AVS was repeated, and 24 (11%) patients with BIL disease on AVS may have been incorrectly offered surgery (PPV 70%). Based on median LAV/IVC ratios (left 5.26; right 0.31; BIL 2.84), no LAV/IVC ratio accurately predicted laterality. DISCUSSION: This multi-institutional study of patients with both UNI and BIL PA failed to validate the previously reported PPV of LAV/IVC ratio for lateralization. Caution should be used in interpreting incomplete AVS data to differentiate between UNI versus BIL disease and strong consideration given to repeat AVS prior to adrenalectomy.

Multicenter Trial of the VenaTech Convertible Vena Cava Filter.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate rates of successful filter conversion and 6-month major device-related adverse events in subjects with converted caval filters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An investigational device exemption multicenter, prospective, single-arm study was performed at 11 sites enrolling 149 patients. The VenaTech Convertible Vena Cava Filter (B. Braun Interventional Systems, Inc, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania) was implanted in 149 patients with venous thromboembolism and contraindication to or failure of anticoagulation (n = 119), with high-risk trauma (n = 14), and for surgical prophylaxis (n = 16). When the patient was no longer at risk for pulmonary embolism as determined by clinical assessment, an attempt at filter conversion was made. Follow-up of converted patients (n = 93) was conducted at 30 days, 3 months, and 6 months after conversion. Patients who did not undergo a conversion attempt (n = 53) had follow-up at 6 months after implant. RESULTS: All implants were successful. One 7-day migration to the right atrium required surgical removal. Technical success rate for filter conversion was 92.7% (89/96). Mean time from placement to conversion was 130.7 days (range, 15-391 d). No major conversion-related events were reported. The mean conversion procedure time was 30.7 minutes (range, 7-135 min). There were 89 converted and 32 unconverted patients who completed 6-month follow-up with no delayed complications. CONCLUSIONS: The VenaTech Convertible filter has a high conversion rate and low 6-month device-related adverse event rate. Further studies are necessary to determine long-term safety and efficacy in both converted and unconverted patients.

Transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) remains controversial. This systematic review sought to examine the role of TACE in the treatment of HCC with PVT in either the main portal vein (MPV) or portal vein branches (PVB). METHODS: PubMed was searched for "hepatocellular carcinoma" and "transarterial chemoembolization" from January 1, 2006 to August 31, 2016. Cohorts treated with TACE for HCC with PVT were included. Meta-analysis of overall survival (OS), mRECIST response, and complication incidence was performed. MPV and PVB subgroups were compared. RESULTS: Of 136 search results, 13 studies with 1933 TACE patients were included. Median OS (95% CI) was eight (5-15) months. Survival rates after one, three, and five years were 29% (20%-40%), 4% (1%-11%), and 1% (0%-5%), respectively. Only 1% experienced liver failure and 18% had post-treatment complications. Patients with MPV thrombosis had worse survival than PVB patients (p < 0.001), but similar mRECIST response rates (14% vs. 16%, p = 0.238). CONCLUSION: TACE is a safe treatment for a highly selected population of HCC patients with PVT. Despite worse survival rates compared to PVB thrombosis, PVT in the MPV should not be considered an absolute contraindication to TACE.

Palliative Interventional Oncology.

Interventional oncologists are playing an ever greater role in improving the quality of life of their patients through minimally invasive procedures, many of which can be performed on an outpatient basis. Some of the most common palliative procedures currently performed will be discussed including management of intractable ascites and pleural effusions, neurolytic plexus blocks, and palliation of pain and bleeding associated with metastatic tumors.

Lipiodol transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review of efficacy and safety data.

UNLABELLED: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) using lipiodol-based regimens, including the administration of an anticancer-in-oil emulsion followed by embolic agents, is widely used in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This approach has been supported by meta-analyses of randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) performed more than a decade ago. We performed a systematic review to understand current efficacy and safety data of lipiodol TACE in treatment of HCC. A search of the literature published between January 1, 1980 and June 30, 2013 was performed using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. All potentially relevant publications were reviewed and articles were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of a total of 1,564 articles reviewed, 101 articles, including a total of 10,108 patients treated with lipiodol TACE, were selected for the efficacy analysis. Objective response rate was 52.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 43.6-61.5). Overall survival (OS) was 70.3% at 1 year, 51.8% at 2 years, 40.4% at 3 years, and 32.4% at 5 years. Median OS was 19.4 months (95% CI: 16.2-22.6). A total of 217 articles presenting precise description on numbers of adverse events (AEs) were selected for the safety review: In these studies, a total of 21,461 AEs were reported in 15,351 patients. Liver enzyme abnormalities were the most commonly observed AE, followed by the symptoms associated with postembolization syndrome. Overall mortality rate was 0.6% and the most common cause of death was related to acute liver insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: In a systematic literature review, survival figures of HCC patients undergoing lipiodol TACE appear to be in line with those reported in previous RCTs, and no new or unexpected safety concerns were identified. (Hepatology 2016;64:106-116).

Treatment of Liver Tumors with Lipiodol TACE: Technical Recommendations from Experts Opinion.

Transarterial chemoembolization with Lipiodol (Lipiodol TACE), also called conventional TACE, was developed in the early 1980s and widely adopted worldwide after randomized control trials and meta-analysis demonstrated superiority of Lipiodol TACE to best supportive care. Presently, there is no level one evidence that other TACE techniques are superior to Lipiodol TACE for intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which includes patients with preserved liver function and nonsurgical large or multinodular HCC without distant metastases. In addition, TACE is part of the treatment for progressive or symptomatic liver metastases from gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. When injected into the hepatic artery, Lipiodol has the unique property of selective uptake and retention in hyperarterialyzed liver tumors. Lipiodol/drug emulsion followed by particle embolization has been demonstrated to improve the pharmacokinetic of the drug and tumor response. Radio opacity of Lipiodol helps to monitor treatment delivery, with retention of Lipiodol serving as an imaging biomarker for tumor response. For 30 years, Lipiodol TACE has been inconsistently referenced in many publications with various levels of details for the method of preparation and administration, with reported progressive outcomes following improvements in the technique and the devices used to deliver the treatment and better patient selection. Consequently, there is no consensus on the standard method of TACE regarding the use of anticancer agents, embolic material, technical details, and the treatment schedule. In order to develop an internationally validated technical recommendation to standardize the Lipiodol TACE procedure, a worldwide panel of experts participated in a consensus meeting held on May 10, 2014 .