Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ecohealth ; 14(2): 244-258, 2017 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28289988

RESUMO

In Bangladesh, highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 is endemic in poultry. This study aimed to understand the biosecurity conditions and farmers' perception of avian influenza biosecurity in Bangladeshi small commercial chicken farms. During 2011-2012, we conducted observations, in-depth interviews and group discussions with poultry farmers in 16 farms and in-depth interviews with seven local feed vendors from two districts. None of the farms were completely segregated from people, backyard poultry, other animals, households, other poultry farms or large trees. Wild birds and rodents accessed the farms for poultry feed. Farmers usually did not allow the buyers to bring egg trays inside their sheds. Spraying disinfectant in the shed and removing feces were the only regular cleaning and disinfection activities observed. All farmers sold or used untreated feces as fish feed or fertilizer. Farmers were more concerned about Newcastle disease and infectious bursal disease than about avian influenza. Farmers' understanding about biosecurity and avian influenza was influenced by local vendors. While we seldom observed flock segregation, some farmers used measures that involved additional cost or effort to protect their flocks. These farmers could be motivated by interventions to protect their investment from diseases they consider harmful. Future interventions could explore the feasibility and effectiveness of low-cost alternative biosecurity measures.


Assuntos
Criação de Animais Domésticos , Galinhas , Virus da Influenza A Subtipo H5N1 , Influenza Aviária/prevenção & controle , Medidas de Segurança , Animais , Bangladesh , Fazendeiros , Fazendas , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Aves Domésticas
2.
Rural Remote Health ; 12: 1927, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22950607

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Backyard poultry raising is common in rural communities and a valued resource that provides food and income for subsistence farmers. Close contact with infected backyard poultry has been associated with H5N1 human cases in different countries. The emergence of this virus within Bangladesh means that backyard poultry raisers are at risk of avian influenza infections. The aim of this study was to understand why people raise backyard poultry and to characterize people's regular interaction with their poultry. METHODS: In 2008, a qualitative study was conducted in two villages from two districts of Bangladesh. In a social mapping exercise the villagers drew all the households in their village: 115 households in the village in Netrokona and 85 households in the village in Rajshahi District. Selected were 40 households (20 households from each of the two villages) for data collection through in-depth interviews (n=40) and household mapping (n=40), and observation sessions (n=16). RESULTS: In both villages, 92% of households raised backyard poultry. The majority of the owners was female and used the money earned from poultry raising to purchase cooking ingredients, clothing, and agricultural seeds, and pay for children's education expenses. The households consumed poultry meat and eggs. In the village in Netrokona, 80% (85/106) of households kept poultry inside the bedroom. In the village in Rajshahi, 87% (68/78) of households had separate cage/night sheds. During feeding the poultry and cleaning the poultry raising areas, villagers came into contact with poultry and poultry feces. Poultry scavenged for food on the floor, bed, in the food pot and around the place where food was cooked. Poultry drank from and bathed in the same body of water that villagers used for bathing and washing utensils and clothes. CONCLUSION: Although raising poultry provides essential support to the families' livelihoods, it exposes them to the risk of avian influenza through close contact with their poultry. Simple warnings to avoid poultry contact are unlikely to change practices that are essential to household survival. Interventions that help to protect poultry flocks and improve household profitability are more likely to be practiced.


Assuntos
Criação de Animais Domésticos/economia , Comércio/métodos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Influenza Aviária/prevenção & controle , Aves Domésticas , População Rural , Zoonoses/transmissão , Adolescente , Adulto , Criação de Animais Domésticos/métodos , Criação de Animais Domésticos/normas , Criação de Animais Domésticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Animais , Bangladesh , Galinhas/microbiologia , Comércio/economia , Feminino , Manipulação de Alimentos/economia , Manipulação de Alimentos/normas , Humanos , Virus da Influenza A Subtipo H5N1/patogenicidade , Influenza Aviária/etiologia , Relações Interpessoais , Entrevistas como Assunto , Gado/microbiologia , Gado/psicologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Propriedade , Aves Domésticas/microbiologia , Doenças das Aves Domésticas/mortalidade , Doenças das Aves Domésticas/prevenção & controle , Doenças das Aves Domésticas/transmissão , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Fatores de Tempo , Mulheres Trabalhadoras , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...