Graft-Versus-Host-Disease and Health-Related Quality of Life in Young Long-term Survivors of Cancer and Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Purpose: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is an established treatment predominantly for malignancies. Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is the leading long-term complication after allo-HSCT, but knowledge on cGVHD and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in long-term survivors of allo-HSCT performed in childhood, adolescence, and young adulthood (CAYA) is scarce. Therefore, we aimed to (1) assess prevalence and risk factors of active cGVHD using the 2014 National Institutes of Health-Consensus criteria, (2) investigate associations between cGVHD severity, patient-reported symptom burden, and HRQOL, and (3) compare HRQOL of survivors to population norms. Methods: We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional study in long-term survivors of CAYA allo-HSCT combining clinical examinations and patient-reported outcome measures. Results: We included 103 survivors, 55 (53%) females, median age of 19.6 years [range 0.3-29.9] at HSCT, 16.8 years [6.0-32.0] from HSCT, and 77 (75%) with underlying malignancy. Overall, 32 (31%) survivors were diagnosed with active cGVHD. The risk of active cGVHD was increased with prior acute GVHD and reduced with in vivo T cell depletion. cGVHD severity was associated with increased symptom burden, but not with adverse HRQOL. Compared to Norwegian population norms, allo-HSCT survivors reported significantly lower HRQOL. Conclusion: These results indicate a high prevalence of cGVHD in long-term survivors of CAYA allo-HSCT. Although we did not find an association between cGVHD severity and HRQOL, survivors reported significantly poorer HRQOL compared to population norms. Knowledge on the long-term consequences of cGVHD will be important for optimizing treatment and long-term follow-up care after CAYA allo-HSCT.

Pad stress tests with increasing load for the diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence.

AIM: The aim of the study was to test the ability of pad stress tests with increasing load (supine, jumping on the floor, and jumping on a trampoline) to document stress incontinence in subjectively stress incontinent women. METHODS: In this prospective study 147 subjectively stress and mixed incontinent women performed consecutively the three pad stress tests with a bladder volume of 300 ml. Nineteen women performed a second trampoline pad stress test to test repeatability of the test. Nine continent women performed a trampoline pad stress test in order to determine if subjectively continent women would leak during the test. RESULTS: Seventy-two women (49%) leaked during the supine, 136 (93%) leaked during the jumping, and 146 (99%) leaked during the trampoline pad stress test. The differences between pad stress tests were significant with P < 0.005. Correlation between the two trampoline pad stress tests was high at 0.8. None of the nine continent women leaked during the trampoline pad stress test. CONCLUSION: The supine pad stress test has low sensitivity and is therefore often falsely negative. The jumping pad stress test is a simple test to perform and is satisfactory for everyday use. Subjectively stress incontinent women who do not leak during the jumping pad stress test may perform a trampoline pad stress test to document stress incontinence. The trampoline pad stress test is also simple to perform and detected leakage in 91% of the women who did not leak during the jumping pad stress test.